• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ah nehs...

Shell heist: Surveyor who accepted $4,000 bribe jailed for four weeks​

ads_court.jpg


Samuel Devaraj

June 30, 2022

SINGAPORE - Paramanandham Srinivasan spotted a man on board a vessel he was inspecting, after cargo had been loaded onto it.
Paramanandham, a surveyor, suspected that the man could have manipulated the readings on the vessel's machinery or documents in order to conceal the misappropriation of gas oil.
He questioned the man's presence on the vessel and the man told him not to interfere and gave him US$3,000.
For accepting the gratification from Muzaffar Ali Khan Muhamad Akram, Paramanandham, was sentenced to four weeks' jail and ordered to pay a penalty of $4,046.70 - the local dollar equivalent of the bribe amount - on Thursday (June 30).
The 39-year-old Indian national pleaded guilty to one corruption charge.
He was among 12 surveyors who were charged on April 14 for allegedly accepting bribes from then Shell employees Muzaffar, Juandi Pungot and Richard Goh Chee Keong.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Norman Yew said in court documents that Paramanandham's company, SGS Testing and Control Services Singapore, offers surveying services, including the inspection of the quantity of cargo supplied to vessels in Singapore by suppliers like Shell.

Paramanandham had spotted Muzaffar some time around April 28, 2016, on board a vessel which his company was engaged to inspect.
DPP Yew said: "After receiving the cash, the accused forbore to accurately report the amount of cargo loaded onto that vessel and turned a blind eye to Muzaffar's misappropriation of gas oil at Shell Pulau Bukom.
"By these actions, the accused helped Muzaffar, Juandi and their co-conspirators to conceal the misappropriation of gas oil."
As a result of Paramanandham's action, the misappropriation of Shell oil worth US$236,956.14 went undetected by the company in 2016.
DPP Yew added that since the discovery of the heist, Shell has taken costly measures to improve its systems and processes at Shell Pulau Bukom, including developing a monitoring software and creating new permanent positions.

On March 31, Juandi was jailed for 29 years for his role in masterminding the misappropriation of more than 200,000 tonnes of gas oil worth $128 million.
This is one of the longest prison sentences for a commercial crime.
Muzaffar's case is still pending.
Some of the other surveyors have also been dealt sentences for accepting bribes. They include Anand Omprekas, 39, Noruliman Bakti, 40, and Muhammad Khairul Asri Mohamad Hanafiah, 38, who were each jailed between four and eight months on May 26.
The maximum penalty for corruption is a $100,000 fine and five years in jail.
 

Jail for housekeeper who stole $5,000 from red packets left in hotel room​

AK_court.jpg

osmondchia.png


Osmond Chia

July 14, 2022

SINGAPORE - A housekeeping staff member of Fairmont Hotel stole almost $5,000 in cash that was kept in a safe box of a guest's room.
The money was packed in red packets that were meant for the victim's son, whose wedding was held at the hotel in Bras Basah.
Saravanan Kannan, 50, who is from Malaysia, pleaded guilty on Wednesday (July 13) to theft and was jailed for three months.
Court documents did not state whether Saravanan is still employed by the hotel, which has been contacted for comment.
The court heard that the victim, Madam Kuo Mei-Yi, 60, arrived in Singapore from Taiwan on April 24 this year with her sister to attend her son's wedding.
Madam Kuo placed close to $20,000 of cash in Singapore and Taiwanese currencies meant for her son in four red packets inside the safe in her hotel room.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Ghopinath Kalimuthu said investigations found that Saravanan entered the victim's room to tidy it up at 1pm on April 26.

The DPP said: "While he was inside the room, he noticed the safe box was unlocked with a few red packets inside the safe.
"The accused looked through the red packets and found cash enclosed in them."
He took some of the cash, amounting to nearly $5,000.

He later changed $1,100 of the money into ringgit and spent it in Malaysia.
When Madam Kuo returned to the room, she saw that the safe was unlocked but was not suspicious then as all the red packets there.
She handed the first red packet to her son during the wedding reception at night.
Her son's wife later called to ask why she had packed such an odd amount of money - $7,401 - in the red packet.
The DPP said: "(Madam Kuo) realised that was not the amount of money that she put inside the first red packet. Hence, she decided to check the remaining red packets inside the safe."

She found that some NT$50,000 (S$2,340) was missing from the second and third red packets and reported the theft to the police and the hotel's security.
The accused was later interviewed and admitted to the theft.
The police retrieved around S$1,500 and NT$50,000 from the accused and returned the cash to Madam Kuo. The hotel's management returned the remaining $1,100 to her and deducted the amount from Saravanan's salary.
He could have been jailed for up to seven years and fined.
 

Drunk man drove ambulance erratically for an hour, smashed into SLE guard rails and injured passenger​

Drunk man drove ambulance erratically for an hour, smashed into SLE guard rails and injured passenger
Ili Nadhirah Mansor/TODAY
  • G Mohanavarooman Gopal Oyyappan did not have a valid driving licence to drive an ambulance
  • He drove while drunk in the wee hours of July 7, 2020
  • At times, he went against traffic flow and also sounded the horn for no reason
  • He ultimately crashed into guard railings along the SLE
  • His passenger who had also been drinking had fractured ribs for the crash

BY

LOUISA TANG

Published July 13, 2022

SINGAPORE — With more than double the legal alcohol limit in his blood, G Mohanavarooman Gopal Oyyappan went on an hour-long joyride around the island in a private ambulance that belonged to his employer.
The 25-year-old stopped only when he crashed into some guard rails in the middle of Seletar Expressway (SLE). His passenger, who had also been drinking in the vehicle, suffered fractured ribs from the impact.
For this escapade, Mohan, now aged 27, pleaded guilty on Tuesday (July 12) to four charges including drink-driving, dangerous driving causing grievous hurt and driving without a valid Class 3 or 3A licence.
The Singaporean also admitted to an unrelated charge of voluntarily causing hurt. About six months before the ambulance incident, he got into a fight while drinking at a Punggol coffee shop and punched a patron.
He has not been sentenced yet and will return to court in September. Another charge of giving false information to a public servant will be taken into consideration for sentencing.

The prosecution is seeking 28 to 37 months’ jail, a fine of S$4,000 to S$5,000, and a 10-year disqualification from holding or obtaining all classes of driving licences.

DROVE AGAINST TRAFFIC FLOW​

The court heard that Mohan and another man, Aravindraj Manohar, 29, were employed by private ambulance provider IM Ambulance Service. He worked as a “medic” while Arvin was a driver.
The pair worked together on July 6 in 2020, taking patients to and from medical centres.
Around 8.45pm that day, they went to a car park at Block 137, Bukit Batok West Avenue 6 to rest. Mohan had reported for work almost 12 hours earlier.
He bought four cans of beer from a nearby provision shop and they drank in the ambulance till 10pm, before Mohan bought more beer and a vodka mixed drink from a convenience store. He told Aravin that these drinks were for his friend.
They then ferried someone from Corporation Road to Bukit Batok Care Home, before continuing to drink until about 11.15pm.

Aravin eventually allowed Mohan to drive the ambulance to his grandmother’s house.
The victim, who is Mohan's friend, later boarded the ambulance. Her name was removed from court documents.
Aravin’s father picked him up in a car and Mohan went behind the wheel of the ambulance. He and the victim began drinking once more before he embarked on a joyride from 1.30am to 2.30am.
Court documents outlined numerous examples of his erratic driving, such as sharply cutting across a cyclist’s path by making a left turn into Hougang Street 22 from the second lane as opposed to the first lane.
He then drove against the flow of traffic along Hougang Street 22, at an open-air car park on Hougang Avenue 1 and on Phillips Avenue.
At the junctions of Phillips Avenue and Yio Chu Kang Road, he beat the red light before driving at a fast speed in a zig-zagging manner by repeatedly alternating between the first and second lanes.

Along the SLE, he drove in an unsteady manner and nearly caused a side-swipe collision with a car. He also sounded the horn many times for no reason.

