-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Biggest Faggot Leader in the World
- Thread starter 555
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,150
- Points
- 113
Justin is like a conniving sneaky schoolboy who got schooled by Donald.
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2018
- Messages
- 489
- Points
- 63
Alpha Male vs Pussy
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 38,558
- Points
- 113
Because Candians are stupid.
- Joined
- May 25, 2011
- Messages
- 996
- Points
- 28
Fagot is Loong, Loong is fagot.
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 38,558
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 38,558
- Points
- 113
http://nationalpost.com/opinion/robyn-urback-trudeau-took-a-picture-with-a-topless-woman-yawn
oughly one half of the adult population — all women, and some men — have these things called “breasts,” which, in Ontario, people are allowed to bare publicly. This is not new. Nearly 20 years ago, a young woman named Gwen Jacob won the right at the Ontario Court of Appeal to go topless in public, five years after she was charged with committing an indecent act for baring her breasts publicly at the age of 19. Since then, most women still choose to cover up in public, though they are not legally obliged to do so.
Earlier this week — largely unnoticed in the lead-up to the first leaders’ debate — a photo surfaced of Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau at the 2014 Toronto Pride Parade standing beside a woman with her top off. It’s the type of photo that political leaders take all the time, except that in most cases, the people in the photo have their clothes on (unless you’re Anthony Weiner, but I digress). But this being Pride, where nudity is more ubiquitous than at the average street festival, this woman left her top off when she ostensibly asked Trudeau for a picture.
And he obliged, since according to Kate Purchase, director of communications for Justin Trudeau, the Liberal leader obliges thousands of Canadians who ask him for photos. I’d assume there is some discretion at play; for example, Trudeau might hesitate to wrap his arm around a man with a swastika emblazoned on his forehead. But breasts do not carry the same sort of taboo messaging as does a swastika: Whereas the latter might say “Kill all the Jews,” the former says, “Hello, I have ovaries” or “Yes, I use these to feed infants.”
Predictably, however, the photo caused a stir, which was catalyzed by right-wing commentator and TheRebel.media commander Ezra Levant. “What politician would pose for this picture? What strategist would advise it? What point does it prove?” Levant tweeted, then deleted. Then, on his website, he added: “What does this say about Justin’s judgment? His attitudes toward women?”
I’d say it says Trudeau rightfully doesn’t approach women’s bodies as something pernicious and I’d add it would say a lot more about his judgment if he refused
to take a photo with a topless woman.
Nevertheless, the supposed scandal took off on Twitter, as these things tend to do, with critics parroting to each other the usual lines about how Trudeau is “just not ready.” This photo, to them, was further evidence of that.
The effect of this sort of attack, however, is nothing but good news for the Liberals: They come off as progressive and egalitarian while their critics appear out of touch and curmudgeonly, spooked by a couple of nipples. There was a similar effect this time last year, when the CPC sent out a series of flyers warning residents about Justin Trudeau’s “plan to make harmful drugs more accessible.” The flyers breathlessly warned that “The Liberals WANT to make buying marijuana a normal, everyday activity for young Canadians,” deaf to the fact that the majority of Canadians actually support decriminalization or legalization of marijuana. Such attacks might have worked in the old echo-chambers of campaign politics, but now it comes off as tired and musty.
Had Justin Trudeau — or any other politician for that matter — refused to take a photo with a topless woman, it would surely say more about his character and judgment than did his compliance. It’s not 1950 anymore, nor is it 1991, when Gwen Jacob would be charged for taking off her top on a hot day. While toplessness is still not “normal,” it’s certainly acceptable in the eyes of the law and in the eyes of many women. Maybe in another 20 years, Justin Trudeau’s critics will come to recognize that.
oughly one half of the adult population — all women, and some men — have these things called “breasts,” which, in Ontario, people are allowed to bare publicly. This is not new. Nearly 20 years ago, a young woman named Gwen Jacob won the right at the Ontario Court of Appeal to go topless in public, five years after she was charged with committing an indecent act for baring her breasts publicly at the age of 19. Since then, most women still choose to cover up in public, though they are not legally obliged to do so.
Earlier this week — largely unnoticed in the lead-up to the first leaders’ debate — a photo surfaced of Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau at the 2014 Toronto Pride Parade standing beside a woman with her top off. It’s the type of photo that political leaders take all the time, except that in most cases, the people in the photo have their clothes on (unless you’re Anthony Weiner, but I digress). But this being Pride, where nudity is more ubiquitous than at the average street festival, this woman left her top off when she ostensibly asked Trudeau for a picture.
And he obliged, since according to Kate Purchase, director of communications for Justin Trudeau, the Liberal leader obliges thousands of Canadians who ask him for photos. I’d assume there is some discretion at play; for example, Trudeau might hesitate to wrap his arm around a man with a swastika emblazoned on his forehead. But breasts do not carry the same sort of taboo messaging as does a swastika: Whereas the latter might say “Kill all the Jews,” the former says, “Hello, I have ovaries” or “Yes, I use these to feed infants.”
Predictably, however, the photo caused a stir, which was catalyzed by right-wing commentator and TheRebel.media commander Ezra Levant. “What politician would pose for this picture? What strategist would advise it? What point does it prove?” Levant tweeted, then deleted. Then, on his website, he added: “What does this say about Justin’s judgment? His attitudes toward women?”
I’d say it says Trudeau rightfully doesn’t approach women’s bodies as something pernicious and I’d add it would say a lot more about his judgment if he refused
to take a photo with a topless woman.
Nevertheless, the supposed scandal took off on Twitter, as these things tend to do, with critics parroting to each other the usual lines about how Trudeau is “just not ready.” This photo, to them, was further evidence of that.
The effect of this sort of attack, however, is nothing but good news for the Liberals: They come off as progressive and egalitarian while their critics appear out of touch and curmudgeonly, spooked by a couple of nipples. There was a similar effect this time last year, when the CPC sent out a series of flyers warning residents about Justin Trudeau’s “plan to make harmful drugs more accessible.” The flyers breathlessly warned that “The Liberals WANT to make buying marijuana a normal, everyday activity for young Canadians,” deaf to the fact that the majority of Canadians actually support decriminalization or legalization of marijuana. Such attacks might have worked in the old echo-chambers of campaign politics, but now it comes off as tired and musty.
Had Justin Trudeau — or any other politician for that matter — refused to take a photo with a topless woman, it would surely say more about his character and judgment than did his compliance. It’s not 1950 anymore, nor is it 1991, when Gwen Jacob would be charged for taking off her top on a hot day. While toplessness is still not “normal,” it’s certainly acceptable in the eyes of the law and in the eyes of many women. Maybe in another 20 years, Justin Trudeau’s critics will come to recognize that.
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,150
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2011
- Messages
- 6,483
- Points
- 113
Pinky Lee sbould invite this gay boy for a duo cat walk in Istana.
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2018
- Messages
- 4,335
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,150
- Points
- 113
The picture shows a man and his daughter in a tuxedo. How heart warming.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
- Messages
- 11,420
- Points
- 113
speaking of fags no one saw her pink highness with the same stance?
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 9,230
- Points
- 63
He legalised Cannabis at the Federal level. For years blokes in Canada and U.S.A. have been shouting for the herb to be legalzed. Trudeau promised them so, if elected. And he got in. Now, its up to the government to collect taxes from sales of ganja and use that money wisely.
Cheers!
