• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Another "honest mistake" by the govt

Generally by being clear minded nothing can escape the eyes of my uncle hence everywhere he goes ceos mgt hospital etc staffs ministry staffs are always beaten flat to a puppy KNN
Just to add when we want to beat people to puppy we cannot be unleesonable KNN mostlee applying this magic sentence "don't think my uncle don't know..."followed by logic flow without being unleesonable is the key to success in beating puppies KNN if done wronglee the leesult become a unleesonable prick KNN
 
MOM apologises to ex-DJ Jade Rasif for saying her account of maid's Covid-19 scare was 'inaccurate'

Sue the MOM.

Gentle reminder to the PAP govt and its civil serpents to focus on doing their jobs, instead of being obsessed about fact-checking and 辟谣.

No govt can be the arbiter of what is right or wrong. In fact, govts lie all the time: big lie, small lie, white lies, half-truths etc.

I know PAP's Sinkieland is a microcosm of CCP's China, but please don't go full retard and go beyond the point of no return. :cool:

EQGiEOIWsAAuQmc.jpg
 

16-year-old boy wrongly given Moderna Covid-19 vaccine; MOE and MOH apologise​

Investigations found that the teen's date of birth was wrongly entered while booking a vaccination appointment, allowing him to select a Moderna vaccination centre.


Investigations found that the teen's date of birth was wrongly entered while booking a vaccination appointment, allowing him to select a Moderna vaccination centre.ST PHOTO: KUA CHEE SIONG
ang_qing_0.png

Ang Qing

Jun 4, 2021


SINGAPORE - A 16-year-old boy was wrongly given the first dose of the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine on Thursday (June 3), but he is not expected to suffer any safety issues.
The mistake was discovered at Kolam Ayer Community Club vaccination centre when its staff identified the boy was under 18 years of age after he had been vaccinated.
In a joint statement, the Ministry of Education and Ministry of Health said vaccination centre staff should have checked his age during registration, and apologised for the inconvenience and anxiety caused.
"As an additional precaution, he was placed under a longer (post-vaccination) observation time of 50 minutes, and remains generally well," the statement said.
The Moderna vaccine has not been authorised for use in Singapore for those under 18.
Investigations found that the teenager's date of birth was wrongly entered when booking a vaccination appointment after receiving the sign-up link.


This resulted in his age being incorrectly registered as above 18, making it possible for a Moderna vaccination centre to be selected.
Both ministries said that they took a serious view of the incident.
"We apologise for the inconvenience and anxiety caused, and have reached out to the youth's parents to explain the situation.
"The expert committee for Covid-19 vaccination has reviewed this case, and does not expect him to suffer any safety issues from this incident," the statement said.
The medical team will consult the committee on what would be best for the youth for the completion of the vaccination.
Covid-19 vaccination begins for students aged 12 and above | ST LIVE

The committee added that data from a trial involving more than 3,700 adolescents aged 12 to 17 in the United States found that the Moderna vaccine is safe and effective for them with no significant safety issues identified.
"The majority of adverse events were mild or moderate in severity, and the common ones were injection site pain, headache, fatigue, muscle aches and chills," it said.
Meanwhile, MOH is conducting a thorough review of internal processes at vaccination centres to prevent a recurrence.
This includes strengthening its online registration process to ensure individuals make appointments at suitable vaccination centres based on their eligibility as well as putting in place more stringent protocols at vaccination sites to verify eligibility.
The ministries said they are in close contact with the boy and his family, and will monitor his health closely.
 
We apologise...blah blah blah....! Tats all. No heads roll? :cautious:
 
In singapore, govt makes mistakes is "honest" and cannot blame culture...

When sinkies walk on the road, a foreigner fall down on the next street 200 meters away... must be singaporeans fault... and sinkies do crime and dun be xeno...
 
"As an additional precaution, he was placed under a longer (post-vaccination) observation time of 50 minutes, and remains generally well," the statement said.

Extra 20 minutes to see if he dies. Still alive = generally well. :biggrin:
 
There are no mistakes nor honesty from our PAP gahmen....
 