LIED THAT HE WASN'T DRIVING​

He made a series of lane changes before finally losing control of the vehicle, skidding from the third to first lane and ramming into the guard railings in the centre of the SLE.
The ambulance toppled to its left and came to a stop between the third and fourth lanes.
A member of the public called the police. An officer went to the scene and noticed that 10 portions of the guard rails had been uprooted and a tree was slanted.
Mohan's friend was unable to move from the front passenger seat because her leg was stuck.
The police officer then saw Mohan walking around the back of the ambulance in a state of panic. He smelled strongly of alcohol and had an unsteady gait.

When questioned if he was the driver, Mohan claimed that the victim had been driving instead. However, the victim said that Mohan had been the driver.
Mohan pleaded with her in Tamil, “Please, you are the driver”, and “Promise on your mother, if you want to save me, help me.”
Mohan soon failed a breathlyser test and was arrested. He was escorted to Khoo Teck Puat Hospital because he did not have his asthmatic inhaler with him.
He had 183mg of ethanol per 100ml of blood, more than double the prescribed drink-driving limit of 80mg per 100ml.
The victim was also taken to the hospital where she was found to have suffered lower rib fractures. She was warded for a week and given 38 days of hospitalisation leave, but did not suffer any permanent disabilities.
For dangerous driving causing grievous hurt, Mohan could be jailed for up to five years. As he is a serious offender, he could also additionally be jailed for up to a year and fined up to S$10,000.
 

Maid jailed for uploading TikTok clip of employer's son's clothes being changed​

Maid jailed for uploading TikTok clip of employer's son's clothes being changed

File photo of the State Courts in Singapore. (Photo: Calvin Oh)

Davina Tham

19 Jul 2022

SINGAPORE: While changing her employer's son's clothes, a maid took a video of the four-year-old boy that exposed his buttocks and private parts, and later uploaded the clip on TikTok.
Rike Kusnul Kotimah, 25, was on Tuesday (Jul 19) jailed for three months and one week after pleading guilty to one charge of voyeurism and one charge of theft.
Another charge of distributing the voyeuristic recording was considered for sentencing. There is a gag order on the victim's identity.
The court heard that Rike Kusnul Kotimah started working for her employer on Mar 11. Soon after this, she asked for a transfer, which her employer agreed to on Apr 14.
The employer checked the maid's photo gallery on her phone to ensure there were no pictures of her household and saw that she had taken a photo of a S$50 note placed in front of her husband's pants.
The maid later admitted to taking the S$50 that was left in her employer's husband's pants, which she found while doing the laundry earlier in April. Her employer made a police report on Apr 14.
During the course of investigations, the police discovered that Rike Kusnul Kotimah had used her phone to record a video of the employer's young son while she was changing him.
Between March and April, while at home, she positioned her phone camera about 1m to 2m away and started recording a video while intentionally changing the boy's pants in the middle of the camera's field of vision.
The child's bare buttocks could be seen throughout the video, which was at least 18 seconds long, and his private parts were exposed for a few seconds.
The maid then uploaded the video onto her TikTok account with a caption in the Indonesian language.
The caption, translated to English, read: "Condition for a domestic worker to be successful: Personal necessities borne by the employer, food and date borne by employer, no off day, no Shoppee (sic), whatever things I can request from employer and just believe it, go back to Indonesia with a bag full of money, not a bag full of dirty clothes!"
Rike Kusnul Kotimah claimed that she had taken the video as a memento, court documents stated.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Alexandria Shamini Joseph, who asked for the sentence imposed, said that the maid had intentionally recorded a video of the victim being changed at home when he had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
The punishment for intentionally recording a child under 14 doing a private act without his or her consent is up to two years' jail and a fine or caning.
The penalty for theft is up to seven years' jail and a fine.
 

10 years' jail for Gurkha cop who misappropriated over $5m from own community​

ads_court.jpg

shaffiq_alkhatib.png


Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent

Jul 20, 2022

SINGAPORE - A sergeant with the Gurkha Contingent of the Singapore Police Force (SPF) misappropriated $5.4 million from people in his community and used some of the money to place bets on remote gambling sites.
The bets, which included winnings he might have rolled over, totalled nearly $40.8 million - the largest amount to date involving a punter linked to unlawful gambling activities.
Bikash Gurung, now 36, had told his 196 victims that he could remit monies to Nepal at favourable exchange rates.
But he only sent around $211,000 back to their home country.
In their submissions, deputy public prosecutors Jeremy Bin and Cheng You Duen described the case as one of the most heinous scams perpetrated in recent history.
Bikash, who has been suspended from service since Sept 24, 2018, took between $2,000 and $240,000 from each victim.
"These monies were absolutely necessary to provide basic necessities such as healthcare, education, food and shelter for the victims' families in Nepal.

"Their lives, and the lives of their families for generations to come, have been irrevocably damaged by virtue of the accused's offences," said the prosecution.
On Wednesday (July 20), Bikash was sentenced to 10 years' jail after he pleaded guilty to 25 counts of criminal breach of trust and nine charges involving unlawful gambling activities.
Another 188 charges were considered during sentencing.

Bikash was known among his friends in the Gurkha Contingent as someone who could reliably remit monies to Nepal at favourable rates.
But in 2016, he incurred significant losses from gambling heavily on football matches.
To fund his gambling habit, he leveraged on his reputation in remitting money.
He said he would accept Singapore dollars from his customers and use the cash to buy goods which would then be transported to Nepal.

Bikash claimed the goods would be sold by businesses there at higher prices and the proceeds would be transferred to his customers' families.
"When the monies were not remitted within the timeframe promised by the accused, some of the victims questioned him.
"To avoid arousing the victims' suspicion for the delay, and to convince future victims that his scheme was legitimate, the accused remitted portions of the money owed to these victims," said the prosecution.
The largest sum of $240,000 came from a retired officer who had entrusted the amount to Bikash between December 2017 and April 2018.
The victim had intended to give $58,000 to his family there for their living expenses and invest the rest in a project in Nepal.
When the monies were not delivered, the victim contacted Bikash, who said delays in the shipment of goods were to blame.
Another victim took a loan of $50,000 against his future income to help his sick mother back home.
He transferred the whole amount to Bikash on April 9, 2018, but after three months, approached the disgraced officer who said he had used the money to buy expensive watches to be sent to Nepal.
The victim was told to wait another month.
Between Dec 18, 2017 and June 30, 2018, Bikash used the money entrusted to him on an unlawful remote gambling service using two different accounts.
His offences came to light when an operations manager from the contingent made a police report in September 2018.
Responding to queries from The Straits Times, the SPF said that it has started internal action against Bikash, adding: "We deal with officers who break the law severely."
 

Jail for repeat offender who continued to assault others while out on bail over similar offences​

court_0.jpg

shaffiq_alkhatib.png


Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent

Jul 25, 2022

SINGAPORE -A recalcitrant offender is back behind bars after he assaulted many people in separate incidents, fracturing the skull of one victim and attacking another with a parang.
Indran Devadas, 40, who committed some of his offences while he was out on bail, was on Monday (July 25) sentenced to two years, 10 months and six weeks' jail with six strokes of the cane.
He had pleaded guilty to five charges for offences including assault, voluntarily causing grievous hurt with a weapon and using criminal force on a police officer.
The court heard that he has been in and out of jail for earlier offences including assault.
He returned to his old ways on April 3, 2020, when he targeted a 50-year-old woman, who was his live-in fiancee at the time.
Indran had come home drunk at around 2.15am that day and got into an argument with the woman.
He then flung a perfume bottle at her which struck her left temple, causing a swelling.

On Nov 20 that year, he confronted her after he heard rumours that a 35-year-old man had slept with her.
Indran then went to the man's flat and repeatedly punched his face before leaving the area.
Indran was arrested before he was released on bail.

