政治文抄公- Political Plagiarizing

[Perspective]

So the plagarism charge has been amended to inadequency in replying to DPM Teo?

I don't care if Pritam plagarizes or plagues a lady's underpanties, but what an insult to the word "integrity" and the man who invented English to have a forked-tongued individual full of half-truths, lies, distortions, going back on own principles, double standards and self-contradicts at every turn of Orchard Road, to use the word on others.

 

[wikiphile]

I don't care if Pritam plagarizes or plagues a lady's underpanties, but what an insult to the word "integrity" and the man who invented English to have a forked-tongued individual full of half-truths, lies, distortions, going back on own principles, double standards and self-contradicts at every turn of Orchard Road, to use the word on others.

What do you expect from the blabber of half truths and teller of fiction? aka SHIT aka 淡滨尼文武慈勇不败大圣天君 aka Fat Village Insect aka Goh Meng Seng

 

[wikiphile]

ssrrvv11 is a very vulgar person. I already know who he is. Fuck you, ssrrvv11, you are a disgrace, I will expose your identity soon. Do you want me to post your sammyboy sex report here to let other see your real nick?

What's up doc?

 

[Perspective]

Yeah, the FVI is still trying to imitate a human by speaking in gentlemenly tones, but you can tell from the stench emitting from our computer screens, more unbearable than SHITs gay partner's artificial self-made cum, shows it's not working.

 

[Forvendet]

The blogger has already clarified that there's no problem with it. Why's GMS still jumping up and down pulling his own hair out? It's clear, it's because it's WP.

 

[ssrrvv11]

ssrrvv11 is a very vulgar person. I already know who he is. Fuck you, ssrrvv11, you are a disgrace, I will expose your identity soon. Do you want me to post your sammyboy sex report here to let other see your real nick?

hi clone. pls do. LOL.

 

[Zombie]

i will only worry if pritam plagiarizes pap's work

 

[ssrrvv11]

What's up doc?

he is THAT doc again? THAT doc that kpkb to leongsam that we bully his new clone. LOL!

 

[Perspective]

And as pointed out by pmpunk, SHITs recent pyro-ing of a PAP chap is only 1 out of 50 recent posts (with 40+ dedicated to WP) and it was like "damn that PAP MP but more damn CSM who didn't pyro him". So you can count that one for PAP and one (more) for WP as well.

This the only time we can see SHITs balls - is when SHIT has the cheek to dare to use that as an illustration/example to show that SHIT had pyro-ed someone from the PAP.

 

[jw5]

goh meng seng the pap dog

............... in a manger.

According to Aesop's fables, the dog in a manger fable is about a dog which wanted to eat but could not find anything other than hay.
So it went into the manger and lay down on the hay, hence preventing the horses from being able to eat.

Usually used to describe a person who wants something, but because he is unable to get it, prevents others from getting it or makes trouble for those who have it.

 

[Debonerman]

Goh Meng Seng! You really no medicine save. You revealed yourself as PAP'S spokeswoman in it's 'fixing the opposition bureau. I will remember to dig out dirt come 2016.

 

[Debonerman]

............... in a manger.

According to Aesop's fables, the dog in a manger fable is about a dog which wanted to eat but could not find anything other than hay.
So it went into the manger and lay down on the hay, hence preventing the horses from being able to eat.

Usually used to describe a person who wants something, but because he is unable to get it, prevents others from getting it or makes trouble for those who have it.

A woman has been having a modest run in the casino made a big bet and lost. To recoup her losses against something of her own doing, she makes bigger and bigger bets. Inevitably she becomes a prostitute for the White ah longs who were just waiting for the chance to lead her down the slippery slope of self destruction. Let it be a lesson to all.

 

[jixiaolan]

Locke,

You should not keep making excuses for your WP colleagues for blatant plagiarism and covering up extra-marital affairs as personal private matter. You do not have to go through a Phd programme to understand the need to make proper attribution. I learned that in primary 3. Bro Perspective was my senior, I am sure he was taught the same. It does not matter whether it is a research journal article, academic paper, facebook posting or even entry in personal blog, it is still a publication. The golden rule is you cannot cut-copy-paste without making proper attribution and worse copy wholesale and try to pass it off as your work. You also need to understand that csm and pritiam singh are different from popular blogger xiaxue and they need to have better standard.

Dear GMS,

You best sum up in my view the notion, " with friends like these who needs enemies. ". Firstly both CSM and PS cannot be held to academic standards for research papers and citations. CSM had shared Donald Lows thoughts on his Facebook, by nature Facebook is informal chatty and is build around the notion of networking, sharing and discussion. Whether one as an individual cites or not is really an informal matter and if every Facebook comment is cited with the same academic certainty as a research paper, it really defeats the informal chatty coffe shop nature of Facebook.

