- Joined
- Dec 6, 2018
- Messages
- 16,783
- Points
- 113
Like I always say. Foreigners get special treatment.
Hong kong should be like this if they want to succeed.Like I always say. Foreigners get special treatment.
They are the ones who gave special privilege to Malays in exchange for citizenship of immigrants. The judge agrees,Like I always say. Foreigners get special treatment.
Who pay?Hahaha...that was what he wanted. He just wanted to go back to the UK.
Deported got free ticket some more.
Again, this proves AMDK. This legal system is unsustainable.
First you will not hang them. Then you will not cane them, Now you will not jail them nor even fine them for the most minor infringement of your laws in your country?
It sets the tone and direction and these AMDK will latch on quickly to your fears. Going forward, you won't be able to do anything to them because they know you give in to negative media exposure in their country.
What are we Singaporeans then? A doormat? No we are not. What we have instead, are spineless politicians.
They are the ones who gave special privilege to Malays in exchange for citizenship of immigrants. The judge agrees,
He has not been convicted of anything. So that time spent, was not jail time but remand. What nonsense 1/3 discount when he is not guilty of anything?The white nutcase has been in jail since July. With the usual 1/3 discount on jail sentences for good behavior, he has been let out. Now, he's been deported and has very likely lost his job here. That is getting really tough on foreigners who break the law while living in Singapore.
Spineless politicians who are continually voted in with majority vote every election by the people of Singapore.Again, this proves AMDK. This legal system is unsustainable.
First you will not hang them. Then you will not cane them, Now you will not jail them nor even fine them for the most minor infringement of your laws in your country?
It sets the tone and direction and these AMDK will latch on quickly to your fears. Going forward, you won't be able to do anything to them because they know you give in to negative media exposure in their country.
What are we Singaporeans then? A doormat? No we are not. What we have instead, are spineless politicians.
sg can file sexpense claim with uk, but uk can either decline or delay payment until queendom cum.Deported means free ticket home?
That means he was rewarded and was not punished.sg can file sexpense claim with uk, but uk can either decline or delay payment until queendom cum.
he cannot return to sg as he’s blacklisted, thus has to resort to wuhan whores at £69 a shot for sextisfaction instead of spg’s who are willing to suck and fuck for free.That means he was rewarded and was not punished.
I don't think you know how the law works.He has not been convicted of anything. So that time spent, was not jail time but remand. What nonsense 1/3 discount when he is not guilty of anything?
Now he has a case for wrongful detention for months. He must be compensated.
Benjamin Glynn to be deported by ICA: Singapore Prison Service
Wan Ting Koh
·Senior Reporter
Thu, 19 August 2021, 11:23 am·2-min read
![]()
SINGAPORE — British expatriate Benjamin Glynn was released from detention and handed over to the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) on Wednesday, Singapore Prison Service (SPS) said on Thursday (19 August).
The 40-year-old was sentenced to six weeks' jail on Wednesday after being convicted of four charges relating to failing to wear his mask, being a public nuisance and for threatening police officers. He was found guilty of all charges after a one-day trial where he represented himself. Glynn's jail term was backdated to 19 July, the date of his remand.
Responding to a query from Yahoo News Singapore, the SPS confirmed that Glynn was released from SPS and handed over to the ICA on Wednesday. ICA will be making arrangements for his deportation to his home country, according to the SPS.
Glynn was remanded in prison from 19 July to 4 August and was later remanded at the Institute of Mental Health from 5 to 18 August.
Glynn was convicted by District Judge Eddy Tham of not wearing a mask while in an MRT train on 7 May, causing public nuisance on 7 May, threatening police officers who went to his residence on 8 and 9 May, and failing to wear a mask within and in the vicinity of the State Courts on 2 July.
In his defence, Glynn claimed that the law involving masks did not apply to him, and that he did not remember threatening the police officers.
"I understand trust law, contract law, tort law, I have studied this for quite a long time. It is not difficult to understand common law. I know what a crime is, there must be a victim which is a living man or woman, not a legal fiction which is what you are, officers. You are not living men and women, they are legal fictions. I am living man, I control my public trust,” he said.
“So therefore I do not consent to this maritime contract, I have not agreed to (a) contract and they have no jurisdiction over me, it's fairly simple," he said.
However DJ Tham found that Glynn's understanding of the law was "completely misguided" as the COVID-19 legislations were passed under law by Singapore's Parliament.
The judge added that Glynn's inability to remember his threats as "woefully insufficient to raise a reasonable doubt".
For the offence of causing public nuisance, Glynn could have been jailed up to three months, fined up to $2,000, or both.
For contravening the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) (Control Order) Regulations 2020, he could have been jailed up to six months, or a fine of up to $10,000, or both.
For using threatening words towards a public servant under the Protection from Harassment Act, he could have been jailed up to 12 months, or fined up to $5,000, or both.