Actually there is some basis to having some control over the media, or to put it nicely, having a "responsible" media. Any smart leader would do so. If you were the ceo of an organization, would you allow your company newsletter to be issued out before reading it, letting someone you trust read it or at least putting in guidelines, rules or people in place who will not be "irresponsible"?
But it can also be argued that as people in a supposedly democratic society, we have the right to read and make judgements for ourselves.
And the way to do so is to step forward and make a stand, ensure that there are opposition voices in parliament, regardless of which party makes up the government.