old dog LKy asked for it again from Malaysia - applogize?

[uncleyap]

http://malaysiakini.com/news/142561

KJ: Kuan Yew's wrong, Malaysia not a failed state

Sep 13, 10 7:38pm

Share

20

Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin today refuted Singapore Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew's allegations that Malaysia is a failed state.

http://malaysiakini.com/news/142564

点评大马族群关系陷入最低潮
李光耀访谈招致凯里十推反击 2010年9月13日
晚上 9点14分


分享



新加坡内阁资政李光耀最近接受外国媒体访谈,点评马来西亚与新加坡的族群政策,再次掀起马来西亚政治人物的非议。李光耀在9月1日接受美国《纽约时报》及其姐妹报《国际先驱者论坛报》专访时,分析新加坡与马来西亚在面对一个多元族群的社会时采纳了不同的治国方式。

李光耀(左图)在有关访谈中指出,与采纳绩效制度及不分肤色的新加坡有所不同,马来西亚视本身为马来人国家,其他的人则是“过客”(lodgers, orang tumpangan),土著则主宰一切。从苏丹、首席大法官、法官、将领、总警长,所有的要职都是马来人垄断,马来人也囊挂所有的大合约,马来文是教学语文但却无法与现代知识接轨。所以华裔建立本身的独立学校来学华文,印裔则拥有本身的淡文学校,但却无法为他们带来工作,马来西亚的族群关系正陷入最低潮(most unhappy situation)。

李光耀的这番言论马上招致巫青团长凯里的批评,斥责李光耀的言论企图分裂马来西亚。

凯里:大马非失败国

凯里(右图)今午在其推特户口连续发表10篇短评,针对李光耀接受《纽约时报》专访时批评马来西亚的言论,一一做出驳斥。推特限制每篇短评仅能长达140个字母。

“对愤世嫉俗者说马来西亚是个失败国家的回应:我曾是阿富汗塔利班政权时的战地记者。我亲眼见证及知道什么是失败国家,我们不是。”

也是林茂国会议员的凯里指李光耀的言论,显示后者认知有误,而且带有历史偏见。

“李光耀的言论除了充满攻击及侮辱外,更是处心积虑地要分裂马来西亚。”

指其他种族是寄居者

他举例,李光耀在专访中的其中一点,更指马来西亚采取不同于新加坡的发展方式,导致马来西亚人认为大马是一个马来国家,其他种族都是“寄居者”。

凯里进一步批评,李光耀指马来西亚出现马来霸权,只在政府学校教导马来文,而马来文不能帮助学生掌握先进知识的言论。

根据《纽约时报》的访问,除此之外李光耀更声称新加坡的马来人,虽然有些仍然包头巾,却有别于马来西亚的马来人,都是受英文教育,思想非常先进和开放。

李光耀在访谈中指出,若东姑阿都拉曼当年继续把新加坡留下来,若马来西亚接纳新加坡的模式,接纳多元种族为社会基础,新加坡所达致的大部分成就也能够在马来西亚实现,虽然成就可能没有新加坡那么多,因为必须考虑到马来西亚的范围较广泛。但是却能够改善种族关系及整体的环境。

他继续分析说,现在马来西亚的种族分化严重,马来人、华裔及印裔在不同的学校就读,生活分隔,关系并不那么融洽,作为隔邻的新加坡,这并非一件好事。

不能拿苹果与橙比较

不过凯里强调,马来西亚与新加坡不同,并非是“苹果与苹果”的公平比较。

他指出,马来西亚的地理幅度远大于新加坡,导致大马面对的挑战更为复杂,而新加坡的国境只不过“局限于宏茂桥与兀兰”(Woodlands)。

“如果我们跟随新加坡的发展模式,马来西亚今天就真的是一个失败国家。马新两国并不同,而我们也并非只有邮票般的大小。”

