• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The official OZ bashing thread.

NZ Cheaper, better than Australia!

181820.1

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4592585a19716.html
The grass isn't greener across the Ditch
Sunday Star Times | Sunday, 22 June 2008
Email a Friend | Printable View | Have Your Say
Sunday Star-Times

OZ BOUND: Thousands of Kiwis hop across the ditch every year in search of a better life in the Lucky Country - but don't expect the grass to always be greener, says recent Melbourne migrant Elinore Wellwood (with Loti, 3)

Australia lives up to its image in many ways.

Kiwi migrants to Melbourne, for example, can read the newspaper as though it's a novel, its fanciful descriptions of gang wars and restaurant assassinations, corrupt police passing names of police informers to gangland contacts, who call in the hitmen.

Even as you shrug off the language differences as background noise thongs for jandals, doona for duvet, a child's fluffy is a babycino, you will smile at the Italian grandmothers who stop polishing their iron railings to run a wrinkled hand under a three-year-old's chin and thrust a gold coin into the mother's hand. "She is beautiful. Buy her something with this."

At the large neighbourhoods of those who still regard themselves as Italians and Greeks even though their grandparents left those cultures behind when they were barely out of their teens.

So, at Easter, the local baker sells specialties like melomakarona (walnut cookies drenched in syrup) and kourabiethes (moonshaped almond shortbreads covered in icing sugar). And all year round, locals go to the brilliant tapas bars in the alleys which produce their own top-selling cookbooks, and the farmers' markets sell beef you can trust the rural folk have known it since it was a calf.

These are reasons to move to Melbourne, to Australia. The food, the warmer weather, the broader multiculturalism.

Just don't expect it to be cheap.

Despite salaries reported to be 25 per cent higher on average, middle-income professionals won't earn that much more than in New Zealand in the same job, says Kiwi lawyer Jo Davidson. She's been Tasman-hopping moving to Melbourne, then back to Wellington, before returning last year to Australia to a dream job.

She loves the gourmet food in and around the city. And for her, the weather is a relief. The summer in Melbourne is warm, the seasons actually change, it's always dawning fine and even when it rains, it's gentle.

She didn't return for the money, though. "I felt significantly better off when I moved back from Melbourne to New Zealand. As a single woman [in Australia] I would never have contemplated buying a house. I went back to New Zealand and within six months bought my own home."

Food, she says, is also much more expensive in Australia. Everyday items such as milk and bread will cost you more. Woolworths' chief executive even admitted to a national inquiry that the company charges shoppers more in Australia than in New Zealand.

"And the quality at supermarkets is appalling. I used to be able to go to New World in Wellington and buy every single thing I wanted, and it was delicatessen standard."

Even if your pay packet is larger, the money quickly disappears. Teacher Mike Arthur, who recently moved from Wellington, says he earns about $4000 more than in New Zealand. "But the higher cost of living here eats that up."

Houses and cars are the big unaffordables. Advertised prices do not include tens of thousands of dollars in stamp duty when buying a house or vehicle. "Our car was far more expensive here, and then we had to pay stamp duty on it, plus about $700 to register it," says Arthur.

Some things cost less. Furniture because of superstores like Ikea and electricity (80 per cent generated from coal, the green-minded should note) are far cheaper, he says.

Presuming you don't earn less than $A25,000 ($31,100) taxes are not too different from New Zealand - about $2500 less in Australia on average but 9 per cent of wages is taken for compulsory superannuation, a figure hidden in the salary packages that lure unsuspecting Kiwis across the Tasman (salary "packaging" to cut your tax burden is big business). Tough if you wanted to pay off the mortgage first.

That's if you can afford to buy. To live within 4km of Melbourne's centre, expect to pay well over $600,000 for a house. The house will be semi-detached, unrenovated, have a tiny courtyard and probably be next to a big highway.

If you can't afford to buy, finding lower-end rental accommodation may be difficult, with an inner-city rental crisis in Melbourne. Chris and Carly, who just moved over from New Zealand, told the Age newspaper they had "been to four inspections in four days. The perception from home is that there are plenty of places to rent, but when you get to a place, 30 people turn up".

Renters are being forced to offer more rent to beat the competition, or pay eight weeks in advance instead of four.

If you are going to go, do it when you don't have kids. Mother-of-one Jocelyn Prasad, who moved to Sydney last year from Auckland, says life in Australia seems harder for families. "If you're single, there's a lot more opportunity. I think the higher cost of living really kicks in when you bring a family here."

She's also found that private schools are not just a luxury for the privileged. Kiwis who would never dream of using anything but the local high school at home, scrimp and save to avoid the Australian government school system and put their child through private education.

