Dipshit Moron Leong Full of Shit, 4th and 5th Waves Causing Lockdowns in Europe

[capamerica]

oh so BOOKMARKED! So funny now ADMIN has "mental illness" LOL!

As we all know Sam Leong has something wrong with him.

 

[capamerica]

State data all from CDC just in case the usual morons accuse me of using fake data which seems to be their only comeback.

Wrong, just like all the other fake crap you find. Lucky peer reviewed data is available to refute 100% of your so called baseless claims.

Just go get help for your problems already, do us all a favor.

 

[shockshiok]

State data all from CDC just in case the usual morons accuse me of using fake data which seems to be their only comeback.

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/29/8845...-was-fired-for-not-manipulating-covid-19-data


Florida Scientist Says She Was Fired For Not Manipulating COVID-19 Data

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Flipboard
• Email

June 29, 20205:02 AM ET
Heard on Morning Edition

LISTEN· 7:377-Minute ListenAdd toPLAYLIST

• Download
• Embed
  
  
• Transcript

NPR's Rachel Martin talks to Rebekah Jones, a scientist who was fired from Florida's health department, who is now publishing a coronavirus dashboard of her own to track the state's COVID-19 cases.
NOEL KING, HOST:
In Florida, COVID cases are surging. It was one of the first states to reopen back in May. And Governor Ron DeSantis said his decision was data driven. But Rebekah Jones says data scientists were pressured to fix the numbers to make the argument to reopen. Up until May, she worked for Florida's Department of Health, and she created Florida's coronavirus data portal. She talked to Rachel on Skype.
REBEKAH JONES: The dashboard itself was a simple way to deliver critical information to the public. So I included things like, you know, cases per day, total cases that we had confirmed, deaths that had been confirmed over time, information for individual counties, testing information, all of that kind of critical information need-to-know stuff. The other side of that was a data portal that allowed people to easily download, essentially, all of the public data that we had. And that whole data system was my job for, you know, 16 hours a day every day for months until early May.
RACHEL MARTIN, BYLINE: So what happened then?
JONES: I was asked by DOH leadership to manually change numbers. This was a week before the reopening plan officially kicked off into phase one. I was asked to do the analysis and present the findings about which counties met the criteria for reopening. The criteria followed more or less the White House panel's recommendations, but our epidemiology team also contributed to that as well. As soon as I presented the results, they were essentially the opposite of what they had anticipated. The whole day while we're having this kind of back and forth changing this, not showing that, the plan was being printed and stapled right in front of me. So it was very clear at that point that the science behind the supposedly science-driven plan didn't matter because the plan was already made.

 

[Leongsam]

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/29/8845...-was-fired-for-not-manipulating-covid-19-data


Florida Scientist Says She Was Fired For Not Manipulating COVID-19 Data

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Flipboard
• Email

June 29, 20205:02 AM ET
Heard on Morning Edition

LISTEN· 7:377-Minute ListenAdd toPLAYLIST

• Download
• Embed
  
  
• Transcript

NPR's Rachel Martin talks to Rebekah Jones, a scientist who was fired from Florida's health department, who is now publishing a coronavirus dashboard of her own to track the state's COVID-19 cases.
NOEL KING, HOST:
In Florida, COVID cases are surging. It was one of the first states to reopen back in May. And Governor Ron DeSantis said his decision was data driven. But Rebekah Jones says data scientists were pressured to fix the numbers to make the argument to reopen. Up until May, she worked for Florida's Department of Health, and she created Florida's coronavirus data portal. She talked to Rachel on Skype.
REBEKAH JONES: The dashboard itself was a simple way to deliver critical information to the public. So I included things like, you know, cases per day, total cases that we had confirmed, deaths that had been confirmed over time, information for individual counties, testing information, all of that kind of critical information need-to-know stuff. The other side of that was a data portal that allowed people to easily download, essentially, all of the public data that we had. And that whole data system was my job for, you know, 16 hours a day every day for months until early May.
RACHEL MARTIN, BYLINE: So what happened then?
JONES: I was asked by DOH leadership to manually change numbers. This was a week before the reopening plan officially kicked off into phase one. I was asked to do the analysis and present the findings about which counties met the criteria for reopening. The criteria followed more or less the White House panel's recommendations, but our epidemiology team also contributed to that as well. As soon as I presented the results, they were essentially the opposite of what they had anticipated. The whole day while we're having this kind of back and forth changing this, not showing that, the plan was being printed and stapled right in front of me. So it was very clear at that point that the science behind the supposedly science-driven plan didn't matter because the plan was already made.