料定必有两极化回应

凯里接着嘲讽说,李光耀的言论一出,预料将引起马来右翼组织如土著权威组织的评论,或一些自以为马来西亚不如“岛国”的人自我批评。

他说,不管是源自土权或自我卑视者的评论,都是错误。

“这也是为何‘一个马来西亚’一定要成功,不管是李光耀的模式或土权的主意,都不能带领马来西亚前进。”
(0)短评

 

[spotter542]

Translated from Google for those English educated :


Singapore's Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew recently accepted the foreign media interviews, reviews population policies in Malaysia and Singapore, Malaysia, again set off criticism of political figures. Lee Kuan Yew on September 1 with the U.S. "New York Times" and its sister newspaper, "International Herald Tribune" interview, analysis of Singapore and Malaysia in the face of a multi-ethnic society, the country adopted a different approach.

Lee Kuan Yew (left) said in the interview, and the adoption of the performance system and regardless of skin color is different in Singapore, Malaysia sees itself as the Malay States, the others are "passing" (lodgers, orang tumpangan), Indigenous is dominated. From the Sudan, the Chief Justice, judges, generals, General Sergeant, all positions are monopolized Malays, the Malay people hanging all the major contracts capsule, Malay is the language of instruction but not with modern knowledge. Therefore, to establish their own independent schools ethnic Chinese to learn Chinese, Indians will have its own short text of the school, but can not provide them with work and Ethnic Relations in Malaysia is at its ebb (most unhappy situation).

Lee Kuan Yew's remarks immediately lead to Wu Qing, head of Kerry's criticism of Lee Kuan Yew's remarks denounced attempts to divide in Malaysia.

Carey: Malaysia non-failed states

Carey (right) this afternoon in their Twitter accounts published 10 consecutive Commentary for Lee accept the "New York Times" interview, criticized Malaysia's remarks, made to refute one by one. Twitter limits each Commentary only up to 140 characters.

"The cynics say that Malaysia is a failed response: I was a war correspondent in Afghanistan during the Taliban regime. I witnessed and know what failed states, we are not."

Carey is also Lin Maoguo Council Members that Lee Kuan Yew's remarks show that the latter perception is wrong, and with a history of bias.

"Lee Kuan Yew's remarks in addition to full of attacks and insults, but also is endeavoring to divide in Malaysia."

Refer to other ethnic groups that live by

For example, he, Lee Kuan Yew in the interview, among other things, but that is different from Singapore, Malaysia, the development approach taken, leading to Malaysians that Malaysia is a Malay country, other races are "sojourners."

Carey further criticism, Lee refers to Malay supremacy in Malaysia appear only in government schools teach Malay and Malay can not help students master advanced knowledge of the speech.

According to "The New York Times," visit in addition to Lee Kuan Yew claimed that Malays in Singapore, although some still wearing a turban, but different from the Malaysian Malays are educated in English, thinking very advanced and open .

Lee Kuan Yew said in the interview, if the Tunku Abdul Rahman then continue to stay in Singapore if Malaysia accepted Singapore's model, based on acceptance of multi-ethnic society, Singapore can achieve most of the success achieved in Malaysia, although Singapore may not have as much success as to take into account a wider range in Malaysia. But to improve race relations and the overall environment.

He continued to analyze, said Malaysia's ethnic divide is a serious, Malay, Chinese and Indian schools in different, separate living, relationships are not so harmonious, as the next Singapore, this is not a good thing.

Can not compare apples and oranges

But Carey stressed that Malaysia and Singapore are different is not "apples to apples," the fair comparison.

He pointed out that the geographic range is much larger than Singapore and Malaysia, leading to more complex challenges facing Malaysia, while Singapore's border is only "limited to Ang Mo Kio and Woodlands" (Woodlands).

"If we follow the development model of Singapore, Malaysia today is really a failed state. Malaysia and New Zealand are different, while the Women is not only a postage stamp of 大小."

Liaoding there must be polarized response

Carey then ridicule that Lee Kuan Yew's remarks, is expected to rise to the right-wing organizations such as the indigenous Malay comments authoritative organizations, or those who think Malaysia as "islands" of human self-criticism.