Education experts such as Richard James, director of Melbourne University's Centre for the Study of Higher Education, says the middle class here has lost confidence in government schools and moved its children to private schools, blaming funding cuts and closures under the previous state government.

In Victoria, last year, only 58 per cent of Year 12 students went to state government schools (which often lack sports fields and language options). Private school fees are often higher than in New Zealand.

It pays to go private. Seven out of 10 Melbourne University students were recruited from private or academically selective government schools, according to an Age survey of 2006 Year 12 students.

And the quality education quest starts early. In parts of Melbourne, even to get on a kindergarten waiting list you have to pay $A100 ($125). School waiting list fees can top $800. And forget picturing your kids growing up running under the sprinkler. Thanks to water restrictions, the grass definitely won't be greener for them.

New Zealanders moving to Australia s
 
Brisbane,Perth, Most Expensive in World!

180354.1

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23774371-5006789,00.html
Brisbane, Perth and Sydney among 50 most expensive cities

Florence Chong | May 29, 2008

RAPIDLY rising rents in Sydney, Brisbane and Perth have pushed the cities into the ranks of the 50 most expensive markets.

In the latest Global Market Rents Survey, published by CB Richard Ellis, Sydney's ranking moved from 62nd to 18th on the list of cities with the fastest-growing occupancy costs.

Sydney's average rent grew by 23.3 per cent to $800/sqm in the 12 months to May this year. It is 38th most expensive office market, jumping 10 places in six months.

Similarly, rents in Perth grew rapidly, averaging $785/sqm, placing the West Australian capital in 41st position -- and debuting in 50 most expensive cities list.

Although it slipped behind Sydney in the latest rankings, having overtaken it six months ago, Brisbane moved up a notch from 47th to 46th, with an average rent of $747/sqm.

Brisbane, which previously featured prominently in the fastest-growing rents list, slipped back from 16th place to 27th in the latest survey.

"This points to an easing in growth in this market in the early part of 2008," says CBRE Research and Consulting executive director Kevin Stanley.

"This is perhaps a sign of things to come for a market which has enjoyed staggering rental growth over the past three to four years," he says.

Rental growth in Perth was the fastest of the Australian cities: 32.3 per cent in the 12 months to May 2008.

It ranked as the 41st most expensive city in the world.

Two Indian cities -- Mumbai and New Delhi -- are now among the 10 most expensive markets.

Rentals in London's West End remain the most expensive, followed by Moscow and Tokyo respectively.

Singapore and Dubai were newcomers to the 10 most expensive cities.

Singapore ranked ninth with a median rent of $1643/sqm.

Occupancy costs in Singapore rose 86 per cent during the survey period, placing it third on the list of the cities with the fastest-growing occupancy costs.

Dubai, which was the 10th most expensive city, recorded a median office rent of $1515/sqm.

Occupancy costs in the UAE city rose 43 per cent in the past 12 months, making it the seventh fastest-growing city.

CBRE's global chief economist Raymond Torto says office occupancy costs are continuing to defy sluggish economic conditions and the credit crunch, rising faster than global inflation.
 
Migrants leaving Australia cost too high

178340.1

http://www.stuff.co.nz/timaruherald/4551382a6010.html
Aust housing crisis forcing Kiwis to leave
The Timaru Herald | Saturday, 17 May 2008
Email a Friend | Printable View | Have Your Say
Related Links
• Subscribe to Archivestuff
• Have your say

Kiwis are missing out on the big bucks in Western Australia because it's too difficult and too expensive to find accommodation.

Booming business is drawing hundreds of people to Western Australia but the accommodation crisis gripping the state is forcing many people to leave.

An anonymous letter sent to the Herald warned Kiwis thinking of moving to "the lucky country" that: "Life is not all milk and honey in Australia."

The letter writer said rental demand is forcing up rentals with some families sleeping in their cars and sharing accommodation with other families.

The West Australian newspaper reported that the State's resource boom is to blame for soaring rents and rising house prices and has created a poverty epidemic in the state.

The number of homeless in Perth is believed to have risen 20 per cent to more than 7000 since the 2001 census and is predicted to worsen.

The letter writer said between one and two dozen families are sleeping in cars each night near Kwinana beach which is south of Perth.

"If people from New Zealand come to Australia without much money they could soon be in the cactus."

A former Timaru woman is also warning people to do their homework before booking a one-way ticket to Perth.

Wendy Tapper said the accommodation shortage is spoiling many Kiwi's plans.

The human resources coordinator said people are coming to Perth in search of big money but can't stay because they can't find anywhere to live.

"I often have Kiwis and other nationalities applying for positions here but unless they have contacts or plenty of money accommodation becomes a huge issue and more often than not they either have to return to New Zealand or try their luck in other states."

Former Waimate man Paul Dillon had a place to stay before he moved to Perth three years ago.

