• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Asshole Prostitute Press Shit Times Leeporter Chris Tan defend high petrol prices

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
23,319
Points
113
Fucker asks you to drive less woh. hahahhahaha. Everyone else in the world driving more because of cheap petrol.

Why are petrol pump prices high when crude oil prices have dipped below US$30 a barrel?

CRUDE oil prices have been falling for over 18 months now, and dipped below US$30 a barrel early this month (January), its lowest level in more than 10 years. Because of that, many readers have written in to askST why petrol pump prices have not fallen in tandem. It is a good question, which senior transport correspondent Christopher Tan will attempt to answer below.

THERE is one main reason why pump prices in Singapore do not seem to fall as much or as fast as crude oil prices - taxes.

We have a relatively high duty on petrol, and that masks any reduction in the price. In countries such as the US, where there is little or no petrol tax, any reduction is more immediately and more fully realised.

Petrol duty was raised a year ago. This further masks the magnitude of any price adjustment.

For instance, when crude was around US$100 a barrel a few years ago, 98-octane petrol was retailing at $2.32 a litre (before discount). If you remove the duty of 44 cents per litre, the price would be $1.88.

Today, the same grade fuel is $2.17 a litre. Minus duty of 66 cents a litre and you get $1.51.

Now, $1.88 - $1.51 = 19.7 per cent price drop.

If we do not take out the duty portion, the drop would work out to 6.5 per cent.

While a 19.7 per cent drop is significant, it still lags behind the 70 per cent drop in crude oil prices. The thing is, petrol (a refined product) does not always move in tandem with the crude product. Much depends on demand for petrol, which can be seasonal. Obviously, geo-economic factors are a big influence, too. For instance, in the last 10 years, China's demand for petrol has soared on the back of rapid motorisation.

Then, there are fixed costs such as land, building and distribution. In fact, the cost of fuel is estimated to make up only one-third of a fuel retailer's total cost. So, that is another major reason why a drop in oil prices does not translate to an equivalent drop in pump prices.

Also, there is usually a lag between price movements of crude and refined products. Retailers have to sell off the "high cost" petrols in their inventory before they can start repricing their fuels.

But having said all that, oil companies are profit-motivated businesses; and it would not be a surprise if they delayed downward adjustments for as long as possible. If prices moved the other way (up), the adjustment tend to be faster.

This tendency is not only apparent in the fuels sector. Prices of foodstuffs, utilities, air travel, medicines and other items also tend to be "sticky downwards". It is only in an extremely competitive market - such as electronic goods - that price adjustments are swift.

What can consumers do about this perceived tyranny of the pumps? Well, the most effective way would be to minimise consumption. If every user cuts back usage by 10 per cent - by driving more efficiently and driving more judiciously and wisely - demand will drop by 10 per cent.

Going by economic theory, price should then fall. And even if they do not, an efficient driver would already have saved on his own fuel bills. Not only that, he would have reduced his carbon footprint.

Other ways to save include driving a well-maintained car with well-inflated tyres. And use 92-octane petrol, which is the cheapest. Most cars will do fine with 92-octane.
 
Gutter article. Illogical argument filled with fallacies and as usual shifting the blame to the man on the street.
 
I pity those people who thinks that this article makes sense
 
Among the various institutions/establishments in Singapore, the only one I find lousy is the newspaper. Being the only available newspaper, it does not reflect the voice or opinion of the masses, instead blares out its support for the government and their policies. Sometimes concocting words to suit its cause. Besides, it may be the only English daily in the world that does not carry a daily crossword puzzle. Piece of shit. I have not bought a copy of this paper since 2009, and I don't miss anything. Have fun.

Cheers!
 
Chris Tan must be our John Tan's brother, maybe even his twin since their IQs are just about at the same zero level.
 
Everyone knows petroleum and crude prices don't always move in tandem. Why JB so much cheaper than SG petrol? Bloody numbnut.
 
Fucker asks you to drive less woh. hahahhahaha. Everyone else in the world driving more because of cheap petrol.

Why are petrol pump prices high when crude oil prices have dipped below US$30 a barrel?

CRUDE oil prices have been falling for over 18 months now, and dipped below US$30 a barrel early this month (January), its lowest level in more than 10 years. Because of that, many readers have written in to askST why petrol pump prices have not fallen in tandem. It is a good question, which senior transport correspondent Christopher Tan will attempt to answer below.