Cuomo Aides Rewrote Nursing Home Report to Hide Higher Death Toll
J. David Goodman, Danny Hakim

9-12 minutes


The intervention was the earliest action yet known in an effort by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo that concealed how many nursing home residents died in the pandemic.

Credit...Cindy Schultz for The New York Times
Published March 4, 2021Updated March 19, 2021
Top aides to Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo were alarmed: A report written by state health officials had just landed, and it included a count of how many nursing home residents in New York had died in the pandemic.
The number — more than 9,000 by that point in June — was not public, and the governor’s most senior aides wanted to keep it that way. They rewrote the report to take it out, according to interviews and documents reviewed by The New York Times.
The extraordinary intervention, which came just as Mr. Cuomo was starting to write a book on his pandemic achievements, was the earliest act yet known in what critics have called a monthslong effort by the governor and his aides to obscure the full scope of nursing home deaths.
After the state attorney general revealed earlier this year that thousands of deaths of nursing home residents had been undercounted, Mr. Cuomo finally released the complete data, saying he had withheld it out of concern that the Trump administration might pursue a politically motivated inquiry into the state’s handling of the outbreak in nursing homes.
But Mr. Cuomo and his aides actually began concealing the numbers months earlier, as his aides were battling their own top health officials, and well before requests for data arrived from federal authorities, according to documents and interviews with six people with direct knowledge of the discussions, who requested anonymity to describe the closed-door debates.
The central role played by the governor’s top aides reflected the lengths to which Mr. Cuomo has gone in the middle of a deadly pandemic to control data, brush aside public health expertise and bolster his position as a national leader in the fight against the coronavirus.
As the nursing home report was being written, the New York State Health Department’s data — contained in a chart reviewed by The Times that was included in a draft — put the death toll roughly 50 percent higher than the figure then being cited publicly by the Cuomo administration.
The Health Department worked on the report with McKinsey, a consulting firm hired by Mr. Cuomo to help with the pandemic response. The chart they created compared nursing home deaths in New York with other states. New York’s total of 9,250 deaths far exceeded that of the next-highest state, New Jersey, which had 6,150 at the time.
The changes sought by the governor’s aides fueled bitter exchanges with health officials working on the report. The conflict punctuated an already tense and devolving relationship between Mr. Cuomo and his Health Department, one that would fuel an exodus of the state’s top public health officials.