He urged people to arrange accommodation before moving to Western Australia because flat hunting can be a long and painful process with as many as 30 people vying for one flat.

He admitted the money was good but it was an expensive lifestyle. "The rent here's like a mortgage back home."
 
Oz CarTax/Duty one of Highest in World!

181812.1

http://www.kotsemo.com/Www/Extra/News/?newsID=223

The hidden taxes on your new car

Every time Porsche sells a new 911 Turbo in Australia, the tax man makes enough money to buy five Toyota Corollas.

That’s the startling truth about Australia’s tax regime as it applies to motor vehicles.

Taxes on new cars range from 9 per cent for Australian made vehicles to 36 per cent for the most expensive imports.

A third of the price of a new Rolls-Royce Phantom, or a staggering $300,805, goes into the government’s coffers. And that figure will rise even further when the Government lifts the luxury tax on vehicles that cost more than $57,123 from 25 to 33 per cent.

In the wake of the latest slug on car buyers, Drive has calculated the various taxes paid on 10 cars sold in Australia’s, ranging from the Hyundai Getz and Holden Commodore to the 911 Turbo and Rolls-Royce Phantom – and the results aren’t pretty.

Drive can’t tell you exactly how much import duty you pay because the 10 per cent tariff is paid on the wholesale price of the car, before the manufacturer and dealer add their profit margins.

Car companies won’t reveal how much import duty they pay because it would allow their competitors to estimate their profit margins.

So for the purpose of our table, we’ve estimated a 10 per cent profit for both the dealer and manufacturer.

The chief executive of the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industry, Andrew McKellar, says Australia is “right up there” when it comes to taxing car buyers.

“The luxury tax in particular is far higher than any similar tax anywhere in the world,” he says.

The differences are most notable in luxury imports. For example, a Porsche 911 that costs more than $200,000 in Australia sells for less than $75,000 in the United States. Holden’s own Commodore SS, which sells for $45,290 here, costs roughly $32,000 in the States.

Australian motorists can potentially pay up to five taxes or duties when they buy a new car.

Import duty is charged when a vehicle arrives on Australian shores, then GST and luxury car taxes are levied, before stamp duty and registration fees take another slice of the pie.

“The tax burden on motorists is already substantial and the increase in luxury tax is simply a punitive measure on top of that,” he says.

He says the tax regime now hits luxury buyers three times during the sale process. Apart from the luxury tax, they also pay more GST by virtue of their car’s higher purchase price.

Then once the sale goes through, they pay a higher percentage of the sale price in stamp duty because the rate is based on a sliding scale, where the tax rate increases in most states at $30,000 and $45,000.

On a Porsche 911 turbo, the GST payable is $25,732, the luxury tax is $51,348 and the stamp duty totals $15,820. Add to that an estimated import duty of more than $20,000 and you come up with a total tax burden that is approaching the cost of a new Porsche Boxster.

The taxes payable on a Toyota LandCruiser would buy a new Toyota Yaris, while the tax on a BMW 5-Series would pay for a Volkswagen Golf.

McKellar says the other injustice is the fact that many cars that were never intended to be caught in the luxury tax net are now affected because the level at which the tax cuts in has not been adjusted in line with inflation.

“There hasn’t been any decent increase in the luxury tax threshold in the past four or five years. It hasn’t kept pace with the changes in the industry. Whatever happened to the good old Aussie notion of a fair go,” he says.
 
How to retire Oz? Govt give too little!

181142.1

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23725513-7583,00.html
Rudd is hanging aged out

* Font Size: Decrease Increase
* Print Page: Print

Bob Brown | May 20, 2008

THE Rudd Government's inaugural budget spent $31 billion in inflationary tax cuts, $40 billion in "future funds" for education and infrastructure projects, $22 billion for defence and $500 million on a "clean coal" fund.

But for Australia's 1.2 million aged pensioners, those of the working families who built this country during the past half-century, there was zero increase in their weekly pay. Pensioners are stuck below poverty levels.

There is a one-off payment of $500 and some help to pay those rapidly rising power and phone bills. But these don't meet the added costs for food, health, transport and housing that pensioners face across the country.

The tax cuts will deliver people such as Kevin Rudd and Brendan Nelson, who earn more than $200,000 a year, an extra $91 a week from next year, rising to $116 in 2010.

Australia's 1.2million pensioners, on the other hand, live on just $273 aweek.

To put that in perspective, the Prime Minister earns $13,000 in a fortnight, while a pensioner, in a year, gets a little more than $14,000.

The letters I receive from pensioners are heart-rending. Many cannot pay for needed dental care or operations or take holidays, let alone buy presents for loved ones.