Sue the MOM.

Gentle reminder to the PAP govt and its civil serpents to focus on doing their jobs, instead of being obsessed about fact-checking and 辟谣.

No govt can be the arbiter of what is right or wrong. In fact, govts lie all the time: big lie, small lie, white lies, half-truths etc.

I know PAP's Sinkieland is a microcosm of CCP's China, but please don't go full retard and go beyond the point of no return. :cool:

EQGiEOIWsAAuQmc.jpg

Poon pe pe again... dickhead..
 

All FairPrice stores to check scales daily after videos show grocery weight discrepancies​

nf-ntuc-110222.jpg

Since the incident occurred at Nex, FairPrice said it has engaged certified technicians to recertify all the scales in the store. ST PHOTO: KUA CHEE SIONG
anjali.png


Anjali Raguraman
Consumer Correspondent

FEB 13, 2022

SINGAPORE - The emergence of two videos on TikTok showing groceries whose weights were inaccurately labelled at NTUC FairPrice outlets has prompted questions online about whether consumers should verify the weight printed on labels at supermarkets before making a purchase.
Both videos emerged in the past week.
The first video, posted on Feb 5 by user Nina Monzolevska, showed that a packet of chicken bought from the FairPrice Xtra outlet at Nex weighed 0.165kg, although it was labelled 0.224kg.
FairPrice apologised in a Facebook post on Feb 6, saying that it had contacted the customer and was investigating "the cause of the alleged mislabelling".
A second video, taken at a FairPrice outlet in Ang Mo Kio on Feb 7, showed a packet of salmon labelled with a weight of 0.296kg. However, TikTok user Ben1841 found that it weighed only 0.176kg on his scale.

In response to queries from The Straits Times about the first incident, a FairPrice spokesman said: "The mislabelling incident likely arose due to human error, based on our initial findings, since we were unable to retrieve the product in question to conduct a more comprehensive investigation."
The supermarket chain has since offered the customer a refund for her purchase.

"We agree this should not have occurred and have reviewed and taken steps to tighten our processes around our labelling procedures to better serve our customers," added the spokesman.
Since the incident occurred at Nex, FairPrice said it has engaged certified technicians to recertify all the scales in the store.
It has also instituted additional protocols, where all stores will need to conduct daily checks on the scales before the start of business.

"Fresh products that have already been labelled will also have the weight rechecked to ensure label accuracy," said the spokesman.
FairPrice said that fresh products like chicken are pre-packed by suppliers in trays, covered in cling wrap and labelled to indicate the date of packing. When FairPrice stores receive them, they are then weighed, taking into consideration the weight of the packaging, and affixed with a price label.
In response to queries from ST, a spokesman for the Weights and Measures Office said it has inspected the weighing instruments at Fairprice's Nex branch and have verified them to be accurate.
"We are currently in touch with NTUC to determine the actual cause of the mislabelling," added the spokesman.
FairPrice said its scales across its FairPrice, FairPrice Finest and FairPrice Xtra outlets are calibrated by authorised vendors yearly and undergo preventive maintenance twice a year.



Similarly, outlets under the DFI Retail Group calibrate their scales once a year.
The group, which runs Cold Storage and Giant supermarkets, said that as part of its standard operating procedures, team members, who are trained regularly, carry out verification checks daily on its weighing scales to avoid errors.
"The weighing and labelling processes are manual, where either our supplier partner, with whom the majority of the fresh meat process is being handled by, or team member, sticks the label on products after weighing the products," said a DFI spokesman.
"While there may be room for human error, both our supplier partners and team members are regularly reminded to double-check before displaying the products for sale."
Sheng Siong did not respond to queries from ST.
The Weights and Measures Office, which is overseen by Enterprise Singapore, said it conducts about 2,400 surveillance checks each year on businesses, including supermarket chains.
Last year, it detected five cases that infringed the Weights and Measures Act due to short weight - or weight that is less than declared - after which fines and warnings were issued to the businesses.
Under the Act, the accuracy of all regulated weighing and measuring instruments used for trade in Singapore must be verified annually by independent, authorised verifiers.
Businesses are also required to supply quantities of goods to consumers that accurately reflect the weight declaration on the product label.