PS should have replied better to DPM catching him out on that issue or for that matter adopted or adapted it in a different manner,

As it stands parliamentary speeches being short and time limited do not allow the brevity or breathe for full fledged citations of sources. Political speeches and public speeches in citations of quotes or extracts tend to be of well known academics, politicians and or personalities. Political speeches are not an academic exercise in research and citations and are not held to academic ideas of citations and riguer. Use of open source extracts are at best an issue of courtesy and clarification post speech.


Locke

 

[Debonerman]

You should not keep making excuses for your WP colleagues for blatant plagiarism and covering up extra-marital affairs

Must have had a good cock sucking session. Sucked GMS's or vice versa. WP, CSM and Pritam Singh in particular. You are in the brothel of politics. Get slimey or at least try! PAP have a 50 years head start.

 

[ssrrvv11]

goh meng seng is a pap god. he can also be known as 政治流浪漢

 

[Ramseth]

Locke,

You should not keep making excuses for your WP colleagues for blatant plagiarism and covering up extra-marital affairs as personal private matter. You do not have to go through a Phd programme to understand the need to make proper attribution. I learned that in primary 3. Bro Perspective was my senior, I am sure he was taught the same. It does not matter whether it is a research journal article, academic paper, facebook posting or even entry in personal blog, it is still a publication. The golden rule is you cannot cut-copy-paste without making proper attribution and worse copy wholesale and try to pass it off as your work. You also need to understand that csm and pritiam singh are different from popular blogger xiaxue and they need to have better standard.

If an MP says "to be or not to be, that's the question" or recites the whole Hamlet soliloquy, must he accredit Shakespeare? But of course, not everybody is as famous as Shakespeare. I thought that all citizenry in political blogging wish their views to be heard in Parliament through MPs who picked up their views. What's the difference whether accreditation or edition was made or not? The blogger is a nobody and was glad that his views were brought up in Parliament, expressly so. You and GMS are picking red herring, in Chinese it's called 吹毛求疵。In short, just finding fault when there's none to begin with, just because you're more unhappy with PAP than WP.

 

[coolguy]

I see nothing wrong with plagarism, especially if it is done with good intent.
As the saying goes 'imitation is the best form of flattery".
Maybe pratar singh emphatize with the message so much that he decides to use it?
So he is actually publicising the message, make it known in parliament, made it heard.
What's wrong with that?

 

[scroobal]

Succint, well articulated and very well reasoned. Agree completely. I am disturbed by these 2 incidents.

Locke,

You should not keep making excuses for your WP colleagues for blatant plagiarism and covering up extra-marital affairs as personal private matter. You do not have to go through a Phd programme to understand the need to make proper attribution. I learned that in primary 3. Bro Perspective was my senior, I am sure he was taught the same. It does not matter whether it is a research journal article, academic paper, facebook posting or even entry in personal blog, it is still a publication. The golden rule is you cannot cut-copy-paste without making proper attribution and worse copy wholesale and try to pass it off as your work. You also need to understand that csm and pritiam singh are different from popular blogger xiaxue and they need to have better standard.

 

[HTOLAS]

Please cite the 'offending' parts of PS's speech and the blogger's remarks (duly acknowledged, of course) so that we can agree or disagree with you on an intelligent basis. Thank you.

Pritam Singh did wrong thing by copying people article wholesale. This wrong act must be brought out to light. Why is it a smear? You are the one biased, cannot see clearly. Whoever do wrong must be point out, it cannot just be he opposition we cover him.

 

[kingrant]

Agreed absolutely, totally, and unconditionally. GMS as usual couldnt get into parliament and has red eyes.

Dear GMS,

You best sum up in my view the notion, " with friends like these who needs enemies. ". Firstly both CSM and PS cannot be held to academic standards for research papers and citations. CSM had shared Donald Lows thoughts on his Facebook, by nature Facebook is informal chatty and is build around the notion of networking, sharing and discussion. Whether one as an individual cites or not is really an informal matter and if every Facebook comment is cited with the same academic certainty as a research paper, it really defeats the informal chatty coffe shop nature of Facebook.

PS should have replied better to DPM catching him out on that issue or for that matter adopted or adapted it in a different manner,

As it stands parliamentary speeches being short and time limited do not allow the brevity or breathe for full fledged citations of sources. Political speeches and public speeches in citations of quotes or extracts tend to be of well known academics, politicians and or personalities. Political speeches are not an academic exercise in research and citations and are not held to academic ideas of citations and riguer. Use of open source extracts are at best an issue of courtesy and clarification post speech.


Locke