The fact is that Australia's pensioners have not had a substantial, well-above-inflation increase in their pension since the mid-1990s, and an extra $30 a week would help to meet the rising costs of medicines, dental and health care and the weekly grocery bill.

After last week's outcry from pensioners at (once again) being left behind, the Rudd Government announced its tax review would examine pension rates. This is of no help to pensioners who are already struggling. Recently the Senate inquired into the cost of living for older Australians and found that a full pension is insufficient to maintain a basic, decent standard of living. Another review won't change that.

Raising pensions by between $30 and $100 a week, as the Greens have been campaigning for since June 2007, would cost about $3 billion a year at the lower end. It is an affordable, sensible and fair proposal.

We would also retrofit Australia's 7.4million homes, starting with low-income Australians such as pensioners, with energy-saving devices such as insulation and solar hot water, cutting power bills and greenhouse gas emissions in an ultimately cost-neutral initiative.

The Australian Greens have different priorities from Labor and the Coalition. We believe government spending should help redress the unfairness that leaves in poverty people who have worked all their lives for Australia, not least women, for whom superannuation was simply not an option.

Much the same applies to carers.

In the Senate last Thursday, the Greens alone opposed Wayne Swan's tax cuts for the wealthy.

In 2006 we tried to limit the pay rise for politicians to 2.5 per cent, level with the rise in the cost of living, instead of the full 7 per cent. (Labor and the Coalition voted against it, 52 to five.)

Last year we tried to stop an additional 6.7 per cent pay rise for politicians, and Labor joined with the Coalition to vote it down, 56 votes tosix.

And when we called on the Howard government to spend $3 billion a year increasing the aged pension by $30 a week, instead of spending $3.5 billion giving more tax cuts to people earning more than $75,000 a year, Labor again joined with the Coalition to vote down the motion, 54 to eight.

ACT Liberal senator Gary Humphries, who chaired the Senate inquiry into the cost of living for older Australians, commented: "You might almost say it's a good thing that many older Australians have lived through harder times and are used to the kinds of conditions that some of them now face." He later apologised for his insensitive remark.

Too many politicians are content to vote for pay increases for themselves while ignoring the plight of pensioners today. The Greens will continue to argue strongly for a fairer go for pensioners. There is no good reason the Coalition and Labor should not support the Greens' call for a minimum $30 a week increase in the pension. Both parties are clearly prepared to spend b
 
UK migrants cannot make it in Australia!

http://www.birminghammail.net/lifes...ppointment-for-other-migrants-97319-20765520/
Australia is the land of milk and honey for some but a huge disappointment for other migrants

Apr 15 2008 By Diane Parkes

For thousands of Brits, Australia has become the promised land - but are its streets paved with gold? DIANE PARKES speaks to two families with very different stories.

DAD Adrian Reilly found the promise of work for trades-people in Oz quickly turned to brick dust as his wages were slashed due to competition.

The 37-year-old brickie and his family moved to Perth in Western Australia about 18 months ago in the hope of finding a better life, but the family soon discovered the reality did not meet their dream.

And work became so desperate in the building trade in Perth that Adrian has put his trowel away and now works as a manager of a local go-kart centre.

Wife Alison, 42, who works as an assistant manager at a shopping centre, believes Brits should know that life in Australia is not necessarily the goldmine people believe it to be.

"The Australian government says it needs all these tradespeople but it doesn't tell you what the wages are like or how expensive it is to live here," she says.

"If you are a tradesman I would say you need to do your research before you come here as there are lots of things the government doesn't tell you.

"For instance, my husband is paid by the brick and he has seen his wage drop three times from Australian $1.20 to $1 to 85c per brick - that is about 40p.

"And he is expected to do other things like put in windows for no extra money.

"He is self-employed and they just tell him that if he doesn't want to work for that rate then others will.

"In the end he had to give up because he just wasn't making enough money for us to live."

Adrian, Alison and their two children, Luke, 16, and Danielle, 13, moved to Perth after holidays in Australia.

"I think some of it has been bad timing," says Alison.

"It took us two years for our visas to be agreed and by the time we got here the cost of housing had risen and wages for work were dropping."

The family also discovered that education can pose its problems. "The terms are different here so Luke ended up skipping a year," says Alison.

"There were issues about that especially when he came to find work. He wanted to be a plumber but he couldn't get a place on a plumbing course.

"There were only 16 places and hundreds of people going for them. Then they said he didn't have enough points because of skipping a year so he has had to go and do a pointless three month course just to get the points so he can do the plumbing course."

But having invested so much in the move, they are determined to make a go of it.

"We sold our house and spent about £3,500 sorting out visas," says Alison.

"We have moved the whole family and we wouldn't want to uproot and go back. We have had moments when we have thought about it but it would be too big a move for us again."

