• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

* Why the Workers’ Party Didn't Hand Over Marine Parade to Other Opposition

8::::::D

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
415
Points
28
Goh Meng Seng is a born loser who whine like a spoiled child

Let me break it down.

Opposition parties may be working together to challenge the PAP, but at the end of the day, they’re also competing with each other. They’re all fighting for the same pool of resources, capable candidates, and public attention. In this case, the Workers’ Party (WP) has been putting in serious effort in Marine Parade for the past 15 years. But after the electoral boundaries changed, they decided that Punggol might be a better place to contest. The problem is, they don’t have enough strong candidates to run in both places at the same time.

So realistically, it wouldn’t make sense for WP to tell another opposition leader like Goh Meng Seng, “Hey, we’ve spent 15 years working in Marine Parade, but we’re short on people now—why don’t you just take over everything we’ve built?”

If WP really wanted to stay in Marine Parade, they could’ve easily sent a backup team that would probably still do better than Goh Meng Seng’s team.


PPP secretary-general Goh Meng Seng took to Facebook to criticise the WP for what he called a pattern of abandoning constituencies during past general elections.

He said the WP abandoned Jalan Besar (formerly Moulmein-Kallang) in GE2015, MacPherson in 2020 and now Marine Parade-Braddell Heights in GE2025.

He asked: “Will they abandon Tampines voters in GE2030 and leave it uncontested and (a) walkover again?”

Mr Goh, who is leading the PPP team in a four-cornered fight in Tampines GRC, said WP’s move is an “irresponsible and senseless manoeuvre” as it denied about 130,000 Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC residents the chance to vote.

He added that if WP had made its intention clear earlier, PPP would have contested the GRC
 
Marine Parade is always there. It the freedom of other oppositions to contest.

If GMS had no qualm about going head on with WP in Tampines, what is stopping him from contesting in MP GRC?
 
It's all due to recent electoral boundary changes. If I am PS, I will also pull out of Marine Parade and focus on East Coast GRC instead.

https://mothership.sg/2025/04/pritam-singh-marine-parade-walkover-explain/

Pritam Singh explains why WP didn't contest in Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC​

1745460195649.png

Workers' Party chief Pritam Singh has addressed the walkover at Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC.

In a Facebook post on Apr. 23, after nominations closed at 12pm, Singh said the party had to make the difficult choice of where to deploy their limited resources.

Singh said that this was so as the electoral boundaries got redrawn ahead of GE2025.

Singh wrote:
" The Workers’ Party contested in Marine Parade GRC since GE2015, after Joo Chiat SMC was drawn into it following GE2011. Voters would remember that our candidate for Joo Chiat SMC, Yee Jenn Jong, lost by a mere 388 votes at GE2011.

For GE2025, Joo Chiat SMC has been drawn out of Marine Parade GRC into East Coast GRC
by the Electoral Boundary Review Committee. Meanwhile, MacPherson SMC and other estates have been drawn into the newly constituted Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC.

It is with a heavy heart I share that The Workers' Party will not stand in Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC for these general elections.

This was a very difficult decision for us, and as a small opposition party, we are constantly faced with difficult choices about where and how best to deploy our limited resources, particularly after electoral boundaries are redrawn.

After much reflection and careful consideration, we have determined that in order to continue fighting for the principles and changes we all believe in, and to give our candidates the best chance of electoral success, the Party must focus its best efforts this GE on a smaller number of constituencies than we would have hoped to contest. "

He thanked the residents there for their support and encouragement.
----------------------
 
if WP contested MP, the Manpower Minister remains in MP, DPM remains in CCK. WP has higher chances of winning Punggol GRC ?
 
PAP fielded its top candidates in the MP constituency, only to discover that the WP had no intention of contesting the seat. As a result, PAP feel played out by the opposition?
 
If WP fielded their best team in MP, TSL will still be there GKY will also contest in MP there probably either TCM or HSK will stay for another term. Same strategy like last GE HSK pop up last minute
 
If WP fielded their best team in MP, TSL will still be there GKY will also contest in MP there probably either TCM or HSK will stay for another term. Same strategy like last GE HSK pop up last minute

Yes, its a strategic maneuvering by both WP and PAP at the highest levels. Looks more like PAP now tio pwned big time and might lose two big guns ministers in CCK and Punggol GRC by rising party PSP.

Goh Meng Seng during nomination day damn xia suay still dare to make a petty speech bear grudge and continue to blame the WP (for fark?). He can go eat shit.
 
if WP contested MP, the Manpower Minister remains in MP, DPM remains in CCK. WP has higher chances of winning Punggol GRC ?
Might as well say if 60% sinkies have abit of the political awareness of uneducated thai farmers maybe pap won’t be lording over us
 
Goh Meng Seng is a born loser who whine like a spoiled child

Let me break it down.

