Frankly, this has been bugging me for years. But in this day and age, with so many alternate media sites, as well as anonymous blogs and social media offerings, why is there still a deafening silence from people in the know about the inside story of the major screw ups in Singapore.
There's no whistleblower culture in Singapore because many people here feel that nothing will be done, especially if allegations of wrongdoing are made against govt departments or ministers. This apathy is reinforced by past experiences of cover-ups or worse, reprisals against whistleblowers. Of course, there are many kiasu buggers who are just too chicken to speak up for fear of losing their jobs, etc.
It has to be institutionalized. In the UK the Public Commissioner for Administration investigates complaints made by any individual against public authorities, and answers to the Lower House. Its powers are very comprehensive, and even the PM can be investigated. The anonymity of the whistleblower is protected by law under the Public Commissioner Act.
In American MNCs, even those operating here, there's an ombudsman who will investigate complaints made by any employee about impropriety by those in management or the board. Investigations are carried out and appropriate action is taken where necessary. Anonymity is protected at all times, if the complainant so wishes. You either drop a note (anonymous or otherwise) in the Ombudsman's Box, or e-mail the ombudsman directly. A meeting may be arranged.
No prizes for guessing why the PAP will never institutionalize whistleblowing here. The entire Lee family and half the cabinet would be indicted. The opposition should push for a similar act in parliament, but I don't see that happening.
Nevertheless, with the advent of social media and online news sources, no wrongdoing can be kept secret for long, even in an authoritarian society. The train crack incident is a good example.