But Alison knows that other Brits in Oz have packed their bags and come home.

"I know people who have done that. They just couldn't make it work here," she says. "Because the reality is very different from what you think it is going to be.

"We have been really disappointed. We didn't come here expecting to be millionaires but we did expect to have at least the same standard of living that we had back home."
 
Australia land of paedophiles

http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/entertainment/4769203/artists-defend-magazines-nude-child-cover
Dad defends magazine's nude child cover
July 7, 2008, 11:02 am
ABC © [Enlarge photo]

Australian artists are defending the controversial decision of Art Monthly magazine to run a photograph of a naked child on its front cover.

The front cover of the magazine features Melbourne photographer Polixeni Papapetrou's 2003 photo of her naked daughter, who was six at the time.

The New South Wales Government is referring the magazine to the Classification Board.

The Prime Minister has said he cannot stand the picture and federal Arts Minister Peter Garrett has said the magazine was being needlessly provocative.

The girl's father, art critic Robert Nelson, says the family has no regrets about the photograph and he has rejected the Prime Minister's criticism of the work.

"There's never been any study that suggests that there's a link between paedophilia and art," he said.

"Unfortunately we're working without any science; people are just making these assertions about protecting children, which is unarguable - I mean why would you not want to [protect them]?

"But no-one's really explained, protect them from what."

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says no child that age could give their consent to such work but Mr Nelson says Mr Rudd should back up his concerns with evidence.

"I think he's welcome to have an opinion on art - I think that's to be encouraged," Mr Nelson said.

"I think the problem arises when, as he did with Bill Henson, he declared that the images are revolting and linked them to the protection of children without a shred of evidence."

But Joe Tucci from the Australian Childhood Foundation says parents should not be allowed to give consent to posing naked on behalf of their children.

"They have the legal right to consent on behalf or their child, but I don't think they have the ethical right to do that," he said.

"I think you can't tell now what the impact will be on that child even today."<h3>'Business as usual'</h3>

Fellow artists are defending the magazine's decision to use the photograph on its cover.

The magazine's editor says the image was published in an attempt to "validate nudity and childhood as subjects for art".

He said he wanted to restore some dignity to the debate following the controversy in May, when artist Bill Henson's photographs of a naked prepubescent girl in a Sydney gallery were confiscated by police.

Martyn Jolly is the co-author of an article on the controversy that is published in the same edition of Art Monthly. He is also the head of photography and media arts at the Australian National University.

"The original photograph, the Bill Henson photographs have been found to be OK ... they were passed by the Board of Review," he said.

He says putting the photo on the front cover was just "business as usual".

"It could be a provocation or it could be simply saying, 'No we aren't going to ... buckle'," he said.

"We aren't going to let this small pressure group dictate what we can and can't show. We aren't going to let the tabloid media, who are always wanting to create media panics, dictate what we can and can't show.

"And we aren't going to let politicians who are always wanting to jump on populist bandwagons dictate what we can and can't show."<h3>'Artistic duty'</h3>

Mr Jolly says the magazine had a duty to reignite the debate over children in art.

"I guess if you're the editor of a magazine which is meant to be reporting on Australia on a month-by-month basis and this has been the biggest thing in Australian art for a long time, you'd be [neglecting] your duty if you didn't actually discuss the debate," he said.

Art Monthly receives funding from the Australia Council, which has issued a statement saying the magazine has been and remains a very effective and valuable means of communication for the visual arts.

"We don't think it appropriate to judge any journal covering a wide field of interests and a diverse range of issues on one deliberately provocative statement which in itself is reaction to an already overheated controversy," the statement read.

"For many years our society has managed to differentiate between artistic creativity and the totally unacceptable sexual exploitation of children.

"Continuing to argue extreme positions is not creating any greater clarity."

The magazine is also funded by the Federal and ACT Governments, and ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope has defended the magazine's right to publish the photo.

Mr Stanhope says he has not seen the picture but he says the magazine is a reputable publication.

"To suggest that this particular photograph that's on the cover of this paper is in anyway pornographic or represents child pornography - I haven't seen it but that's a huge leap to suggest that a photograph of a young child is inherently pornographic if it is displayed publicly," he said.

"That's a concept that causes me enormous difficulty."

The Federal Government says the Australia Council will now be asked to draw up a set of protocols on the representation of children in art.
 
Australia Faulted for Nazi Inaction

Nazi hunters fault Australia for inaction

By VERONIKA OLEKSYN – 5 hours ago

VIENNA, Austria (AP) — Australia, Hungary and Lithuania are failing to investigate and prosecute suspected Nazi war criminals largely due to a lack of political will, the Simon Wiesenthal Center said Thursday.