Meanwhile, the man went to Khoo Teck Puat Hospital where he was found with injuries including a fractured skull.
Indran was out on bail on Jan 5 last year when he got into another tiff with his then-fiancee and assaulted her.
The couple quarrelled again on May 23 last year, and she later changed the padlock to her rental flat.
Two days later, she called the police saying that Indran has broken into her home when she was at work. The court heard that she had found out about what he had done following a call from a friend.
Officers arrived at the scene, and Indran admitted that he had used a tool to cut the padlock to enter the flat.
They arrested him, and when he wasin a police vehicle, he kicked an officer's left arm.
Court documents did not disclose what happened next, but his then-fiancee was at a restaurant in Yishun last October when she spotted a man who used to be in the same secret society as Indran.
According to her, she confronted the 54-year-old man as she heard that he had spread rumours about Indran's medical condition.
The woman later called Indran who turned up at the eatery, armed with a parang.
A scuffle broke out between the two men and a weapon came into contact with the older man's right eye and eyelid.
Indran fled and he wasarrested later that evening.
The victim was found with injuries including facial fractures.
The court heard that he was later unable to fully close his eyes due to a notch from his eyelid wound.
 

4 weeks' jail for man who offered $100 to Certis officer after he was caught littering​

ads-kalamin-260722.jpg

Khan Mohammad Alamin threw his cigarette butt into a drain on Feb 3, 2022. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
Samuel Devaraj

Jul 26, 2022

SINGAPORE - After learning that he would have to pay a $300 fine for throwing his cigarette butt into a drain, a construction worker offered $100 to an enforcement officer to let him go.
On Tuesday (July 26), Khan Mohammad Alamin, a 41-year-old Bangladeshi national, was sentenced to four weeks' jail for the offence, which took place on Feb 3 this year.
He pleaded guilty to a corruption charge.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Louis Ngia told the court that at about 6pm, Mr Muhammad Raffli Holip, an officer with Certis who was on anti-littering patrol in the vicinity of Block 235 Choa Chu Kang Central, saw Khan throwing the cigarette butt.
Together with his colleague, he approached Khan to take down his particulars for the purpose of issuing him a notice to attend court.
Mr Raffli told Khan that he had committed a littering offence and asked for his work permit or identity card.
Said DPP Ngia: "The accused then apologised to Raffli, stating that it was his first time committing this offence. The accused pleaded for Raffli to give him a chance."

Mr Raffli warned Khan that the police would be called if he refused to cooperate.
When Khan asked about the penalty, he was told that for a first-time offence, it would be a fine of $300 and that he would have to attend court for subsequent offences.
Khan said he had no money and offered to give Mr Raffli $100 to let him go.
Despite Mr Raffli's explanation that he had to pay the fine to the Singapore Government, Khan took out two $50 notes from his wallet and offered them to Mr Raffli, stating: "I $100 give, you excuse me."
Mr Raffli warned Khan that he was not allowed to offer money to him or his colleague, and told him to keep his money before they called the police.
Khan later admitted in investigations that he wanted Mr Raffli to accept the $100 so that the officer would not take down his particulars.
Speaking via a translator in court on Tuesday, Khan said in Bengali that he was remorseful. He came to Singapore to work and is the sole breadwinner in his family.
He added that this was his first offence and hoped that he could continue working here.
For corruption, Khan could have been fined up to $100,000, jailed for up to five years, or both.
 

Jail for man who bribed victim in exchange for giving false evidence in stabbing case​

ads-mthoondy-260722.jpg

Muraleindren Thoondy was sentenced to six months' jail after he pleaded guilty to one count of graft. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
shaffiq_alkhatib.png


Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent

July 26, 2022

SINGAPORE - In a bid to get off the hook, an assailant who stabbed three people gave a $10,000 bribe to one victim so that the man and his brother would give false evidence.
According to court documents, Muraleindren Thoondy assaulted three people - an unnamed man and siblings Santhiran Mayalagu and Surash Mayalagu - in 2012.
He gave Santhiran the bribe in August 2015.
Muraleindren, 53, was on Tuesday (July 26) sentenced to six months' jail after he pleaded guilty to one count of graft.
Another man, Sinevigneshwaraneckman Many, 41, was sentenced to four months' jail in February this year for abetting him in the charge.
Santhiran and Surash were dealt with in court in 2020 and were each sentenced to eight months' jail.
Muraleindren stabbed the three victims outside a Liang Court club near River Valley Road on Dec 8, 2012.

He later claimed trial and the two brothers identified him as their assailant.
In December 2014, Muraleindren was found guilty and he was sentenced to 42 months' jail with 12 strokes of the cane in May 2015.
He decided to appeal against his conviction and sentence.

Some time in mid-2015, he told Sinevigneshwaraneckman, who was then his fitness trainer, about the stabbing incident and his appeal.
The other man said Santhiran and Surash were his distant relatives. Muraleindren then hatched a plan to bribe the siblings into giving false evidence to aid his appeal.
Around August 2015, he asked his trainer if the latter could ask the brothers to sign statutory declarations to say they had mistakenly identified him as their assailant.
Muraleindren also said that he would give the siblings a reward of $10,000 if they signed the documents.
The fitness trainer agreed to help him and contacted Santhiran, who accepted the offer and said he would convince his brother to do likewise.
They met at a Toa Payoh coffee shop on Aug 22, 2015. Surash did not attend the meeting as he was unavailable then.

Muraleindren showed Santhiran a copy of a statutory declaration and the latter agreed to sign it. The trio were on their way to a nearby lawyer's office when Santhiran received the $10,000 bribe.
Santhiran later signed the document and handed it to Muraleindren who provided him another copy of a statutory declaration for Surash to sign. Surash did so at the lawyer's office a week later.
But on Aug 12, 2016, the two brothers each filed an affidavit, stating that the contents of their statutory declarations were false.
Court documents did not disclose what spurred them to file such affidavits.
The following month, the High Court dismissed Muraleindren's appeal against his conviction and sentence.
He was offered bail of $10,000 on Tuesday and ordered to surrender himself at the State Courts on Aug 3 to begin serving his sentence over the bribery charge.
It was not stated if he had served his sentence over the 2012 assault.
 

How a celebrity CEO's rule of fear helped bring down hot Singapore start-up Zilingo​

ac_ankikibose_040822.jpg

Zilingo suspended its 30-year-old chief executive officer Ankiti Bose over complaints about alleged financial irregularities in March. ST PHOTO: FELINE LIM

Aug 4, 2022

SINGAPORE (BLOOMBERG) - At first glance, the implosion of vaunted fashion start-up Zilingo looked jarringly sudden.
When the Singapore tech darling suspended its 30-year-old chief executive officer Ankiti Bose over complaints about alleged financial irregularities, it was March. Within weeks, creditors were recalling loans, more than 100 employees had left, and Ms Bose found herself fired, though she denies any wrongdoing. The company's survival is now in question.
The Zilingo meltdown has rattled the tech industry in South-east Asia and beyond. The start-up had raised more than US$300 million (S$414 million) from some of the region's most prominent investors, including Singapore investment company Temasek and Sequoia Capital India, the regional arm of the Silicon Valley firm that backed Apple and Google. Ms Bose was a celebrity who criss-crossed the globe to speak at tech gatherings from Hong Kong to California.
Interviews with more than 60 people, including current and former staff, merchants, investors, entrepreneurs and friends of the key players, suggest that Zilingo struggled for years under Ms Bose's leadership. Her management style alienated employees and undermined the business, according to staff who worked under her.
The start-up veered from one strategy to another in pursuit of sales, including a US$1 million promotional trip in Morocco, loans to customers and a short-lived push into the United States. At one point, she became fixated on "crazy growth" to catch the attention of Japanese tech titan Masayoshi Son, according to two former employees with direct knowledge of the matter.
At the heart of the company's breakdown lies the soured relationship between Ms Bose and her long-time supporter, Mr Shailendra Singh, head of Sequoia India. Allies for years, they fell out as financial pressures mounted. Mr Singh lost faith in the management skills of the young founder he had championed, while Ms Bose believed Mr Singh betrayed her by pushing her out of her own company, according to people familiar with their relationship, who requested anonymity as the talks were private.
The clash grew so acrimonious that Sequoia's lawyers demanded in a May legal notice that Ms Bose stop making allegations that could tarnish Sequoia's reputation, the people said.