THERE is one main reason why pump prices in Singapore do not seem to fall as much or as fast as crude oil prices - taxes.

We have a relatively high duty on petrol, and that masks any reduction in the price. In countries such as the US, where there is little or no petrol tax, any reduction is more immediately and more fully realised.

Petrol duty was raised a year ago. This further masks the magnitude of any price adjustment.

For instance, when crude was around US$100 a barrel a few years ago, 98-octane petrol was retailing at $2.32 a litre (before discount). If you remove the duty of 44 cents per litre, the price would be $1.88.

Today, the same grade fuel is $2.17 a litre. Minus duty of 66 cents a litre and you get $1.51.

Now, $1.88 - $1.51 = 19.7 per cent price drop.

If we do not take out the duty portion, the drop would work out to 6.5 per cent.

While a 19.7 per cent drop is significant, it still lags behind the 70 per cent drop in crude oil prices. The thing is, petrol (a refined product) does not always move in tandem with the crude product. Much depends on demand for petrol, which can be seasonal. Obviously, geo-economic factors are a big influence, too. For instance, in the last 10 years, China's demand for petrol has soared on the back of rapid motorisation.

Then, there are fixed costs such as land, building and distribution. In fact, the cost of fuel is estimated to make up only one-third of a fuel retailer's total cost. So, that is another major reason why a drop in oil prices does not translate to an equivalent drop in pump prices.

Also, there is usually a lag between price movements of crude and refined products. Retailers have to sell off the "high cost" petrols in their inventory before they can start repricing their fuels.

But having said all that, oil companies are profit-motivated businesses; and it would not be a surprise if they delayed downward adjustments for as long as possible. If prices moved the other way (up), the adjustment tend to be faster.

This tendency is not only apparent in the fuels sector. Prices of foodstuffs, utilities, air travel, medicines and other items also tend to be "sticky downwards". It is only in an extremely competitive market - such as electronic goods - that price adjustments are swift.

What can consumers do about this perceived tyranny of the pumps? Well, the most effective way would be to minimise consumption. If every user cuts back usage by 10 per cent - by driving more efficiently and driving more judiciously and wisely - demand will drop by 10 per cent.

Going by economic theory, price should then fall. And even if they do not, an efficient driver would already have saved on his own fuel bills. Not only that, he would have reduced his carbon footprint.

Other ways to save include driving a well-maintained car with well-inflated tyres. And use 92-octane petrol, which is the cheapest. Most cars will do fine with 92-octane.

What an idiotic reply. So if food prices drop
And our foodstalls don't drop, then don't eat Loh!!
 
If supply cost to middle man, be it Hawkers, refineries, etc) drops and yet the end selling price remain unchanged, someone is profiteering isn't it? Simple as that. No need PhD to know that.

One can understand if is a private Organisation profiteering while consumers have alternatives.

By the Writers' logic of tax, it implies government took up all the profits from reduced cost, by way of tax? Amazing idiotic logic, and if true, even more amazing the government is skimming off savings to the consumers!
 
This is BS. My angmo country also got high petrol duties, still pump prices fall. Because duties is constant. Crude oil prices are variable. It should follow variables instead of a constant.

Gotcha!
 
THERE is one main reason why pump prices in Singapore do not seem to fall as much or as fast as crude oil prices - taxes.

We have a relatively high duty on petrol, and that masks any reduction in the price. In countries such as the US, where there is little or no petrol tax, any reduction is more immediately and more fully realised.

Petrol duty was raised a year ago. This further masks the magnitude of any price adjustment.

For instance, when crude was around US$100 a barrel a few years ago, 98-octane petrol was retailing at $2.32 a litre (before discount). If you remove the duty of 44 cents per litre, the price would be $1.88.

Today, the same grade fuel is $2.17 a litre. Minus duty of 66 cents a litre and you get $1.51.

Now, $1.88 - $1.51 = 19.7 per cent price drop.

If we do not take out the duty portion, the drop would work out to 6.5 per cent.


So Christopher Tan is ultimately blaming PAP for high petrol pump prices because of their very high taxes on petrol??

