• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Sinkies Worry About Late Lunch For Their Spoilt Brats Despite Constant Snacking!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
ST_20170127_YSLUNCH27A_2902399.jpg


Some parents have voiced concerns that their primary school children are having lunch late due to later dismissal times as more schools switch to a single-session model.

Over the past week, a flurry of letters and comments, both online and offline, has cast scrutiny on how late it can be before children tuck into a proper lunch as more primary schools let them off only between 1.30pm and 1.45pm, instead of around 1pm previously.

A check with the Ministry of Education (MOE) found that about three in five primary and secondary schools now set aside time for pupils to eat packed snacks, like fruit or a sandwich in class, on top of the usual half-hour recess. But parents still worry that their kids are having their lunch too late.


Responding to queries from The Straits Times, MOE said it has been encouraging schools to provide two meal breaks - one longer, one shorter - since 2015. "Students benefit from having short breaks in school to maintain energy levels and focus," said an MOE spokesman.

At schools that have not introduced a snack break, students can seek permission to have snacks during lessons, MOE added. There are now 182 primary schools here which operate on a single-session model.

Schools dismiss pupils later because of later start times or to accommodate new programmes, such as enrichment activities, in curriculum time, though many dismiss pupils before 1pm about one day a week.

But some parents like Madam June Tan, 43, who has a Primary 2 son in St Stephen's School, feels that snack time does not suffice.

The boy has a half-hour recess break at 10.15am and a break of around five minutes to eat a packed snack at noon. But she said he can eat lunch usually only after 2.40pm as he has to take the school bus from the school in Siglap to their home in Simei, and is the last to be dropped off.

"It's difficult for him as he has to go for a few hours without food, and he doesn't have a good appetite by dinner time as he has his lunch too late," said Madam Tan, who is self-employed and has given feedback to the school about this.

But other parents like housewife Pauline Kum, 35, are happy enough with the additional snack break.

"We had to get used to the timings but if you plan ahead, you can prepare nutritious snacks that won't affect their appetite during later meals. They don't need large portions because they are still young," said Ms Kum, who has a Primary 3 daughter in Sengkang Green Primary School, where they usually finish school at around 1.45pm.

Unity Primary School usually dismisses its pupils at 1.30pm. Vice-principal Remund Koh said the introduction of a 10- to 15-minute snack break this year has been largely well received by parents and the school is monitoring the situation to see if there is need for adjustment.

"Most of our pupils stay within walking distance from the school and I don't think there is a need for us to introduce an additional lunch break, which will mean later dismissal times for pupils."

At Mayflower Primary School, a snack break for pupils at 12.30pm was introduced last year. The principal, Mrs Lim-Chua Siow Ling, said this move was made after feedback from parents.

"Our dismissal time is 1.45pm and a large number of pupils in lower primary take the school bus home. By the time they get back, it can be as late as 3pm," said Mrs Lim.

With the snack break, pupils will at least have an opportunity to eat something every three hours and keep their stomachs full, she said.

"If parents are concerned about whether a snack is substantial, they can pack something heavier, like a sandwich," she added.

http://www.straitstimes.com/singapo...over-pupils-late-lunches-despite-snack-breaks
 

gingerlyn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This complain is unfounded and baseless even though I dont like MOE.

You can see that children are getting fat nowadays. what is wrong to ask them to skip lunch or having late lunch? they are already overweight and over eat!!!!
 

fupikee

Alfrescian
Loyal
This complain is unfounded and baseless even though I dont like MOE.

You can see that children are getting fat nowadays. what is wrong to ask them to skip lunch or having late lunch? they are already overweight and over eat!!!!

ah gin gin....you obviously never have any of your own children.....

There is ancient wisdom why our ancestors and parents all want their children to eat more and eat more and be fat, fat, fat and rounded....

Remember, these children are rapidly developing and science says that in a developing body, much nutrition will be needed to properly build up healthy body systems....so even if boy boy and girly are fat fat, these are just baby fat....when the body needs it for developing any part, they will make use of these resources to build them up so that ah boy and girly will grow up strong and healthy. Fats or whatever extra will go away when the hormones start acting up and they will be jumping around like so active monkeys....

Sure we don't want our kids to be stunted internally because they lack the nutrition for proper development because some ignorant liberalise idiot aunty come around and start restricting the children's diet....

You taU????:smile:
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
ah gin gin....you obviously never have any of your own children.....