Image
Credit...Yuki Iwamura/Associated Press
In the past week, Mr. Cuomo’s once seemingly unshakable grip on power has been buffeted by a wave of scandal. Three women have accused the governor of inappropriate conduct, including workplace sexual harassment. On Wednesday, he publicly apologized for his actions, which are soon to be subjected to an independent investigation overseen by the state attorney general.
The crisis over Mr. Cuomo’s behavior with women came just as his administration had been dealing with political turmoil over nursing homes. Lawmakers moved to strip him of the emergency powers he had been granted during the pandemic, and federal prosecutors in Brooklyn opened a separate investigation.
An outside lawyer hired by the state has begun interviewing officials about the handling of nursing homes during the pandemic, according to a person with knowledge of the discussions.
The aides who were involved in changing the report included Melissa DeRosa, the governor’s top aide; Linda Lacewell, the head of the state’s Department of Financial Services; and Jim Malatras, a former top adviser to Mr. Cuomo brought back to work on the pandemic. None had public health expertise.
In response to a detailed list of questions from The Times sent on Tuesday, the governor’s office responded with a statement Thursday night from Beth Garvey, a special counsel, who said “the out-of-facility data was omitted after D.O.H. could not confirm it had been adequately verified.” She added that the additional data did not change the conclusion of the report.
The tension over the death count dated to the early weeks of the pandemic when Mr. Cuomo issued an order preventing nursing homes from turning away people discharged from the hospital after being treated for Covid-19. The order was similar to ones issued in other states aimed at preventing hospitals from becoming overwhelmed.
But by late spring, Republicans were suggesting that the order had caused a deadly spread of the virus in nursing homes. Mr. Cuomo disputed that it had. Still, critics and others seized on the way the state was publicly reporting deaths: Unlike other states, New York excluded residents who had been transferred to hospitals and died there, effectively cloaking how many nursing home residents had died of Covid-19.
The 33-page report, which was issued in July by the state Health Department, found Mr. Cuomo’s policies were not to blame, but it became a turning point in the Albany debate over the governor’s policies.
The day after the report was published, legislators began calling for hearings and requesting complete data. Public health officials criticized its approach. A think tank began seeking the data the next month, as did the Justice Department.
Health officials, nursing home operators and even some of Mr. Cuomo’s aides expressed bafflement at the governor’s apparent insistence on delaying the release of the data for so long, as none of the information released so far has changed the overall number of Covid-19 deaths in New York — now more than 47,000, including more than 15,000 nursing home residents.
But the July report allowed Mr. Cuomo to treat the nursing home issue as resolved last year, paving the way for him to focus on touting New York’s success in controlling the virus.
“I am now thinking about writing a book about what we went through,” Mr. Cuomo said four days after the report’s release, his first public comments about a possible book.

Image

Credit...Dave Sanders for The New York Times
By that point, he was already seeking formal approval from a state ethics agency to earn outside income from book sales, according to a person with knowledge of his planning at the time.
The governor’s policy to direct nursing homes to accept and readmit patients who had tested positive for the coronavirus remains a subject of intense debate. An investigation by the attorney general’s office, released in January, said that Mr. Cuomo’s memo to nursing homes was consistent with federal guidance, but it “may have put residents at increased risk of harm in some facilities.”
Ms. Garvey said in her statement that the governor’s order did not drive nursing home deaths, a conclusion that was also reached in the Health Department report.
At the time when the report was being prepared, Mr. Cuomo, a third-term Democrat, still enjoyed broad popularity for his televised news briefings.
For its report, the Health Department had drawn on data submitted by the state’s more than 600 nursing homes, which were particularly hard hit in March and early April, as New York became a global epicenter.
“To us, it was clear: that you’ve got to report cases and deaths by all categories — case in nursing home, case in hospital,” said Stuart Almer, chief executive of Gurwin Health Care System, which runs a 460-bed nursing facility on Long Island that has recorded 65 resident deaths from Covid-19. “We always had confidence, and still do, in our numbers.”

Image

Credit...Benjamin Norman for The New York Times
State health officials could see from the data that a significant number of residents died after being transferred to hospitals. The state health commissioner, Dr. Howard Zucker, had been aware as early as June that officials in his department believed the data was good enough to include in the report, according to two people with knowledge of the discussions.
But Dr. Zucker testified to lawmakers in early August that the department was still auditing the numbers and could not release them. State Senator Gustavo Rivera, the chair of the health committee, suggested during the hearing that the data was being withheld to improve the governor’s image.
“That’s a problem, bro,” Mr. Rivera told Dr. Zucker. “It seems, sir, that, in this case, you are choosing to define it differently so that you can look better.”
In a statement issued on Thursday, Gary Holmes, a spokesman for the Health Department, echoed Ms. Garvey’s words, disputing that the numbers had been ready in time for the report and saying that, regardless, they would not have changed its conclusions.
Dr. Eleanor Adams was the Health Department’s lead on the report, but her draft was substantially rewritten by Mr. Malatras, now the chancellor of the State University of New York system. He was among a number of officials and former advisers temporarily recruited by Mr. Cuomo to assist with the pandemic response.
The back-and-forth went well beyond the usual process of the governor’s office suggesting edits to an agency report, and became “intense” at times, according to two people with knowledge of the discussions.
Health officials felt the governor’s office, whose opinion was conveyed by Mr. Malatras, wanted to simplify too much. They worried it was no longer a true scientific report, but feared for their jobs if they did not go along.
Even so, an edited version prepared by Mr. Malatras did not remove the higher death toll.
That occurred later, after Ms. DeRosa and Ms. Lacewell became aware of its inclusion. It was taken out soon after.
Luis Ferré-Sadurní contributed reporting.