The Weights and Measures Office said action will be taken against businesses that fail to meet the requirements under the Act, including selling short-weight goods.
Depending on the severity of the offence, culprits may face a fine of up to $5,000, and/or imprisonment of up to three months.
"The Weights and Measures Office takes a serious view of non-compliance with weights and measures regulations and will investigate reports filed by the public on infringements," said the spokesman.
Both NTUC and the DFI Retail Group encouraged customers to approach their staff immediately if they find any labelling discrepancy on their products.
They said they will also honour a full refund or exchange for products that have been inaccurately labelled.
After learning about the videos, consumers whom ST spoke to said they are more concerned about discrepancies in the weight of groceries, but a few grams' difference is still acceptable.

Ms Marianne Tan, 33, a producer, buys fresh meat every week and bulk-buys frozen meat like beef and pork every few weeks, depending on how much cooking she has to do that week. She shops at FairPrice and Cold Storage.
While she will be more wary about mislabelled weights, she said: "If the discrepancy is not huge, it's okay."
She added: "You can roughly eyeball the piece of meat and see if it looks like the weight stated. I'd probably let it slide... I don't think the staff do it on purpose as they might have just forgotten to put the scale back to zero after weighing the previous item, since they have so much to do."
In a check of five meat items at a FairPrice outlet in Bishan, ST found that the weight on the label deviated only slightly from the reading on the scale. For instance, a strip of pork loin with a labelled weight of 0.276kg weighed 0.286kg on the scale.

Tips for consumers buying goods by weight​

The Weights and Measures Office said consumers buying goods sold by weight can adopt the following tips to ensure that they get what they paid for.
• Use the verified in-store weighing scales to get an estimated weight of the
packaged product.
• Look out for the Weights and Measures Office’s "Accuracy" label affixed on in-store scales to check that they have been verified within the past year. The red-and-white label has a QR code label bearing a unique, seven-digit identification number. Consumers can scan the code for more information about the instrument, such as the validity of its accuracy label and date of last verification.
• Alert the seller when the weight or price displayed on the label is not clear or inaccurate.
• Ask the seller to show you the readings on the weighing scale.
• Check that the display indicates zero before the goods are weighed.
• Check that you are charged for the net weight of the goods, that is, avoid weighing the products together with other items, such as ice or heavy containers.
• Check goods with torn or tampered packaging, as the net quantity may be less than that stated on the label.
Consumers who suspect that they were short-changed should approach the businesses for compensation, said the Weights and Measures Office.
If they cannot resolve the matter, they can approach the Consumers Association of Singapore for help.
If there are concerns about the supply of short-weight goods, or the inaccuracy of weighing and measuring instruments used by businesses, consumers may contact the Weights and Measures Office by phone on 6898-1800 or e-mail [email protected]
 

Police trained to fire at centre of body to stop threat of serious injury or death: Shanmugam​

hzbendemeer260322b.jpg

A recent case involved a knife-wielding drug offender who was shot dead at Block 33 Bendemeer Road. PHOTOS: K. SHANMUGAM SC/FACEBOOK
Samuel Devaraj and Nadine Chua

MAR 26, 2022

SINGAPORE - Some of the recent violent incidents involved known drug users who were armed and had to be stopped to prevent great harm, the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) said in a statement to The Straits Times.
A recent case which was widely reported involved a knife-wielding drug offender - Ng Eng Kui, 64 - who was shot dead after a confrontation with police officers at Block 33 Bendemeer Road on March 23.
The officers fired three Taser shots at Ng and retreated, but he continued to advance towards them. He was then shot in the chest.
While most people understood the police's actions, Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam noted that some have asked whether it was possible to shoot to injure, rather than kill.
He said in Facebook post on Saturday (March 26): "Our officers are trained to fire at the centre of the body to stop an imminent threat of grievous hurt or death.
"This offers a higher probability of hitting and reduces risk of injury to innocent bystanders."