Christopher Tan's ridiculous "solution" in the article is for Sinkies to cut back on car usage. Sinkies pay hefty sums to PAP for COE + road taxes to own and drive a car for 10yrs, COE and cars depreciates every month, it's a big waste for Sinkies not to use their cars normally and have their cars sit at home like white elephants.

Christopher Tan is a moron. The right solution should be to make PAP and the local oil cartel lower the high petrol prices to consumers and stop the profiteering.
 
Last edited:
Fucker asks you to drive less woh. hahahhahaha. Everyone else in the world driving more because of cheap petrol.

Why are petrol pump prices high when crude oil prices have dipped below US$30 a barrel?

CRUDE oil prices have been falling for over 18 months now, and dipped below US$30 a barrel early this month (January), its lowest level in more than 10 years. Because of that, many readers have written in to askST why petrol pump prices have not fallen in tandem. It is a good question, which senior transport correspondent Christopher Tan will attempt to answer below.

THERE is one main reason why pump prices in Singapore do not seem to fall as much or as fast as crude oil prices - taxes.

We have a relatively high duty on petrol, and that masks any reduction in the price. In countries such as the US, where there is little or no petrol tax, any reduction is more immediately and more fully realised.

Petrol duty was raised a year ago. This further masks the magnitude of any price adjustment.

For instance, when crude was around US$100 a barrel a few years ago, 98-octane petrol was retailing at $2.32 a litre (before discount). If you remove the duty of 44 cents per litre, the price would be $1.88.

Today, the same grade fuel is $2.17 a litre. Minus duty of 66 cents a litre and you get $1.51.

Now, $1.88 - $1.51 = 19.7 per cent price drop.

If we do not take out the duty portion, the drop would work out to 6.5 per cent.

While a 19.7 per cent drop is significant, it still lags behind the 70 per cent drop in crude oil prices. The thing is, petrol (a refined product) does not always move in tandem with the crude product. Much depends on demand for petrol, which can be seasonal. Obviously, geo-economic factors are a big influence, too. For instance, in the last 10 years, China's demand for petrol has soared on the back of rapid motorisation.

Then, there are fixed costs such as land, building and distribution. In fact, the cost of fuel is estimated to make up only one-third of a fuel retailer's total cost. So, that is another major reason why a drop in oil prices does not translate to an equivalent drop in pump prices.

Also, there is usually a lag between price movements of crude and refined products. Retailers have to sell off the "high cost" petrols in their inventory before they can start repricing their fuels.

But having said all that, oil companies are profit-motivated businesses; and it would not be a surprise if they delayed downward adjustments for as long as possible. If prices moved the other way (up), the adjustment tend to be faster.

This tendency is not only apparent in the fuels sector. Prices of foodstuffs, utilities, air travel, medicines and other items also tend to be "sticky downwards". It is only in an extremely competitive market - such as electronic goods - that price adjustments are swift.

What can consumers do about this perceived tyranny of the pumps? Well, the most effective way would be to minimise consumption. If every user cuts back usage by 10 per cent - by driving more efficiently and driving more judiciously and wisely - demand will drop by 10 per cent.

Going by economic theory, price should then fall. And even if they do not, an efficient driver would already have saved on his own fuel bills. Not only that, he would have reduced his carbon footprint.

Other ways to save include driving a well-maintained car with well-inflated tyres. And use 92-octane petrol, which is the cheapest. Most cars will do fine with 92-octane.



byline-christopher-tan.png

Christopher Tan
 
When oil prices go up, bus fare prices got jacked up, airlines and cruise ships charge FUEL SURCHARGE.
When oil prices literally COLLAPSED below $30 per barrel, all of the above did not come down citing BS excuses for other 'costs'!
 
Gutter article. Illogical argument filled with fallacies and as usual shifting the blame to the man on the street.

a govt which taxes unreasonably so that HO CHING can go ho ho ho and pinky smiling from left to right\
and papigs clap hands.............horsay liao MORE PAY n BONUSES from blood and sweat of sgian
 
When oil prices go up, bus fare prices got jacked up, airlines and cruise ships charge FUEL SURCHARGE.
When oil prices literally COLLAPSED below $30 per barrel, all of the above did not come down citing BS excuses for other 'costs'!

what other costs?
provide details so difficult meh???
so fucking blatant
hi way robbery aided by govt......... what fucking govt do we have? Cheats
 
Back
Top