Ass Loon said don't anyhow say he wants coalition government

[Leepotism]

• POSTED: 13 Apr 2014 20:13

[h=2]Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said a coalition government for Singapore was not on his mind, as a Financial Times article had suggested.[/h]

SINGAPORE: Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said a coalition government for Singapore was not on his mind, as a Financial Times article had suggested.


During a recent interview, he was asked by an FT journalist if he could envisage a day when the People's Action Party is not in power.


In a post on Facebook, Mr Lee on Sunday said: "Some journalists have asked me whether I was really thinking of a coalition government in Singapore.


"My press secretary has told them that what I meant was that I could imagine a situation one day where the PAP is not dominant, but that I had no idea how that would work, or whether it could be made to work at all.


"To think that instead of PAP dominance we will have a stable two-party system is naive.


"A coalition government for Singapore was not on my mind."

 

[Leepotism]

So don't dream that this Ass Loon want to "share share" power. How to cover up her husband Ho Ching's misdeeds if there's a coalition government

 

[scroobal]

A coalition govt is not by choice. When you don't have a majority you have little choice. If you think that scenario might rise, you might prepare the party for it by having an understanding or sponsoring the creation of a "friendly" party.

He mentioned that after the drubbing in GE, 2 BEs and 1 PE. In the PE, it was a debacle. If that is not a trend I do not know what is.

So don't dream that this Ass Loon want to "share share" power. How to cover up her husband Ho Ching's misdeeds if there's a coalition government

 

[Leepotism]

A coalition govt is not by choice. When you don't have a majority you have little choice. If you think that scenario might rise, you might prepare the party for it by having an understanding or sponsoring the creation of a "friendly" party.

He mentioned that after the drubbing in GE, 2 BEs and 1 PE. In the PE, it was a debacle. If that is not a trend I do not know what is.

True, a coalition is not by choice. He still thinks that PAP dominance is forever. If voters wise up, I think PAP cannot even be the government come next election.

 

[zhihau]

A coalition govt is not by choice.

he's a mathematician by training, he know his odds, any form of coalition will make him look bad :p:p:p

 

[winnipegjets]

The PAP will lose 2016 if election is fair.

If the WP takes over government, we will get the chance to see the skeletons in the closet and bring the PAP elites to justice.

To incarcerate them in Pulau Sudong, Pulau Senang and Pulau Pawai and let the RSAF make their remaining days a living hell for the decades of hardship they have imposed on sinkees.

 

[Leepotism]

Yes jail all those corrupt bastards and their cronies. De-Leegalised them and bring justice for all to see.

 

[scroobal]

I think he must have done extensive research. The Liberals in Australia have never been able to form a govt on its own and always led a coalition govt and this has been going for decades. They are now in Govt. The mix would be the PAP strength in technocracy and control with a partner party that is closer to social issues and people focused led by known and accepted identities. The minor will emulate WP to cut its base.

I am aware that we will all wonder how it works but typically they will given certain privileges as well concessions in term of minor policies.

It will interesting as the minor party will have to emerge sometime soon. I bet it will have ex PAP members to some extent but will be led by someone charismatic who has no prior links to the PAP. I also will speculate that his articulation skills will be superb yet will display humility.

he's a mathematician by training, he know his odds, any form of coalition will make him look bad :p:p:p

 

[zhihau]

I think he must have done extensive research.

thought the Swiss model of coalition looked very alluring...

 

[scroobal]

The swiss model is driven by culture and language interest but the principles are the same as most people look at the MP and not what the Govt is going to be when they vote.

thought the Swiss model of coalition looked very alluring...

 

[scroobal]

Unlikely. Singaporeans are by nature cautious. Many will prefer the status quo if they are see uncertainty. They are also not clear about the concept of democracy, the role of the press and conduct of PA etc.

The PAP will lose 2016 if election is fair.

If the WP takes over government, we will get the chance to see the skeletons in the closet and bring the PAP elites to justice.

To incarcerate them in Pulau Sudong, Pulau Senang and Pulau Pawai and let the RSAF make their remaining days a living hell for the decades of hardship they have imposed on sinkees.

 

[kohpc]

he's a mathematician by training, he know his odds, any form of coalition will make him look bad :p:p:p

The field of Applied Probability and Linear Regression would help him project and decide.

 

[rushifa666]

Unlikely. Singaporeans are by nature cautious. Many will prefer the status quo if they are see uncertainty. They are also not clear about the concept of democracy, the role of the press and conduct of PA etc.

very tempted to just leave the peasants to their fates. i dont know what runs their bodies. it certainly isnt a brain

 

[Tuayapeh]

smel;s like a kelong going on.....


probably one where they sent their double agents to form another "opposition" to sway the votyers and then form another "coalition" govt all in the name of Leemocracy

 

[3_M]

It a freudian slip that betrayed his inner thoughts, like how he said he was going to 'fix opposition'.

 

[SaBoon]

Ya loh, you all don't anyhow, hes reading SBF......

 

[laksaboy]

Ya loh, you all don't anyhow, hes reading SBF......

Maybe not him, but his little doggy minions, definitely.

 

[chonburifc]

Unlikely. Singaporeans are by nature cautious. Many will prefer the status quo if they are see uncertainty. They are also not clear about the concept of democracy, the role of the press and conduct of PA etc.

What do you mean by 'by nature cautious'? Voting for the incumbent is cautious? Voting for oppositions is kamikaze and thrill seeking?

I see your post contains a very subliminal threatening message that Sinkees are daft, ignorant and balless to make a change? Is that right?

 

[Tuayapeh]

he's a mathematician by training, he know his odds, any form of coalition will make him look bad :p:p:p

aiyah what he envisages is a coalition behind the backs of sinkies fucktards lor.....


heads i win -tails you lose type of situation....not unlike the american systemn

...in the end the people get fucked over by 2 political parties who just answer to the same bosses


....talk about ultimate kelong lor.....



get ready for your life in hell........ as Tuayapeh would say.....

 

[Leepotism]

Ya loh, you all don't anyhow, hes reading SBF......

PAP IBs will make a report to HQ on what netizens are saying now.