• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

13 weeks’ jail for Alvin Chew Hou Ming, 51, who kicked elderly stranger thinking she had mocked him

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
Dear @zhihau 你的老相好 @ginfreely 又来骂人了
Tsk tsk tsk you Cantonese dog son of slut prostitute mistress everyday 说三道四 颠倒黑白 it’s you criminal dogs smear and insult me slut whore mistress and not I scold you first Pui!
IMG_2024-04-07-214231.png
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
Dear @zhihau 你的老相好 @ginfreely 又来骂人了
难道zhihao和老巫婆有一腿? :tongue:
@zhihau 全身上下只有腿還是硬的

Not my 老相好, I don’t know her at all.
只是嘴硬而已 :coffee::coffee::coffee:
A bunch of Cantonese dogs sons of prostitutes that everyday 说三道四 do defamation crimes to Gansiokbin hokkien virgin Pui!
 

Charlie99

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

13 weeks’ jail for man who kicked elderly stranger thinking she had mocked him​

courts-and-crime.jpg

nadinechua.png

Nadine Chua
UPDATED

OCT 22, 2024, 02:32 PM

SINGAPORE – A man was sentenced to 13 weeks’ jail for kicking a 67-year-old woman because he thought she had called him stupid.

He believed the woman did that because he was experiencing auditory hallucinationshearing sounds or voices that are not there.

On Oct 21, Alvin Chew Hou Ming, 51, pleaded guilty to one charge of assault.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Lee Da Zhuan said that on Dec 13, 2021, the victim was with her husband at Circuit Road Hawker Centre when Chew confronted her, accusing her of mocking him for being stupid.

“This did not actually happen, and the victim never once called out to the accused or mocked him,” said the prosecutor, adding that Chew and the victim were strangers.

To avoid trouble, the victim ignored Chew and walked away.

When he saw that she ignored him, he kicked her on her back. She fell forward onto a chair at the hawker centre and then to the ground.

Chew was subsequently remanded at the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) for evaluation, and was diagnosed with psychotic disorder at the time of the offence.

“The doctor opined that he experienced auditory hallucinations that the victim called him ‘stupid’, hence he was paranoid towards her and possibly kicked her in anger,” said DPP Lee.

As a result of the kick, the victim suffered blunt abdominal trauma and had to undergo a procedure to repair a small bowel injury. She was hospitalised for seven days and given hospitalisation leave for 14 days.

The medical bills for the surgery amounted to over $3,600 but no restitution has been made to date, said the DPP.

The pain in her abdomen also prevented her from returning to work, and she had to resign from her job. It was not mentioned in court what kind of work she was doing.

She resumed work around six months later in May 2022, said the prosecutor.

Seeking at least 12 to 13 weeks’ jail for Chew, DPP Lee said no mitigating weight should be attributed to Chew’s psychotic disorder diagnosis.

“The IMH report merely describes what the accused reportedly experienced – that he thought the victim had called him ‘stupid’, and crucially does not show that he was unable to control or refrain himself from committing the criminal act because of his mental condition,” said the prosecutor.

In mitigation, Chew apologised for his actions and said he was drunk at the time, adding that he was unable to make restitution as he has been unemployed for the past few years.

In meting out the sentence, Deputy Principal District Judge Kessler Soh told Chew: “Even if someone used that word on you, which in this case the victim did not, it does not mean you can just go and beat up that person.”

In response, Chew said people have called him “stupid” for many years.

He then apologised to the judge, who warned him not to reoffend.

For hurting the woman, Chew could have been jailed for up to five years, fined up to $10,000, or both.
A very severe punishment.
 

True Believer

Alfrescian
Loyal
Whether it is due to auditory hallucinations or being under the influence of liquor, who is going to pay for the victim's medical bills and loss of earnings?
 

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ban Ban Ban! :laugh:

penguin-pudgy.gif
I have a better suggestion. Instead of the abused enabling the ignore button, the administrator should impose the ignore button on the abuser so that the abuser will never get to see or read anything written by the abused that may provoke the abuser. In this case, the abused runs a long list. That way we remove the 'toxic' from the abuser's cyberspace without the need to ban her.
 

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal
That banning module was removed long ago. :coffee::coffee::coffee:

Even if it’s restored, I don’t think it gives me any pleasure to ban anyone anymore. Boss has enlightened me with his profound wisdom.

You should learn from Boss Sam too.
Your pleasure is to relac one corner and fantasize about some tantric sex which obviously you're not capable anymore. :wink:
 

LaoHongBiscuit

Stupidman
Loyal
I have a better suggestion. Instead of the abused enabling the ignore button, the administrator should impose the ignore button on the abuser so that the abuser will never get to see or read anything written by the abused that may provoke the abuser. In this case, the abused runs a long list. That way we remove the 'toxic' from the abuser's cyberspace without the need to ban her.
Even simpler is to SEND THIS CRAZY NUTCASE TO IMH PERMANENTLY!
 

JurongEast

Alfrescian
Loyal
I have a better suggestion. Instead of the abused enabling the ignore button, the administrator should impose the ignore button on the abuser so that the abuser will never get to see or read anything written by the abused that may provoke the abuser. In this case, the abused runs a long list. That way we remove the 'toxic' from the abuser's cyberspace without the need to ban her.
In the olden days abusers eyes were purposely blinded so that abusers could not see people and abuse others
 
Top