Opposition parties may be working together to challenge the PAP, but at the end of the day, they’re also competing with each other. They’re all fighting for the same pool of resources, capable candidates, and public attention. In this case, the Workers’ Party (WP) has been putting in serious effort in Marine Parade for the past 15 years. But after the electoral boundaries changed, they decided that Punggol might be a better place to contest. The problem is, they don’t have enough strong candidates to run in both places at the same time.

So realistically, it wouldn’t make sense for WP to tell another opposition leader like Goh Meng Seng, “Hey, we’ve spent 15 years working in Marine Parade, but we’re short on people now—why don’t you just take over everything we’ve built?”

If WP really wanted to stay in Marine Parade, they could’ve easily sent a backup team that would probably still do better than Goh Meng Seng’s team.


assuming WP is not a mole party now................should send 5 part-timers to contest there to stake their claim...............otherwise next elections may have 3-corner fights............or voters not happy with WP..........

unless WP no money to pay deposits ??!!...........can't be what...........
 
Yes, its a strategic maneuvering by both WP and PAP at the highest levels. Looks more like PAP now tio pwned big time and might lose two big guns ministers in CCK and Punggol GRC by rising party PSP.

Goh Meng Seng during nomination day damn xia suay still dare to make a petty speech bear grudge and continue to blame the WP (for fark?). He can go eat shit.
GMS is still around? lol only weirdos like Iris koh would support him
 
assuming WP is not a mole party now................should send 5 part-timers to contest there to stake their claim...............otherwise next elections may have 3-corner fights............or voters not happy with WP..........

unless WP no money to pay deposits ??!!...........can't be what...........
Pritam did his maths, MacPherson area Lau Humkus will pull votes for Rin Tin Tin, minimum 55% overall votes for incumbent even if a WP A-list team is fielded.
 
GMS is still around? lol only weirdos like Iris koh would support him
Then you better make sure to take vaccines when the next scamdemic comes.

Let’s see who the weirdo that takes vaccines like a lab rat
 
Unity among opposition parties only goes so far. From my experience in an industry association made up of various companies, I noticed that many company leaders participated not to push for collective progress, but to ensure the association didn’t make recommendations that might go against their own interests.
The same applies to opposition unity. Each party is ultimately protecting its own turf. Imagine if Pritam Singh had invited Goh Meng Seng to take over Marine Parade. Come the 2030 election, Goh would likely not step aside, and that’s not a scenario the Workers’ Party would welcome. Why would they willingly empower a rival?
The truth is, the Workers’ Party is already facing a shortage of top-tier candidates. They fully intend to contest in Marine Parade, but to do that effectively, they need strong, credible talent, not just anyone.
If we want to strengthen the opposition, good people need to step up and join the Workers’ Party. The residents deserve to see that real talent is stepping forward, not just any Tom, Dick, or Harry like "Goh Meng Seng"
 
Yes, its a strategic maneuvering by both WP and PAP at the highest levels. Looks more like PAP now tio pwned big time and might lose two big guns ministers in CCK and Punggol GRC by rising party PSP.

Goh Meng Seng during nomination day damn xia suay still dare to make a petty speech bear grudge and continue to blame the WP (for fark?). He can go eat shit.
That is a load of crock explanation....in the past...the pap MPs who won via walkover will just campaign at the contested GRCs...like what happen at Cheng San....every seat must to contested to tie down the pap mps....anyway Wanker Bayi has pissed alot of supporters off....the only way forward is PSP wins in West Coast...and Ah Chee and Ah Paul win their seats...that way we give them a chance..instead of having pap lite endorsing pap policies
 
That is a load of crock explanation....in the past...the pap MPs who won via walkover will just campaign at the contested GRCs...like what happen at Cheng San....every seat must to contested to tie down the pap mps....anyway Wanker Bayi has pissed alot of supporters off....the only way forward is PSP wins in West Coast...and Ah Chee and Ah Paul win their seats...that way we give them a chance..instead of having pap lite endorsing pap policies

Well, managing a political party is not easy esp. larger ones like WP. They might have pre-selected a series of new candidates but resources is still limited to field the right candidate for each area. For GE 2025, due to recent electoral boundary changes by ELD there is a total of 18 GRCs and 15 SMCs vs 17 GRCs and 14 SMCs with some SMCs or parts of it being removed or merged with former GRCs like rojak besides new GRCs created. So the issue is far more complex than it seems to ensure maximum electoral advantage for WP.