He said that no matter from land rights or self of rejecting those comments are wrong.

"This is why 'a Malaysian' must succeed, no matter the model or the land rights of Lee Kuan Yew's idea, can not lead the Malaysia forward."

 

[myo539]

Although some may think that MM Lee's views about Malaysia as being not sensitive or impolite, what is wrong in trying to call a spade a spade? We all know that he would not hesitate to speak out forcefully especially for something he felt strongly, such as being kicked out of Malaysia.

For example, Malaysia's failed bumiputra policy has already been criticised by many Malaysians - even by the Malays themselves. Some Malay Malaysians including Mahathir, Anwar and the Najib - have spoken out loud about the issue (albeit when it serves their interest of the day).

Of course, he may have calculated the risk of offending the Malaysians - something that he has always done. And we have observed that after the initial hue and cry by the UMNO boys, relations will be back on an even keel, as in the past, as each depends heavily on each other and because of the close cultural ties among the people. The "blowing hot and cold air" that characterises the relations - works both ways - sometimes the Malaysians blow hot air, and at other times, it was Singapore's turn. (hehehe, we can do this to the Malaysians, but we can't do this to the Indonesians).

Sadly, it has to come at this time (I think MM Lee took the opportunities - as he may not have many left) as the relations have been most cordial in recent years. But read more into it, and one could have realised that he is covertly lending some support to Najib - doing him a favour - as Najib himself would have come under heavy fire by the more ultra bumi-Malays for speaking against the dis-affirmative policy.

As we have learnt before on trying to play mediator to the China-Taiwan issue, at the end of the day we are not consider "family". Best is to let Malaysians settle the problem themselves, and we learn from it. MM Lee is trying to make our people learn from his remarks.

Next chapter : Surely Mahathir will not miss the opportunities to throw some sarcastic stones at MM Lee or Singapore. Hope someone can post his remarks here - makes hilarious reading at times. (My one-cent worth of thought.)

 

[winners]

I can only say that the old hag should have mind his own business. Let Malaysia be what they want to be, why bother? What good does it do by saying all those things? Why he wants to antagonize the other side? Malaysia is not like his own Singapore, where the Lee empire seems to rule in eternity. The old hag should have instead concentrated on how to improve the lives of its own citizens, especially the low to middle class range. Otherwise, he is indeed not worth his annual S$3.5m salary.

 

[halsey02]

I can only say that the old hag should have mind his own business. Let Malaysia be what they want to be, why bother? What good does it do by saying all those things? Why he wants to antagonize the other side? Malaysia is not like his own Singapore, where the Lee empire seems to rule in eternity. The old hag should have instead concentrated on how to improve the lives of its own citizens, especially the low to middle class range. Otherwise, he is indeed not worth his annual S$3.5m salary.

Dr M Salary is RM20,000, and is on pension of RM10,000
http://chedet.co.cc/chedetblog/2010/09/sahoca.html#more

You guys have forgotten what Lee Kuan Yew had said recently:

Quote

He quoted a Chinese proverb: Do not judge a man, until his coffin is closed. "Close the coffin, then decide,' he said. "Then assess him. I may still do something foolish before the lid is closed on me."
Uquote

In other words....after he is dead and gone, you can not hold himaccountable for what he had said.... ha ha ha

 

[uncleyap]

It is excellent laughingstock yet again, as the incompetent coward once again stepped on the minefield of his own nightmare. He is so afraid and incompetent to face / handle and yet he kept himself so clumsy to repeatedly step on it with his own foot.

If he had the ability and confident as well as skill and experience, he would had tackle these issues directly and frontal approach and solved them all 50 years ago.

http://uncleyap-news.blogspot.com/2010/09/incompetency-clearly-showed-again-in.html

http://sammyboy.com/showpost.php?p=560394&postcount=2

All these years in the past half-a-century he had been clearly on denial mode and dodged here dodged there and refused to face the reality of or national needs. Especially within the Racial, Lingual & Religious aspects.