Mr Shanmugam said the man had ignored orders to drop his knife and continued moving towards the officers.

Although they fired their Tasers, he was not incapacitated and continued to go at the officers with the knife. One of the officers then fired a shot, which hit the man.
"The man is wanted by CNB. He has a history of drug abuse, and suspected drug apparatus was found in his flat.
"He was also under investigations for several offences, including rash act and voluntarily causing hurt to a police officer," added Mr Shanmugam.


CNB did not provide specifics of the cases in its reply to questions by ST but referred to violent incidents in the past few weeks.
On March 14, a 37-year-old man is said to have swung a sword at a pedestrian in Buangkok Crescent, causing his victim to suffer a cut on his left arm and two cuts on his left shoulder.
Passers-by wrestled the man - Fadhil Yusop - to the ground before the police arrested him. He had allegedly popped some pills before the incident. Fadhil was charged with one count of voluntarily causing hurt.
dw-sword-buangkok1-220315.jpg

The man was detained by five members of the public before being arrested by police officers who responded to the call. PHOTO: VANI LOGAN/FACEBOOK, SCREENGRABS FROM WHATSAPP VIDEO
In its statement, CNB noted research has shown that those under the influence of drugs are prone to aggression, violent behaviour, hallucination, and loss of control of their senses and reality.
"Preliminary findings are that the subjects involved in several violent incidents in the past few weeks, which endangered the lives of the public and the responding police officers, have a history of drug abuse," the bureau said.
It added that they could have been under the influence of drugs at the time of the incidents.
"They had exhibited violent and reckless behaviour, and were armed, and could have caused even greater harm had they not been stopped in time," CNB added.
MORE ON THIS TOPIC
Bendemeer police shooting: How Tasers work and why they sometimes fail to subdue subjects
'I thought I was already dead,' says ex-cop who was hit in the neck in 1972 shoot-out
In response to queries from ST, a police spokesman said that situations involving those armed with weapons endangering the safety of the public can be dynamic.
"In some incidents, they may turn violent and threaten the safety of the public and responding police officers," said the spokesman.
"The involved persons, including police officers, do get hurt at times.
"Hence, officers have to swiftly consider the various force options and take decisive actions to subdue persons who pose a danger to the public or to them."
MORE ON THIS TOPIC
2 men arrested after 5-hour stand-off with police, CNB in Ang Mo Kio
Use force or negotiate? A look at how the S’pore police handle tense stand-offs
Dr Annabelle Chow, principal clinical psychologist at Annabelle Psychology, said drug use by itself might not cause violent behaviour, but it can disrupt brain functions responsible for impulse control or cognitive processing.
She added: "Substance use can lead to abusers experiencing irritability, mood swings, paranoia or increased aggression."
In another incident also on March 14, a 33-year-old man allegedly injured two passers-by with a razor blade at Block 59 Strathmore Avenue in Queenstown.
hzstrathmore260322b.jpg

Officers conducting investigations at Block 59 Strathmore Avenue on March 14, 2022. PHOTO: LIANHE ZAOBAO
Mohd S. Muhibullah Said Abdullah, who was arrested by police, claimed he had heard voices in his head telling him to attack people.
Aside from a history of drug use, Muhibullah, who is facing two charges of voluntarily causing hurt with a dangerous weapon, also has past records with the Institute of Mental Health (IMH).
Associate professor of sociology at the National University of Singapore Tan Ern Ser said the outbreak of violence could be due to mental health issues, or drug-induced, or both.
"One could blame (stress related to) Covid-19 rules, but I doubt it is a factor, given that armed violence is taking things to the extreme, and most people are unlikely to get to such extremes," he added.
MORE ON THIS TOPIC
Elderly man charged after he allegedly swung chopper in Bendemeer Road fight
Jail for man found armed with chopper after he threatened to 'kill everyone'
But Dr Chow said most people with mental illness are not violent.
She added: "The stereotype of association between mental illness and violence often leads to increased stigma against individuals with mental illness. This can lead to increased social isolation and discrimination by society, which are the opposite of what they require."

