• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

A revisit of the Underage Prostitute Case

due to international pressure on underaged human trafficking, they are toeing the international line. they're not gonna rethink a rethink again. this issue has been rethunk too many times.


In the case of the Viet underaged gal, I can understand. S'pore gal, I can't.
 
If LKY's....maybe he will tell you to do what you need to do. As for Lao Goh, most likely he will ask you what do you think?


That's my guess too.

Education and deterrence message already conveyed. Public shaming too. Objectives met 100%.

No other reason to overkill for a victimless crime, imo. Has to be for the international stage.

Just curious. If LKY's grandson was involved or son(s) of minister(s), still proceed like that?
 
In the case of the Viet underaged gal, I can understand. S'pore gal, I can't.

for publicity, must show same standard for all underaged gals, viet, thai, pinay, chinkie, sinkie, indie, etc. an underaged cheebye has no nationality label attached to it.
 
Actually, the so called underaged prostitute was marketed as social escort on the internet. A social escort has no obligation to provide sexual service during her booking and the money paid to her was not for sex procurement. In the circumstance where sex actually took place, it was mutual consent between 2 mature adults (above 16) with no money transaction. Unless it can be proven that the clients paid over and above the booking fee, there is no evident that commercial sex actually took place.
 
In the case of the Viet underaged gal, I can understand. S'pore gal, I can't.

I agree. Even when toeing the international line, we should be using our brains too. What is the main purpose of this law? Is it not to protect minors who are being forced into such trade? The law is trying to stop people from having paid sex with minor so that pimps will find it less lucrative to get minors into the trade.

I agree with most that in this case, the criminal is the pimp and the gal, not the 50 men. If she had advertised as 17 and those 50 men still up her, I say to hell with all of them
 
I agree. Even when toeing the international line, we should be using our brains too. What is the main purpose of this law? Is it not to protect minors who are being forced into such trade? The law is trying to stop people from having paid sex with minor so that pimps will find it less lucrative to get minors into the trade.

I agree with most that in this case, the criminal is the pimp and the gal, not the 50 men. If she had advertised as 17 and those 50 men still up her, I say to hell with all of them

Whether given warning or pay fine, I think that's enough as punishment. All the publicity and photos kau liao. Okay, i day jail and fine should be the max for the victims. The pimp and gal deserved to be punished harshly for deception. All this is becoming like a joke.
 
They will lose the case and they will be the perpetrators as well as the victims when the end is reached. The law is the law. We have seen how laws have been bent but the precedent has been set with the principal being imprisoned.

HS's refusal to admit guilt has brought about more shame as his previous convictions and incarceration has been made public. Should the girl be a witness in court, the sordid details of these men will be made public. What kind of a man do we have that pays money to bed a girl young enough to be his daughter? What type of sexual acts as well as the sexual thoughts of these men will be made known to the public.

I beg to differ on your arguments. I agree that law is law, but since this is a highly publicised case, I think the courts still have to maintain certain degree of "Reasonableness" and have to give them a fair trial.

As for your point on bedding a girl young enough to be his daughter, I think that is your personal moralistic point of view. He is seeking a sexual service and should be one that pleases his eye. If you go on this argument, then he can only bed prostitutes above 40? Then a 60 year old man will have to look for 60 year old prostitute?
 
Back
Top