This GE with the new immigrant crisis in hand he should not be permitted by us Singaporeans to take cover as he used to do. Force him to face it!

 

[uncleyap]

Dr M started fucking LKy & PAp again!



http://malaysiakini.com/news/142654

Dr M: Genesis of racialism began with PAP
<script>author_photo("")</script>

Sep 14, 10 9:12pm

<fb:share-button type="button_count" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;" href="http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/142654"></fb:share-button> <fb:like href="http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/142654" show_faces="false" width="330" style="float: left;"></fb:like>
Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad has blamed Singapore's People's Action Party (PAP) and its founder Lee Kuan Yew as the root cause of racialism in Malaysia.



http://malaysiakini.com/news/142655

驳马新不分家改善种族关系论
马哈迪归咎李光耀当年种祸根
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td id="MUGSHOT"><script>author_photo("")</script>

</td><td id="AUTHOR" valign="bottom">2010年9月14日
晚上 9点20分</td></tr></tbody></table>

<fb:share-button class=" " type="button_count" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;" href="http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/142655">分享 35</fb:share-button> <fb:like class=" fb_edge_widget_with_comment fb_iframe_widget" href="http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/142655" show_faces="false" width="330" style="float: left;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?api_key=137107756312393&channel_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fconnect%2Fxd_proxy.php%23cb%3Df129fb17846cfba%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fmalaysiakini.com%252Ff1e223cef308f3a%26relation%3Dparent.parent%26transport%3Dpostmessage&href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.malaysiakini.com%2Fnews%2F142655&layout=standard&locale=zh_CN&no_resize=true&node_type=link&sdk=joey&show_faces=false&width=330" class="fb_ltr" style="border: medium none; overflow: hidden; height: 35px; width: 330px;" name="f269e8a59c73916" id="f31588f655f5492" scrolling="no"></iframe></fb:like>
新加坡内阁资政李光耀日前声称若新加坡当年没被逐出马来西亚，我国的种族关系不会陷入低潮的言论，已招致巫统领袖如巫青团长凯里及前首相马哈迪的口诛笔伐。马哈迪更进一步归咎马来西亚目前出现的种族主义，全是新加坡当年加入大马所种下的祸根。

马哈迪表示，李光耀当年所领导的新加坡人民行动党，在1963年加入大马后，即打出“马来西亚人的马来西亚”口号，就十分的种族主义，鼓动华人情绪，结果更被民主行动党抄袭，成为一个种族主义口号。

他在部落格上撰文说，李光耀所打出的“马来西亚人的马来西亚”口号，暗示华人并没享有与马来人一样的权利，根本就是彻底的种族主义。

“如果鼓动华人对马来人的情绪不算种族性，我不晓得什么才算是种族性。”

行动党口号最种族主义

他说，虽然半岛华人在1964年全国大选选择与巫统的马来人同在，拒绝新加坡人民行动党，但由于“马来西亚人的马来西亚”运动，一些巫统领袖却因此反煽动新加坡的马来人情绪。

根据马哈迪的说法，新加坡接着便出现了前所未有的种族骚乱，而李光耀更因此指责前巫统领袖赛嘉化阿巴（Syed Jaafar Albar）鼓动新加坡的马来人。

“虽然我从未到过新加坡，或会见过那里的马来人，但我也被李光耀标签为极端马来主义者。”

马哈迪续称，就在1965年国内的种族主义高涨，国父东姑阿都拉曼被迫宣布马新分家，但华裔种族主义（Chinese racialism）已因此而种下，就算新加坡人民行动党离开，但民主行动党却继承了前者的产物——“马来西亚人的马来西亚”。

“看回新加坡在马来西亚短短3年的活动，我们是否真可相信，若新加坡没有被‘驱逐’，马来西亚的种族关系能更好？”

