- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 4,501
- Points
- 0
Re: 3rd batch name list coming out, includes Lawyers, high ranking army officers, ban
This definition is well understood... but how to proof that the man actually did penetrate the girl??? By her words? By her pimp's words??? I am talking about the question of law which up till now i still cannot understand.
If i insist that i paid to see the girl because i want to talk to her and convince her to stop prostituting herself... why should the judge believe in her and not me?????
Para 1, Sect 376B of the Penal Code (Chap 224) states:
"Commercial sex with minor under 18
376B. (1) Any person who obtains for consideration the sexual services of a person, who is under 18 years of age, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 7 years, or with fine, or with both."
Para 4 defines "sexual services" as:
"(4) In this section, “sexual services” means any sexual services involving —
(a) sexual penetration of the vagina or anus, as the case may be, of a person by a part of another person’s body (other than the penis) or by anything else; or
(b) penetration of the vagina, anus or mouth, as the case may be, of a person by a man’s penis."
Section 377C (d) {Interpretation of sections 375 to 377B (sexual offences)} defines "sexual" as:
"(d) penetration, touching or other activity is “sexual” if —
(i) because of its nature it is sexual, whatever its circumstances or any person’s purpose in relation to it may be; or
(ii) because of its nature it may be sexual and because of its circumstances or the purpose of any person in relation to it (or both) it is sexual;"
So the handjob or no penetration excuse is a no go.
This definition is well understood... but how to proof that the man actually did penetrate the girl??? By her words? By her pimp's words??? I am talking about the question of law which up till now i still cannot understand.
If i insist that i paid to see the girl because i want to talk to her and convince her to stop prostituting herself... why should the judge believe in her and not me?????