- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 2,489
- Points
- 48
I'm very happy that Sinkies loved to be fcuk by PAP. It proves that I'm right in emigrating to the USA.
I'm very happy that Sinkies loved to be fcuk by PAP. It proves that I'm right in emigrating to the USA.
PAP tactic:
If recession
Blame sinkies for the recession and vote PAP to help sinkies out of the recession.
If no recession
Credit PAP for the economy effort and vote PAP to sustain the economy.
Blame Sinkies + Credit PAP = Fucked up Singapore.
This tactic may have worked in the past but when you are under employed or jobless for years & years, Sporeans will get desperate especially with the current high cost in Spore.
Each time sinkees forgo the opportunity to rid a PAP politician, they deserve to suffer more. There is karma.
the real situation on the ground is different. just saw 6 sinkie wannabe bikers at local kopitiam with multi-thousand-dollar bikes and thousand-dollar attires plus cleats showing off to other sinkies, pinoy maids and angmo's on mother's day. even angmo's are humble with their cheap utility bikes carrying groceries in baskets and kids in tow. these sinkies talked loudly like they just completed the tour de france. most likely same bunch of tpx on sbf.![]()
I saw a bunch of Sinkies beggars at Ang Moh Kio asking for $ to buy their dinner last nite, the Pinoy and the Ah Nehs were most Generous to em.
How do you know these beggars are sinkies?![]()
The 70% will thank the residents of BB for having more of the following in future-
MORE Pinoys, PRC's and Indian immigrants to take their jobs and housing ,more places/scholarships for foreigners in universities, more train breakdowns, more waiting time at hospitals/polyclinics , more deaths from dengue, more taxes,ect2.
Welcome to paradise-for foreigners.
Second thing to note: How much might voters "punish" the incumbent PAP for having an adulterous MP? In the 2013 Punggol East by-election sparked by incumbent PAP MP Michael Palmer's resignation over an extramarital affair, the vote swing against the PAP was 10.8 percentage points.
This time, Bukit Batok voters deserted the PAP with a swing of 11.8 percentage points, just eight months after the PAP's Mr David Ong got 73 per cent of the vote last September. He quit in March over an extramarital affair.
If one can parse such things, one is tempted to say PAP voters hand out a 10 percentage point penalty for such misconduct.
This is in contrast to Workers' Party (WP) voters. In Hougang, WP's Mr Yaw Shin Leong got 64.8 per cent in the 2011 General Election. Then, he was sacked over an extramarital affair. WP's Mr Png Eng Huat defended the party's stronghold in the 2012 by-election, getting 62.1 per cent. The drop: 2.7 percentage points.
Third, this by-election's result is consistent with the belief that voters respond better to candidates with grassroots appeal.
Again, a comparison with Punggol East is apt. There, WP candidate Lee Li Lian garnered 41 per cent of the vote in GE2011. In the 2013 by-election, she won the seat with 54.5 per cent against PAP candidate Koh Poh Koon, a surgeon who the PAP said was of ministerial calibre. But he was new to the area and lost to Ms Lee, a by-then familiar face to residents.
In Bukit Batok this time, the PAP chose Mr Murali, with 16 years of grassroots experience in the estate. Both candidates campaigned on municipal issues, coming up with social and community plans. The result suggests the grassroots strategy works.
The fourth issue was what the result says about voters' acceptance of the controversial Dr Chee, who has fought not only with the PAP but also his former mentor, but who has worked hard to build up the SDP and change his image in recent years.
His reception by Bukit Batok voters suggests Dr Chee is making inroads into the hearts and minds of heartland voters. The 38.8 per cent he managed is his personal best, nearly double the 20 per cent his team got in Jurong GRC in 2001. No wonder he said, minutes after the official count was released : "This doesn't feel like a defeat."
His vote share is 5.4 percentage points higher than the 33.4 per cent his team got in GE2015 in Holland-Bukit Timah GRC, where about 45 per cent of residents live in private housing. That Dr Chee, standing alone in a seat with 95.7 per cent who live in public housing, can better his GRC team's result, flies in the face of conventional belief that he appeals more to the middle class. Perhaps that Hokkien music video Dr Chee starred in had some marginal impact. A 5.4 percentage point increase is hardly the huge swing Dr Chee would have needed for a win. Still, the result will embolden Dr Chee and trouble some in the PAP, which considers Dr Chee the kind of opposition politician Singapore does not need.
The fifth issue: This by-election shows that yes, the opposition is capable of unity. Leaders from the other major parties did not enter the fray, to allow this straight fight between the PAP and SDP.
One final point about that 11.8 percentage point swing against the PAP. That might be due in part to the "adultery penalty" theory alluded to earlier. But I think a large part is due to the loss of the halo effect from SG50 and the Lee Kuan Yew factor, that had buoyed the PAP to its 69.9 per cent win in GE2015.
Stripped of those factors, the vote share this time is probably a better gauge of heartlanders' sentiments towards the PAP on the ground.
Assured of a PAP government in power (this is just a by-election after all), and freed from a sense of showing loyalty to Singapore's founding Prime Minister and his party, voter sentiment seems to have reverted back to past norms.
In other words, 70 per cent in 2015 was likely a blip. The PAP will have to contend with the vote share dipping back to the low to mid-60s - and work very hard to keep it up.
the real situation on the ground is different. just saw 6 sinkie wannabe cyclists at local kopitiam with multi-thousand-dollar bikes and thousand-dollar attires plus cleats showing off to other sinkies, pinoy maids and angmo's on mother's day. even angmo's are humble with their cheap utility bicycles carrying groceries in baskets and kids in tow. these sinkies talked loudly like they just completed the tour de france. most likely same bunch of tpx on sbf.![]()
The bicycle gear thing I really do not understand....really!...I have observe parents buying young kids bicycle & then teaching them how to ride the thing....helmet, elbows pads, shoulder pads, knees pads, training wheels... all BRANDED...just to learn how to ride a bicycle?!!....in my days, we learnt how to ride a bicycle on a RALEIGH bicycle.....no training wheels....you fall left, you fall right, you hit stones, fall forward, you fall into drains, down slopes, encounter brake failures.....& thereafter, one become an expert in riding the bicycle in any condition, come rain or shine.
When you look at all these people with their expensive gears....you cant help feeling " hao lian"....![]()
Interesting analysis of the results ....
http://www.straitstimes.com/politics/singapolitics/after-halo-effect-of-sg50-a-return-to-the-norm
Third, this by-election's result is consistent with the belief that voters respond better to candidates with grassroots appeal.
Again, a comparison with Punggol East is apt. There, WP candidate Lee Li Lian garnered 41 per cent of the vote in GE2011. In the 2013 by-election, she won the seat with 54.5 per cent against PAP candidate Koh Poh Koon, a surgeon who the PAP said was of ministerial calibre. But he was new to the area and lost to Ms Lee, a by-then familiar face to residents.
In Bukit Batok this time, the PAP chose Mr Murali, with 16 years of grassroots experience in the estate. Both candidates campaigned on municipal issues, coming up with social and community plans. The result suggests the grassroots strategy works.
Each time sinkees forgo the opportunity to rid a PAP politician, they deserve to suffer more. There is karma.