• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Another piece of faked HDB propaganda

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
3,359
Points
0
LOOK OUT FOR SHITTY TIMES ARTICLES LIKE THIS


Jun 7, 2010
Share a flat
More than 600 families given roof over their heads under HDB scheme
By Carolyn Quek

•WAITING OR NOT ELIGIBLE FOR PUBLIC RENTAL FLAT
•CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY A FLAT
•ANOTHER OPTION FOR FAMILIES

FAMILIES down on their luck have been able to get a roof over their heads through a year-old Housing Board scheme to find them interim housing.

More than 600 families from a list of 1,830 have found rental homes for the short term in flats in older districts, which are slated for demolition.

Many of the tenants are families in financial difficulties, like Mr Muhammad, a logistics supervisor and sole breadwinner who could not keep up with payments on a four-room resale flat he bought in 2005.

In April last year, he sold his flat in Yishun and moved into his sister-in-law's home.

With the addition of his family of four, there were 12 people in her four-room flat, and his nephews had to sleep on mattresses in the living room.

'I felt embarrassed so I kept looking for another place to stay,' said Mr Muhammad, 49, who did not want to give his full name.

The father of a daughter, 15, and son, 11, could not front the cash for a three- room resale flat and was not eligible for a rental flat as he was earning more than $1,500 a month.

The housing authority offered him another option in an Interim Rental Housing (IRH) three-room flat in Block 28, Toa Payoh Lorong 6. The block is scheduled to be knocked down in a few years' time under the Selective En-bloc Redevelopment Scheme.

The initiative seeks to help families 'facing a transition in their housing arrangement', said the HDB: In other words, those who need temporary shelter while they work towards arranging longer-term accommodation.

Of the 600 families, 87 have moved on, either to permanent rental housing or their own flats.

Households that qualify include those already in the rental queue but in urgent need of shelter, and households in financial hardship downgrading to smaller flats which are still being built.

Households which qualify for the scheme sign a renewable six-month contract and are able to move into their temporary homes within a month.

The IRH units in Toa Payoh, Havelock Road and Bedok South will be managed for three years by EM Services.

Rent is kept low by having two families share one three-room flat, which normally rents for about $1,200 a month.

Mr Muhammad, his homemaker wife and two children moved in at the end of March, paying $400 for one room in the flat.

The other family, Madam Rasidah Ali, 39, her husband and daughter, moved in about two months later. They, too, had chalked up arrears on a flat in Yishun, and are waiting for a new two-room flat, which will be ready in two years.

Neither family had a say in their choice of flatmates but EM Services tries to pair families of similar backgrounds, HDB explained.

Mr Muhammad said he had heard about flatmates on the scheme quarrelling, but the two families in his flat have been getting along.

Madam Rasidah, a cook in a fast-food restaurant, became friends with Mr Muhammad's wife, who looks after her 11-year-old daughter while she is at work.

Both families also share groceries and compromise on other matters such as the use of the bathroom, especially during 'the peak period' on weekday mornings.

'It was awkward initially but we have to get along,' Madam Rasidah said.

'You can say I'm quite lucky to get a good family.'

Mr Muhammad, who is saving up to buy a flat, said: 'Having your own home is more comfortable and convenient, but I don't know how long I will have to wait before I can buy my own place.

'At least I am no longer troubling my sister-in-law.'

[email protected]
 
Of the 600 families, 87 have moved on, either to permanent rental housing or their own flats.

600 FAMILIES = ABOUT 2400 S'POREANS!

SO WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE OTHER 513 FAMILIES? CRAP!
 
Mah BT and HDB have change their tactic and strategy. Instead of MBT appearing on TV, newspapers ...MSM etc every week to talk about how good HDB is, now MBT will stay off from the MSM while HDB will push out "good news" every week for the MSM to report.

Goh Meng Seng
 
Mah BT and HDB have change their tactic and strategy. Instead of MBT appearing on TV, newspapers ...MSM etc every week to talk about how good HDB is, now MBT will stay off from the MSM while HDB will push out "good news" every week for the MSM to report.

Goh Meng Seng

hahaha you might be right
 
Gov should change the house income limit from $1.5k to $2k for rental eligible subsidy . Now $2k not even enough for family of 4 person.
 
EM services must be thrilled to helping fellow Singaporeans for the very first time in handling rentals. They of course were helping incoming foreigners to find subsidized rentals from a portfolio of HDB and HUDC flats owned by the govt. They used to operate near Jurong Town Hall vicinity in the 1990s with nice reception, seats with numbered queues, fast services etc. You can pick up 5 sets of keys by putting down $10 deposit per key and then check the apartments. After you pick up the apartment, you can even get them to change some basic stuff.

It has been a long journey and finally an opportunity to help own countrymen.
 
what is there to be proud of when only 600+ out of 1800+ need to apply for this scheme. 2 things come to mind, shouldn't govt expedite and help the remaining 1200+ to settle down asap before publishing this news rather. what is their intention? to blow their own trumpet that they are doing something and once it captured readers attention, they will no longer be bother to process for the remaining 1200+ and using the excuses that they had helped 600+ already.

Secondly, is this figure high? is there any similar figure 10, 20 years ago that we can compare with? if so, has it increased or deceased? if the demand is increasing it can only means that more and more citizens cannot afford to have their own flats which means that our policies are not moving in the right direction
 
Back
Top