• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Riverfront Residences, a condominium in Hougang, has banned dog-walking on its premises

LaoHongBiscuit

Stupidman
Loyal

SINGAPORE

Condominium in Hougang bans dog-walking, sparking petition from over 90 dog owners​


Riverfront Residences in Hougang has imposed a ban on dog-walking following complaints of uncleared faeces. The decision, which forces pet owners to use an underground parking lot, has sparked a petition signed by over 90 dog owners calling for a more targeted solution.

815a3e9d4fae1d299c8071169d8b3c65

Published
20 hours ago on 16 September 2024
By The Online Citizen
petition-riverfront.png

Photo of the notice from ShinMin Daily

Riverfront Residences, a condominium in Hougang, has banned dog-walking on its premises

following complaints about uncleared dog faeces damaging the lawns and public amenities.
The decision, communicated via a notice issued at the end of August 2024, has drawn significant backlash from dog owners living in the estate, who have since submitted a petition to reverse the ban, according to a report by Shin Min Daily News.
The management’s decision was prompted by repeated incidents of faeces and urine left on the property grounds, which reportedly led to damage to the landscaping and complaints from residents.
In response, a rule was introduced that forbids dog-walking on the condominium’s ground floor areas, forcing pet owners to use an underground parking lot to exit the compound with their pets.
The alternative route, however, has been met with concerns from the condominium’s residents. Ms Liu, a 46-year-old resident, highlighted that the dimly lit and busy parking lot lacks a designated pathway, making it an unsafe environment for walking dogs. “It’s not a good place to walk your dog,” she said.
Other dog owners echoed her sentiments. One resident, Ms Liang (41), shared that she had specifically moved from public housing to the condominium in order to provide a better environment for her golden retriever. She expressed frustration at the sudden imposition of the rule, stating that she would not have chosen the property had she known about its pet-unfriendly policies.
Another dog owner, Ms Huang, raised concerns about her elderly dog, who struggles with mobility and can only manage short walks. “It’s been very inconvenient,” she said, adding that the management should target irresponsible pet owners instead of punishing all residents. Liu agreed, noting that most dog owners in the condominium were responsible and only a few “bad apples” failed to clean up after their pets.
Riverfront Residences, located along Hougang Avenue 7, was completed in 2023 and has since attracted a significant number of pet-owning residents.
However, the recent ban has left many feeling that their concerns are not being adequately addressed. According to the Shin Min report, over 90 dog owners have submitted a petition urging the management to reconsider the rule and address the issue through stricter enforcement on individual offenders rather than a blanket prohibition.
Residents are now awaiting the management’s response to the petition, with many hoping for a more balanced approach that addresses the problem without unduly inconveniencing responsible pet owners.
 

rushifa666

Alfrescian
Loyal
Whts with fag petitions? Has that ever worked in dictatorship? Sue them as a group. You were not told this when younbought the place
 

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal

SINGAPORE

Condominium in Hougang bans dog-walking, sparking petition from over 90 dog owners​


Riverfront Residences in Hougang has imposed a ban on dog-walking following complaints of uncleared faeces. The decision, which forces pet owners to use an underground parking lot, has sparked a petition signed by over 90 dog owners calling for a more targeted solution.

815a3e9d4fae1d299c8071169d8b3c65

Published
20 hours ago on 16 September 2024
By The Online Citizen
petition-riverfront.png

Photo of the notice from ShinMin Daily

Riverfront Residences, a condominium in Hougang, has banned dog-walking on its premises

following complaints about uncleared dog faeces damaging the lawns and public amenities.
The decision, communicated via a notice issued at the end of August 2024, has drawn significant backlash from dog owners living in the estate, who have since submitted a petition to reverse the ban, according to a report by Shin Min Daily News.
The management’s decision was prompted by repeated incidents of faeces and urine left on the property grounds, which reportedly led to damage to the landscaping and complaints from residents.
In response, a rule was introduced that forbids dog-walking on the condominium’s ground floor areas, forcing pet owners to use an underground parking lot to exit the compound with their pets.
The alternative route, however, has been met with concerns from the condominium’s residents. Ms Liu, a 46-year-old resident, highlighted that the dimly lit and busy parking lot lacks a designated pathway, making it an unsafe environment for walking dogs. “It’s not a good place to walk your dog,” she said.
Other dog owners echoed her sentiments. One resident, Ms Liang (41), shared that she had specifically moved from public housing to the condominium in order to provide a better environment for her golden retriever. She expressed frustration at the sudden imposition of the rule, stating that she would not have chosen the property had she known about its pet-unfriendly policies.
Another dog owner, Ms Huang, raised concerns about her elderly dog, who struggles with mobility and can only manage short walks. “It’s been very inconvenient,” she said, adding that the management should target irresponsible pet owners instead of punishing all residents. Liu agreed, noting that most dog owners in the condominium were responsible and only a few “bad apples” failed to clean up after their pets.
Riverfront Residences, located along Hougang Avenue 7, was completed in 2023 and has since attracted a significant number of pet-owning residents.
However, the recent ban has left many feeling that their concerns are not being adequately addressed. According to the Shin Min report, over 90 dog owners have submitted a petition urging the management to reconsider the rule and address the issue through stricter enforcement on individual offenders rather than a blanket prohibition.
Residents are now awaiting the management’s response to the petition, with many hoping for a more balanced approach that addresses the problem without unduly inconveniencing responsible pet owners.
Like that Cantonese cannot buy or rent the condo because all Cantonese are Cantonese dogs according to my mentor.
 

