• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Teo Chee Hean: Png lacks integrity!

insignia

Alfrescian
Loyal
Are these tactics acceptable? Typical of PAP.


Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean has fired a second salvo at the Worker's Party over its Hougang candidate Png Eng Huat's explanation for why he was not selected for a Non-Constituency MP spot, saying it 'raises a new and serious question' about Mr Png's integrity.

In a written statement, Mr Teo said Mr Png had first tried to paint the picture that he had taken his name off the ballot for consideration for the NCMP post because he was against the scheme. But comments from WP chief Low Thia Khiang at the WP rally last night showed that 'Mr Png had not been telling the truth, and had indeed been rejected by the WP,' said Mr Teo in a statement.

At the WP rally, Mr Low had said that 'the selection of NCMP lies solely with the CEC...therefore whether a candidate wanted to be NCMP or not, the decision is not his,' recounted Mr Teo.

'This is the opposite of the picture that Mr Png first tried to paint - that he had taken his name off the ballot, and that he was not considered for the NCMP post because he did not want it. Thus, Mr Low confirmed that Mr Png had not been telling the truth, and had indeed been rejected by the WP,' said Mr Teo.

Mr Teo then asserted that his original question - raised at a PAP rally on Sunday and the trigger for the events of the last three days - has still not been answered by the WP. He said that the original question is: 'If Hougang is so important to the WP, why did WP decide to send Mr Png, a candidate whom their central executive council clearly decided was not good enough to send to Parliament last year?'

'Voters should re-consider whether the WP is just tugging at their emotions, but actually taking voters for granted,' he said. In reference to the WP's slogan for last year's General Election, he concluded: 'For a First World Parliament, the basic prerequisite is that parliamentarians must be honest and truthful.'

http://www.straitstimes.com/The-Big-Story/The-Big-Story-2/Story/STIStory_802129.html
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
me remembered quite clearly that PM Lee stated that one can see the CTE whilst travelling in the MRT carriage along the North South Line... me tried many times without avail :(:(:(
 

PAPIBCHIEF

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
TEO CH has every right to cast doubts on Png whether it is right or wrong. As the Deputy PM, he has a duty to raise this so that the truth be told? Whether Png is guilty or not is immaterial. Collateral damage is ok as long as the right to question is preserved!
 

insignia

Alfrescian
Loyal
TEO CH has every right to cast doubts on Png whether it is right or wrong. As the Deputy PM, he has a duty to raise this so that the truth be told? Whether Png is guilty or not is immaterial. Collateral damage is ok as long as the right to question is preserved!

Or it might just be that Teo Chee Hean is a moron who is trying to stir sh1t.
 

Cruxx

Alfrescian
Loyal
TEO CH has every right to cast doubts on Png whether it is right or wrong. As the Deputy PM, he has a duty to raise this so that the truth be told? Whether Png is guilty or not is immaterial. Collateral damage is ok as long as the right to question is preserved!

Hi PAPIBCHIEF. Welcome to the forum. I like your username btw. :wink:
 

PAPIBCHIEF

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Thanks Cruxx! U can pay me some money to buy this if u wish. Just quite the price.
Hungry Go where also sold to Singtel liao....so anything has a price.
I am sure if my PAP political masters quote a price to Sam, he would sell this site to them too.
 

Kinana

Alfrescian
Loyal
TEO CH has every right to cast doubts on Png whether it is right or wrong. As the Deputy PM, he has a duty to raise this so that the truth be told? Whether Png is guilty or not is immaterial. Collateral damage is ok as long as the right to question is preserved!

Thats call real democracy. The right to question, the responsibility to be transparent and accountable.

Png needs to be transparent and accountable for his misleading statements.
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
... 'This is the opposite of the picture that Mr Png first tried to paint - that he had taken his name off the ballot, and that he was not considered for the NCMP post because he did not want it ...
tis wat ah huat said ... 'had already made it clear to the secretary-general, as well as the East Coast team, that I would not want to be considered for the NCMP position' ...

iz a shame dat tis burger, despite holding such a respectable posn, has 2 stoop 2 such low levels n twist other ppl's words n put words in2 other ppl's mouth ...

but den, tiz typical of their kind ... stil remember how dat scum burger put words in feelings in2 bhutanese, tinking dey wun noe ...
 

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
The problem is, even without twisting the words, Png was already pointing the daggers at himself!

Goh Meng Seng





tis wat ah huat said ... 'had already made it clear to the secretary-general, as well as the East Coast team, that I would not want to be considered for the NCMP position' ...

iz a shame dat tis burger, despite holding such a respectable posn, has 2 stoop 2 such low levels n twist other ppl's words n put words in2 other ppl's mouth ...

but den, tiz typical of their kind ... stil remember how dat scum burger put words in feelings in2 bhutanese, tinking dey wun noe ...
 

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
PAPIBCHIEF said:
TEO CH has every right to cast doubts on Png whether it is right or wrong. As the Deputy PM, he has a duty to raise this so that the truth be told? Whether Png is guilty or not is immaterial. Collateral damage is ok as long as the right to question is preserved!

Don't abuse truth to achieve his only objective which is to smear Png's character in order to win an election. Even Eric Tan who resigned from WP in anger have came out to corroborate Png's story that he was not interested in the NCMP.

It is quite astonishing that the DPM has insisted to press for a win in an argument that is devoid of any real evidence. It is dangerous to play with a double edged sword. I won't be surprised that the WP will launch a strong attack in the Minister's home constituency in GE 2016.
 

Khun Ying Pojaman

Alfrescian
Loyal
tis wat ah huat said ... 'had already made it clear to the secretary-general, as well as the East Coast team, that I would not want to be considered for the NCMP position' ...

iz a shame dat tis burger, despite holding such a respectable posn, has 2 stoop 2 such low levels n twist other ppl's words n put words in2 other ppl's mouth ...

TCH didn't do the twisting; Png was the one doing the stunts all this while.

Png was trying to paint the picture that he was not NCMP not because he was rejected but that he rejected. The truth that he rejected was confirmed by LTK but not documentary evidence. The documentary evidence shows he was indeed rejected after having received just one vote.
 
Last edited:

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Kinana said:
Thats call real democracy. The right to question, the responsibility to be transparent and accountable.

Png needs to be transparent and accountable for his misleading statements.

The one who accuses need to show some real proof.
 

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
po2wq said:
iz a shame dat tis burger, despite holding such a respectable posn, has 2 stoop 2 such low levels n twist other ppl's words n put words in2 other ppl's mouth ...

At least to me, he has damaged his own reputation doing just that.
 

PAPIBCHIEF

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
The one who accuses need to show some real proof.

This is not a court of law. As long as TCH has reaonable suspicion or grounds to believe, he has the moral duty as DPM to raise any integrity questions irrespective of any collateral damage caused to Png!
 

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Khun Ying Pojaman said:
TCH didn't do the twisting; Png was the one doing the stunts all this while.

Png was trying to paint the picture that he was not NCMP not because he was rejected but that he rejected. The truth that he rejected was confirmed by LTK but not documentary evidence. The documentary evidence shows he was indeed rejected after having received just one vote.

Are you present at these meetings? If not just shut up,
 

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
PAPIBCHIEF said:
This is not a court of law. As long as TCH has reaonable suspicion or grounds to believe, he has the moral duty as DPM to raise any integrity questions irrespective of any collateral damage caused to Png!

He has a duty but it is not a moral duty.
 
Top