Zilingo's turmoil highlights an apparent lax internal corporate governance culture that is not uncommon in the start-up industry. For two years, the company failed to file annual financial statements, a basic requirement for all businesses of its size in Singapore. Auditor KPMG has yet to sign off on Zilingo's financial year 2020 results. While it is not unusual for start-ups to miss these deadlines, which can result in a fine of up to $600, it is typically a warning sign that firmer action may be needed by the board.
Yet, investors, including Temasek and the Economic Development Board's investment arm EDBI, put more funds into Zilingo at the end of 2020. Shareholders that together own a majority stake of the company only formally acted against Ms Bose after whistle-blower complaints were filed earlier this year.

Tech warning​

The saga has also become a warning for the region's tech community, which is assessing the fallout of global economic shocks from Covid-19, the war in Ukraine and global inflation.


"Whatever happened at Zilingo, there will be a lot more dramas in the next couple of years as the big worldwide recession impedes hot shots from raising money," said veteran investor Jim Rogers, chairman of Rogers Holdings in Singapore. "I have seen this rodeo before."
Bloomberg News reviewed dozens of internal documents, e-mails, texts and other media from Zilingo, and Ms Bose sat for two extensive interviews, one before and one after her dismissal from the company on May 20. The board's decision to fire her was not abrupt, but rather the culmination of years of tension, according to the documents and people with direct knowledge of the matter.
"Board members were concerned about the company's performance over the last few years and sought to share suggestions to address the company's performance including cash burn," Zilingo and its board said in a statement to Bloomberg News.
"In March 2022, investors received complaints about serious financial irregularities which appeared to require investigation. With the support of the majority investor shareholders, an independent forensic investigations consultancy was appointed to look into the said complaints. After a comprehensive process lasting almost two months, including numerous opportunities for Ms Bose to provide documents and information, the company subsequently terminated Ms Bose for cause based on the findings of that investigation."
SPH Brightcove Video

Ms Bose said the process to terminate her was an "unfair witch hunt" and denied that she was given numerous opportunities to respond to allegations. She said she has not seen the investigation report, which was not made public. On the board's suggestion to implement changes, she said the team cut the cash burn by 70 per cent between the end of 2019 and the end of 2021.
"It was not easy, we did not succeed at everything," she said in July. "It was chaotic and painful, but we did do it and we made the best effort we could."
Zilingo's origin story is part of South-east Asia's start-up lore. Ms Bose came up with the idea as she wandered through Bangkok's Chatuchak market, where 15,000 stalls offer goods from across Thailand. She and co-founder Dhruv Kapoor wanted to build a platform that would allow such small merchants to sell to consumers across South-east Asia.

Mr Singh was instrumental from the start. He and Ms Bose had worked together at Sequoia and he was happy to support one of the firm's own. Mr Singh had started his career in Sequoia's Silicon Valley office, learning at the side of veteran investors Michael Moritz and Doug Leone. Mr Singh had transformed Sequoia Capital India over 16 years into the region's biggest venture capital (VC) firm with some US$9 billion of assets under management and 36 unicorns on its score sheet across India and South-east Asia.
He invested in Zilingo's seed round in 2015, when Ms Bose was 23 years old, and in every fund raising since. "We think the world of her," he told a fellow venture capitalist in 2016, in an e-mail seen by Bloomberg News.
ac_DhruvK_040822.jpg

Mr Dhruv Kapoor, co-founder and chief technology officer of fashion e-commerce marketplace Zilingo. PHOTO: ZILINGO
But like many upstarts, Ms Bose and Mr Kapoor faced challenges almost from the beginning. Their consumer-focused fashion site struggled because of the thin margins and low average income in South-east Asia, a fragmented region with different languages and currencies. By late 2017, they decided to reposition Zilingo into a business-to-business platform, where small manufacturers and wholesalers could sell goods directly to small retailers in the region.
In 2018, Zilingo raised US$54 million from investors. The company decided to splurge US$1 million to whisk nine social media influencers to Morocco for a three-day extravaganza, complete with camel rides, a hot-air balloon trip, yoga lessons and gourmet dinners.
It was a massive flop, according to an early employee with direct knowledge of the event. The goal of #ZilingoEscape was to bring in one million new users, one for each US$1 spent. The final tally was about 10,000, the person said. Ms Bose declined to comment specifically on the campaign, but said it was part of the company's US$10 million annual marketing budget.
This appears to have become a pattern for Ms Bose. With cash in Zilingo's coffers, she would dive into new initiatives to supercharge growth even if the immediate financial benefits were questionable. In one example, Ms Bose suggested that Zilingo subsidise a 2 per cent to 4 per cent discount for transactions, effectively paying merchants to trade with one another. She cheered on the team as gross merchandise value hit US$1 million for the first two months, even though Zilingo was getting no fees from the merchants, said a person directly involved.
In 2018, Ms Bose came up with the idea of giving out loans to suppliers and vendors who needed capital. It took off, so in the coming months Ms Bose cranked up the pressure. She told the team to give out more loans each month on a running basis, the person said. But no one could have predicted the pandemic, or the toll it would take on start-ups like Zilingo, and much of the debt had to be written off.
Yet Ms Bose's star was rising in the industry. In early 2019, Zilingo raised US$226 million, lifting its valuation to US$970 million. The charismatic CEO wooed tech gatherings with her vision of how start-ups like hers were a new model for the emerging world.
"We are about to shake things up quite a bit," Ms Bose said at a panel discussion in Singapore, flashing a wide smile and drawing applause from the audience.
Inside the company, she drove staff relentlessly. In one instance, Ms Bose messaged a senior lieutenant early on a Sunday morning and called about a dozen times. When the employee did not pick up immediately, she told the lieutenant: "You obviously don't care about the company enough."

Publicly, the company seemed to be going from strength to strength. In July 2019, Mr James Perry, former managing director and Asia-Pacific head of technology investment banking for Citigroup, joined Zilingo as its first chief financial officer.
It was a coup for Ms Bose, some 20 years Mr Perry's junior. Ms Bose said in an interview with Bloomberg News in 2019 that Mr Perry's experience and respect in the financial world would complement her "young and crazy" self and give confidence to investors. "He's James Perry, he's a god in finance," she said.
In the investment world, her big target remained Mr Son, whose SoftBank Group had upended venture capital by making huge bets on unproven start-ups. Ms Bose told her deputies that Zilingo needed to achieve rapid growth to catch Mr Son's attention, one of the deputies said.
Ms Bose met Mr Son twice that year, once in Jakarta and a second time in Tokyo, according to people familiar with the matter. She explained her vision for Zilingo, but Mr Son never backed her. Neither did KKR & Co, which was considering investing in the start-up at the time, the people said.
In October 2019, Zilingo announced it would spend US$100 million to expand into the US, establishing offices in New York and Los Angeles. Ms Bose's idea was to take advantage of then President Donald Trump's trade war by offering American retailers a way to avoid tariffs by finding producers outside China. Less than a year later, the company shut its US operations.
By the end of 2019, Mr Singh and other directors had told Ms Bose several times to slow the cash burn. But Mr Singh was not getting regular financial reports from Ms Bose, and it was not till a board meeting in November that the directors learnt that the company was actually going through some US$7 million to US$8 million a month, more than they had expected. Mr Singh picked up the phone and had a tough conversation with Ms Bose, according to people with knowledge of the conversations.

Guzzling money​

It turns out that the company was guzzling money. The US$226 million Zilingo had raised from investors in early 2019 was gone in less than two years.
In 2020, the pandemic battered the business and Ms Bose saw an opportunity to supply personal protective equipment, inking a deal in April to supply 10 million KN-95 masks, valued at US$22.5 million, to India. Six months later, Zilingo was embroiled in a legal battle with the Indian government, which claimed the company had failed to deliver 3.2 million of the masks on time. The company did not comment on the lawsuit, which is still ongoing.
In September, Mr Perry left Zilingo to rejoin Citigroup.

