<TABLE id=msgUN border=0 cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD id=msgUNsubj vAlign=top>
Coffeeshop Chit Chat - Another Mini-LKY </TD><TD id=msgunetc noWrap align=right>
Subscribe </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=msgtable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="96%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msg vAlign=top><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgbfr1 width="1%"> </TD><TD><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead vAlign=top><TD class=msgF width="1%" noWrap align=right>From: </TD><TD class=msgFname width="68%" noWrap>Foreign Thrashes = 1st class (BabaEro11) <NOBR></NOBR> </TD><TD class=msgDate width="30%" noWrap align=right>4:42 pm </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT height=20 width="1%" noWrap align=right>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname width="68%" noWrap>ALL <NOBR></NOBR></TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right> (1 of 4) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft rowSpan=4 width="1%"> </TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>25420.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt>Another Mini-LKY !
REFUSED to apologise for the errors.
...............................
No explanation after confusion over parking offence
http://www.straitstimes.com/STForum/OnlineStory/STIStory_462613.html
Dec 5, 2009
ON NOV 18, I received a reminder notification from HDB carparks section informing me that my car was involved in a parking offence at Woodlands Street 83 carpark.
I then called HDB carparks section to query this notification and informed them that, at the time of the offence, my car was parked at my office.
However, the officer claimed that the parking warden who issued the notification confirmed my car had indeed committed the offence, and my car number, make and colour were noted.
The next day, I met the carparks supervisor with Woodlands Town Council to submit my car movement log provided by my office carpark operator which showed that my car was in the carpark the whole day. I then asked him to investigate how a notification could be issued regarding a car which was not there at the time of the offence.
He promised to investigate and give me a satisfactory reply.
Sadly, when I received an e-mail message after a week from the estate officer, it still insisted that my car did not display a valid coupon but went on to say that the authorities had considered the appeal and waived the notice.
I am puzzled as to how my car could be in two different places at the same time. Even after furnishing supporting evidence, no one bothered to investigate or explain how this error had occurred.
Fortunately, I was able to prove my case. If not I would have been penalised for an offence I did not commit.
Jonathan Goh
</TD></TR><TR><TD> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msgleft width="1%"> </TD><TD class=msgopt width="24%" noWrap>
Options</TD><TD class=msgrde width="50%" noWrap align=middle>
Reply</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
REFUSED to apologise for the errors.
...............................
No explanation after confusion over parking offence
http://www.straitstimes.com/STForum/OnlineStory/STIStory_462613.html
Dec 5, 2009
ON NOV 18, I received a reminder notification from HDB carparks section informing me that my car was involved in a parking offence at Woodlands Street 83 carpark.
I then called HDB carparks section to query this notification and informed them that, at the time of the offence, my car was parked at my office.
However, the officer claimed that the parking warden who issued the notification confirmed my car had indeed committed the offence, and my car number, make and colour were noted.
The next day, I met the carparks supervisor with Woodlands Town Council to submit my car movement log provided by my office carpark operator which showed that my car was in the carpark the whole day. I then asked him to investigate how a notification could be issued regarding a car which was not there at the time of the offence.
He promised to investigate and give me a satisfactory reply.
Sadly, when I received an e-mail message after a week from the estate officer, it still insisted that my car did not display a valid coupon but went on to say that the authorities had considered the appeal and waived the notice.
I am puzzled as to how my car could be in two different places at the same time. Even after furnishing supporting evidence, no one bothered to investigate or explain how this error had occurred.
Fortunately, I was able to prove my case. If not I would have been penalised for an offence I did not commit.
Jonathan Goh
</TD></TR><TR><TD> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msgleft width="1%"> </TD><TD class=msgopt width="24%" noWrap>
