Ah Pek, you are joining me in the colonial rule issues with the British Empire, the drug leaders. If you are living under the colonial period you are likely to smoke opium. Imagine today is 1915, not 2015, under the British Empire bastards, drug dealers.
Under colonial rule, your Chinese forefathers were British Subjects, in their birth certificate, but the white bastards do not share the wealth with tem(common wealth) but were instead encourage to smoke opium which make the Chinese poor.
Does K JBJ did that to your family and friends make them drug addicts opium smokers.
House after house of feeble, emaciated, ill wrecks, all smoking Monopoly Opium, all contributing, by their shame and degradation, to the revenues of the mighty British Empire.
That evening after dinner, I sat on the wide verandah of the hotel, looking over a copy of the "Straits Times." One paragraph, a dispatch from London, caught my eye. " Chinese in Liverpool. Reuter's Telegram. London, January 17, 1917 Thirty-one Chinese were arrested during police raids last night on opium dens in Liverpool. Much opium was seized. The police in one place were attacked by a big retriever and by a number of Chinese, who threw boots and other articles from the house-top."
Coming fresh from a tour of the opium-dens of Singapore, I must say that item caused some mental confusion. It must also be confusing to the Chinese. It must be very perplexing to a Chinese sailor, who arrives in Liverpool on a ship from Singapore, to find such a variation in customs. To come from a part of the British Empire where opium smoking is freely encouraged, to Great Britain itself where such practices are not tolerated. He must ask himself, why it is that the white race is so sedulously protected from such vices, while the subject races are so eagerly encouraged. It may occur to him that the white race is valuable and must be preserved, and that subject races are not worth protecting. This double standard of international justice he must find disturbing. It would seem, at first glance, as if subject races were fair game-if there is money in it. Subject races, dependents, who have no vote, no share in the government and who are powerless to protect themselves-fair game for exploitation.
Is this double-dealing what we mean when we speak of "our responsibility to backward nations, 1) or of "the sacred trust of civilization" or still again when we refer to "the White Man's burden " ?
Pondering over these things as I sat on the hotel verandah, I finally reached the conclusion that to print such a dispatch as that in the " Straits Times" was, to say the least, most tactless.
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/om/om4.htm
Knn KJ!! I will never vote for you! You talk macam like Englishman! I don't want to live under your colonial rule. You can't even fill out your election form properly. How to trust you to handle my town council?