Inside the company, former employees paint a picture of a boss who ruled by fear. She allegedly told some staff they would have no second chance in the start-up industry because of her powerful connections. She would publicly shame employees and declare that she had to do everything herself to save the company, one person said. Another described her as a narcissist who would throw anyone under the bus if it meant saving her own reputation.
Asked in an interview in Singapore before she was fired about the culture under her leadership, Ms Bose uncharacteristically paused and stared out of the window as the sun set over the city.
"I was 23 when I started the company," she said eventually. "I liked having control at the beginning. Of course, I made mistakes and learnt from them. By the time we got to the stage where we had all these senior people, I don't think I was a control freak."
In her most recent interview with Bloomberg in July, Ms Bose reiterated that she has not done anything wrong. "I'm going to be a lot calmer, a lot more empathetic and understanding of how people work together. That has been a big learning for me. Managing people, managing relationships, managing communications - I think all of this is coming down to that," she said.
By November 2020, Zilingo had barely enough cash to last a month. A group of existing investors, including Sequoia, EDBI, Sofina, Temasek and SIG, stepped in to rescue the company by purchasing US$25 million of convertible notes.
In January 2021, Mr Singh and Ms Bose met at the Four Seasons Hotel's alfresco cafe as they did from time to time to talk shop. Mr Singh suggested that Ms Bose consider stepping aside. He said Mr Ananth Narayanan, founder of brand-building service Mensa Brands and former CEO of fashion platform Myntra, could be a potential successor. The two men had met recently and, when Mr Narayanan said he was looking for a new opportunity, Mr Singh had thought of Zilingo.
Ms Bose was shocked. "Not yet," she said.
She went home and, that night, sent a series of emotional texts to Mr Singh, saying his suggestion was a gender-related issue and pouring her heart out. She said her departure would make her look bad, as though the firm needed to be saved by someone else. Mr Singh said it was just a preliminary idea and there was no need to discuss it again. He urged her instead to focus on improving metrics, finding a new CFO and fund raising, according to people familiar with the meeting and texts seen by Bloomberg.
Ms Bose ended the chat by saying they should work together towards the best possible outcome, and Mr Singh replied with two thumbs-up emojis. It was 2.29am.
The mounting pressure was also testing the relationship between Ms Bose and co-founder Mr Kapoor, the chief technology officer. They had clashed over the future of the company the previous month when the company was scrambling to stay afloat.
"I am scared honestly that we will not hit our goals," she texted Mr Kapoor several hours after the chat with Mr Singh. "When something is wrong, the blame falls on me, but everyone's there to take credit for the good," she wrote.
"I don't like being hated for busting my ass at all," she added.
Ms Bose spent most of the year trying to pull in more funds. In July 2021, the company took mezzanine debt of US$40 million from Indies Capital Partners and Varde Partners, but subsequent efforts to raise money from private equity and venture capital firms failed. One issue was a concern from potential investors that users were making fake transactions in key markets to bilk Zilingo's subsidies. Executives from two firms told Bloomberg News that they decided not to back Zilingo after they found evidence of merchant fraud in Indonesia, the country that accounted for more than half of Zilingo's gross merchandise volume in financial year 2021.
There was no suggestion that Zilingo was involved in the suspected fake transactions. Some existing investors, including Burda Principal Investments, Temasek and Sofina, questioned Ms Bose about the company's unaudited financial reports, according to people familiar with the matter. But Ms Bose was providing monthly financial updates to the board, and they were lenient as Zilingo was busy with fund raising at the time, one of the people said.
In March this year, Ms Bose received an ominous text on her phone: "Storm is coming your way."
A few days later, she was asked to join a meeting with investors at Burda's shophouse office in Singapore's Boat Quay, according to people familiar with the details of the meeting. There, Mr Singh and the two other shareholders dealt her a stunner. They said Zilingo's board had received complaints about alleged mismanagement and financial misrepresentation and they were suspending her during an investigation. Mr Singh urged her to be cooperative.
"We just want to save the company," he said, according to one of the people.

Ms Bose promised to help. As she left, she started running through the pouring rain.
"I think the tale is about what sometimes happens when you go into hyper-growth mode," said Ms Aliza Knox, senior adviser at Boston Consulting Group, who has held senior management positions at tech companies including Google and Twitter in Asia Pacific.
In these situations, start-ups need to think about adding independent board members beyond "founders and funders", she said. "Could some of the problems have been mitigated if there were a different kind of board a little bit earlier? That's an important question to ask."
Zilingo is not the only Sequoia-backed start-up embroiled in controversy. BharatPe's co-founder Ashneer Grover resigned from the fast-growing Indian fintech start-up in March after senior leadership accused him of misappropriation of funds. Mr Grover has denied the accusations against him, including that he stole company money to fund an extravagant lifestyle, which he said stem from "personal hatred and low thinking", he said on LinkedIn.
A forensic team from EY India has looked into Indian social commerce start-up Trell, another Sequoia-backed company, amid allegations of financial irregularities. Trell's three co-founders did not respond to requests for comment. Co-founder and CEO Pulkit Agrawal in March sent a note to investors, questioning the nature of the forensic audit, the Economic Times reported, citing its own review of the note.
Sequoia India and South-east Asia published a blog post in April, saying it would take "proactive steps" to drive corporate governance at start-ups it invests in.
Mr Singh is feeling the heat as he evolves from start-up cheerleader to champion of corporate governance. Increased scrutiny prompted some Sequoia-backed Indian founders to compare him to a forceful ruler from Indian history.
"There is art to setting up governance - the board, process and advisers - in such a way that brakes kick in automatically when something bad happens," said Mr Dmitry Levit, founder of Singapore-based VC firm Cento Ventures. He said many of Sequoia India's companies are like racing cars. "If somebody tries to run a Formula One car on off-road terrain in stormy weather, it cannot absorb the shocks."
Sequoia India said it has always cared about corporate governance.
"Building world-class companies requires first-rate governance," a Sequoia India spokesman said in a statement to Bloomberg. "There is always more we can do to work with founders so that their companies benefit from better, more robust standards of governance, such as stronger audit oversight, clear whistle-blower processes and the need to bring independent directors on board earlier."
ac_ABz_040822.jpg

Ankiti Bose was a celebrity who crisscrossed the globe to speak at tech gatherings from Hong Kong to California. PHOTO: ZILINGO

Salary questions​

The zeal for governance may have come too late for Zilingo. About a week after Ms Bose was suspended, a board director and an adviser to another shareholder questioned her about why she was drawing a monthly salary of $50,000. Her employment contract five years ago stated it as $8,500 and the adviser had just discovered she had been making considerably more since 2019, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Ms Bose said the numbers are inaccurate but did not provide her salary information.
Investigators hired by the board also questioned her about three sets of revenue numbers for financial year 2021 that Zilingo had shared with external parties: US$190 million, US$164 million and US$140 million. Ms Bose explained to them that the US$190 million had been circulated before the year closed and before the cancellation of masks and other orders. The US$140 million was used in a due diligence report for fund raising, while the US$164 million included uninvoiced revenue, according to a document seen by Bloomberg.
But another document the company shared with a potential investor, seen by Bloomberg News, showed that Zilingo's net revenue for the year was about US$40 million. A representative for Kroll, the firm that conducted the probe, declined to comment.
Ms Bose said in an interview with Bloomberg News in May that Zilingo has used aggressive methods for recognising revenue, but that the calculations are standard practice for the industry and that all of its investors were fully aware of them. "These matters are well understood by all investors," Ms Bose said in the interview.

Zilingo "went through a tough time during Covid-19", said Mr Rohit Sipahimalani, Temasek's chief investment officer. "There were clearly some things the board was unaware of, and when there were complaints made, they investigated into it and actions have been taken subsequently."
Now, the company is in turmoil and some employees say they are worried about their future. The board in June was considering liquidating the company. After her suspension in March, Ms Bose herself filed a formal complaint to the board, asking it to also suspend Mr Kapoor and then chief operating officer Aadi Vaidya, a friend from college, for their poor work performance and lack of leadership. A representative of the company, Mr Kapoor and Mr Vaidya declined to comment. Mr Vaidya resigned last week after seven years with Zilingo, explaining "now is the time to move on, clear my head and reset priorities".
It is a steep fall for Zilingo from just five months ago, when Ms Bose's fund-raising efforts valued the company at US$1.2 billion.
 
