92.5% OF SINGAPOREANS WILLING TO TAKE PAY CUT to kick out FTs

[Force 136]

Last Friday (22 Feb), Singapore’s Chinese TV channel – Mediacorp Channel 8 – featured a live forum ‘Frontline Connects 《前线开讲》

A poll was taken on the question : If the foreign population is reduced, can you accept a lower rate of economic growth? ( and hence, lower pay)

The results:

92.5% can accept lower economic growth/pay
7.5% can’t


Grace Fu was present at the show......... as usual, she refused to see what Singaporeans think, insisting that the Whit Paper is good for Singaporeans and their children.......

THE PAP STILL REFUSE TO ACCEPT PUBLIC OPINION......REFUSE TO LISTEN........ REFUSE TO BE OUR VOICE....

THE PAP IS FINISHED IF THEY PERSIST IN IGNORING THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE....... KAPUT..... HABIS..... MATI.....

:oIo:

 

[laksaboy]

Your Chinese and/or economics is not very good, is it?

经济增长率 = economic growth rate. It has nothing to do with wages.

And wages can be artificially depressed. Look no further than Singapore.

 

[enterprise2]

Last Friday (22 Feb), Singapore’s Chinese TV channel – Mediacorp Channel 8 – featured a live forum ‘Frontline Connects 《前线开讲》

A poll was taken on the question : If the foreign population is reduced, can you accept a lower rate of economic growth? ( and hence, lower pay)

The results:

92.5% can accept lower economic growth/pay
7.5% can’t


Grace Fu was present at the show......... as usual, she refused to see what Singaporeans think, insisting that the Whit Paper is good for Singaporeans and their children.......

THE PAP STILL REFUSE TO ACCEPT PUBLIC OPINION......REFUSE TO LISTEN........ REFUSE TO BE OUR VOICE....

THE PAP IS FINISHED IF THEY PERSIST IN IGNORING THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE....... KAPUT..... HABIS..... MATI.....

:oIo:

All of U should know the real reason why PAP is pushing this. If economic growth slows, all of us suffer a pay cut but the biggest cut will be borne by the rich. On the flip side, if they increase FTs, the rich will benefit the most whilst the rest of us gets the so called 'trickle down' effects!!

 

[laksaboy]

All of U should know the real reason why PAP is pushing this. If economic growth slows, all of us suffer a pay cut but the biggest cut will be borne by the rich. On the flip side, if they increase FTs, the rich will benefit the most whilst the rest of us gets the so called 'trickle down' effects!!

Only problem is: there is no such thing as 'trickle down' effect. Trickle-down economics a.k.a Reaganomics doesn't work in real life. The concept is as asinine as cutting taxes for the richest so that they will create jobs.

 

[wMulew]

Dumbfuck opposition supporting retards talking cock. When they see their wages stagnant, price of goods and services continue to climb, they will be begging for the Foreigners to return

 

[enterprise2]

Only problem is: there is no such thing as 'trickle down' effect. Trickle-down economics a.k.a Reaganomics doesn't work in real life. The concept is as asinine as cutting taxes for the richest so that they will create jobs.

That's why I say the 'so called' trickle down effect. In fact, if we allow more FT, the bosses benefit whilst our wages get depressed we suffer the overcrowding. It's win lose situation!

 

[kongsimi]

where got say FT? it talks about economic growth!!

but it doesn't mean more FTs will have higher economic growth.

because statistics won't lie, unless you distort them! LOL!

 

[Kinana]

If we kick out these FTs, inflation will be rampant. No jobs n inflation. Its a deadly trap.

 

[shctaw]

If we kick out these FTs, inflation will be rampant. No jobs n inflation. Its a deadly trap.

92.5% don't mind.

 

[Fook Seng]

Dumbfuck opposition supporting retards talking cock. When they see their wages stagnant, price of goods and services continue to climb, they will be begging for the Foreigners to return

New FT increases population by 2% a year (assuming 100,000 intake annually), GDP increases only 1.3%. How exactly did FT help us?

 

[moolightaffairs]

alamak! who say Singaporean willing to accept lower pay?
let those foreign trash fuck off, more jobs for Singaporeans!
less foreign trash to compete for resources and jobs, living cost must go down. then lower pay no prob.
RENT MUST GO DOWN! NOT PAY!
IF FOREIGN TRASH FUCK OFF, WE THE CITIZENS MUST GO AND FILL UP THE HOLE BY PAY CUT? THAT MEANS MORE PAY CUT? LANJIAO!
RENT AND COST OF LIVING MUST GO DOWN!!!

 

[singveld]

that mean 92.5% of people in that survey does not know basic economic.

without adding the working population, the country will go into steep decline, business will collapse, shops will closed, banks will be in trouble, house price will fall, singapore standard of living will fall.

If that is ok to them? i will be surprised.
That is capitalism. Learn to live with it.

 

[Scrooball (clone)]

Then why did those balless voters vote the wrong way? Something must be wrong.

 

[moolightaffairs]

that mean 92.5% of people in that survey does not know basic economic.

without adding the working population, the country will go into steep decline, business will collapse, shops will closed, banks will be in trouble, house price will fall, singapore standard of living will fall.

If that is ok to them? i will be surprised.
That is capitalism. Learn to live with it.

not adding working populations to the country is ok.
but the income of Singaporeans must increase to sustain the economy.
not asking Singaporeans to take more pay cuts when foreign trash is chase out of sg. u see?

 

[Alamaking]

This is a stupid survey......it doesnt solve the problem and the gov still earning huge profits......

 

[peppertail]

Any more details of that survey? I can't read chinese, thanks.

 

[escher]

Singkies such stupid fucks that it beggars the mind.

No fucking balls to kick out everyone of those maggots in white time and time and time again and now moaning
and whimpering to take pay cuts to kick out FTs.

SHADDUP AND BEND YOUR HEAD DOWN AND UP YOUR ARSE VASELINED FOR LKY TO SCREW YOU.

AND YOU BETTER MOAN NICELY TO PLEASE HIM

 

[ykhuser]

will the payrise scheme works base on 40% ta pao by goverment?
assumes $100 pay rise
employer pay $60
gov pay $40

finally
you get $80 after 20% CPF deduction
gov get $20 into CPF
employer pay another 16% contribution which is $16 (should be increasing to 20% in future ) into CPF
gov get another $16

statement balance
you get $60
gov get $36 but after the inital $40 payout , gov lose $4
employer fork out $76

chain effect:
you get $60
after 7% gst deduction you left $55.80
$4.20 enter gov reserve.

gov payout $40
total return $40.20

with the high inflation
$55.80 become much lesser and less attractive.

 

[Kinana]

92.5% don't mind.

These ppl will mind after the job losses n inflation trap come, by then it till be too late

 

[Kinana]

New FT increases population by 2% a year (assuming 100,000 intake annually), GDP increases only 1.3%. How exactly did FT help us?

Where did you get this 100000 figure from? And you think we grew only 1.3% for all the years?