• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

A Relook at China's "no first use of nuke policy"

KingFook Sr

Alfrescian
Loyal
Does it mean that if you dun nuke China, China will not nuke you?
.
You folks better examine the detailed text of this policy.

Within the FORMAL WORDING of this (particular) policy is one sentence that all should pay attention to…

“…if attacked… China reserves the right … to use every means at its disposal … to attack the nation that attacks it.”
.
For years, western media and nations prefer to ignore this tiny detail.
 

Willamshakespear

Alfrescian
Loyal
Belief is one thing, but REALITY is quite another. NO mortal leader would not resort to use nukes if under severe attack.

What matters is NOT who would not use nukes, but rather - WHO will launch nukes as a first strike, because it will come at a horrific & deadly cost - Mutually Aided Destruction.

There is NO such thing as one nation fires a nuke, then sit back, have a cup of tea & then negotiate for armistice. The moment a nuke launch is detected, MULTIPLE nukes would be launched even upon allies & axis nations, upon missile military targets, population centres, etc, as NO leader will take any chances.....in order to ensure that there will be NO 2ND nuke strike, as by then, nothing, absolutely NOTHING will be left survivable on planet Earth...

 
Last edited:
Top