Chief District Judge Tan Siong Thye - the new laughing stock or going places

[winnipegjets]

So, this is kangaroo judge that found Law professor Tey Tsun Hang 'guilty' on all six counts of corruption in sex-for-grades case.

Despite the incompetence shown by CPIB investigators and that witnesses were forced to make the accusations, the kangaroo judge chose to ignore those.

Is he going to be promoted to the High Court as a result of this 'exceptional' work? He has the look of a future PAP Minister.

 

[methink]

Let's watch what's going to happen after this

 

[Bigfuck]

Tey has the lease cut off his neck. He can now right sincerely without malice what Singapore and its kangaroo law is all about to the world. People will read and take him seriously. He can go back to Malaysia. Suing him in Malaysia is not easy.

 

[winnipegjets]

He can easily land a job in the many foreign universities based in Malaysia.

One more learned individual to join the anti-PAP camp. Welcome Tey!

 

[Charlie99]

Tey has the lease cut off his neck. He can now right sincerely without malice what Singapore and its kangaroo law is all about to the world. People will read and take him seriously. He can go back to Malaysia. Suing him in Malaysia is not easy.

leash vs lease

write vs right

 

[lovesamleong]

Was not following this case... was Law professor Tey Tsun Hang framed by PAP?

 

[winnipegjets]

Was not following this case... was Law professor Tey Tsun Hang framed by PAP?

Definitely. I don't know anything about him ...but the case against him was so weak, yet he was convicted. Having sex is not a crime but they made it into one. Tey must have done something to upset someone important.

 

[Charlie99]

May be the book written by Tey ruffled the feathers of the "elites"

 

[soIsee]

May be the book written by Tey ruffled the feathers of the "elites"

Tey surely ruffled the feathers of crony Chesterman even before appeal is filed and got fired.

This place really self pawn with cronies behaving so obvious as cronies that one does not need to examine the personal ties Chesterman has wih the establishment! LOL

 

[Sinkie]

Defending a corrupted Prof? What a joke!

As long as there is a teacher-student relationship...please, no hanky panky. He should know better. Serves him right.

 

[winnipegjets]

Defending a corrupted Prof? What a joke!

As long as there is a teacher-student relationship...please, no hanky panky. He should know better. Serves him right.

Corrupt government versus corrupt Prof ...who is the bigger crook? Focus on the big crooks, instead of the small fry ...the case wasn't even water-tight ...there were so many reasonable doubts ...Tey was a marked man, that's why he was charged and convicted. Who wanted to take him down?

 

[DuYunQi]

Moral of the story? You must be a Chief of a some agency.. or a higher up in the chain-of-command to get you off the hook.. look at past cases of supposed "corruption"... the only thing i wondered about previous case was.. since only BJ involved.. why no invoke that SPECIFIC law.. u noe.. THAT ONE that states "unnatural sex if intercourse did not follow after BJ"..

Weirder and weirder in Sg by the day

 

[winnipegjets]

Who did Tey upset in the establishment to get him into trouble?

 

[lovesamleong]

I see, looks like he wrote these publications:

"Legal Consensus: Supreme Executive, Supine Jurisprudence, Suppliant Profession of Singapore"
"Confining the Freedom of the Press in Singapore: A Pragmatic Press for Nation-Building"

 

[Sinkie]

Corrupt government versus corrupt Prof ...who is the bigger crook? Focus on the big crooks, instead of the small fry ...the case wasn't even water-tight ...there were so many reasonable doubts ...Tey was a marked man, that's why he was charged and convicted. Who wanted to take him down?

Why not water-tight? This crooked Prof is a certified LAWYER. He should know better!!!

You keep saying he was a marked man. Where is your evidence?

 

[Sinkie]

Who did Tey upset in the establishment to get him into trouble?

If you wish to go into that rabbit hole, be my guest, but you're barking up the wrong tree.

 

[Sinkie]

I see, looks like he wrote these publications:

"Legal Consensus: Supreme Executive, Supine Jurisprudence, Suppliant Profession of Singapore"
"Confining the Freedom of the Press in Singapore: A Pragmatic Press for Nation-Building"

Anything inflammatory or anti-PAPpy about these publications?

A crook should not point finger at others.

That is the moral of the story.

 

[lovesamleong]

Anything inflammatory or anti-PAPpy about these publications?

No idea. Hoping someone who has read them could cast some light.

 

[Sinkie]

No idea. Hoping someone who has read them could cast some light.

No need to read and waste time. This Prof is a hypocrite, so no matter what he writes is rubbish.

He abuses his power and influence as a lecturer and have sex, gifts, free air-ticket, free dinner with his student, knowing that her grade is under his control.

If this is not immoral, what is? Yet, on the surface, he acts like he is a goodie-2-shoes, but behind closed door, he is a street-crook, that's all there is to him.

Don't dramatize his contribution to the evolving legal jurisdiction in Singapore. He does not qualify. His character is shit.

Most lawyers are crooks and hypocrites anyway, including that Darinne ugly fuck.

 

[lovesamleong]

He abuses his power and influence as a lecturer and have sex, gifts, free air-ticket, free dinner with his student, knowing that her grade is under his control.

If this is not immoral, what is? Yet, on the surface, he acts like he is a goodie-2-shoes, but behind closed door, he is a street-crook, that's all there is to him.

Yes, no matter what, a teacher having sex with his student is not ok and abuse of power.