 

[Leongsam]

Wrong, just like all the other fake crap you find. Lucky peer reviewed data is available to refute 100% of your so called baseless claims.

Just go get help for your problems already, do us all a favor.

Point me to what you consider to be a reliable source of data and I will plot the graphs accordingly.

 

[redbull313]

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/29/8845...-was-fired-for-not-manipulating-covid-19-data


Florida Scientist Says She Was Fired For Not Manipulating COVID-19 Data

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Flipboard
• Email

June 29, 20205:02 AM ET
Heard on Morning Edition

LISTEN· 7:377-Minute ListenAdd toPLAYLIST

• Download
• Embed
  
  
• Transcript

NPR's Rachel Martin talks to Rebekah Jones, a scientist who was fired from Florida's health department, who is now publishing a coronavirus dashboard of her own to track the state's COVID-19 cases.
NOEL KING, HOST:
In Florida, COVID cases are surging. It was one of the first states to reopen back in May. And Governor Ron DeSantis said his decision was data driven. But Rebekah Jones says data scientists were pressured to fix the numbers to make the argument to reopen. Up until May, she worked for Florida's Department of Health, and she created Florida's coronavirus data portal. She talked to Rachel on Skype.
REBEKAH JONES: The dashboard itself was a simple way to deliver critical information to the public. So I included things like, you know, cases per day, total cases that we had confirmed, deaths that had been confirmed over time, information for individual counties, testing information, all of that kind of critical information need-to-know stuff. The other side of that was a data portal that allowed people to easily download, essentially, all of the public data that we had. And that whole data system was my job for, you know, 16 hours a day every day for months until early May.
RACHEL MARTIN, BYLINE: So what happened then?
JONES: I was asked by DOH leadership to manually change numbers. This was a week before the reopening plan officially kicked off into phase one. I was asked to do the analysis and present the findings about which counties met the criteria for reopening. The criteria followed more or less the White House panel's recommendations, but our epidemiology team also contributed to that as well. As soon as I presented the results, they were essentially the opposite of what they had anticipated. The whole day while we're having this kind of back and forth changing this, not showing that, the plan was being printed and stapled right in front of me. So it was very clear at that point that the science behind the supposedly science-driven plan didn't matter because the plan was already made.

All fake bullshit

 

[redbull313]

Point me to what you consider to be a reliable source of data and I will plot the graphs accordingly.

You r just a stupid piece of shit. Like the thread says dipshit moron

 

[Leongsam]

You r just a stupid piece of shit. Like the thread says dipshit moron

On the contrary it looks like I'm one of the few with sufficient intelligence to see through the evil agenda of the great reset. I suggest you remove your blinkers and do your own research if you don't want to make use of my concise and accurate analysis of the situation.

 

[redbull313]

On the contrary it looks like I'm one of the few with sufficient intelligence to see through the evil agenda of the great reset. I suggest you remove your blinkers and do your own research if you don't want to make use of my concise and accurate analysis of the situation.

Get your head out of your ass dipshit

 

[Leongsam]

Get your head out of your ass dipshit

Name calling and vulgarities do nothing to help your cause. If you think my data is wrong all you need to do is explain why and point me to data which you believe is more accurate and I'll do the necessary calculations and adjust the numbers.