The Nazi-hunting group said the same holds true for Croatia, Estonia, Latvia and Ukraine, adding all countries in question face no legal obstacles in bringing suspects to justice.

The findings were published in the center's annual report, which graded the investigation and prosecution efforts of countries around the world between April 2007 and March 2008.

"In analyzing the results presented in this report, the critical importance of political will in bringing Nazi war criminals to justice is increasingly evident," wrote Efraim Zuroff, the center's chief Nazi hunter.

However, he lauded the success achieved by U.S. prosecution agencies, saying they should serve as a catalyst for governments around the world.

Australia was given the worst possible mark — an "F-2"_ for its continued failure to extradite Nazi collaborator Charles Zentai, an Australian citizen accused of killing a Jewish teenager in Hungary during World War II.

The report said Australia admitted at least several hundred Nazi war criminals and collaborators but has failed to take successful legal action against a single one.

In August, an Australian judge found that Zentai's case and circumstances met the requirements of the Australian Extradition Act and the Extradition Treaty between Australia and the Republic of Hungary. Lawyers for Zentai said at the time they would appeal the ruling.

Hungary, also in the "F-2" category, was reprimanded for failing to prosecute former gendarmerie officer Sandor Kepiro, accused by the Wiesenthal Center of playing an active role in the "mass murder of at least hundreds of civilians" in Novi Sad, Serbia, on Jan. 23, 1942.

In October, Hungarian prosecutors investigating Kepiro said they were considering expanding their probe to Serbia and were awaiting access to archival documents there which could shed new light on the 1942 events.

In a separate development in September, Serbian prosecutors lodged a request for investigation against Kepiro with the Belgrade war crimes court, the first step toward a possible indictment and trial.

Lithuania, meanwhile, got a failing grade for its refusal to jail Algimantas Dailide, convicted in 2006 of helping round up Jews for Nazis as an officer in the Vilnius security police. He was sentenced to five years in jail, but the judge ruled he was too frail to serve the sentence. The center said that reflected Lithuania's resistance to acknowledging "the extensive scope of local complicity in the crimes of the Holocaust."

The report also criticized Norway, Sweden and Syria, saying all three countries refuse in principle to investigate and prosecute suspected Nazi war criminals because of legal or ideological restrictions.

The report noted that Austria, which got a "C" for its efforts, has not convicted anyone for crimes committed against Jews during the Holocaust for more than three decades.

It also said Austrian authorities have refused the center's request to allow a foreign medical expert to examine Milivoj Asner, a wartime Croatian police chief living in Carinthia and suspected of an active role in deporting hundreds of Serbs, Jews, and Gypsies to their deaths. Authorities have said Asner suffers from dementia.
 
Re: Starbucks Closes Shop in Australia!

star bucks go star gazing liao!

hahhaa...our old kopitiam still survives...back to our teh tarik sarabat tall!!! majulah singapura!!!
 
Re: Starbucks Closes Shop in Australia!

186206.1

http://www.theappointment.co.uk/news/?submitted=False&ID=3758

Starbucks to close 61 Australian outlets
Starbucks is planning to shut 61 of its 85 stores in Australia. The coffee chain opened its first store in Australia in 2000 but has faced stiffed competition. Around 700 jobs will be lost.
However, reiterating the group’s expansion plans, founder Howard Schulz said: “As I have stated in previous communications, the US store closure decision was one of the most angst-ridden choices that we have made in my more than 25 years with Starbucks. Our decision to close underperforming stores in the Australia market was just as difficult, and it in no way reflects the state of Starbucks business in countries outside of the United States, which is quite strong. Our challenges in Australia are unique, and there are no other international markets that need to be addressed in this manner. Although it is not easy, hopefully, we realise that part of transforming Starbucks is our ability to look forward, while pursuing innovation. We strongly believe that our decisions to close underperforming stores and reduce our partner workforce will help support Starbucks continued growth”.
In the first three months of the year, Starbucks’ profits plummeted by 28% and the chain has been struggling in the US as consumers were hit by the slowdown.
In other news, Michelle Gass, senior vice president, will head a new marketing business and Jim Alling, appointed head of Starbucks Coffee International only last year, is leaving the group. Martin Coles will move from his role as chief operating officer back to his prior position, filling in for Mr Alling.
Additionally, Dorothy Kim, executive vice president, global supply chain operations, is moving to a new role as executive vice president, global strategy - office of the CEO; and Peter Gibbons, senior vice president of global manufacturing operations has been promoted to executive vice president, global supply chain operations.

U stupid Shockshit fool! OZ has cheaper and better (italian coffee), who needs Starbucks? 1 Latte or Capucinno is only $2.50. No wonder they have to close so many stores. Starbucks sucks!
 
Re: Starbucks Closes Shop in Australia!

