• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

AssMRT: It Could be Worse...

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Why isn't fare reduced given fxxx up service, oil priced dropped 60% and pay cut is now widespread?

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Nov 7, 2008
COMMUTERS AND SHAREHOLDERS
</TR><!-- headline one : start --><TR>SMRT aims to please them all
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to Mr Gilbert Goh's letter, 'Corporatisation, if it's only for public good'.
While it is true transport fares have increased over the years, the increase has been moderate and lags behind the rise in operating costs, as well as the cost increase in health care, utilities and household necessities. Over the past six years, the total increase in bus fares was 6.8 per cent, and 4.9 per cent for trains. Factoring in the 4 percentage point increase in GST over the same period, which we fully absorbed, the actual fare increases applied were 2.8 per cent and 0.9 per cent for buses and trains respectively. The Consumer Price Index, on the other hand, increased by 5.7 per cent from 2003 to last year. In the same period, SMRT's energy costs have escalated. Between last year and this year, energy costs rose by 18.1 per cent.
SMRT is mindful of its twin objectives of keeping fares affordable for the commuting public and ensuring reasonable returns to our shareholders. Both are concurrently attainable by increasing profitability with efficient operations and growing non-fare revenue from overseas business, rental and advertising. This year, we further increased our productivity and this resulted in a reduction in the maximum fare adjustment allowable from 4.5 to 3 per cent. In addition, in support of the Government's efforts to encourage use of public transport, SMRT further absorbed a major part of the increase in transfer rebate. As a result, the effective fare increase this year for both SMRT trains and buses was only 0.6 per cent, despite significant inflationary pressures. Nevertheless, we continue to introduce many proactive initiatives, including additional train runs and train refurbishment. These initiatives are possible because we maintain a healthy bottom line.
As a corporation, it is in SMRT's interest to keep fares affordable. Even though our fares are one of the world's lowest, SMRT is committed to attaining and maintaining high standards of operational and service performance. In a recent global ranking (Nova and CoMET) of the world's top operators in Asia, Europe and the Americas, SMRT Trains was first in the areas of manpower and cost efficiency. We also maintain leading positions for punctuality and safety.
Internationally, SMRT is reputed for consistently delivering exceptional value to the public it serves and to its shareholders. We are sought after by many countries to provide consultancy services and transport solutions. Riding on our established strengths, we will continue to manage costs prudently and grow the company's profitability, while continuing to deliver services befitting those of a leading transport system. Goh Chee Kong
Vice-President, Corporate Marketing and Communications
SMRT Corporation
 

myo539

Alfrescian
Loyal
Yes, it could have been worse - much worse for train commuters!

We may have to employ PRC or Bangla pushers to ensure that MRT survives at a shoestring budget if MRT operates like a charitable organisation. Of course it would be good if MRT can keep its price low - so that it becomes more affordable for more PRCs, Banglas, Thais and Indons to take the MRT.

Hehehe - I rather stick to my car.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axwMxUBL_ws
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060906001533AAA0V0m

Who is the highest paid Minister in the world?

Singapore PM & SM is getting more than 1 million Singapore dollars per annual (about USD 630,000), just wonder any part of the world, any Minister is getting more than that?
  • <ABBR title="2006-09-06 00:15:33">2 years ago</ABBR>
Report Abuse

by RENDEVOU... <DL class=stats><DT class=member>Member since: <DD class=member>September 06, 2006 <DT class=total>Total points: <DD class=total>2437 (Level 3) </DD></DL>
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker

Below is a comparison of salaries of Singapore's ministers with those of their counterparts in other countries:


Annual salaries of heads of government:

1. Singapore Prime Minister US$1,100,000 (S$1,958,000) a year

2. United States of America President: US$200,000

3. United Kingdom Prime Minister: US$170,556

4. Australia Prime Minister: US$137,060


Annual salaries of heads of government:

1. Singapore Minister: US$819,124

2. UK Minister: US$146,299

3. US Cabinet Secretary: US$157,000


(Source: Asian Wall Street Journal 10 Jul 2000)
  • <ABBR title="2006-09-06 18:03:10">2 years ago</ABBR>

<DL class=answer-rating><DT>Asker's Rating: </DT><DD>
rating-5.gif
</DD><DT class=desc>Asker's Comment: </DT><DD class=desc>This is crazy, right? With Singapore 4 million population, every single citizen is paying about S$0.50 per annual for the Prime Minister salary. No wonder Singapore look rich, but the citizen are poor. </DD></DL>Is this what you are searching for?


 

DerekLeung

Alfrescian
Loyal
If you do not like how the system runs !

Show your dislike by boycotting it for 5-10 years !

Stop spending in Singapore.

Help inflation and screw consumerism !
 
Top