These are talents.

Talent surplus CECA virus.

according to pap-piglets
 

Man jailed 10 months for role in scam that used voicemails to gain access to WhatsApp accounts​

sv_Arivalagan_080822.jpg

Arivalagan Muthusamy was sentenced to 10 months' jail. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
Samuel Devaraj


AUG 8, 2022

SINGAPORE - Using the default personal identification number (PIN) 8888, Arivalagan Muthusamy gained access to multiple StarHub voicemail mailboxes that were used to take over WhatsApp accounts.
Some of these accounts were then used in cheating scams that saw three victims transfer $83,750 to a syndicate.
Arivalagan, 37, was sentenced to 10 months' jail on Monday (Aug 8) after he pleaded guilty to three charges under the Computer Misuse Act.
Arivalagan's alleged accomplice - Hoang Trung Khang - has been charged in court, and proceedings against the 28-year-old Vietnamese national is ongoing.
Deputy Public Prosecutor R. Arvindren said in court documents that Arivalagan and Hoang started working for a syndicate involved in cheating scams last year and targeted StarHub mobile users registered with a voicemail feature.
The voicemail mailbox could be accessed remotely by keying in the mobile number and PIN.
Arivalagan and Hoang called mobile numbers to test if the call gets diverted to voicemail when it goes unanswered.

Arivalagan then called StarHub's service hotline and keyed in the targeted victim's mobile number and the default PIN, which is available publicly.
After getting a message containing a one-time password, it was used to illegally take over WhatsApp accounts of the victim by registering a new account on another mobile device.
It was not clear in court documents how the one-time password messages were generated.


Said DPP Arvindren: "The accused knew that the purpose of taking over WhatsApp accounts of victims is to allow the syndicate to cheat individuals in the contact list of the victims' WhatsApp accounts by asking them to invest in gold or cryptocurrencies."
Between October and Nov 26 last year, Arivalagan accessed 40 WhatsApp accounts belonging to unknown owners in order to gain control of the accounts. He was paid $250 for each compromised account.
On Nov 27, Arivalagan accessed another 12 WhatsApp accounts following instructions from a syndicate member called Shawn. Arivalagan was provided a list of numbers to contact.
Three of the accounts were later logged out and could not be used by the syndicate, and Arivalagan was paid $2,250 for the nine other accounts.
The next day, he gained access to the StarHub voicemail mailbox belonging to Mr Amos Lye.

Mr Lye's WhatsApp account was then taken over by the syndicate, and his friends were then contacted by a member of the syndicate and were targeted as potential scam victims.
Multiple police reports were filed and Arivalagan was arrested on Nov 29 last year at a unit in Geylang, and Hoang was arrested in a hotel room in the same area the next day.
In his written sentencing submissions, DPP Arvindren asked for Arivalagan to be sentenced to 11 months' jail, saying the nature of his crimes is difficult to detect and the crime was fairly sophisticated.
For each charge, Arivalagan could have been fined $5,000 fine and jailed for up to two years.
 

1661166133304.png

Shell Bukom heist: 15 weeks' jail for surveyor who reported inaccurate fuel amounts for $16k in bribes​

Source: Straits Times
Article Date: 20 Aug 2022
Author: Wong Shiying
Kumunan Rethana Kumaran accepted bribes from his colleagues and reported the inaccurate amount of Shell gas oil loaded onto vessels and turned a blind eye to the misappropriation of fuel. As a result, 2 misappropriation incidents went undetected by Shell in 2016.
A surveyor accepted bribes totalling US$12,000 (S$16,134) from his colleague in exchange for reporting the inaccurate amount of Shell gas oil loaded onto vessels and turning a blind eye to the misappropriation of fuel.

As a result of Kumunan Rethana Kumaran's help, two incidents of Shell gas oil misappropriation worth around US$634,000 went undetected by Shell in 2016.

Kumunan, 40, who was then working for CCIC Singapore, a company that provides cargo inspection services, was on Friday (Aug 19) sentenced to 15 weeks' jail after he pleaded guilty to a graft charge.

He was also ordered to pay a penalty of $16,134, which is the amount of bribes he took. He will spend an additional four weeks behind bars if he is unable to pay it.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Norman Yew said on Friday that Kumunan had accepted the bribes from another surveyor from CCIC Singapore, Noruliman Bakti.

Noruliman had earlier been roped into a scheme to sell misappropriated Shell gas oil to vessels docked at the oil giant's Pulau Bukom facility. His case is still pending.

As a surveyor, Kumunan was tasked to perform jobs which included checking the quantity of cargo, including fuel such as gas oil, supplied to vessels.

The court heard that Noruliman approached Kumunan in 2016 to offer him money in exchange for reporting the inaccurate amount of cargo loaded onto vessels CCIC was hired to inspect.

DPP Yew said Kumunan accepted the offer even though he suspected that Noruliman intended to facilitate the misappropriation of Shell gas oil.

He added: "(The accused) omitted to inspect non-nominated tanks and thereby falsely understated in his ullage reports the amount of cargo loaded onto the vessels.

"He also turned a blind eye to and kept quiet about any misappropriation of Shell gas oil."

In August 2017, a Shell representative alerted the police, stating that the company had suffered an unidentified loss of fuel worth nearly $3 million earlier that year.

At least 26 people have been hauled to court over this conspiracy.

On March 31, Juandi Pungot, 45, was jailed for 29 years for his role in masterminding the misappropriation of more than 200,000 tonnes of gas oil worth $128 million. This is one of the longest prison sentences for a commercial crime.

For graft, an offender can be jailed for up to five years and fined up to $100,000.
 

Jail for ex-property agent who duped nearly 200 foreigners of more than $300k​

court_1.jpg

shaffiq_alkhatib.png


Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent

Aug 22, 2022

SINGAPORE - A real estate agent, who was under investigation over a series of rental scams perpetrated in 2017, was out on bail when he continued his cheating spree until 2019.
Ramanathan Sujithran duped nearly 200 foreign nationals of $308,815 in total.
He was working for PropNex Realty before he was terminated in July 2017 and deregistered as a real estate salesperson.
Despite this, the Singaporean continued to cheat his victims by using his own real estate firm, TSR Logistics.
Ramanathan, now 54, was sentenced on Monday (Aug 22) to 4 ½ years' jail after he pleaded guilty to 11 charges including multiple counts of cheating.
They involved 71 victims who were cheated of $138,365 in total. Ninety-seven other charges, including those linked to the remaining amount, were considered during sentencing.
Deputy Public Prosecutors Louis Ngia and Ong Xin Jie stated in court documents: "Rental scams do not simply occasion monetary loss to their victims but often cause much anguish and uncertainty, as they threaten a very basic and fundamental human need (such as) a roof over one's head."

To attract his victims, Ramanathan would claim in advertisements that certain units were available for rent in Singapore, the court heard.
When prospective tenants responded to the advertisements, he would enter into tenancy agreements with them.
The prosecutors added: "At all times, the accused knew that he was in no position to satisfy the tenancy agreements that he had entered into, and that he would not be renting out the units to... the (prospective tenants) for the periods listed in the tenancy agreements."

Despite this, Ramanathan would ask them to pay him a sum of money as "deposit" to confirm the rental. On or around the moving-in date, he would give repeated excuses to the prospective tenants that they were not allowed to move into the unit yet.
The tenancy agreement would later be cancelled, with Ramanathan pocketing the "deposits" for his own use.
In one instance, he stated in an advertisement in May 2017 that a residential unit in Hougang Avenue 7 was available for rent. Investigations later revealed this unit was offered for rent without the homeowner's knowledge.
The owner had instead engaged Ramanathan's services as a property agent to rent out only the master bedroom of the unit.