新加坡未加入前问题少

马哈迪进一步质问，李光耀在《纽约时报》访问中，指若新加坡没有被“驱逐”，马来西亚的种族关系能更好的说法，是否一个事实或纯粹幻想？

他续称，在新加坡加入半岛，沙巴及砂拉越组成马来西亚之前，马来西亚这个联盟甚少种族主义。

他举例，1955年，80%的马来西亚公民都是马来人，但却愿意把选区交给华裔和印裔上阵，确保华印裔可以在马来人的支持下胜出。

“联盟最终赢得52席中的51席，东姑于是向支持联盟的华印裔，无条件奖赏100个公民权，结果造成马来人人口降至60%。”

暗示光耀是513事件祸首

马哈迪也说，就算在新加坡人民行动党退出大马后，马华也开始批评所谓的马来特权，更要求建立一所华裔大学，而巫统则要求占据更多的经济权，最终造成联盟在1969年的大选惨胜。

他说，行动党及由马华失意分子组成的民政党，在该年大选中斩获甚多，导致联盟深感震惊及慌乱。

“过后，民政党及行动党在马来腹地甘榜巴鲁举行胜利游行，侮辱了马来人，造成513事件爆发。”

“直至今日为止，‘马来西亚人的马来西亚’仍然是行动党的口号。马来西亚的种族主义显然是新加坡加入大马短短3年的结果。”

“我们是否真可相信，若新加坡没被逐出大马，大马就不会有种族主义问题？”

揶揄新加坡专门封杀异议

马哈迪也反指责李光耀，在专访中的论点，显示新加坡才有严重的种族主义问题。

据马哈迪的说法，其中一点是李光耀承认，“当新加坡退出马来西亚后，华人成了新加坡的大多数人口”。

“新加坡人口由75%华人组成，但却占据了95%的经济。这不是真正的多元种族国家，而是一个华人国家，而少数族群非常的贫困。”

他也揶揄新加坡，每当有人出来竞选，对抗人民行动党时，那个人不是被控上法庭，就是被该党收编。

“但是，在马来西亚，反对党却赢得许多国会议席，甚至组成了5个州政府。”

“如果新加坡现在还是马来西亚一员，新加坡人民行动党就能与马来西亚的华人，重新炮制所谓的‘非种族性政治’，而该党也将种族性地统领马来西亚政治。”

“异议全被封杀，没有人敢发出任何异议。”

李光耀纽时专访再掀争议

李光耀是在《纽约时报》访谈中指出，若东姑阿都拉曼当年继续把新加坡留下来，若马来西亚接纳新加坡的模式，接纳多元种族为社会基础，新加坡所达致的大部分成就也能够在马来西亚实现，虽然成就可能没有新加坡那么多，因为必须考虑到马来西亚的范围较广泛。但是却能够改善种族关系及整体的环境。

此外李光耀更声称新加坡的马来人，虽然有些仍然包头巾，却有别于马来西亚的马来人，都是受英文教育，思想非常先进和开放。

他继续分析说，现在马来西亚的种族分化严重，马来人、华裔及印裔在不同的学校就读，生活分隔，关系并不那么融洽，作为隔邻的新加坡，这并非一件好事。
<!-- Begin:Loginbox --> <!-- End:Loginbox --> <!-- Begin:Comment Box -->

 

[Velma]

Why can't the old fart just mind his own business for once? He likes to antagonize Malaysia, dishes out 'good advice' to Japan and carry the balls of the PRC. If he shuts up, there will be lesser anger in the world. No country in the world likes to be told what to do.

It is an irony then, when anybody criticizes Singapore for suppresing opposition and a semi-authoritarian, he goes on the mega-defensive, starts the character-assasination of the critic and sues him for defamation.

 

[tun_dr_m]

Why can't the old fart just mind his own business for once? He likes to antagonize Malaysia, dishes out 'good advice' to Japan and carry the balls of the PRC. If he shuts up, there will be lesser anger in the world. No country in the world likes to be told what to do.

It is an irony then, when anybody criticizes Singapore for suppresing opposition and a semi-authoritarian, he goes on the mega-defensive, starts the character-assasination of the critic and sues him for defamation.

