thank you. the music and movie industry has teeth, and you rightly pointed it out.
Last edited:
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Race & Religion Folder ?
- Thread starter scroobal
- Start date
thank you. the music and movie industry has teeth, and you rightly pointed it out.
And Schmitz thought he got all figured it out.If Schmitz of Megaupload ,who was floating on millions,could be caught on the wrong foot what makes you think eatshitndie is well informed and therefore you are well advised?
What is discussed here about the dos and donts on the net is based on past precedents.Crime against humanity is certainly a no no by any measure in any country.
I could try to live a life of zero risk but then I'd be no better than most sinkies.
Once I start worrying about the consequences of each and every post, where does it end. I might as well shut the site down myself and go fishing.
I threaten nobody so I don't know what my crime will be. If a court order is served, I have lawyers to rely on and the justice system will kick in.
Well said.Everything carries a risk since our whole life revolves around decisions.
But the gist of what I am saying is there are certain risk not worth taking.
that's either exaggeration or embellishment being stretched a little too far. i just committed a crime against humanity by having beans for lunch, and the natural gas produced and leaked also caused an environmental disaster. not defending jar, but a case of crime against humanity requires dead bodies by the thousands. are you on weed?
I see your ego bloated beyond recognition.And I am not contesting you for who can pee furthest either.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimes_against_humanity
Crimes against humanity, as defined by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Explanatory Memorandum, "are particularly odious offenses in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. Murder; extermination; torture; rape; political, racial, or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity only if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice. Isolated inhumane acts of this nature may constitute grave infringements of human rights, or depending on the circumstances, war crimes, but may fall short of falling into the category of crimes under discussion."[SUP][1][/SUP]
Last edited:
your wiki quote contradicts with what you claimed as crime against humanity. let's put jar jar bings on a mock trial here. in the court of international law, mere words, essays, blogs without the evidence of real acts and perpetration against real persons will fall flat and get buried at the complaints desk. that's as far as it will go. the judge will toss you out. ok, how many indians have jar jar killed or caused acts of harm? are you one of them? emotional distress? well, go ahead and file a civil lawsuit in sg. the hague will have no frivolous nonsense from you. you're in conspiracy theory wonderland, and like sam says, taking this too seriously. :p
I have said enough.I had said that before and I am saying it now.
Any further discussion in detail and depth only alerts the PAP and provide them with fodder free of charge.But this much I can say; you ought to improve your English comprehension skill.
However,if it makes you feel better that you have won this argument.So be it.Go ahead and pin the victory for all to see.You have my permission.
ironically, it'll be the likes of conspiracy theorists like you who will snitchbitch with the pappies you detest. and they can't do a fecking thing. this site is u.s. based and it enjoys certain free speech protection, and talking shit about race and religion is protected under the same rights. you haven't seen true hate sites yet in the u.s. go visit them. this is child's play. the reason they exist is the same free speech reason i cited. authorities won't act until those authors ACT on what they say. apparently, you're confused between act and say. the operative rule is in which jurisdiction is this site under. you seem to totally miss the forest for an imagined tree.
Each and every one of your words you wrote betrays you.I was merely being diplomatic that your lack English comprehension.....that's sort of saying you carry an agenda--- if it's out of your depth.
Is Jah Rastafar your clone?
omg. you're resorting to the lowest scum tactics on cyberspace when you lose an argument. i am jar jar bings, jahrastafar i, jahrastafar ii, iii, rastafuck, robox, mashichan, greenlaser and many more. i have about half the ipv6 address space in the universe for all my clones. darth sidious is my brother. you just lost all diminishing credibility you have left.
See,all I need to do is throw a stone and wow !....the ripples it creates.Works all the time.
As typical Jah Rastafar and other PAP lackeys you respond with your typical ad hominem attack.
Buddy,you folks need to improve yourself lah.Just because you write with a different style than Jah Rastafar means you folks leave no smoking gun ah?
All I asked was a simple question.Cannot answer yes or no mah?Why go haiwire and start chasing your own tail?
Look,I heck care even if your are LHL.
....and incidentally you are talking about credibility ;is that the same guy who preached not to take this forum seriously?The more you engage me the more I unravel you.