Three prospective tenants, all Indian nationals, responded to the advertisement and entered an agreement with him to rent the whole unit.
Ramanathan cheated the trio of $1,400 each, and none of them was able to move into the unit.
The court heard that he had used a similar method to cheat his other victims.
Out of the total amount taken from all his victims, only about $29,000 was returned to some of them.
For each count of cheating, an offender can be jailed for up to 10 years and fined.
 
even 160th media speaks profusely abt them. despite pap-piglets always favoring ceca over all others esp native malaun. that trend was started by that old fogey harry lee a moron of highest calibre.


and yet here we are. ah neh keling kia pundek always involved in crimes.

70% of gang members in malaysia are ah nehs, 25% are chinks.

why the eff aren't these kafir pendatang tossed out of malaysia by now?

wtf is going on?

melayun are the most tolerant country anywhere on the planet to a fault. absurd.
 

Man shot by police during raid in 2020 gets jail for theft, cheating and drug-related offences​

ads_court.jpg

Samuel Devaraj

Aug 25, 2022

SINGAPORE - A man who was shot by a police officer during a raid had committed theft, cheating and drug-related offences before the incident in 2020.
On Thursday (Aug 25), Prakash Mathivanan, 38, was sentenced to jail for three years and 10 months after he pleaded guilty to eight charges.
A further 23 charges were taken into consideration during his sentencing.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Theong Li Han told the court that Prakash became acquainted with a man named Gardi Bandi, an operations manager at a restaurant where he was seeking employment.
The pair, together with Prakash's girlfriend, Malani Naidu Prabhakar Naidu, conspired to buy items using stolen credit card information and sell them for cash.
The two men also agreed to use those details to pay for hotel stays.
Gardi obtained the credit card details for Prakash, who promised to pay Gardi $100 for each set of details.

Gardi uploaded photographs of the credit card as attachments to an e-mail message and saved the message as a draft in an e-mail account set up for Prakash to access.
Using this scheme, they obtained the UOB credit card details of a Lee Su Lynn and used them to pay for several items worth $2,968.80 in total.
The items, which were ordered on May 2, 2017, from online platform Qoo10, included printers, vacuum cleaners and an air fryer.

On May 24, 2017, Prakash and Gardi agreed that Prakash would book a two-night stay at Raffles Hotel for Gardi using the stolen details of an American Express card held by Mr Solomon Thomas Fernandez.
Gardi had taken a photo of its details from the personal organiser of Mr Fernandez's secretary. Court documents do not say how Gardi was acquainted with Mr Fernandez.
Using the data, Prakash reserved a two-night stay at Raffles Hotel costing $1,401.60.
On May 25, 2017, American Express alerted Mr Fernandez to several unauthorised transactions on his card and he cancelled the card.
But Prakash called American Express, pretending to be Mr Fernandez, and got a new card delivered to a cafe owned by Gardi in Lim Tua Tow Road, in Kovan.
On May 24, 2020, Prakash called Maybank, identifying himself as Mr Fernandez, and got them to send him a replacement credit card.
The card was sent to Mr Fernandez's address, but Prakash retrieved it and used it to make fraudulent transactions.
On June 2, 2020, Maybank lodged a police report about fraudulent transactions totalling $11,883.20 made with the stolen card.
Prakash had also committed other offences.
In January 2017, he was found with at least 0.36g of methamphetamine. In the same year, he also stole an iPad from his stepbrother's wife in April and on May 29 failed to turn up for a urine test. He had been placed on compulsory supervision for 24 months on Jan 5, 2016, and was required to present himself for urine testing at Ang Mo Kio Police Divisional Headquarters every Monday and Friday, except public holidays.
On Nov 5, 2020 - when the shooting occurred - he was arrested around midnight in an apartment by police officers and a search turned up at least 6.38g of methamphetamine.
The police had said previously that a man was shot in the abdomen that morning during a struggle with officers who raided an apartment in City Suites condominium in Balestier Road.
Three policemen in plain clothes, armed with revolvers and handcuffs, had raided the apartment to arrest four people suspected of being involved in a series of cheating cases.
Prakash, who has charges pending against him, will return to court on Sept 8.
 

SGX disciplinary committee raps Aspen, directors over Honeywell announcements​

ac_aspenglove2_280822.jpg

The committee found that the company and its directors had failed to promptly disclose material information to its investors. PHOTO: ASPEN
Yong Jun Yuan

AUG 28, 2022

SINGAPORE (THE BUSINESS TIMES) - The Singapore Exchange's (SGX) listings disciplinary committee has reprimanded property developer Aspen (Group) Holdings for false and misleading statements it made about a purported deal to supply Honeywell International with gloves.
In a regulatory statement on Friday (Aug 26), the committee also reprimanded Aspen's chief executive and executive director Murly Manokharan, and two other executive directors: executive deputy chairman Nazir Ariff and group managing director Ir Anilarasu Amaranazan.
Mr Murly has to agree not to take any position in any other SGX-listed company for six months beginning July 20 this year. He also has to undergo a training programme on listing rule obligations. The two other executive directors will also have to undergo such a programme.
Aspen had on April 13 last year announced a US$210 million (S292.9 million) two-year master supply agreement (MSA) with multinational conglomerate Honeywell.
But this statement turned out to be false. At the time it was made, the company did not have any executed copy of the agreement or confirmation that it had been officially executed.
News of the agreement was picked up by the media, including The Straits Times and The Business Times.
Honeywell subsequently contacted Aspen to stop circulating the announcement and asked that the company retract press statements it had issued.

Instead of issuing a retraction on the SGXNet immediately, Aspen made attempts to ask media outlets to take down their articles about the announcement.
According to a statement by the committee, Aspen believed "once it removed the press releases in the media, it would then have clarity as to whether an agreement between Aspen and Honeywell would eventually be signed, and thus be able to make an appropriate announcement at that stage".
It was not till April 24 that the announcement was retracted.

Honeywell indicated on May 8 that it would not proceed with the MSA with Aspen.
While Aspen indicated that it accepted the decision to terminate negotiations on May 11 last year, it did not inform investors of the development in its business update on May 17. Instead, Aspen only said that it would update shareholders via SGXNet when there were any material developments.
It was only on June 4 last year, after further queries from SGX, that the company announced to investors that the deal was called off and the MSA was not consummated by Honeywell.
Aspen's shares later fell 8.3 per cent between June 4 and 7, to 19 cents. This was also 23.3 per cent lower than its share price of 24.5 cents on April 13, when the initial MSA announcement was made.

In the committee's grounds for its decision, it laid out two charges against Aspen, Mr Murly, its executive directors and other relevant non-executive directors for not promptly disclosing that MSA negotiations had been officially terminated, and for failing to have in place adequate and effective systems of internal controls and risk management systems.
An additional charge of failing to promptly disclose the non-consummation of the MSA was laid on Aspen, Mr Murly and the executive directors.
Furthermore, the company and Mr Murly received a further charge for releasing the MSA announcement, which was non-factual, false and misleading.
Shares of Aspen fell 0.5 cent, or 9.8 per cent, to 4.6 cents on Friday, after the regulatory statement was released.
 

Single mother jailed over Citibank cheating case, 13th person to date​

AK_court.jpg

shaffiq_alkhatib.png


Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent

Aug 29, 2022

SINGAPORE - A single mother has become the thirteenth person to be handed a jail sentence for her role in a ruse that saw forged documents submitted to Citibank to secure loans.
Kiran Kaur, 29, was on Monday (Aug 29) sentenced to six months' jail for cheating.
The court heard that between September and October 2018, the consumer division of Citigroup received and approved about 20 loan applications that were later found to contain forged income documents.
Each loan involved between $12,000 and $24,000.
Kaur was jobless and facing financial difficulties when she responded to an advertisement in September 2018 for a "fast cash" job on online marketplace Carousell, said Deputy Public Prosecutor Dhiraj G. Chainani.
Through the ad, she contacted a man known only as "Charles" via messaging platform WhatsApp.
Charles, whose identity was not mentioned in court papers, told her he could help her obtain a loan from Citibank.