鸡婆欠鸟！

Kay Poh Kiam Kan!

Ought to be fucked for Kay-Poh!

 

[Lee_cunt_yew]

Bravo Dr M! LKY Pit-Cha Lah!

Dr M started fucking LKy & PAp again!



http://malaysiakini.com/news/142654

Dr M: Genesis of racialism began with PAP
<script>author_photo("")</script>

Sep 14, 10 9:12pm

<fb:share-button type="button_count" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;" href="http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/142654"></fb:share-button> <fb:like href="http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/142654" show_faces="false" width="330" style="float: left;"></fb:like>
Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad has blamed Singapore's People's Action Party (PAP) and its founder Lee Kuan Yew as the root cause of racialism in Malaysia.



http://malaysiakini.com/news/142655

驳马新不分家改善种族关系论
马哈迪归咎李光耀当年种祸根
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td id="MUGSHOT"><script>author_photo("")</script>

</td><td id="AUTHOR" valign="bottom">2010年9月14日
晚上 9点20分</td></tr></tbody></table>

<fb:share-button class=" " type="button_count" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;" href="http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/142655">分享 35</fb:share-button> <fb:like class=" fb_edge_widget_with_comment fb_iframe_widget" href="http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/142655" show_faces="false" width="330" style="float: left;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?api_key=137107756312393&channel_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fconnect%2Fxd_proxy.php%23cb%3Df129fb17846cfba%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fmalaysiakini.com%252Ff1e223cef308f3a%26relation%3Dparent.parent%26transport%3Dpostmessage&href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.malaysiakini.com%2Fnews%2F142655&layout=standard&locale=zh_CN&no_resize=true&node_type=link&sdk=joey&show_faces=false&width=330" class="fb_ltr" style="border: medium none; overflow: hidden; height: 35px; width: 330px;" name="f269e8a59c73916" id="f31588f655f5492" scrolling="no"></iframe></fb:like>
新加坡内阁资政李光耀日前声称若新加坡当年没被逐出马来西亚，我国的种族关系不会陷入低潮的言论，已招致巫统领袖如巫青团长凯里及前首相马哈迪的口诛笔伐。马哈迪更进一步归咎马来西亚目前出现的种族主义，全是新加坡当年加入大马所种下的祸根。

马哈迪表示，李光耀当年所领导的新加坡人民行动党，在1963年加入大马后，即打出“马来西亚人的马来西亚”口号，就十分的种族主义，鼓动华人情绪，结果更被民主行动党抄袭，成为一个种族主义口号。

他在部落格上撰文说，李光耀所打出的“马来西亚人的马来西亚”口号，暗示华人并没享有与马来人一样的权利，根本就是彻底的种族主义。

“如果鼓动华人对马来人的情绪不算种族性，我不晓得什么才算是种族性。”

行动党口号最种族主义

他说，虽然半岛华人在1964年全国大选选择与巫统的马来人同在，拒绝新加坡人民行动党，但由于“马来西亚人的马来西亚”运动，一些巫统领袖却因此反煽动新加坡的马来人情绪。

根据马哈迪的说法，新加坡接着便出现了前所未有的种族骚乱，而李光耀更因此指责前巫统领袖赛嘉化阿巴（Syed Jaafar Albar）鼓动新加坡的马来人。

“虽然我从未到过新加坡，或会见过那里的马来人，但我也被李光耀标签为极端马来主义者。”

马哈迪续称，就在1965年国内的种族主义高涨，国父东姑阿都拉曼被迫宣布马新分家，但华裔种族主义（Chinese racialism）已因此而种下，就算新加坡人民行动党离开，但民主行动党却继承了前者的产物——“马来西亚人的马来西亚”。

“看回新加坡在马来西亚短短3年的活动，我们是否真可相信，若新加坡没有被‘驱逐’，马来西亚的种族关系能更好？”