There is ancient wisdom why our ancestors and parents all want their children to eat more and eat more and be fat, fat, fat and rounded....

Remember, these children are rapidly developing and science says that in a developing body, much nutrition will be needed to properly build up healthy body systems....so even if boy boy and girly are fat fat, these are just baby fat....when the body needs it for developing any part, they will make use of these resources to build them up so that ah boy and girly will grow up strong and healthy. Fats or whatever extra will go away when the hormones start acting up and they will be jumping around like so active monkeys....

Sure we don't want our kids to be stunted internally because they lack the nutrition for proper development because some ignorant liberalise idiot aunty come around and start restricting the children's diet....

You taU????:smile:

A growing number of kids are fat and ugly because they overeat.

20130924_obesechild_ST.jpg
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
they should follow usa system and provide school lunches - all kinds of funny slop.

this is another example of "the road to hell is paved with good intentions." the school lunch system in america is becoming a huge bureaucracy and gravy train with abuse, fraud and a complete waste of taxpayers' money. parents, especially poor fat lazy american parents and poor fat lazy illegal immigrant parents are relying on the school lunch system to feed their kids. for many kids it's their only meal of the day. meanwhile their poor fat lazy parents freeload on welfare, refuse to work, and spend much of the welfare handouts on gambling at the nearest casino. and they just leave their kids to fend for themselves. now the stupid liberals are saying without these school provided lunches those poor kids will be impoverished and go hungry. parents' responsibility to feed their kids never cross their minds. it's all about the state, gov and school providing everything, relieving parents of any accountability and stewardship in providing for and bringing up children. next they will be asking for the state and taxpayers to provide housing allowances for families.....wait, it already happened.....it's called section 8.
 

The_Hypocrite

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
this is another example of "the road to hell is paved with good intentions." the school lunch system in america is becoming a huge bureaucracy and gravy train with abuse, fraud and a complete waste of taxpayers' money. parents, especially poor fat lazy american parents and poor fat lazy illegal immigrant parents are relying on the school lunch system to feed their kids. for many kids it's their only meal of the day. meanwhile their poor fat lazy parents freeload on welfare, refuse to work, and spend much of the welfare handouts on gambling at the nearest casino. and they just leave their kids to fend for themselves. now the stupid liberals are saying without these school provided lunches those poor kids will be impoverished and go hungry. parents' responsibility to feed their kids never cross their minds. it's all about the state, gov and school providing everything, relieving parents of any accountability and stewardship in providing for and bringing up children. next they will be asking for the state and taxpayers to provide housing allowances for families.....wait, it already happened.....it's called section 8.

The Japs have school lunches n it's good stuff...And parents still take care of their kids..Tat is responsibility. I hope breeding licences are introduced to prevent the trailer park trash from breeding
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
i think they should teach these kids more life skills like smoking weeds, selling illicit ciggies, selling used panties, etc
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Thru out the years, it will be the same aspiring middle income parent who went to English school but cant speak properly but feels that she made it. You never see ordinary or rich parents behaving like this. Parents demand include - their kids must sit in front, tell techers to call the parent directly for school excursions, partcipating in certain type of sports, canteen cannot sell high sugar juice, canteen must sell still water etc.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
What's wrong for being fat?

http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/obesity/basics/complications/CON-20014834

Complications

By Mayo Clinic Staff


If you're obese, you're more likely to develop a number of potentially serious health problems, including:

  • High triglycerides and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • High blood pressure
  • Metabolic syndrome — a combination of high blood sugar, high blood pressure, high triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol
  • Heart disease
  • Stroke
  • Cancer, including cancer of the uterus, cervix, endometrium, ovaries, breast, colon, rectum, esophagus, liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidney and prostate
  • Breathing disorders, including sleep apnea, a potentially serious sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts
  • Gallbladder disease
  • Gynecological problems, such as infertility and irregular periods
  • Erectile dysfunction and sexual health issues
  • Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, a condition in which fat builds up in the liver and can cause inflammation or scarring
  • Osteoarthritis

Quality of life

When you're obese, your overall quality of life may be diminished. You may not be able to do things you used to do, such as participating in enjoyable activities. You may avoid public places. Obese people may even encounter discrimination.
Other weight-related issues that may affect your quality of life include:

  • Depression
  • Disability
  • Sexual problems
  • Shame and guilt
  • Social isolation
  • Lower work achievement
 
Top