Would it matter? DOME, Gloria Jeans, Coffee Club and many other smaller outlets have better coffee, for cheaper prices.

And some of them are really influenced by their Italian roots. So its genuine coffee. Besides Starbucks over expanded in the bubble era- and now they're paying the price.
 
Re: Starbucks Closes Shop in Australia!

initially i thought they drink milk and not coffee?
 
Re: Starbucks Closes Shop in Australia!

At least Sam's Alfresco Coffee Shop is still growing strong with these newbie - OzSucks!
 
Re: UK migrants cannot make it in Australia!

I guess emigration is a bold decison and need to be well reseach...for me the satisfaction of comparing the overall of quality living standard in a scale of 10...OZ - 7.23 and SG - 6.99. Very country will has it's pros n cons...
For all singaporeans whom is planning to emigrate...what is there to lost if you don't even try? Your life deserve an alternatives! At least you won't regret in life later when you're too old to even qualified...
 
Re: How to retire Oz? Govt give too little!

Yes...it's a fact that in near future there don't be much pension left for the oldie...so each Aussie individual gonna be self sufficient...sigh...
 
Re: NZ Cheaper, better than Australia!

Yes, there's a trend now that OZ is heading to NZ for retirement...being an Aussie, living in NZ can be indefinite with no visa issue...so worth considering - OZ or NZ! You make your pick!
 
Re: Australia in recession

At least the "R" only come out for the first time in almost 20 years...I wouldn't says how much "R" has come about for SG...btw, OzSucks you've done a great job from all the previous threads; I reckon you'll have a short probation!
 
Re: Brisbane,Perth, Most Expensive in World!

180354.1

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23774371-5006789,00.html
Brisbane, Perth and Sydney among 50 most expensive cities

Florence Chong | May 29, 2008

RAPIDLY rising rents in Sydney, Brisbane and Perth have pushed the cities into the ranks of the 50 most expensive markets.

In the latest Global Market Rents Survey, published by CB Richard Ellis, Sydney's ranking moved from 62nd to 18th on the list of cities with the fastest-growing occupancy costs.

Sydney's average rent grew by 23.3 per cent to $800/sqm in the 12 months to May this year. It is 38th most expensive office market, jumping 10 places in six months.

Similarly, rents in Perth grew rapidly, averaging $785/sqm, placing the West Australian capital in 41st position -- and debuting in 50 most expensive cities list.

Although it slipped behind Sydney in the latest rankings, having overtaken it six months ago, Brisbane moved up a notch from 47th to 46th, with an average rent of $747/sqm.

Brisbane, which previously featured prominently in the fastest-growing rents list, slipped back from 16th place to 27th in the latest survey.

"This points to an easing in growth in this market in the early part of 2008," says CBRE Research and Consulting executive director Kevin Stanley.

"This is perhaps a sign of things to come for a market which has enjoyed staggering rental growth over the past three to four years," he says.

Rental growth in Perth was the fastest of the Australian cities: 32.3 per cent in the 12 months to May 2008.

It ranked as the 41st most expensive city in the world.

Two Indian cities -- Mumbai and New Delhi -- are now among the 10 most expensive markets.

Rentals in London's West End remain the most expensive, followed by Moscow and Tokyo respectively.

Singapore and Dubai were newcomers to the 10 most expensive cities.

Singapore ranked ninth with a median rent of $1643/sqm.

Occupancy costs in Singapore rose 86 per cent during the survey period, placing it third on the list of the cities with the fastest-growing occupancy costs.

Dubai, which was the 10th most expensive city, recorded a median office rent of $1515/sqm.

Occupancy costs in the UAE city rose 43 per cent in the past 12 months, making it the seventh fastest-growing city.

CBRE's global chief economist Raymond Torto says office occupancy costs are continuing to defy sluggish economic conditions and the credit crunch, rising faster than global inflation.

and when you add melbourne to the mix you have australia, the worst country in the world.
 
Re: Australia Faulted for Nazi Inaction

Nazi hunters fault Australia for inaction

By VERONIKA OLEKSYN – 5 hours ago

VIENNA, Austria (AP) — Australia, Hungary and Lithuania are failing to investigate and prosecute suspected Nazi war criminals largely due to a lack of political will, the Simon Wiesenthal Center said Thursday.

The Nazi-hunting group said the same holds true for Croatia, Estonia, Latvia and Ukraine, adding all countries in question face no legal obstacles in bringing suspects to justice.

The findings were published in the center's annual report, which graded the investigation and prosecution efforts of countries around the world between April 2007 and March 2008.

"In analyzing the results presented in this report, the critical importance of political will in bringing Nazi war criminals to justice is increasingly evident," wrote Efraim Zuroff, the center's chief Nazi hunter.

