The number of Ah nehs applicants applying for a job opening is just astonishing. My department recently have a temp position open and out of 10 applicants you get 8 from India! Out of the remaining 2 you have one that is ah neh that is residing here, while remaining, an "inexperience" local. This is for a lowly paid, low skilled job. You get "Managers", "executive" applying for a temp, not a permanent position from India! Is this what you see in SIngapore as well? Is that why companies hire more ah nehs? Our company is fortunate enough that getting a visa to work here is not as simple as Singapore, so most of the 80% of the resume are out of the door. Still, does this show that the ah nehs are more willing to work then locals?
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
The number of Ah Nehs applicants for a job is just astonishing!
- Thread starter Ash007
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
- Messages
- 30,580
- Points
- 0
The more important question is did you hire them?
Pls Ash you will be doing all sinkies a favor by just simply trashing their applications. We don't need anymore shit skin employees.
Pls Ash you will be doing all sinkies a favor by just simply trashing their applications. We don't need anymore shit skin employees.
Its not for me to decide who to hire. Most of them do not even qualify for what we want. I'm just astonished by the audacity that some of them even applied without a valid visa. Some, we think wants to just come over and move to another department later. Funny enough, one of the applicants ah neh applicants have the required experience but was asking outside of the range we are willing to pay.
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2012
- Messages
- 292
- Points
- 18
Madrigal sez that it is said that there are "employment agencies" at work here and in Oz whereby they have companies that provide 457 visa resume mill services for a fee to Ah Nehs. They will then get a cut of everything.
Borders on human trafficing.
Borders on human trafficing.
They clamping down on 457s. Getting a work visa for us is not exactly easy as well.
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,615
- Points
- 0
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/x_umLiJuTNY?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
THIS EXPLAINS
THIS EXPLAINS
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,615
- Points
- 0
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/D394zejxkQo?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
INDIAN ECONOMY COLLAPSING...
INDIAN ECONOMY COLLAPSING...
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,530
- Points
- 113
Citibank hires alot of them. Not surprisingly, these chao ah nehs has fucked up the bank really well.
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,530
- Points
- 113
SHEILA BAIR: The Board Made The Right Decision, Pandit Didn't Know How To Execute
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/bair-board-was-right-to-fire-pandit-2012-10#ixzz2kaMnNY00
Former FDIC chair Sheila Bair has never been shy about the fact that she thinks Vikram Pandit was unqualified to run Citigroup. She dedicates a few passages to her opinion of him in her new book, Bull by the Horns.
Bair's reason for her disappointment with Pandit was, and is, that he was never a traditional banker and didn't know how to run Citi. As the head of the FDIC, Bair had to bail the bank out three times, and struggled with Pandit's' leadership at the height of the financial crisis.
Now that Pandit has left, Bair is making the rounds on TV networks talking about what this means for the bank. Her ultimate point — This is good for Citi and the board did the right thing letting Pandit leave.
From Bloomberg TV:
"I think the board is doing their job and this should be a good model for other boards. There were obviously some issues, some shareholder unhappiness. I don't want to say anything that's not positive because I think this was a very positive move and the board discharged its responsibilities and I think they should be commended for that....I did have concerns about Mr. Pandit's qualifications to serve as CEO of the largest commercial bank since he'd never been a commercial banker. Also, in my interactions with him--on the bailout initiatives, the ring-fence with the original Wachovia situation--I saw not a good ability to execute, not a good ability to have information, which I thought was pretty basic for anyone managing a large institution…this was a concern to me. Citi still has a very good global franchise, there's some very positive things about Citi and I think they deserve the best of leadership. I wish Mr. Pandit well and I think he's got skills that may be well suited at a different type of organization, but we did see problems with execution."
And in case you missed it, in her book, Bull by the Horns, Bair details how unimpressed she was when she met him (from the book):
Pandit looked nervous, and no wonder. More than any other institution represented in that room, his bank was in trouble. Frankly, I doubted that he was up to the job. He had been brought in to clean up the mess at Citi. He had gotten the job with the support of Robert Rubin, the former secretary of the Treasury who now served as Citi's titular head. I thought Pandit had been a poor choice. He was a hedge fund manager by occupation and one with a mixed record at that. He had no experience as a commercial banker, yet now he was heading one of the biggest banks in the country.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/bair-board-was-right-to-fire-pandit-2012-10#ixzz2kaMj1DrE
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/bair-board-was-right-to-fire-pandit-2012-10#ixzz2kaMnNY00
Former FDIC chair Sheila Bair has never been shy about the fact that she thinks Vikram Pandit was unqualified to run Citigroup. She dedicates a few passages to her opinion of him in her new book, Bull by the Horns.
Bair's reason for her disappointment with Pandit was, and is, that he was never a traditional banker and didn't know how to run Citi. As the head of the FDIC, Bair had to bail the bank out three times, and struggled with Pandit's' leadership at the height of the financial crisis.
Now that Pandit has left, Bair is making the rounds on TV networks talking about what this means for the bank. Her ultimate point — This is good for Citi and the board did the right thing letting Pandit leave.
From Bloomberg TV:
"I think the board is doing their job and this should be a good model for other boards. There were obviously some issues, some shareholder unhappiness. I don't want to say anything that's not positive because I think this was a very positive move and the board discharged its responsibilities and I think they should be commended for that....I did have concerns about Mr. Pandit's qualifications to serve as CEO of the largest commercial bank since he'd never been a commercial banker. Also, in my interactions with him--on the bailout initiatives, the ring-fence with the original Wachovia situation--I saw not a good ability to execute, not a good ability to have information, which I thought was pretty basic for anyone managing a large institution…this was a concern to me. Citi still has a very good global franchise, there's some very positive things about Citi and I think they deserve the best of leadership. I wish Mr. Pandit well and I think he's got skills that may be well suited at a different type of organization, but we did see problems with execution."
And in case you missed it, in her book, Bull by the Horns, Bair details how unimpressed she was when she met him (from the book):
Pandit looked nervous, and no wonder. More than any other institution represented in that room, his bank was in trouble. Frankly, I doubted that he was up to the job. He had been brought in to clean up the mess at Citi. He had gotten the job with the support of Robert Rubin, the former secretary of the Treasury who now served as Citi's titular head. I thought Pandit had been a poor choice. He was a hedge fund manager by occupation and one with a mixed record at that. He had no experience as a commercial banker, yet now he was heading one of the biggest banks in the country.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/bair-board-was-right-to-fire-pandit-2012-10#ixzz2kaMj1DrE
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
- Messages
- 1,826
- Points
- 0
These FT nehs are here to steal jobs from locals. They are desperate for employment to stay in sinkie land, good medical care, good schools, etc. Any job, any pay will do, better than live in their own slums back home.
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,615
- Points
- 0
DBS as well
GUPTA IS A REAL TALENT?
SPORE NO TALENT TO RUN DBS?
GUPTA IS A REAL TALENT?
SPORE NO TALENT TO RUN DBS?
They all went to be ministars* since the pay there is on par in the comercial sector.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Messages
- 27,891
- Points
- 113
Ah Nehs are good in bs, talk big and shake head. Few are real talents.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2010
- Messages
- 12,839
- Points
- 63
bro, jalan lempeng got one ah neh moved in liao!
That's the impression I have when I went through the resume as well.
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2013
- Messages
- 376
- Points
- 0
They can help boost the local birth rates
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,615
- Points
- 0
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,204
- Points
- 0
Similar threads
