• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PM Lawrence Wong on steering Singapore through global change

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Messages
38,218
Points
113
Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong deliverw the 14th S Rajaratnam Lecture, where he will share his perspectives on geopolitical developments and outline how Singapore is positioning itself to navigate the evolving global landscape.

 
Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong deliverw the 14th S Rajaratnam Lecture, where he will share his perspectives on geopolitical developments and outline how Singapore is positioning itself to navigate the evolving global landscape.


lQMyhIc.gif
 
I hope this lawless fellow will not bring SG against China.
Now Malaysia is solidly on the right side of history .... China & Malaysia in love.
.
 
Global change will come, but remember to side with the right team.

For starters, you can disavow those Davos globalist fuckers. Also consider removing Tharman as the overpaid Istana dog.

But of course you won't. So I expect you, and this island, to get fucked by the mentioned global change. :cool:



 
Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong deliverw the 14th S Rajaratnam Lecture, where he will share his perspectives on geopolitical developments and outline how Singapore is positioning itself to navigate the evolving global landscape.


He is getting too predictable making generic motherhood statements in his speeches with no concrete plans layout for people to analyze. Very disappointing Prime Minister. Not up to par.
 
He is getting too predictable making generic motherhood statements in his speeches with no concrete plans layout for people to analyze. Very disappointing Prime Minister. Not up to par.
PM LW needs to fire his speech writer since he keeps using clichés which are overused to the point of losing their original meaning, impact and novelty. LW has become so predictable, stale, unoriginal and unimaginative. His seat-warming days are numbered.
 
PM LW needs to fire his speech writer since he keeps using clichés which are overused to the point of losing their original meaning, impact and novelty. LW has become so predictable, stale, unoriginal and unimaginative. His seat-warming days are numbered.
Really generic load of shit everything when he speaks. Either his speech writer is crap or he really clueless in his PM job.
 
Last edited:
I feel a growing alienation from S'pore. It is upsetting to no longer recognise the country I once called home. The claim of affordability rings hollow to most S'porean; especially considering the changing demographics of my community and the disruptive behaviour we experience. Furthermore, the necessity of dual-income households just to manage the cost of living (particularly housing), highlights a basic issue with how affordability is measured. This economic reality has clear consequences for families and S'pore's birth rate; concerns we doubt are fully grasped by those in leadership who are grossly overpaid.
 
But he can determine the BTO flat prices!
The govt promotes homeownership as a means to both secure a stake in SG's growth and build long-term wealth for our retirement. At the same time, PM Wong expresses confidence in the continued affordability of HDB flats. This reveals a basic policy paradox: the difficulty in pursuing asset appreciation and affordability in the housing market at the same time. Trying to reconcile the dual purpose of housing (as both a place to reside and an investment), creates difficulties for policymakers. Perhaps it is time to critically evaluate this long-standing policy.
 
Any regime which persists with a carbon tax needs to be voted out or driven out by force.
 
Back
Top