LaoHongBiscuit

Stupidman
Loyal
Like that Cantonese cannot buy or rent the condo because all Cantonese are Cantonese dogs according to my mentor.
Riverfront Residences is quite a nice place next to the PCN. I cycled pass there many times. It's a nice serene condo facing Serangoon River. ...
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Condo rules are made by the management committee of that condo.

If that committee has people like Ginfreely on it, expect lots of petty laws and restrictions for the residents. :cool:
 

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal
Condo rules are made by the management committee of that condo.

If that committee has people like Ginfreely on it, expect lots of petty laws and restrictions for the residents. :cool:
For example: Must use door bells, cannot knock on the doors.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Easier to upgrade from hdb for this 99 year leasehold condo

But I was thinking…u move from a 99 year lease hdb to a 99 year lease condo, what’s the diff? U got swim or gym often ma?

IMG_2825.jpeg
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset

SINGAPORE

Condominium in Hougang bans dog-walking, sparking petition from over 90 dog owners​


Riverfront Residences in Hougang has imposed a ban on dog-walking following complaints of uncleared faeces. The decision, which forces pet owners to use an underground parking lot, has sparked a petition signed by over 90 dog owners calling for a more targeted solution.

815a3e9d4fae1d299c8071169d8b3c65

Published
20 hours ago on 16 September 2024
By The Online Citizen
petition-riverfront.png

Photo of the notice from ShinMin Daily

Riverfront Residences, a condominium in Hougang, has banned dog-walking on its premises

following complaints about uncleared dog faeces damaging the lawns and public amenities.
The decision, communicated via a notice issued at the end of August 2024, has drawn significant backlash from dog owners living in the estate, who have since submitted a petition to reverse the ban, according to a report by Shin Min Daily News.
The management’s decision was prompted by repeated incidents of faeces and urine left on the property grounds, which reportedly led to damage to the landscaping and complaints from residents.
In response, a rule was introduced that forbids dog-walking on the condominium’s ground floor areas, forcing pet owners to use an underground parking lot to exit the compound with their pets.
The alternative route, however, has been met with concerns from the condominium’s residents. Ms Liu, a 46-year-old resident, highlighted that the dimly lit and busy parking lot lacks a designated pathway, making it an unsafe environment for walking dogs. “It’s not a good place to walk your dog,” she said.
Other dog owners echoed her sentiments. One resident, Ms Liang (41), shared that she had specifically moved from public housing to the condominium in order to provide a better environment for her golden retriever. She expressed frustration at the sudden imposition of the rule, stating that she would not have chosen the property had she known about its pet-unfriendly policies.
Another dog owner, Ms Huang, raised concerns about her elderly dog, who struggles with mobility and can only manage short walks. “It’s been very inconvenient,” she said, adding that the management should target irresponsible pet owners instead of punishing all residents. Liu agreed, noting that most dog owners in the condominium were responsible and only a few “bad apples” failed to clean up after their pets.
Riverfront Residences, located along Hougang Avenue 7, was completed in 2023 and has since attracted a significant number of pet-owning residents.
However, the recent ban has left many feeling that their concerns are not being adequately addressed. According to the Shin Min report, over 90 dog owners have submitted a petition urging the management to reconsider the rule and address the issue through stricter enforcement on individual offenders rather than a blanket prohibition.
Residents are now awaiting the management’s response to the petition, with many hoping for a more balanced approach that addresses the problem without unduly inconveniencing responsible pet owners.
My friend lives at Riversound Residence, which is nearby. She has a dog, and hopes her estate does not follow suit.
 
Top