• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sentosa Welcums Maids But Not Elderly Sporns!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Sentosa family scheme includes maids but not grandparents
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->UNDER the Sentosa Islander Family membership scheme, a family unit consists of a man, his wife and children, including a domestic helper (if any) - totalling not more than five persons in all.
Grandparents are, however, not classified as immediate family members under the scheme, and can apply for membership only as individual members.
I find that policy rather worrying and possibly sending a wrong message: How can a domestic helper be considered a part of the "immediate family" but not one's grandparents?
Filial piety is something deeply treasured in the Asian society. Instead of encouraging it, organisations seem to be increasingly undermining it.
Our parents have worked long and hard for us and according them the right respect is something we should uphold. Classifying them as "less-immediate" family than domestic helpers is robbing them of the respect they deserve.
Tina Lim (Ms)
 

khaw boon wan

Alfrescian
Loyal
But they are better off in Johor Bahru!

It is easier for children to visit their grandparents in Johor than Sentosa.

:oIo::oIo::oIo:


<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Sentosa family scheme includes maids but not grandparents
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->UNDER the Sentosa Islander Family membership scheme, a family unit consists of a man, his wife and children, including a domestic helper (if any) - totalling not more than five persons in all.
Grandparents are, however, not classified as immediate family members under the scheme, and can apply for membership only as individual members.
I find that policy rather worrying and possibly sending a wrong message: How can a domestic helper be considered a part of the "immediate family" but not one's grandparents?
Filial piety is something deeply treasured in the Asian society. Instead of encouraging it, organisations seem to be increasingly undermining it.
Our parents have worked long and hard for us and according them the right respect is something we should uphold. Classifying them as "less-immediate" family than domestic helpers is robbing them of the respect they deserve.
Tina Lim (Ms)
 
Top