• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SUGGESTIONS PLEASE: What do we do with SKPonggol?

LeMans2011

Alfrescian
Loyal
He is the real leader of PAPIB.
He makes a point to attribute every misery in Singaporean life to Workers' Party instead of PAP (who formulated all the policies that make people suffer).
His logic is: WP did not fight for their rights (knowing very well how many WP MPs were in Parliament for the last 20 years)

He is dedicated in spreading the falsehood. He is fulltime.

I would like to summarise members' opinion what we should do with our dear bro SKPonggol.

Suggestion:
1) Zap him to oblivion
2) Ban him
3) Infract him
4) Gang rape him
5)
.
.

Although SAM would surely upz him back... but who cares
 
Last edited:

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Do nothing.Let him suffer in pain until he faint.Then pour cold water on him,let him suffer in pain again until he faint.Repeat the cycle..
 

Sinkie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If he is PAP IB, the forum OA will take care of him for us. If OA did not, then he is not PAP IB.
 

3_M

Alfrescian
Loyal
He is the real leader of PAPIB.
.......

the art of propaganda is to make it sound as it not like propaganda, else it lost it effectiveness. likewise PAPIB won't make it so obvious that they are PAPIB.

Just leave this little fellow in his soreness.
 

wwabbit

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Highly doubt he is PAPIB. The stuff written by PAPIB are more subtle and constructive, making actual good arguments.
This guy is just a troll out to rile people up. If the mods or admin doesn't want to touch him, then the only thing we can do is to just ignore him. Trying to reason or argue with him doesn't achieve anything. Anyway his spin-doctiring is so terrible that he is not convincing anyone sane to turn their backs on the Worker's Party.
 

metalmickey

Alfrescian
Loyal
Highly doubt he is PAPIB. The stuff written by PAPIB are more subtle and constructive, making actual good arguments.

Like myself?

Anyway I vote for option 4.

People like skponggol are not entirely harmless. The more people in here have to smack him down, the less time and energy you have for proper constructive debate.
 

LeMans2011

Alfrescian
Loyal
Highly doubt he is PAPIB. The stuff written by PAPIB are more subtle and constructive, making actual good arguments.
This guy is just a troll out to rile people up. If the mods or admin doesn't want to touch him, then the only thing we can do is to just ignore him. Trying to reason or argue with him doesn't achieve anything. Anyway his spin-doctiring is so terrible that he is not convincing anyone sane to turn their backs on the Worker's Party.

I sincerely admit my mistake.... he is indeed not the leader of PAPIB... if he is i am happy to leave him around for sparring and debate.
SKPonggol is a TROLL that spew rubbish
... my opinion is to obliterate him... however this forum is democratic and if popular opinion suggests to leave him alone then let it be.
 

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
SKPonggol has been deployed to assist his master in the absence of Palmer at East Ponggol, he will be busy until the bi-election is called.
 
Last edited:

wwabbit

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
however this forum is democratic and if popular opinion suggests to leave him alone then let it be.

This forum is not democratic. If it were, skponggol would have been banned long time ago. Since our great dictator has decided that skponggol should stay, the next best thing we can do is to just ignore him and leave him alone to talk rubbish with himself.
 

godiva

Alfrescian
Loyal
The more rubbish skpunggol posts about wp, the more it shows wp is on the right track. Ditto GMS.
 

julyaric720

Alfrescian
Loyal
Highly doubt he is PAPIB. The stuff written by PAPIB are more subtle and constructive, making actual good arguments.
waha.jpg
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
SINGAPORE: The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has said a by-election must be held in Punggol East SMC to preserve Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's moral authority.

In a statement signed by SDP's Secretary-General Chee Soon Juan, the party said Mr Michael Palmer's stepping down as a Member of Parliament and also as Speaker of Parliament has left a gaping hole in the legislature that cannot be ignored or papered over.

More importantly, SDP said voters of Punggol East have been badly let down and they deserve the opportunity to elect another representative.

The statement said governance requires not just political but also moral authority.

It said without moral authority, the PM will find his power undermined and challenged from within and outside of his party.

A by-election is the only way that Mr Lee can stem the erosion of his moral authority, it added.

- CNA/de
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
Too many political party in Singapore. The real ground was only PAP and WP. PAP had converted other small party (MIC, MCA, UMNO and so on) become a strong party.

The WP leader still sleep. They never try to alliance with other small party to make them strong. The WP had to make sometime different from PAP. The small parties shall had their own voice and activities but when come to election small parties shall provide good quality candidate to contest in election. The number of candidate from small parties shall come to an agreement point before contest. If not, WP party will facing more cornered fight in Election.

In the 2011 general elections, this ward was the only ward to have a 3 cornered fight, not seen since the 2001 general elections in the then Bukit Timah SMC. Desmond Lim of the Singapore Democratic Alliance secured a mere 4.45% of the votes in Punggol East SMC, against PAP's Michael Palmer and [[Singapore Democratic Alliance's Desmond Lim, which is the lowest percentage of votes a candidate has gotten in the 2011 election. As a result, he was the only candidate in that particular election to have his election deposit forfeited.
 
Top