Let Grok AI explains:
----------------------

The Workers’ Party (WP) unexpectedly withdrew from contesting Marine Parade-Braddell Heights Group Representation Constituency (GRC) in Singapore’s General Election (GE) 2025, opting instead to field a team in Tampines GRC, a constituency they have never contested before. This decision has led to a four-cornered fight in Tampines GRC, involving WP, the People’s Action Party (PAP), the National Solidarity Party (NSP), and the People’s Power Party (PPP). Let’s analyze the purported original WP candidates for Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC, the reasons for WP’s sudden contest in Tampines GRC, the role of Faisal Manap in potentially garnering Malay votes, and the possible real reasons behind WP’s strategic shift.

Purported Original Candidates for Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC​

WP was widely expected to contest Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC, as they had consistently engaged the area since GE 2020, where they secured 42.26% of the vote in the former Marine Parade GRC. Several WP members were spotted on the ground, leading to speculation about their candidacy:
  • Nathaniel Koh: An IT professional who contested Marine Parade GRC in 2020, Koh was seen at Marine Parade Central Market and Food Centre as recently as April 19, 2025, indicating active engagement.
  • Fadli Fawzi: A lawyer who also ran in Marine Parade GRC in 2020, Fawzi was visible during grassroots activities, including Ramadan outreach, alongside other WP members.
  • Jeraldine Phneah: An account director at AlphaSense, Phneah had been increasingly active in Marine Parade-Braddell Heights, notably during Ramadan events where she was seen interacting with residents in Malay. Her presence sparked speculation that WP might field a female candidate for the first time since 2015.
  • Harpreet Singh Nehal: A senior counsel and WP’s “star catch” for GE 2025, Singh was frequently spotted in Marine Parade, raising expectations that he might lead the team.
These individuals were likely part of the purported WP team for Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC, given their visibility and historical involvement in the area. However, WP ultimately did not field any candidates there, resulting in a walkover for PAP.

Why Contest Tampines GRC Despite Limited Historical Presence?
WP’s decision to contest Tampines GRC, where they have no historical presence since its formation in 1988, was a surprise move, especially given the four-cornered fight against PAP, NSP, and PPP. Several factors may explain this shift:
  • Strategic Resource Allocation: WP Secretary-General Pritam Singh stated that the party faced “difficult choices” about deploying limited resources after electoral boundary changes. By focusing on fewer constituencies, WP aimed to give their candidates the best chance of electoral success. Tampines GRC, with 170,000 registered electors, offered a larger voter base compared to Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC’s 131,493, potentially maximizing WP’s impact.
  • Groundwork in Tampines: Despite no prior contest, WP had been laying groundwork in Tampines since at least 2016, including house visits and community engagement. Singh noted that WP had wanted to field a team in Tampines for GE 2020 but lacked sufficient candidates at the time. By 2025, WP had a slate ready, led by Faisal Manap, with new faces Ong Lue Ping, Jimmy Tan, Eileen Chong, and Michael Thng.
  • Faisal Manap and Malay Votes: Tampines GRC has the highest proportion of Malay voters among GRCs, with nearly one in four residents being Malay. Faisal Manap, a former Aljunied GRC MP and WP vice-chairman, is a prominent Malay-Muslim leader. His move to Tampines was a strategic choice, as Singh revealed Faisal had long wanted to contest there. Faisal’s candidacy could appeal to Malay voters, especially given WP’s manifesto addressing issues like the Gaza conflict and advocating for Singapore to recognize Palestine, which resonates with Malay-Muslim sentiments.