Is that really so difficult?

Profanities are easy to conjure up. Composing a lucid argument requires a bit more effort.

 

[redbull313]

Name calling and vulgarities do nothing to help your cause. If you think my data is wrong all you need to do is explain why and point me to data which you believe is more accurate and I'll do the necessary calculations and adjust the numbers.

Is that really so difficult?

Profanities are easy to conjure up. Composing a lucid argument requires a bit more effort.

Take your bullshit and shove it up your ass

 

[capamerica]

Take your bullshit and shove it up your ass

Sam Leong has been cutting and posting lies so I just post peer reviewed data that is beyond dispute and he has no answer.

 

[Leongsam]

Get your head out of your ass dipshit

Show me where my data is wrong and I'll correct it.

 

[Leongsam]

Sam Leong has been cutting and posting lies so I just post peer reviewed data that is beyond dispute and he has no answer.

Where is your source of this "peer reviewed" data? Peer reviewing is done when a paper is published based on a study that has been performed. I'm not obtaining my data from any particular paper. All I'm doing is taking raw numbers from sites such as CDC, Ourworldindata, WHO etc and from what I can see all the daily numbers are within 1% of each other. You can take a look yourself if you doubt my claim.

I look at deaths per million, cumulative deaths, cases per million etc in order to work out percentages and compare case and death figures from various countries around the world.

If you have a more accurate source of raw data please advise me where to find it and I'll rework the figures.

 

[capamerica]

Where is your source of this "peer reviewed" data? Peer reviewing is done when a paper is published based on a study that has been performed. I'm not obtaining my data from any particular paper. All I'm doing is taking raw numbers from sites such as CDC, Ourworldindata, WHO etc and from what I can see all the daily numbers are within 1% of each other. You can take a look yourself if you doubt my claim.

I look at deaths per million, cumulative deaths, cases per million etc in order to work out percentages and compare case and death figures from various countries around the world.

If you have a more accurate source of raw data please advise me where to find it and I'll rework the figures.

So many can be found in this thread

https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/us...-by-95-sam-leong-very-angry-red-faced.299648/

 

[Leongsam]

So many can be found in this thread

https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/us...-by-95-sam-leong-very-angry-red-faced.299648/

All I see are articles. I want what you consider to be an accurate source of raw data upon which I can base my calculations and compare countries and US states. If ourworldindata and CDC and WHO are not reliable point me to a source that is.

Articles are just a lot of words often based upon limited data from evaluations which do not reflect real world environments. A good example is the data regarding masking. There are plenty of lab based studies that show masks being effective and I have no doubt that in a controlled scenario they could actually make a difference.

However in the real world things are not perfect and discipline required to use a mask correctly and effectively is missing so masks end up making things worse. That is why all the data shows that mask mandates do nothing to stop the spread and in fact are increasing the infection rate.

 

[TuckFrump]

All I see are articles. I want what you consider to be an accurate source of raw data upon which I can base my calculations and compare countries and US states. If ourworldindata and CDC and WHO are not reliable point me to a source that is.

Articles are just a lot of words often based upon limited data from evaluations which do not reflect real world environments. A good example is the data regarding masking. There are plenty of lab based studies that show masks being effective and I have no doubt that in a controlled scenario they could actually make a difference.

However in the real world things are not perfect and discipline required to use a mask correctly and effectively is missing so masks end up making things worse. That is why all the data shows that mask mandates do nothing to stop the spread and in fact are increasing the infection rate.

 

[redbull313]

LOL! Sore loser, we continue to laugh at you because you have no credibility, and we know you post QANON Conspiracy theory "data" that no one believes

But dont stop need to keep laughing at you LOL!

fuck this moron Leong

 

[capamerica]

ADMIN has something wrong with his mental, according to @IMHDOCTOR

Its breathtaking just how wrong everything he posts I mean just about all of it is just crap

 

[redbull313]

Just get vaccinated and if you see morons like Sam Leong punch them in the face