Recent cases of violent attacks involving weapons​

The police have taken note of the recent spate of violent attacks and threatening behaviour by individuals armed with weapons. Here are the cases:

March 23​

hzbendemeer260322.jpg

An officer at the crime scene at Block 33 Bendemeer Road where a man was shot dead. ST PHOTO: GAVIN FOO
Ng Eng Kui, 64, was shot dead during a confrontation with police officers at Block 33 Bendemeer Road. The officers fired three Taser shots at Ng, who was wielding a knife, and retreated, but he continued to advance towards them. He was shot in the chest and was pronounced dead that day. The police said they will be investigating if he was on drugs during the incident.

March 20​

hzcq260322.jpg

A man needed 20 stitches for cuts on his head after he was attacked at Clarke Quay. PHOTOS: MS LOW
A man who wanted to be known only as Mr Chua told The Straits Times that he was struck multiple times on the back of his head with a sharp object near Clarke Quay. He needed 20 stitches for cuts up to 10cm long. The police confirmed that a report has been made and that investigations are ongoing.

March 16​

yq-bdm-18032022.jpg

Ng Hui Ooh allegedly swung a chopper at another man during a fight at Bendemeer Market and Food Centre. PHOTO: ST FILE
Ng Hui Ooh, 77, allegedly swung a chopper at another man during a fight at Bendemeer Market and Food Centre. Preliminary investigations show that he did not hit anyone with the weapon. Ng was charged with criminal intimidation and with being in possession of a weapon in a public place.

March 14​

fhknives160322.jpg

Knives seized from Leonard Goh Yew Cheng, who allegedly threw one at a police officer in Bukit Batok. PHOTOS: SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE
A police officer suffered a bruise on his cheek after Leonard Goh Yew Cheng, 27, allegedly threw a knife at him in Bukit Batok. When confronted by police officers, he allegedly pulled out the knife from under his T-shirt and threw it at the officer. Goh was charged with one count of voluntarily causing hurt to deter a public servant from his duty and two counts of possessing offensive weapons.

March 14​

HZSTRATHMORE260322.jpg

Officers conducting investigations at Block 59 Strathmore Avenue on March 14, 2022. PHOTO: LIANHE ZAOBAO
Mohd S. Muhibullah Said Abdullah, 33, is accused of injuring two people with a razor blade at Block 59 Strathmore Avenue in Queenstown. He was handed two charges of voluntarily causing hurt with a dangerous weapon.

March 14​

hzsword260322.jpg

Fadhil Yusop was seen swinging his sword at a pedestrian in Buangkok Crescent. PHOTO: ROADS.SG/FACEBOOK
Fadhil Yusop, 37, was seen wielding a sword and swinging it at a pedestrian and hitting passing cars in Buangkok Crescent. He was accused of injuring the pedestrian, who suffered one cut on his left arm and two cuts on the left shoulder. Fadhil was charged with one count of voluntarily causing hurt.

Feb 17​

hzclementi260322a.jpg

A man with a knife confronting a police officer in Clementi before he was shot. PHOTO: BENNY TAN TAN/FACEBOOK
Soo Cheow Wee, 49, is accused of slashing a 41-year-old man on a pavement near Block 420A Clementi Avenue 1. He then allegedly charged towards another man, 20, outside Clementi Police Division while brandishing a knife. He was shot by police during a stand-off and was taken to hospital with a gunshot wound. He was charged with one count each of assault and criminal intimidation.
 
Did any heads roll? If this was from an opposition, I am sure PAP and their running dogs will conduct an "investigation" and claim that there is corruption.
 