Possible Real Reasons for the Pullout and Shift to Tampines GRC​

While WP cited strategic resource allocation, deeper analysis reveals additional motivations and calculations behind the pullout from Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC and the contest in Tampines GRC:
  • Boundary Changes and Perceived Odds:
    • Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC underwent significant boundary changes, absorbing MacPherson SMC and parts of Mountbatten and Potong Pasir SMCs while ceding Joo Chiat to East Coast GRC. These changes may have altered the demographic and political landscape, potentially making it less favorable for WP. For instance, MacPherson was a PAP stronghold under Tin Pei Ling, and Potong Pasir has a mixed history, having been held by the opposition until 2011.
    • In contrast, Tampines GRC absorbed three polling districts (3,834 voters) from WP-held Aljunied GRC, which could provide a small but strategic voter base familiar with WP. Additionally, PAP’s 66.41% voteshare in Tampines in 2020 was below their 72.06% in 2015, suggesting a potential softening of support that WP might exploit.
  • Four-Cornered Fight Dynamics:
    • The four-cornered fight in Tampines GRC, while risky, might benefit WP if opposition votes split between NSP and PPP, both of which have weaker historical performances. NSP’s best showing in Tampines was 42.78% in 2011, but their voteshare dropped to 33.59% in 2020. PPP, led by Goh Meng Seng, has limited traction. If NSP and PPP each take only 2–3% of the vote, as speculated in online discussions, WP could consolidate the remaining opposition votes, potentially challenging PAP’s majority.
    • In Marine Parade-Braddell Heights, a straight fight against PAP might have been less winnable, given PAP’s stronger slate, including Speaker Seah Kian Peng and Minister of State Faishal Ibrahim, despite the last-minute switch of Tan See Leng to Chua Chu Kang GRC.
  • Maximizing Electoral Impact:
    • WP’s “Eastfront” strategy focuses on interconnected eastern constituencies like Aljunied, Sengkang, East Coast, and now Tampines and Punggol GRCs. By contesting Tampines, WP positions itself to expand its influence in the east, where it already holds Aljunied and Sengkang. Marine Parade-Braddell Heights, while historically contested, might have been seen as a lower-priority target given the boundary changes and PAP’s entrenched presence.
    • Faisal’s move to Tampines aligns with this strategy, as his appeal to Malay voters could bolster WP’s chances in a GRC with a significant Malay population, potentially offsetting the lack of historical presence.
  • Internal Party Dynamics and Candidate Readiness:
    • WP’s decision might reflect internal assessments of candidate readiness. The Tampines team, except for Faisal, consists of new faces, suggesting WP prioritized experienced candidates like Harpreet Singh (who was fielded in Punggol GRC) for other battlegrounds. Marine Parade-Braddell Heights might have required a stronger, more established team to compete effectively, which WP couldn’t assemble given their resource constraints.
    • Singh’s comment that PAP was “watching where we were going” hints at a tactical move to avoid a predictable contest in Marine Parade, where PAP might have prepared a stronger defense, and instead surprise them in Tampines, where PAP’s slate, while formidable, includes newcomers like David Neo and Charlene Chen.
  • Voter Sentiment and National Issues:
    • Tampines residents have voiced concerns over cost-of-living issues, a key point in WP’s campaign. Faisal’s team could capitalize on this discontent, especially among Malay voters, to challenge PAP’s dominance. In contrast, Marine Parade-Braddell Heights, with PAP’s long tenure and recent walkover, might have less voter frustration to leverage.
    • The national push for diversity in parliament, as acknowledged by PM Lawrence Wong post-GE 2020, might also encourage WP to spread their efforts across new constituencies like Tampines, where a multi-cornered fight could amplify their visibility and message.

Critical Examination​

WP’s stated reason of “strategic resource allocation” holds some weight, as small opposition parties often face tough choices in Singapore’s electoral landscape. However, the move to Tampines GRC, a PAP stronghold with no prior WP contest, raises questions about the party’s confidence in Marine Parade-Braddell Heights. The boundary changes in Marine Parade might have made the constituency less winnable, but WP’s decade-long groundwork there suggests they had a foundation to build on. The decision to abandon this effort in favor of Tampines, where they face a four-cornered fight, might reflect an overestimation of their ability to consolidate opposition votes or an underestimation of PAP’s resilience in Tampines, especially with Masagos Zulkifli anchoring the team—a figure popular among Malay voters.

Faisal’s deployment to Tampines likely aims to garner Malay votes, but this alone may not suffice in a four-cornered fight, where vote-splitting could favor PAP. Some online sentiments question WP’s strategy, arguing that Tampines, with limited groundwork, might be a harder battle than Marine Parade, where WP had a 42.26% voteshare in 2020. The pullout also drew criticism from other opposition parties, who felt it denied Marine Parade voters a democratic choice, suggesting WP prioritized winnable seats over broader representation—a pragmatic but potentially shortsighted move.

Conclusion​

The purported original WP candidates for Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC likely included Nathaniel Koh, Fadli Fawzi, Jeraldine Phneah, and Harpreet Singh Nehal, based on their active engagement in the area. WP’s sudden contest in Tampines GRC, despite no historical presence, stems from a strategic shift to focus resources on fewer constituencies, leverage groundwork since 2016, and deploy Faisal Manap to appeal to Tampines’ significant Malay population. The real reasons for the pullout and Tampines contest include boundary change impacts, the dynamics of a four-cornered fight, WP’s Eastfront strategy, candidate readiness, and targeting voter discontent on national issues. While Faisal’s presence aims to garner Malay votes, WP’s success in Tampines will depend on their ability to consolidate opposition support amidst a fragmented contest, a challenge that may prove tougher than anticipated.
---------------------
 
Last edited:
Back
Top