Another non-Chinese member quit the Chinese Workers' Party

[skponggol]

Yeah so far 0 evidence of any racist incidents. I hear this keling candidate only has O levels and Png probably isn't that highyl educated but yet ppl are praising this keling to the skies on how good his english is on how he can play around with words while png who's so helpful still gets looked down on.

Read my signature.

Thank you for zapping for points to prove my points.

.....

 

[skponggol]

Thanks. You said it better than I do. It's such things (the part in bold) that I find frustrating to respond to these forummers. The truth can be reversed just like that - that's the former WP brigade for you.

I have criticised WP more than Kinana+SKP+GMS have given them due credit add together. What in the world exists that everything they do is wrong. Even Satan also the three won't criticise like that.

You have criticised former WP members more than WP, devaluing all their sacrifices and contribution for the party, smearing them dishonest, just because they could not agree with Low Thia Khiang and have left the party...

Why is Low Thia Khiang and his cronies so petty, mean and intolerant?


....

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

Crazy fella in what way is wp racist? It's weird you'll read assholes like him say wp and sg as a whole is racist BUT you won't find any examples.

 

[Perspective]

You have criticised former WP members more than WP, devaluing all their sacrifices and contribution for the party, smearing them dishonest, just because they could not agree with Low Thia Khiang and have left the party...

Why is Low Thia Khiang and his cronies so petty, mean and intolerant?


....

The difference between your criticism of WP and criticism of its former WP members is far greater than mine, so for your own sake, don't even go there. The whole forum is proof. Furthermore you don't even talk about PAP or other topics.

And sorry, I am no LTK nor his cronies. I criticise former WP members, therefore LTK and his cronies are petty? What kind of logic is that.

That is how dishonest all these statements are.

 

[mojito]

You have criticised former WP members more than WP, devaluing all their sacrifices and contribution for the party, smearing them dishonest, just because they could not agree with Low Thia Khiang and have left the party...

Why is Low Thia Khiang and his cronies so petty, mean and intolerant?

Wouldn't you like the new Barbie?

[video=youtube;1xLBF44nkpU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xLBF44nkpU[/video]

 

[sleaguepunter]

yo, ah hock, making big bucks from sale of many funeral blankets for the cabby who killed by the ah tiong hor.

 

[deepblue0911]

Read my signature.

Thank you for zapping for points to prove my points.

.....

I think you're too angry. It's not good for you. Please try to calm down.

And try not to think about WP. It makes your blood pressure goes up.

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

Aiayh, WP is animel fram one lah. Veyr humsup and raicsts animla one. You read downstair


"The Animal Farm That Is WP

Four legs good....that's how WP ran under Low Thia Khiang when he took over WP after being prodded to do so by a PAP emisssary in March 1998.

After 11 years as Secretary-General and 21 years with his snout in the PAP trough and millions of dollars in the bank, Low has now wholeheartedly embraced the PAP's philosophy that whilst standing on four legs is good, standing on two is way better.

It is a party of three, Sylvia and him and his sponsor, the PAP. The rest of the WP members are rubber stampers. Anyone who wants to move up the WP ladder must fulfill three criteria.

One, kowtow to Low.

Two, be Low's personal rubber stamp.

Three, not be a threat, present and future, to Low.

Fulfill these criteria and he will bequeath upon you his blessings. Yaw Shin Leong was one such beneficiary. Even though he denies it, Low was well aware of Yaw's philandering ways but neverthless, chose to reward Yaw over other party members for his loyalty. Loyalty not to the party but to Low. Also, as an incorrigible philanderer himself, Low lacks the moral authority to stop his party members from doing likewise.

To Low, his position as SG is God's gift to him. As such, it cannot be taken away from him. After all, the God that gifted him this seat is a very powerful God, the PAP.

Those Low saw as a threat, present and future, were undermined and sidelined. Dr Poh Lee Guan is one such person.

Those he saw with the potential to eclipse him are quietly undermined, quietly sidelined and forced to adopt a low media profile. Chen Show Mao is one such person.

Low treats people as he would, tissue. To be made used off and discarded when no longer required.

Low's racism and racial chauvinism is well known amongst party members. For reasons best known to himself, he has a particular distaste for Indians and Malays. He took a neutral view towards Eurasians.

The truth about who Low really is will continue to emerge. It will culminate in a final revelation about Low which will show Singaporeans how they have been taken on a very,very long ride by the PAP and their appointed millionaire stooge, Mr Low Thia Khiang."

Ok firstly i want to address the issue of racism here and also the issue of low refusing to give the spotlight to anyone else and if you kiss his ass he'll treat you exceptionally well so to speak from the examples you have given here on various party members.

You claim low is racist and chauvinistic but i don't see any examples. Care to give some examples in what way is low a racist? I like to seperate racism from chauvinism cos let's be honest who isn't chaunvinistic about their own race? How about some indian boss asking his non indian staff to wear indian garb at some function? Sounds rather chauvinistic to me and might i add racist if the situation were reversed and the boss was chinese and the staff were non chinese yet in the scenerio i presented indian boss getting non indian staff to wear indian garb at a function show cases indian chauvinism but i'm sure it's 100% ok for you since only chinese chauvinism isn't allowed.

Back to the topic care to show in what case low is a racist?

You see if you were to apply the other examples of how you claim low does not like others in the party to outshine him like Dr Poh Lee Guan and Chen Show Mao and how they were quietly undermined and quietly sidelined then i suppose he must have done the same to the indian and malay party members too and in which case that isn't him being a racist since he did the same exact thing to Dr Poh Lee Guan and Chen Show Mao. So please i would like for you to explain explicitly how low is a racist. It seems that in singapore a person can be accused of being a racist and yet does not display any discerning behavior to be attributed as racist behavior but yet is still considered a racist.

Mind you pls be more discerning that if someone dislikes someone that isn't a chinese that automatically does not make him a racist.

 

[KNNBCCB]

....edited... wrong thread :p