Me too, but not because I support/like him, but because the reality is that the current ground swell, like you said:
...trump will draw the non-partisan, independent, and libertarian votes which typically comprise 20% of total votes. swing votes from this camp of misfits and fence-sitters will be huge for trump, as turncoat democrats may also vote for him, especially those hardcore bernie supporters who hate the dem establishment and washington insiders. among political nut cases here, "enemy of my enemy is my friend" and they would either abstain from voting or cast their lot with a so called "conservative" outsider. i truly think when it comes down to the final race between trump and hillary, trump has a chance as pubs and independents gel around the presumptive nominee and negative stories start to swirl around hillary, especially when she slept through benghazi, and her state department email fiasco begins to become an albatross around her neck.
is pointing to a new Republican-controlled US government, led by a Trump Administration, starting early next year, unless Trump unexpectedly dies.
Also, I might be wrong (and I also hope I'm wrong), but I have a feeling that the Pentagon is planning to invade Iran within two years after next year's inauguration, just like how they invaded Iraq in early 2003, about two years after George W. Bush was inaugurated:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_Doctrine
wikipedia.org/wiki/Support_for_military_action_against_Iran
globalresearch.ca/we-re-going-to-take-out-7-countries-in-5-years-iraq-syria-lebanon-libya-somalia-sudan-iran
[video=youtube;9RC1Mepk_Sw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw[/video]
[video=youtube;-MqVY1-ncBI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MqVY1-ncBI[/video]
[video=youtube;_qxzZY4JycY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qxzZY4JycY[/video]
wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_to_America
wikipedia.org/wiki/Den_of_Espionage
wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah
(a "
Shi'a Islamist militant group and political party based in Lebanon", that was "
conceived by Muslim clerics and funded by Iran primarily to harass the Israeli occupation" of southern Lebanon, after Israel invaded it in 1982; Hezbollah even seems to have the moral support of Russia!)
Furthermore, just last year (2015), Ali Khamenei, Iran's "Supreme Leader", said:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_will_not_exist_in_25_years
I also noticed that since the Vietnam War started in the mid-1950s, it seems that whenever the US military physically invades another country, it's during the tenure of a Republican President.
If a pro-immigration Democrat President were to be elected, it would be difficult for him/her to approve the US military to invade Iran, because that might offend the Shia Muslims in the US:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_States#Shia_Islam
So I think that's why the powers that be want an anti-immigration (especially if the immigrants are Muslim) Republican President to be inaugurated next year.
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?225699-Trump-Announces-run-for-Presidency&p=2392504#post2392504
Namaste everybody
This could very well spell the beginning of the end of mankind.
If Donald Trump really becomes the POTUS in January next year, he will be 70 going on 71, thus breaking Ronald Reagan's record as the oldest man to be inaugurated as the POTUS in 1981:
wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_age#Lis t_of_Presidents
wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_America_Great_Again
It will be quickly followed by at least four key elections in 2017/18:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_Chief_Executive_election,_2017
wikipedia.org/wiki/French_presidential_election,_2017
wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_German_federal_election
wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_presidential_election,_2018
Will these elections signal a new wave of wars around the world (even if they are not considered as "World War Three"), just like the wars that started during the 1980s?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_1945–89#1980–1989
or something even worse? :(