Lawrence Khong declares LGBT people are possessed by Satan.

[kryonlight]

Singapore pastor calls LGBT rights movement the 'onslaught of the evil one'

Faith Community Baptist Church pastor Lawrence Khong says that the devil is behind LGBT people asking for rights

A Singaporean pastor has delivered a sermon titled God's Pattern for Marriage in front of 3,000 people in which he called the LGBT movement 'diabolical'.

'I believe that God has awakened to face one of the greatest attacks on the family by the evil one,' said Lawrence Khong.

Khong also called the LGBT rights movement the 'onslaught of the evil one'.

The sermon is significant as Khong is influential in Singapore. Former prime minister Goh Chok Tong has visited his Faith Community Baptist Church, which has over 9,000 members.

'We are vulnerable, not just as individuals, but as a community,' said Jean Chong founder of Singaporean LGBT rights group Sayoni about why speeches such as Khong's cannot just be dismissed.

'Hate speech can escalate into hate crime. As a society, we need to signal that such threats and acts are not acceptable. They offend public decency and are unjust.'

In contrast, today Singapore's law minister K Shanmugam Sc praised a 12-year-old boy who stood up against anti-gay bullies in a YouTube video that now has over 100,000 views.

'Articulate, talented young boy,' said the law minister. 'We should all condemn bullying, whether it is on cyberspace or in classrooms.'

Chong, who asked Shanmugam to do more for LGBT Singaporeans at a meeting in January, said that he should go further and condemn legalized bullying and bullying in the churches.

'Isn't 377A [the law that criminalizes gay sex] a form of institutionalized bullying by targeting gay men?' said Chong.

'Isn't postings like this from Lawrence Khong not bigotry or hate speech? Is bigotry propagated by religions in the name of God okay in Singapore? Sounds like the government agree it is!'

 

[drifteri]

 

[drifteri]

 

[drifteri]

Disciple whom Jesus loved:

 

[Frodo]

Singapore pastor calls LGBT rights movement the 'onslaught of the evil one'

Faith Community Baptist Church pastor Lawrence Khong says that the devil is behind LGBT people asking for rights

A Singaporean pastor has delivered a sermon titled God's Pattern for Marriage in front of 3,000 people in which he called the LGBT movement 'diabolical'.

'I believe that God has awakened to face one of the greatest attacks on the family by the evil one,' said Lawrence Khong.

Khong also called the LGBT rights movement the 'onslaught of the evil one'.

The sermon is significant as Khong is influential in Singapore. Former prime minister Goh Chok Tong has visited his Faith Community Baptist Church, which has over 9,000 members.

'We are vulnerable, not just as individuals, but as a community,' said Jean Chong founder of Singaporean LGBT rights group Sayoni about why speeches such as Khong's cannot just be dismissed.

'Hate speech can escalate into hate crime. As a society, we need to signal that such threats and acts are not acceptable. They offend public decency and are unjust.'

In contrast, today Singapore's law minister K Shanmugam Sc praised a 12-year-old boy who stood up against anti-gay bullies in a YouTube video that now has over 100,000 views.

'Articulate, talented young boy,' said the law minister. 'We should all condemn bullying, whether it is on cyberspace or in classrooms.'

Chong, who asked Shanmugam to do more for LGBT Singaporeans at a meeting in January, said that he should go further and condemn legalized bullying and bullying in the churches.

'Isn't 377A [the law that criminalizes gay sex] a form of institutionalized bullying by targeting gay men?' said Chong.

'Isn't postings like this from Lawrence Khong not bigotry or hate speech? Is bigotry propagated by religions in the name of God okay in Singapore? Sounds like the government agree it is!'

Where's the alleged declaration by LK of LGBT being Satan-possessed?

 

[Frodo]

Disciple whom Jesus loved:

So what are you suggesting? Your point being? You seem to like walking the fine line with the religious harmony law here. Haven't had your kopi yet?

 

[kryonlight]

So what are you suggesting? Your point being? You seem to like walking the fine line with the religious harmony law here. Haven't had your kopi yet?