However, he lauded the success achieved by U.S. prosecution agencies, saying they should serve as a catalyst for governments around the world.

Australia was given the worst possible mark — an "F-2"_ for its continued failure to extradite Nazi collaborator Charles Zentai, an Australian citizen accused of killing a Jewish teenager in Hungary during World War II.

The report said Australia admitted at least several hundred Nazi war criminals and collaborators but has failed to take successful legal action against a single one.

In August, an Australian judge found that Zentai's case and circumstances met the requirements of the Australian Extradition Act and the Extradition Treaty between Australia and the Republic of Hungary. Lawyers for Zentai said at the time they would appeal the ruling.

Hungary, also in the "F-2" category, was reprimanded for failing to prosecute former gendarmerie officer Sandor Kepiro, accused by the Wiesenthal Center of playing an active role in the "mass murder of at least hundreds of civilians" in Novi Sad, Serbia, on Jan. 23, 1942.

In October, Hungarian prosecutors investigating Kepiro said they were considering expanding their probe to Serbia and were awaiting access to archival documents there which could shed new light on the 1942 events.

In a separate development in September, Serbian prosecutors lodged a request for investigation against Kepiro with the Belgrade war crimes court, the first step toward a possible indictment and trial.

Lithuania, meanwhile, got a failing grade for its refusal to jail Algimantas Dailide, convicted in 2006 of helping round up Jews for Nazis as an officer in the Vilnius security police. He was sentenced to five years in jail, but the judge ruled he was too frail to serve the sentence. The center said that reflected Lithuania's resistance to acknowledging "the extensive scope of local complicity in the crimes of the Holocaust."

The report also criticized Norway, Sweden and Syria, saying all three countries refuse in principle to investigate and prosecute suspected Nazi war criminals because of legal or ideological restrictions.

The report noted that Austria, which got a "C" for its efforts, has not convicted anyone for crimes committed against Jews during the Holocaust for more than three decades.

It also said Austrian authorities have refused the center's request to allow a foreign medical expert to examine Milivoj Asner, a wartime Croatian police chief living in Carinthia and suspected of an active role in deporting hundreds of Serbs, Jews, and Gypsies to their deaths. Authorities have said Asner suffers from dementia.

why do think australia is so bad? its like they have a welcome sign there for white morons who like to torture non-whites. and australia is well known for its skinheads.

australia truly is the worst country in the world.
 
Re: Rising Unemployment in Australia!

186358.1

http://business.smh.com.au/business/layoffs-add-to-the-fear-20080803-3pbj.html
Lay-offs add to the fear in Oz

* Ross Gittins

* August 4, 2008
* Page 1 of 2

Starbucks's decision to close almost three-quarters of its stores and lay off 700 workers may not distress too many coffee drinkers, but it's ominous news for the economy.

That's because it's just the latest in a lengthening list of lay-offs. Also announced last week was the Don smallgoods manufacturer's decision to close its factories in Melbourne and Western Australia and divest itself of 640 workers.

The closure of South Pacific Tyres' factory in Melbourne will cost almost 600 employees their jobs at the end of the year. Holden will stop producing four-cylinder engines at Fishermans Bend late next year, leaving 530 workers out of a job, though the company says it will absorb some of them into other operations.

Qantas has flagged its intention to slash between 500 and 1500 jobs. Its regional carrier, QantasLink, will close its maintenance base at Mildura and axe several air services at the cost of 20 jobs.

Insurance Australia Group plans to get rid of 600 staff. Suncorp is to close five bank branches in NSW and one in Bendigo. The NIB health fund is closing four retail centres, with job losses but no forced redundancies.

The point is not that those announcements add up to a significant blow to national employment in themselves, but that they're probably the forerunners of many such decisions.

Job losses and rising unemployment play a key role in compounding and lengthening downturns in the economy. In the jargon of Keynesianism, they're at the heart of the "negative multiplier effect".

And it's not just the direct effect of job losses on the spending levels of the unemployed. It's more the effect on the spending of the many people who, seeing those job losses, become fearful of losing their own jobs and tighten their belts in anticipation.

Many more people will fear losing their jobs than actually do. But whether the fears are justified or not, their reduced spending - with their saving used to reduce their debts - helps ensure more people actually do lose their jobs.

And here's the trick: it's not the monthly announcement of falling employment or rising unemployment figures that scares people. No, that's too impersonal.

What does most to put the wind up people is a succession of stories on the nightly news of this firm laying off 700 workers and that firm declaring 600 staff redundant. Footage of workers streaming out the factory gates for the last time may be cliched, but it strikes a powerful emotional chord with the punters.

2009 - the year australia bled and cried. it will be very painful in 2009.

hee hee.
 
Back
Top