新加坡未加入前问题少

马哈迪进一步质问，李光耀在《纽约时报》访问中，指若新加坡没有被“驱逐”，马来西亚的种族关系能更好的说法，是否一个事实或纯粹幻想？

他续称，在新加坡加入半岛，沙巴及砂拉越组成马来西亚之前，马来西亚这个联盟甚少种族主义。

他举例，1955年，80%的马来西亚公民都是马来人，但却愿意把选区交给华裔和印裔上阵，确保华印裔可以在马来人的支持下胜出。

“联盟最终赢得52席中的51席，东姑于是向支持联盟的华印裔，无条件奖赏100个公民权，结果造成马来人人口降至60%。”

暗示光耀是513事件祸首

马哈迪也说，就算在新加坡人民行动党退出大马后，马华也开始批评所谓的马来特权，更要求建立一所华裔大学，而巫统则要求占据更多的经济权，最终造成联盟在1969年的大选惨胜。

他说，行动党及由马华失意分子组成的民政党，在该年大选中斩获甚多，导致联盟深感震惊及慌乱。

“过后，民政党及行动党在马来腹地甘榜巴鲁举行胜利游行，侮辱了马来人，造成513事件爆发。”

“直至今日为止，‘马来西亚人的马来西亚’仍然是行动党的口号。马来西亚的种族主义显然是新加坡加入大马短短3年的结果。”

“我们是否真可相信，若新加坡没被逐出大马，大马就不会有种族主义问题？”

揶揄新加坡专门封杀异议

马哈迪也反指责李光耀，在专访中的论点，显示新加坡才有严重的种族主义问题。

据马哈迪的说法，其中一点是李光耀承认，“当新加坡退出马来西亚后，华人成了新加坡的大多数人口”。

“新加坡人口由75%华人组成，但却占据了95%的经济。这不是真正的多元种族国家，而是一个华人国家，而少数族群非常的贫困。”

他也揶揄新加坡，每当有人出来竞选，对抗人民行动党时，那个人不是被控上法庭，就是被该党收编。

“但是，在马来西亚，反对党却赢得许多国会议席，甚至组成了5个州政府。”

“如果新加坡现在还是马来西亚一员，新加坡人民行动党就能与马来西亚的华人，重新炮制所谓的‘非种族性政治’，而该党也将种族性地统领马来西亚政治。”

“异议全被封杀，没有人敢发出任何异议。”

李光耀纽时专访再掀争议

李光耀是在《纽约时报》访谈中指出，若东姑阿都拉曼当年继续把新加坡留下来，若马来西亚接纳新加坡的模式，接纳多元种族为社会基础，新加坡所达致的大部分成就也能够在马来西亚实现，虽然成就可能没有新加坡那么多，因为必须考虑到马来西亚的范围较广泛。但是却能够改善种族关系及整体的环境。

此外李光耀更声称新加坡的马来人，虽然有些仍然包头巾，却有别于马来西亚的马来人，都是受英文教育，思想非常先进和开放。

他继续分析说，现在马来西亚的种族分化严重，马来人、华裔及印裔在不同的学校就读，生活分隔，关系并不那么融洽，作为隔邻的新加坡，这并非一件好事。
<!-- Begin:Loginbox --> <!-- End:Loginbox --> <!-- Begin:Comment Box -->

 

[Loofydralb]

Old dog LKY after all these while is ruefully regretting getting kicked out.

Poor old dog, he must be having nightmares in his sleep.

Its quite apparent he is past his use-by -date.

The world has moved on but he is still stuck in the 60s wishing he would be PM of MALAYSIA.

Death would be his salvation from this shameful existence of the failure of his biggest and dumbest experiment. His mistake:

He thought a high IQ and a glib tongue will prevail. Now he's the proven court jester.

 

[humloongson]

Wait until we hear from Najib first. The son of Tun Razak.

 

[Velma]

鸡婆欠鸟！

Kay Poh Kiam Kan!

Ought to be fucked for Kay-Poh!

I agree. Indeed. A little STFU does not hurt.

