• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Athletics: SAA president refutes 'irresponsible' allegation

streetcry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
923
Points
0
SINGAPORE: He took the stand on Monday, and has so far refuted all allegations against the Singapore Athletic Association (SAA) in their ongoing trial against China-born shot putter Luan Wei.

However, SAA president Loh Lin Kok, 63, did concede on Tuesday that the matter could have been handled better.

Luan, 27, and his mother Zhang Ping are seeking damages from the national sports association (NSA) for the athlete's loss of opportunities in his education and athletics career as a result of his sacking by SAA in 2004. They also claim the SAA reneged on eight promises made in 1999, including training allowances, English lessons, enrolment in a university and Singapore citizenship within a year of arrival.

On the issue of citizenship, plaintiffs' counsel Edmond Pereira, in his six-and-a-half hour cross-examination of Loh at the Subordinate Courts on Tuesday, asked why a written agreement on what exactly was expected of Luan was not drawn up, particularly since the SAA had stressed performance and results were vital to applying for citizenship for the thrower, where as a caveat, Luan would have to return to China if he failed to make the cut.

"We were inexperienced," Loh told the court. "I agree and accept that in hindsight, things could have been done better then."

Although it was the first time the NSA were recruiting athletes under the Republic's foreign sports talent scheme, Loh admitted there should have been formal documentation spelling out exact expectations of Luan when he met the parents of the various throwers recruited, including E Xiaoxu and Dong Enxin.

However, Loh took issue with Pereira's description that he had acted "irresponsibly". "We acted to the best of our abilities," said Loh, who has helmed the SAA since 1982, except for a two-year period from 2004-2006. "There was no working paper (at that time) from the authorities, so it was not easy for us to reduce it into writing."

The veteran lawyer added that his association had been "indulgent" towards Luan, who apart from registering 17.17 metres in May 2003, failed to throw beyond 17m since arriving here in 1999.

Pereira also described the SAA's lack of a progression criteria to monitor Luan's development as "shocking". But Loh replied: "We didn't have the luxury. (But) all of us have an intimate knowledge of the sport, so we know who are the potentials."

He insisted he did not promise citizenship to Luan "within a year" of the athlete arriving in Singapore as such issues were up to the authorities, and not him, to decide.

"It'd be crazy to do so because I'd be putting my name and reputation and my association at stake," said Loh.

He also described allegations by the NSA's former vice-president (training and selection) Steven Lee, and former national coach Guo Huaiyun, that promises were made to Luan's parents, including a coaching job for their son, as "serious lies". He said: "I can only postulate that they were concocting this as one is a disgruntled ex-official and the other a disgruntled ex-employee."

Loh also insisted the SAA's intention was for the China-born athletes to become full-time athletes, and not enrol in mainstream schools here, a claim Pereira is disputing.

Hearing for the civil suit continues on Wednesday. - TODAY
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1051547/1/.html
 
a lawsuit pursued by despicable greedy failed PRC reject made possible by the inept administration of Loh Lin Kok's FT wannabe venture ....

Defence lawyer Edmond Periera is also a long time critic & opponent of Loh. Edmond, president of flash athletics club had run twice against Loh in the past for the SAA Presidency but lost both times. He has also represented Haron Mundir before in court, emerging triumphant over Loh & SAA in the late 80s.

Disgraceful incidents like these is only one reasonout of many why Loh Lin Kok should be ousted from SAA Presidency come June.
 
a lawsuit pursued by despicable greedy failed PRC reject made possible by the inept administration of Loh Lin Kok's FT wannabe venture ....

Defence lawyer Edmond Periera is also a long time critic & opponent of Loh. Edmond, president of flash athletics club had run twice against Loh in the past for the SAA Presidency but lost both times. He has also represented Haron Mundir before in court, emerging triumphant over Loh & SAA in the late 80s.

Disgraceful incidents like these is only one reasonout of many why Loh Lin Kok should be ousted from SAA Presidency come June.


On the contrary, "disgraceful incidents" like this shows that democracy in S'pore is indeed "GUIDED DEMOCRACY" and in JUNE, people should preserved REAL DEMOCRACY in Singapore and vote for Loh.

ALways bear in mind the PEOPLE BEHIND THE SCENE in this SAA saga. ALways remember the CHEEBYE KIA.

<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
>>He also described allegations by the NSA's former vice-president (training and selection) Steven Lee, and former national coach Guo Huaiyun, that promises were made to Luan's parents, including a coaching job for their son, as "serious lies". He said: "I can only postulate that they were concocting this as one is a disgruntled ex-official and the other a disgruntled ex-employee."<<

Aiyo why so many people wanna 'sabo' him leh? Got a saying NO SMOKE WITHOUT FIRE wor.
 
>>He also described allegations by the NSA's former vice-president (training and selection) Steven Lee, and former national coach Guo Huaiyun, that promises were made to Luan's parents, including a coaching job for their son, as "serious lies". He said: "I can only postulate that they were concocting this as one is a disgruntled ex-official and the other a disgruntled ex-employee."<<

Aiyo why so many people wanna 'sabo' him leh? Got a saying NO SMOKE WITHOUT FIRE wor.


You live in S'pore and you do not know there are many PORLUMPARS and GRASSLOOTERS out to curry favors?
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
There you go again, ahleebabathief, cease & desist from exposing your blatant ignorance about singapore athletics ....

Go suck Loh Lin Kok's cock ... where were you when he was bullying Patrick Zedhner, Mona Kunalan, Yu Long Nyu, Loh Chan Pew, Harun Mundir, James Wong & U K Shyam, how many coaches & athletics have been oppressed by Loh .... even your beloved Loh admitted he wasted over $300k on his failed foreign talent scheme .... anyway, this is my last post on Loh ... forummers here know nuts & care less about the state of athletics .... believing Loh is some anti-PAP hero when he is a 30-year dictatorial tyrant as well !:oIo:
 
a lawsuit pursued by despicable greedy failed PRC reject made possible by the inept administration of Loh Lin Kok's FT wannabe venture ....

Defence lawyer Edmond Periera is also a long time critic & opponent of Loh. Edmond, president of flash athletics club had run twice against Loh in the past for the SAA Presidency but lost both times. He has also represented Haron Mundir before in court, emerging triumphant over Loh & SAA in the late 80s.

Disgraceful incidents like these is only one reasonout of many why Loh Lin Kok should be ousted from SAA Presidency come June.


hi there


1. it is hard to understand that the president who is no fool with his wealth of legal experience has nothing concrete or written.
2. especially when there is "investment" involved.
3. it is not some 2 bucks but taxpayers' monies into the thousands or millions.
4. i am also wondering whether the sheepish table-tennis thing has something in black and white or what?
 
Back
Top