It's so simple. Your God Jesus Christ was a gay by any modern day interpretation, even by school kids! LOL!

 

[Frodo]

It's so simple. Your God Jesus Christ was a gay by any modern day interpretation, even by school kids! LOL!

Oh really? And the drawings are your proof? Your so-called evidence no standard one lah.

Anyway, you still owe us the LK declaration. Looks more like you are the one making the declaration.

 

[drifteri]

So what are you suggesting? Your point being? You seem to like walking the fine line with the religious harmony law here. Haven't had your kopi yet?

These pictures are very biblical, one of them from a pastor's website. What wrong with you? You not read John's gospel? Actually, how many books have you read? You have joined the wrong forum, there are many christian forums

 

[drifteri]

John 20:2 So she came running to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one Jesus loved, and said, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we don’t know where they have put him!”

John 13:25: Leaning back against Jesus, he asked him, “Lord, who is it?”

 

[Frodo]

These pictures are very biblical, one of them from a pastor's website. What wrong with you? You not read John's gospel? Actually, how many books have you read? You have joined the wrong forum, there are many christian forums

In what way are these pictures very Biblical? Even if granted they are, how is your interpretation Biblical?

Of what relevance is the number of books I read got to do with this? Read more books will win the argument? What kind of books are you talking about?

 

[Frodo]

John 20:2 So she came running to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one Jesus loved, and said, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we don’t know where they have put him!”

John 13:25: Leaning back against Jesus, he asked him, “Lord, who is it?”

It takes a perverse mind to see any sexual connotations in these verses or to even think in terms of LGBT.

 

[drifteri]

In what way are these pictures very Biblical? Even if granted they are, how is your interpretation Biblical?

Of what relevance is the number of books I read got to do with this? Read more books will win the argument? What kind of books are you talking about?

Simply proved that you have not read the gospel of john entirely. Your igorance is your own problem, don't embrass yourself

 

[drifteri]

It takes a perverse mind to see any sexual connotations in these verses or to even think in terms of LGBT.

Did I write any comment on the verse? You are the one making sexual connotations and got very laughable emo You illogical emo is snapped, whahahahaaha I am enjoyable my time with you dumb fool

 

[Frodo]

Simply proved that you have not read the gospel of john entirely. Your igorance is your own problem, don't embrass yourself

How does this prove that I have not read the Gospel of John? And you still have not shown why a gay interpretation is correct. Pictures do not depict anything sexual or erotic to deem it as gay or homo. You must be imagining things.

 

[Frodo]

Did I write any comment on the verse? You are the one making sexual connotations and got very laughable emo You illogical emo is snapped, whahahahaaha I am enjoyable my time with you dumb fool

So what would you comment about the verse? Nothing? Honesty not your policy, am I right?

 

[drifteri]

How does this prove that I have not read the Gospel of John? And you still have not shown why a gay interpretation is correct. Pictures do not depict anything sexual or erotic to deem it as gay or homo. You must be imagining things.

Now are you arguing the pictures are biblical, contradicted your initialize stance,LOL.
Your initial stance the pictures are unbiblical? Tell us is that not so, darling? Have your actually read or heard of the 2 verses? Forget about the fact that you have not read more than 50% of the bible.

 

[drifteri]

So what would you comment about the verse? Nothing? Honesty not your policy, am I right?

It it up to me to decide whether to comment or not to and when to comment, darling

 

[Frodo]

Now are you arguing the pictures are biblical, contradicted your initialize stance,LOL.
Your initial stance the pictures are unbiblical? Tell us is that not so, darling? Have your actually read or heard of the 2 verses? Forget about the fact that you have not read more than 50% of the bible.

How have I contradicted myself? Oh right, you have no idea what a contradiction is.

 

[Frodo]

It it up to me to decide whether to comment or not to and when to comment, darling

Of course of course. Better to keep quiet about what you don't know, else your abysmal ignorance would be exposed again by yours truly. Good move.