- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 119
- Points
- 0
Scroobal,
Academia is in the shit house. With the whole autonomy business, they now don't care about anything but money. The fixation on the bottomline is very myopic and is going to seriously harm intellectual and social development. Already, you can feel the ground move and damage being done. Humanities/social sciences especially are suffering because they don't generate income like other knowledge disciplines.
Read the papers today about NUS objecting to their ranking among Asian unis? Seems like they question the criteria only when the results aren't favourable to them. Otherwise, they're good with it. They should be dissing the whole concept of uni ranking. It's a total farce. Social impact and outreach of uni, quality of teaching, type of programmes, uni culture don't enter into the ranking. That means faculty must focus on churning out many papers rather than groundbreaking ones. And they're not required to make any social impact whatsoever, not required to bring their learning into society. In fact, they get penalised for entering the public domain because it takes time away from publishing. Just hole themselves up and write elite rubbish for elite journals that only their elite colleagues read.
One day, when we have hit rock bottom, an Alan Greenspan of academia, who himself is deeply involved in promoting uni autonomy, will come up and say what is already obvious to your average academic--how this focus on rankings and bottomline was a braindead thing to do. Unis should be supported by the public and they should serve the public.
Academia is in the shit house. With the whole autonomy business, they now don't care about anything but money. The fixation on the bottomline is very myopic and is going to seriously harm intellectual and social development. Already, you can feel the ground move and damage being done. Humanities/social sciences especially are suffering because they don't generate income like other knowledge disciplines.
Read the papers today about NUS objecting to their ranking among Asian unis? Seems like they question the criteria only when the results aren't favourable to them. Otherwise, they're good with it. They should be dissing the whole concept of uni ranking. It's a total farce. Social impact and outreach of uni, quality of teaching, type of programmes, uni culture don't enter into the ranking. That means faculty must focus on churning out many papers rather than groundbreaking ones. And they're not required to make any social impact whatsoever, not required to bring their learning into society. In fact, they get penalised for entering the public domain because it takes time away from publishing. Just hole themselves up and write elite rubbish for elite journals that only their elite colleagues read.
One day, when we have hit rock bottom, an Alan Greenspan of academia, who himself is deeply involved in promoting uni autonomy, will come up and say what is already obvious to your average academic--how this focus on rankings and bottomline was a braindead thing to do. Unis should be supported by the public and they should serve the public.