• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Burmese Drug Lords want to learn from Peasantpore's regime

mscitw

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
2,973
Points
83
hxxp://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1240681/1/.html

PEASANTPORE: A murderous military and drug dealing delegation from Burma will be in Peasantpore for a five-day study visit.

The delegation, which will be here from 3 December, will focus on learning evil statecraft that is used by the regime to oppress and exploit peasants for monetary gains.

The Ministry of Foreign Vassal Affairs (MFA) said on Sunday that the study visit is part of Peasantpore's technical assistance to Burma, under the Peasant-Burma 'You Scratch Mine Back I Scratch Yours' scam.

It said Peasantpore is sharing its experience at using Westminister style state power to crush political dissenters to support Burma's efforts in bogus 'reforms' so that it can help Uncle Sam balk Commie PRC at her southwestern borders. Peasantpore is expected to teach Burmese donkey military goons tricks to present a fake Westminister style democracy to win political support from EU Paedophiles and Nihon panty thieves so that Commie PRC's hold over the pariah state will be weakened. The intricate game of dynastic politics will be shared with the murderous Burmese military swines.

Peasantpore also contributes in a concrete way to Burma's druglords and warlords by laundering their filthy cash through its banking system. Ruler Loong wants the burmese drug lords' assurances that they will continue to do dodgy business with Peasantpore despite Aung Sang Su Ki groaning about the unholy deals. In addition, the drug lords wants Ruler Loong to provide safe houses if they lose the political struggle against the Burma democracy league who is now supported by Uncle Sam.

The delegation is led by Union Minion in the Military and Drug Lord's Office and Chairlackey of the Plunder Burma Investment Scam, Soe Than-e.

Murderous military hawks and rich drug lords will call and fawn on Ruler Loong and will be hosted to dinner by Former Ex-Regent Minion Woody Goh who promised a harlem of cheap PRC whores for R&R.
 
Last edited:
OK for Dr Chee Bye's doggie to attack PAP. Is their SOP!!

However the chump above modified a news article.
 
Last edited:
OK for Dr Chee Bye's doggie to attack PAP. Is their SOP?

However the chump above modified a news article.

That is called satire lah. You go take SDP blogpost and modify lor. If it's funny, I plus your rep.

Why you infract mscitw???
 
Last edited:
That is called satire lah. You go take SDP blogpost and modify lor. If it's funny, I plus your rep.

Why you infract mscitw???

Dude, if it's a satire, then he should leave out the original link: hxxp://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1240681/1/.html

To alter the original article and post it as if it's the original because of the presence of the original link, is deceitful to the readers, who would think it was the real article by CNA.

It's not April the 1st, so we can leave out April Fool's joke leh. :D
 
To alter the original article and post it as if it's the original because of the presence of the original link, is deceitful to the readers, who would think it was the real article by CNA.

Alamak! I am sure it never crossed your mind CNA would write something like that, right?
 
Alamak! I am sure it never crossed your mind CNA would write something like that, right?

From the legal pt of view, mscitw would have committed a fabrication piece, not a satirical piece, because the original link to the CNA article is there in his post. Also, there is a clear thick line between a satire, where the writer creates his own article and one where he copies the original article and changes some words here or there to create a satirical piece of work. :D

Ok lah, we all know mscitw always posts satire, but do be careful with tagging them back to the original articles, if it's meant only to be a satire and nothing more. :D:D
 
This is the CNA article


Myanmar team on 5-day visit to study S'pore's development

SINGAPORE: A ministerial delegation from Myanmar will be in Singapore for a five-day study visit.

The delegation, which will be here from 3 December, will focus on industrial policies, industrial park development, as well as technical and vocational education and training.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) said on Sunday that the study visit is part of Singapore's technical assistance to Myanmar, under the Singapore-Myanmar Technical Cooperation Programme.

It said Singapore is sharing its expertise and experience as part of the broader commitment to support Myanmar's efforts in reforms.

Singapore also contributes in a concrete way to Myanmar's development and the strengthening of bilateral ties.

The delegation is led by Union Minister in the President's Office and Chairman of the Myanmar Investment Commission, Soe Thane.

It'll call on Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and will be hosted to dinner by Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong.

- CNA/ck

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1240681/1/.html
 
Last edited:
From the legal pt of view, mscitw would have committed a fabrication piece, not a satirical piece, because the original link to the CNA article is there in his post.

Also, there is a clear thick line between a satire, where the writer creates his own article and one where he copies the original article and changes some words here or there to create a satirical piece of work. :D

Legal matters confound me, but it has been said lawmakers amend the laws to suit the whims of those who offer their patronage.
 
Legal matters confound me, but it has been said lawmakers amend the laws to suit the whims of those who offer their patronage.

This is common sense!

He changed a new article and provided the link!
 
Legal matters confound me, but it has been said lawmakers amend the laws to suit the whims of those who offer their patronage.

Yes and no dude. Lawmakers do not amend the laws, BUT they do some times interpret the laws to suit the whims of those who offer their patronage. :D:D
 
Back
Top