 

[uncleyap]

哎呀老狗贼啊。。。。

怎么的又再犯贱啊？ 真折堕哦！

自找倒霉，自凑霉头，自作自受呀？

打灯笼上茅房-找死呀？ 一再拒绝吸取过去的惨痛教训啊？ 脸还丢的不够呀？

想恐吓反对党结果作法自弊了啦？活该咯！

你除了阴沟里哪儿都不翻船呢？偏爱阴沟里翻船吗？



喂！阿聋仔啊！

还不敢快出来救你爹啊？

你爹屁股开花，死得很难看喇！快出来救救你爹呀？！ 龟儿子！你还当什么总理哪？我啐！我啐！啐！啐！啐！啐！

看你连自己爹都救不了，百姓能指望你呀？

父子俩一块装聋作哑是吗？一代不如一代！孬种！

闯祸不敢出来担当，从来就没种！

李家王朝祸国殃民！:oIo:

 

[redlightmeansgo]

Old dog LKY after all these while is ruefully regretting getting kicked out.

Poor old dog, he must be having nightmares in his sleep.

Its quite apparent he is past his use-by -date.

These days, there is the added burden of him having to lie beside a comatose hag and tell her stories.

This is the ultimate curse of the wicked: the more you hang on to the past, the more dementia will set in.

One down, one more to go

 

[aw_bark_kark]

These days, there is the added burden of him having to lie beside a comatose hag and tell her stories.

This is the ultimate curse of the wicked: the more you hang on to the past, the more dementia will set in.

One down, one more to go

I think the besotted LCB is talking to a corpse by himself, no one around dare tell him that she is dead. LCB really need IMH badly.

 

[tun_dr_m]

[COLOR="_______"]LKY is a racist pig in disguise. A coward and an egoistic bastard too.[/COLOR]

Home > Breaking News > SE Asia > Story
Sep 15, 2010
Dr M rebuts MM Lee
He says there was less racial politics before that
Dr Mahathir rejected MM Lee's comments in The New York Times interview. -- PHOTO: REUTERS

KUALA LUMPUR - FORMER prime minister Mahathir Mohamad said yesterday that racism in Malaysia is the result of Singapore's two-year membership in Malaysia.

Rebutting recent comments made by Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, Tun Dr Mahathir wrote in his blog: 'With the background of Singapore's activities in Malaysia in the short three (sic) years of its membership, can we really believe that if it had not been 'turfed out', race relations would be better in Malaysia?

'While Kwan Yew (sic) talks about his belief that all ethnic communities should free themselves from the shackles of racial segregation in order to promote fairness and equality among the races, he also said that 'once we are by ourselves (out of Malaysia) the Chinese become the majority'.'

Mr Lee, in an interview with The New York Times, compared how Singapore and Malaysia handled racial relations.

He said Malaysia would have achieved much of what Singapore had accomplished if it had accepted a multiracial base, and described Malaysia as being in a 'most unhappy situation'.

'I think if the Tunku had kept us together, what we did in Singapore - had Malaysia accepted a multiracial base for their society - much of what we've achieved in Singapore would have been achieved in Malaysia. But not as much, because it's a much broader base. We would have improved inter-racial relations and an improved holistic situation,' Mr Lee had said in the interview, referring to Malaysia's first prime minister, Tunku Abdul Rahman.

 

[jixiaolan]

Expecting apology? There will be none. Every time we are near to election period, politicians will make bold controversial statement to show their political toughness and stir the emotion of the electorate.

 

[halsey02]

Wait until we hear from Najib first. The son of Tun Razak.

You kidding!...when he arrives, while he is walking, you shout, 'MONGOLIAN", he will automatically reply " where'?...and have to excuse himself to the toliet...

 

[halsey02]

Next chapter : Surely Mahathir will not miss the opportunities to throw some sarcastic stones at MM Lee or Singapore. Hope someone can post his remarks here - makes hilarious reading at times. (My one-cent worth of thought.)

http://chedet.co.cc/chedetblog/2010/09/malaysia-according-to-lky.html#more

It would be interesting if MM would sue Dr.M for his remarks??