The DPP said: "The accused told Charles that she was not working at that time and did not have any Central Provident Fund contributions in order to apply for a bank loan.
"Charles told the accused not to worry and that the accused did not need to satisfy the requisite income level to qualify for a bank loan."
He got Kaur to divulge her Singpass login details and told her to meet an unidentified man outside a Citibank branch at MacDonald House in Orchard Road to collect a set of documents for the loan application.

She did as she was told and received documents that falsely stated she was working for another bank and earning $6,700 a month for July and August that year.
The court heard that Charles then told her to look for Citibank contract staff Kirk Chua Min Xuan, 29, at the branch.
Her loan application was submitted on Sept 10 and later approved.
In total, Kaur received $13,490 in cash, but she claimed she kept $4,000 and gave the rest to the man who gave her the forged documents.

Charles had instructed her to do this, she said.
On Oct 2 that year, a Citibank representative made a police report that the bank had approved loans based on falsified income documents.
Kaur was identified as one of the applicants.
Twelve other offenders linked to the ruse were dealt with in court earlier.
Chua's case is still pending. In an earlier statement, the bank said that he has not been working on Citibank-related matters since 2019.
The court heard that Kaur has since made restitution of $4,000.
Her bail was set at $10,000 on Monday and she was ordered to surrender herself at the State Courts on Sept 26 to begin serving her sentence.
For cheating, she could have been jailed for up to 10 years and fined.
 

Ex-director fined $558,000 for falsifying statements on export certificates: Customs​

ads_court_0.jpg

Wallace Woon

Aug 31, 2022

SINGAPORE - A 41-year-old former director was slapped with a $558,000 fine for faking statements on the export of some $9.72 million worth of goods, in order to benefit from preferential tariff treatment.
In a statement on Tuesday, the Singapore Customs said Solaiyappan Ramanathan pleaded guilty to two charges under the Regulation of Imports and Exports Regulations on Monday.
Another six charges were taken into consideration during sentencing.
Solaiyappan, a Singapore permanent resident, held a directorship at Feccuni Singapore and was the sole proprietor of Shakambri Overseas.
He set up these companies to trade in scrap metals and other metal products sourced from local and overseas suppliers.
From August 2017 to April 2019, he imported scrap metals from China and re-exported them from Singapore to India.
He applied for 137 preferential certificates of origin (PCOs) for the export of the goods to India.

These certificates offer preferential tariff treatment under the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement and Asean-India free trade in goods agreement.
Singapore Customs began investigating Solaiyappan after it received information alleging that Feccuni had issued false statements about the country of origin of the scrap metals in the PCOs.
The statement added that the scrap metal was from China, but Solaiyappan had falsely stated on the PCOs that they were from Singapore, knowing that the preferential tariff would apply only for goods manufactured or wholly obtained in Singapore.
Customs also revealed that Solaiyappan had been approached by a Malaysian to use Feccuni as an exporter for shipping scrap metals to India.
In return, Feccuni would earn commission for every PCO applied.
This was done as buyers in India had expressed interest in the preferential tariff treatment.
While his company was not involved in any transaction between the Malaysian and the Indian buyers, Solaiyappan created invoices bearing Feccuni's name and submitted them for PCO applications.
This, the statement said, was done to give the impression that the scrap metals sold by Feccuni were of Singapore origin instead of China.
Under the Regulation of Imports and Exports Regulations, any person found guilty of providing false statements to the issuing authority to obtain preferential tariff treatments can be jailed for two years, or be fined the higher of a sum of up to $100,000, or three times the value of the goods involved, or both.
 

Man sentenced to 7 weeks in jail, could not account for monies banked into his account​

court_2.jpg


Sep 5, 2022

SINGAPORE - The Commercial Affairs Department was alerted in December 2020 when a man's bank account received US$21,500 (S$30,195) from a suspected foreign victim of remittance fraud in October 2020.
Investigations showed that the account - belonging to Kanda Amandeep Singh - received another $5,000 in November 2020, which was traced to another foreign victim linked to a tech support scam.
On Monday, Kanda, 26, was sentenced to seven weeks in jail after he pleaded guilty to two offences under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act (CDSA).
The funds received in his account between October and November 2020 were withdrawn within the same day or the next day via cash withdrawals and fund transfers.
Kanda had provided his bank account and Internet banking details to a third party who claimed he needed help to receive monies from his relatives.
The third party asked Kanda to withdraw a sum of about $8,900 between Oct 16 and Oct 17, 2020. Kanda also withdrew $5,000 on Nov 7.
The court was not told how Kanda met the third party.

Kanda was not aware of the source of these funds and felt suspicious but continued to conduct the withdrawals.
The withdrawals were traced to alleged foreign victims of remittance fraud.
As Kanda failed to account for how he came by the extra money, he was liable for two counts of an offence under the CDSA.
The offence of possessing any property which may be reasonably suspected of being, in part, directly representing the benefits of criminal conduct carries a fine of up to $150,000, or imprisonment of up to three years, or both.
The police have regularly reminded the public not to allow others to use their bank accounts for any purpose.
 

Drunk man who drove ambulance before crashing it on SLE gets 2 years' jail, 10-year driving ban​

court_3.jpg

wong_shiying.png

Wong Shiying

Sep 5, 2022

SINGAPORE - With more than twice the legal limit of alcohol in his blood, a 27-year-old man took a joyride in his employer's private ambulance for about an hour before crashing it on the Seletar Expressway (SLE).
His passenger, who had also been drinking in the vehicle, suffered fractured ribs as a result of the accident in 2020.
When the police arrived, G. Mohanavarooman Gopal Oyyappan showed no concern for his passenger, who was screaming in pain, and told her to lie that she was the one at the wheel.
Mohan, now 27, was sentenced on Monday to two years' jail and a $4,000 fine. He will also be banned from driving all classes of vehicles for 10 years.
The Singaporean had earlier pleaded guilty to four charges including drink driving, dangerous driving causing grievous hurt and driving without a valid Class 3 or 3A licence.
He also admitted to an unrelated charge of voluntarily causing hurt for punching a patron at a coffee shop during a fight in January 2020.
The court heard that Mohan and another man, Aravindraj Manohar, 29, were employed by I. M. Ambulance Service, a private ambulance provider. Mohan worked as a medic while Aravin was a driver.

At 8.45pm on July 6, 2020, they went to a carpark in Bukit Batok to rest after work.
Mohan bought four cans of beer and they drank in the ambulance till 10pm.
The accused then bought more beer and a vodka drink and told Aravin that they were for his friend.
The pair then ferried someone from Corporation Road to Bukit Batok Care Home, before continuing to drink until about 11.15pm.
Then, Aravin allowed Mohan to drive the ambulance to the latter's grandmother's house and Hilton Garden Inn in Serangoon.
The victim, who is Mohan's friend, boarded the ambulance at Garden Inn at around 1am. Her name was redacted from court documents.
After Aravin left, Mohan and the victim started drinking before he drove the ambulance around from 1.30am to 2.30am.

There were numerous instances of Mohan driving erratically, such as driving against the flow of traffic in Hougang Street 22 and beating the red light at the junction of Philips Avenue and Yio Chu Kang Road.
He made several lane changes before crashing the ambulance into the guard rails on the SLE.
The vehicle toppled to its left and skidded along the expressway while revolving.
Mohan's friend could not move from the front passenger seat as her leg was stuck.
A police officer who arrived at the scene saw Mohan walking around the ambulance in a state of panic. He smelled strongly of alcohol and had an unsteady gait.
When asked if he was the driver, Mohan lied and said it was the victim. He then pleaded with her in Tamil to "help him".
Mohan failed a breathalyser test and was arrested. He had 183mg of ethanol per 100ml of blood, more than double the legal driving limit of 80mg per 100ml.
The victim was found to have suffered lower rib fractures and was given 38 days' hospitalisation leave.
For dangerous driving causing grievous hurt, an offender can be jailed for up to five years.
 
Back
Top