Last edited:

Mothership's press accreditation suspended until Aug 18 for breaking Budget embargo​

yu_mothership2403.png

The accreditation was suspended after Mothership broke an embargo on the Budget on Feb 18. PHOTOS: MOTHERSHIP, LAWRENCE WONG/FACEBOOK
jessielim.png

Jessie Lim

MAR 24, 2022

SINGAPORE - The press accreditation for local media outlet Mothership will be suspended for six months, until Aug 18, after it broke an embargo on the Budget on Feb 18.
In response to queries from The Straits Times (ST), the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) said on Thursday (March 24) that Mothership.sg had broken the embargo on details of the staggered goods and services tax (GST) increases.
MCI decided on the length of the suspension after reviewing an appeal by Mothership.
MCI said: "Given the seriousness of the breach, which involved information that is highly market sensitive and prejudicial to national interest, MCI has reviewed the appeal and decided to suspend Mothership's press accreditation for a total of six months."
This means that Mothership's representatives will not be able to attend briefings and press conferences by government agencies.
ST understands that in February, Mothership released an infographic with details of the GST hike before Finance Minister Lawrence Wong announced this during his Budget speech.
On Thursday, Mothership's managing editor Martino Tan said the media outlet accepts that the temporary suspension of its press accreditation was necessary, given the nature of the breach.

He added: "We will use this period before the reinstatement to strengthen our internal processes and implement the necessary remedial actions.
"This incident, while regrettable, is an important reminder to us of the standards required of a professional and credible media operation."
Mr Tan had said in February that the breaking of the embargo was a genuine mistake made by prematurely publishing an infographic on Mothership's Facebook page.
He had said that the media outlet identified the mistake in under two minutes and immediately deleted the post. The staff involved were also suspended for two weeks, he added.
 

Mothership’s press accreditation suspended again after breaking embargo on PUB announcement​

dw-mothership-2-230929.jpg

Local media outlet Mothership published an article on its website and a Facebook post on the revision of water prices on Sept 26, before the embargo was lifted on Sept 27. ST PHOTO: DESMOND FOO
Kolette Lim

SEP 29, 2023

SINGAPORE - The press accreditation of Mothership has been suspended, after the local media outlet broke an embargo on an announcement by national water agency PUB.
The outlet published an article on its website and a Facebook post on the revision of water prices on Tuesday, before the embargo was lifted at 5pm on Wednesday, the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) said on Friday, in response to The Straits Times’ queries. It has until Oct 11 to make an appeal, the ministry added.
“Given the breach, the MCI has suspended Mothership’s press accreditation with immediate effect,” the ministry said, without elaborating on the length of this suspension. This means Mothership’s representatives will not be able to attend briefings and press conferences by government agencies.
This is the second time the Singapore-based media outlet has broken an embargo on a government announcement in two years.
On Feb 18, 2022, Mothership released details on the staggered goods and services tax (GST) increases before it was announced during the 2022 Budget. The outlet’s press accreditation was subsequently suspended for six months.
In response to media queries, Mothership acknowledged the latest incident was “a serious breach, as the information impacts every person in Singapore”.
It said it removed the embargoed material when it was alerted to the breach, and subsequent investigations showed that a member of its editorial team failed to observe its protocols and also breached the additional safeguards put in place in 2022. It did not elaborate on them.

“The colleague has been suspended from duty while we conclude our investigations and make our representations to the regulators,” Mothership said.
Its managing editor Martino Tan said: “While this may have been an error on the part of an individual colleague, as managing editor I assume personal responsibility for not adequately ensuring and enforcing the standards that we had set for ourselves.” He added that the outlet would resolve “these operating issues once and for all”.
“We unreservedly apologise to Singaporeans, our stakeholders – especially PUB and MCI – and our industry colleagues for this matter, and for causing such unnecessary trouble at a time when there are more pressing priorities to focus on.”

 
That why I Don understand 60% dumb sinkies still lvote them, they increases this n that n suck from us n paid them ,lol, even can recover they still keep, n worse can 70% vote for snakes,this action lahi make them eager to raise all, lol,after erection straight increase this n that,lol
 
Lol ,some companies already bankrupt or closed down , hpw to recover, wait,thi k there is a way ,suck from sinkies again,lol
 
Back
Top