Last edited:
ROFL! ok nice gook yes it's ok for you to use a racist nick while i committed crimes against humanity!! by posting on this forum.
this is about one of the most funny claims on sbf.....ever. crimes against humanity aimed at a lowly foulmouthed (but not as foul as deboned) pathetic troll like you? he's giving you an honor you don't deserve. rotflmao!
i'm laughing so hard i don't care what low standards you think i belong to. my last drink at a comedy club was a year ago. and it wasn't as funny. gook nite! rotf! :*:
If that were the case why would you even bother to tell anyone that you were laughing hard at all?
my neighbors are complaining. i have to record this lol event on sbf just in case someone calls the cops. i'm old and have a poor memory. you and sbf are just a tool to me.
Your imaginary neighbours in the mad house sure must be fuming mad. A tool to you for world domination yes ok old fool you sure hurt our feelings.
One of the oldest trick of PAP clones is to fight among themselves incessantly.That's how most begin their lives.It is to create an illusion that they are world apart opinion wise.I am putting it mildly here.
The other is ,of course,is to wear an opposition tag.Which PAP lackey in his/her right mind will want to wear a PAP badge?
But most of us after some times can recognize their traits.Because eventually they will spill their beans.However,for better wisdom we just mind our business for the sake of peace.Since we are not paid to troll.
If it helps some newbies;just observe how eatshitndie side steps the issue....wanting to pick a fight with provocation and accusation.Perhaps eatshitndie is not in the highest of PAP of echelon and just a smallbie.Since all his tactics backfired due to it's antiquity.
The other is ,of course,is to wear an opposition tag.Which PAP lackey in his/her right mind will want to wear a PAP badge?
But most of us after some times can recognize their traits.Because eventually they will spill their beans.However,for better wisdom we just mind our business for the sake of peace.Since we are not paid to troll.
If it helps some newbies;just observe how eatshitndie side steps the issue....wanting to pick a fight with provocation and accusation.Perhaps eatshitndie is not in the highest of PAP of echelon and just a smallbie.Since all his tactics backfired due to it's antiquity.
Nice-Gook and I have been at logger heads on so many issues but this is something that he is absolutely right.
There is also the other part of the equation which has nothing to do with the state or breaching rules and the law. Forummers are turned off when they see the same trash being repeated in nearly every thread. People will eventually move away as they did in 3 in 1 during the Richard Wan's moderation period. He was against FTs getting the primary seat but he struggled to keep the lid on the racists. Now it is graveyard with same few bantering away. The same guy who caused havoc there is now here doing the same thing.
There is also the other part of the equation which has nothing to do with the state or breaching rules and the law. Forummers are turned off when they see the same trash being repeated in nearly every thread. People will eventually move away as they did in 3 in 1 during the Richard Wan's moderation period. He was against FTs getting the primary seat but he struggled to keep the lid on the racists. Now it is graveyard with same few bantering away. The same guy who caused havoc there is now here doing the same thing.
[h=1]Dotcom trial may not occur - Judge[/h]
By David Fisher
5:30 AM Saturday Apr 21, 2012
[h=2]Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom. Photo / Sarah Ivey[/h]
The criminal charges against Kim Dotcom in the United States may never get to trial, the judge overseeing the case has told the FBI.United States district court judge Liam O'Grady said he didn't know if "we are ever going to have a trial in this matter" after being told Dotcom's file-sharing company had never been formally served with criminal papers by the US.
The comment has been seized on by Dotcom's lawyers, who say it could lead to the extradition case in New Zealand being tossed out.It follows a paperwork error by New Zealand authorities, who seized Dotcom's property without giving proper notice. The restraining order on his property was finally granted last week.
Megaupload was the world's biggest file-sharing website and claimed it was responsible for 4 per cent of internet traffic.Dotcom faces a court hearing for extradition to the United States after a warrant was issued for him and six others on criminal copyright charges relating to music and movies on its computer servers.
Lawyers acting for the US have said they will argue Dotcom should be extradited because he was a member of an organised criminal group, which carries a sentence of five years.The US Government needs to get over the hurdle of a five-year jail sentence to meet the criteria for extradition. Copyright charges in NZ carry a maximum of four years.
