• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Venezuela allows soldiers to use deadly force against 'threatening' protesters

LightYears

Alfrescian
Loyal

Venezuela allows soldiers to use deadly force against 'threatening' protesters


PUBLISHED : Saturday, 31 January, 2015, 3:51pm
UPDATED : Saturday, 31 January, 2015, 3:51pm

Agence France-Presse in Caracas

protester_caracas_reuters.jpg


Opposition supporters march during a protest against shortages of basic goods in Caracas earlier this month. Photo: Reuters

Venezuelan soldiers can open fire on demonstrators if they feel their lives are at risk, under a new regulation published one year after anti-government riots left 43 people dead.

The rules announced on Thursday outlined procedures for soldiers to maintain public order, going up gradually from asserting an “imposing presence” to the use of deadly force.

The regulations were published just days before the anniversary of the start of anti-government riots that erupted when Venezuelans vented fury over rampant crime, runaway inflation, corruption and shortages of basic goods in the country with the world’s largest proven oil reserves.

During those months of unrest, mainly in Caracas and the city of San Cristobal, protests often ended with hooded demonstrators throwing Molotov cocktails at police who answered with tear gas, water cannons and – in some cases – rubber bullets.

Defence Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez said in a statement yesterday that the rule was a direct response to “last year’s violence”, which took weeks to quell.

He brushed aside criticism that “aims to twist and take out of context this magnificent document which fully respects human rights and human life – including the life of the protesters”, he said.

The new rules, nevertheless, were viewed negatively by many rights activists.

“One can never leave to the discretion of a government official, and even less to a member of security forces, to determine on the spot if they deem their life is in danger,” said constitutional lawyer Tulio Alvarez.

Rocio San Miguel, who works with an NGO called Control Ciudadano (Citizen Control) said it is right to regulate how soldiers behave but that the new rule is “dangerously vague and controversial”.

In a report released on Thursday, Human Rights Watch said Venezuelan security personnel had routinely use force in an improper manner against unarmed demonstrators and passers-by.


 
Top