Chitchat The stationary flat Earth

[flatearther]

[video=youtube;eBYNfkZyGFU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBYNfkZyGFU[/video]



[video=youtube;jL-h5GA8tKc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL-h5GA8tKc[/video]

 

[flatearther]

 

[flatearther]

[video=youtube;TW__MZXMA7A]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW__MZXMA7A[/video]

 

[flatearther]

[video=youtube;msY3xc8pVLE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msY3xc8pVLE[/video]

 

[flatearther]

[video=youtube;P5LzJrVKmBk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5LzJrVKmBk[/video]

 

[flatearther]

[video=youtube;ecDoKWoaATA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecDoKWoaATA[/video]

 

[flatearther]

[video=youtube;afsb39_6QF0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afsb39_6QF0[/video]

 

[chootchiew]

This is a very weird thread coming from a weird nick with a weird background and hobby

 

[zhihau]

This is a very weird thread coming from a weird nick with a weird background and hobby

Don't be mean. Their world cannot function if you shatter their miserable dream.

 

[Mozilla]

As a toddler i use to think that earth is flat

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

Don't be mean. Their world cannot function if you shatter their miserable dream.

These videos are created for religious radicals who interpret literally and prefer to live in medieval times rather than the 21st century. There's good money to be made. Big religion is big money, and what more radical religion. Politically, they can be milked and that's why the Republican Party loves these chaps. Ultimately comes down to money and politics.

 

[flatearther]

Don't be mean. Their world cannot function if you shatter their miserable dream.

These videos are created for religious radicals who interpret literally and prefer to live in medieval times rather than the 21st century.

May I ask, did you watch at least the first two videos (or at least the 8-minute video about the Earth not moving) in this thread?
The proofs in them were 100% scientific (especially the aeroplane examples) and not based on any religious scripture, whether Christian or non-Christian.
Furthermore, Eric Dubay (the maker of those videos) is not only not a Christian, he's also anti-Christian.

 

[chootchiew]

May I ask, did you watch at least the first two videos (or at least the one about the Earth not moving) in this thread?
The proofs in them were 100% scientific (especially the aeroplane examples), and not based on any religious scripture, whether Christian or non-Christian.
Furthermore, Eric Dubay (the maker of those videos) is not only not a Christian, he's also anti-Christian.

Bro join my true religion . No need pay any money.
True religion aspire to bring down earth and rebuild to stone age.

 

[mojito]

Silly man lah you TS. If the earth is flat, how you prove every sunrise sunset is the same sun?

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

May I ask, did you watch at least the first two videos (or at least the 8-minute video about the Earth not moving) in this thread?
The proofs in them were 100% scientific (especially the aeroplane examples) and not based on any religious scripture, whether Christian or non-Christian.
Furthermore, Eric Dubay (the maker of those videos) is not only not a Christian, he's also anti-Christian.

The videos are not even well made. There was once my colleagues had to come back to work on Sunday night to prepare a last min powerpoint presentation for a client 8am Monday and it was far superior despite their being next to computer illiterate. I've also seen weekly polytechnic assignment submitted that are far superior. Clearly the makers of those videos are nutcases who can't even do a video with finesse or a modicum of professionalism

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

Ignorance is big money and that's why there's often very little political will to improve the educational system.

We in fact see this happening in Singapore too where teachers earn many more times moonlighting as private tutors and so have no stake in helping create a better school system.

 

[flatearther]

The videos are not even well made. ...Clearly the makers of those videos are nutcases who can't even do a video with finesse or a modicum of professionalism

Even if they are not well made, at the very least the 8-minute video about the Earth not moving (with the aeroplane and parachute examples) should be understandable (which is what matters, right?); in fact, those few examples in that video alone are more than enough proof that the Earth is obviously stationary.

Yes, the proofs seem quite simple, but proving that the Earth is stationary happens to be that simple (at most requiring only a secondary school education), so there's nothing wrong with proofs being simple.

Ignorance is big money and that's why there's often very little political will to improve the educational system.

Even so-called "improvements" are still far from perfect, especially if certain lies are taught as "truth", whether in Science subjects or non-Science subjects.

 

[zhihau]

Even if they are not well made, at the very least the 8-minute video about the Earth not moving (with the aeroplane and parachute examples) should be understandable; in fact, those few examples in that video alone are more than enough proof that the Earth is obviously stationary.

The person who made the video clearly didn't understand what is inertia.

 

[flatearther]

Silly man lah you TS. If the earth is flat, how you prove every sunrise sunset is the same sun?

[video=youtube;sb5kDVdPx84]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb5kDVdPx84[/video]

atlanteanconspiracy.com/2016/02/sun-and-moon-equal-divine-balanced.html

In the Flat-Earth model, the Sun and Moon spotlights are perpetually hovering over and parallel to the surface of the Earth. From our vantage point, due to the Law of Perspective, the day/night luminaries appear to rise up the Eastern horizon, curve peaking high overhead, and then sink below the Western horizon. They do not escape to the underside of the Flat-Earth as one might imagine, but rather rotate concentric clockwise circles around the circumference from tropic to tropic. The appearance of rising, peaking and setting is due to the common Law of Perspective where tall objects appear high overhead when nearby, but at a distance gradually lower towards the vanishing point.

“Although the Sun is at all times above and parallel to the Earth’s surface, he appears to ascend the firmament from morning until noon, and to descend and sink below the horizon at evening. This arises from a simple and everywhere visible law of perspective. A flock of birds, when passing over a flat or marshy country, always appears to descend as it recedes; and if the flock is extensive, the first bird appears lower, or nearer to the horizon than the last. The farthest light in a row of lamps appears the lowest, although each one has the same altitude. Bearing these phenomena in mind, it will easily be seen how the Sun, although always parallel to the surface of the Earth, must appear to ascend when approaching, and descend after leaving the meridian or noon-day position.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Earth Not a Globe, 2nd Edition” (85)

“What can be more common than the observation that, standing at one end of a long row of lamp-posts, those nearest to us seem to be the highest; and those farthest away the lowest; whilst, as we move along towards the opposite end of the series, those which we approach seem to get higher, and those we are leaving behind appear to gradually become lower … It is an ordinary effect of perspective for an object to appear lower and lower as the observer goes farther and farther away from it. Let any one try the experiment of looking at a light-house, church spire, monument, gas lamp, or other elevated object, from a distance of only a few yards, and notice the angle at which it is observed. On going farther away, the angle under which it is seen will diminish, and the object will appear lower and lower as the distance of the observer increases, until, at a certain point, the line of sight to the object, and the apparently uprising surface of the earth upon or over which it stands, will converge to the angle which constitutes the ‘vanishing point’ or the horizon; beyond which it will be invisible.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (230-1)

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

Even if they are not well made, at the very least the 8-minute video about the Earth not moving (with the aeroplane and parachute examples) should be understandable (which is what matters, right?); in fact, those few examples in that video alone are more than enough proof that the Earth is obviously stationary.

Yes, the proofs seem quite simple, but proving that the Earth is stationary happens to be that simple (at most requiring only a secondary school education), so there's nothing wrong with proofs being simple.



Even so-called "improvements" are still far from perfect, especially if certain lies are taught as "truth", whether in Science subjects or non-Science subjects.

You are obviously on to something very major and earth shattering that no one in the forum can comprehend. I suggest you start a blog or write a book. Let the whole world be turned on its side by these astounding revelation