Judge O'Grady raised the prospect of there being no trial while hearing arguments over FBI applications to wipe Megaupload's vast database of members' files.
He said further study needed to be made of the failure to serve Megaupload, adding; "I frankly don't know that we are ever going to have a trial in this matter."
He said the arguments around the future of the data on the 1100 computers servers seized from Megaupload could be "premature". He wanted more information on why Megaupload had not been served.The FBI's lack of service meant Megaupload was "kind of hanging out there", Judge O'Grady said.
Dotcom's US-based lawyer, Ira Rothken, said it was the defence's understanding that it was not legally possible for Megaupload to be served with papers accusing it of criminal acts.He said it would be possible to serve the company with papers for a civil case and - as happened in NZ - for individuals to be remotely charged with crimes.
"My understanding as to why they haven't done that is because they can't. We don't believe Megaupload can be served in a criminal matter because it is not located within the jurisdiction of the United States."Mr Rothken said he would have expected the FBI to have had the same legal advice, having described the case as the "largest copyright case in the US, which also means the world".
Mr Rothken said a key defence against extradition was the claim by Dotcom and others that they were accused of offences not covered by the law on extradition.
Prosecutor Jay Prabhu told the Virginia court hearing it might not matter because Dotcom owned 68 per cent of the company.
He said it was not a case of a corporation which might normally turn up. "It's seven people who actually don't want to show up."Meanwhile, legal negotiations are under way to have jewellery and personal effects belonging to Dotcom's wife, Mona, returned.By David Fisher
5:30 AM Saturday Apr 21, 2012
[h=2]Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom. Photo / Sarah Ivey[/h]
The criminal charges against Kim Dotcom in the United States may never get to trial, the judge overseeing the case has told the FBI.United States district court judge Liam O'Grady said he didn't know if "we are ever going to have a trial in this matter" after being told Dotcom's file-sharing company had never been formally served with criminal papers by the US.
The comment has been seized on by Dotcom's lawyers, who say it could lead to the extradition case in New Zealand being tossed out.It follows a paperwork error by New Zealand authorities, who seized Dotcom's property without giving proper notice. The restraining order on his property was finally granted last week.
Megaupload was the world's biggest file-sharing website and claimed it was responsible for 4 per cent of internet traffic.Dotcom faces a court hearing for extradition to the United States after a warrant was issued for him and six others on criminal copyright charges relating to music and movies on its computer servers.
Lawyers acting for the US have said they will argue Dotcom should be extradited because he was a member of an organised criminal group, which carries a sentence of five years.The US Government needs to get over the hurdle of a five-year jail sentence to meet the criteria for extradition. Copyright charges in NZ carry a maximum of four years.
Judge O'Grady raised the prospect of there being no trial while hearing arguments over FBI applications to wipe Megaupload's vast database of members' files.
He said further study needed to be made of the failure to serve Megaupload, adding; "I frankly don't know that we are ever going to have a trial in this matter."
He said the arguments around the future of the data on the 1100 computers servers seized from Megaupload could be "premature". He wanted more information on why Megaupload had not been served.The FBI's lack of service meant Megaupload was "kind of hanging out there", Judge O'Grady said.
Dotcom's US-based lawyer, Ira Rothken, said it was the defence's understanding that it was not legally possible for Megaupload to be served with papers accusing it of criminal acts.He said it would be possible to serve the company with papers for a civil case and - as happened in NZ - for individuals to be remotely charged with crimes.
"My understanding as to why they haven't done that is because they can't. We don't believe Megaupload can be served in a criminal matter because it is not located within the jurisdiction of the United States."Mr Rothken said he would have expected the FBI to have had the same legal advice, having described the case as the "largest copyright case in the US, which also means the world".
Mr Rothken said a key defence against extradition was the claim by Dotcom and others that they were accused of offences not covered by the law on extradition.
Prosecutor Jay Prabhu told the Virginia court hearing it might not matter because Dotcom owned 68 per cent of the company.
He said it was not a case of a corporation which might normally turn up. "It's seven people who actually don't want to show up."Meanwhile, legal negotiations are under way to have jewellery and personal effects belonging to Dotcom's wife, Mona, returned.By David Fisher
Similar threads
