• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

$$$Million Ex-MRT Msian CEO Blames LTA for Fiasco! 0 Remorse! SHOCKINGLY BOCHUP!

Leckmichamarsch

Alfrescian
Loyal
COMMISSION of Enquiry

No brainer to conclude that Saw Phiak Hwa is the only cause for all the SMRT woes which are shouldered by Singaporeans while she cheated the system; made millions in bonus at expenses of reduced maintenance & labour...... yet she has the cheek to to justify/defend the dishonourable things she has done in SMRT! Time to claw back her bonuses - we did it with TT Durai, why not her?

Worse is the thought that she is a clone of PAP asses who did wrong but first tries to hide the fact & later defend the untenable. She thinks we are fools as did Mah BT, Wong KS, Raymond Lim, etc...
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Re: COMMISSION of Enquiry

Worse is the thought that she is a clone of PAP asses who did wrong but first tries to hide the fact & later defend the untenable. She thinks we are fools as did Mah BT, Wong KS, Raymond Lim, etc...

Absolutely no remorse. :rolleyes:

She could have clawed back some credibility if she had simply admitted liability. Something like this...

"I come from a retail background. I have no engineering experience and I concentrated on the wrong aspects of the business during my tenure. I put in a lot of hard work to increase the profitability of the corporation in the area of my expertise but I neglected the primary role of my position which was to provide a reliable transport service for the nation. With hindsight, I have to admit that I was not the right person for the job and accept whatever consequences that may be coming my way."
 

I_Hate_Pappies

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: COMMISSION of Enquiry

absolutely no remorse. :rolleyes:

She could have clawed back some credibility if she had simply admitted liability. Something like this...

"i come from a retail background. I have no engineering experience and i concentrated on the wrong aspects of the business during my tenure. I put in a lot of hard work to increase the profitability of the corporation in the area of my expertise but i neglected the primary role of my position which was to provide a reliable transport service for the nation. With hindsight, i have to admit that i was not the right person for the job and accept whatever consequences that may be coming my way."

Clap! Clap! Clap!
 
Last edited:

Kuailan

Alfrescian
Loyal
She had a recent operation done on her knee.

She was paid million dolars $$$ too heavy on her, so he body couldn't take it anymore,
knee cap gave way, so have take walking stick.

Or probably she saw her million dollar stack up in her room she was so shock, got heart attack,
now slow recovering from shock!!!
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
SMRT top brass' incredible defence of maintenance regime

Chief District Judge Tan Siong Thye, who chairs the committee, was also puzzled that SMRT's maintenance arm had not given due seriousness to the missing claws, although it knew that the system could not support two missing claws.

The claws secure the third rail, which supplies electricity to trains, and 21 were found to be dislodged or missing.

To this, Mr Tan replied that he thought that the staff dealing with the situation might have felt replacing the claws the following day would reduce any potential risk. It would take SMRT 18 months to replace all the claws to those with the positive locking mechanism, he added.

- http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC120512-0000057/SMRT-top-brass-defends-maintenance-regime
 

Seee3

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: SMRT top brass' incredible defence of maintenance regime

The interim CEO claimed that comparing maintenance cost by "train per km" is more relevant than "passenger per km" which their internal COI uses. The maintenance is constant for train per km but is dropping if "passenger per km" is used. Till now the number 1 man is still trying to pull a statistical bluff. Any JC kid will know that wear and tear is more severe when the train is running at full load or worse still, overload. How can "train-km" be a more relevant than "passenger-km". Train disruption is going to be a norm - looking at the kind of top management that they are having and keeping.
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: SMRT top brass' incredible defence of maintenance regime

The interim CEO claimed that comparing maintenance cost by "train per km" is more relevant than "passenger per km" which their internal COI uses. The maintenance is constant for train per km but is dropping if "passenger per km" is used. Till now the number 1 man is still trying to pull a statistical bluff. Any JC kid will know that wear and tear is more severe when the train is running at full load or worse still, overload. How can "train-km" be a more relevant than "passenger-km". Train disruption is going to be a norm - looking at the kind of top management that they are having and keeping.

You are right. All the press reports about new "convenience for commuters" and Apps point to that direction. Our new norm.
 

yourlaubu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Saw Phuck Wah insists her cheebye is not chow

And this despite the whole cuntry already confirmed and double confirmed that her cheebye is kan sibeh chow, the most super sibeh awesome chow chee bye


"Train operator SMRT had wanted to conduct further checks after the first major train disruption on 15 December last year, but had instead resumed services at the prompting of the Land Transport Authority (LTA).

This was what former SMRT CEO Saw Phaik Hwa said, when she testified at the public inquiry into the train breakdowns.

She added, however, that she was unaware if the intention to stop services for more checks was communicated to the LTA.

Taking the stand on the 18th day of the public inquiry, Saw revealed she was at a company awards ceremony when the breakdown occurred. She stayed back while the senior management left and updated her on further developments.

According to Saw, she was informed that the situation “was under control” at about 9pm and the sagging third rail had also been secured.

Just half an hour later, she received a call from Mr Khoo Hean Siang, the executive vice-president of trains, who advised her to rest the train system as it would be “better to do a more complete check”.

Despite that, SMRT resumed train services at about 11.40pm at LTA’s request. However, Saw admitted that she was not aware if Khoo’s concern had been relayed to the regulator as she was not in direct contact with LTA.

“I can only say that the communication given to me was that we were instructed by LTA that we should start service as soon as possible,” said Saw, who was on the stand for close to five hours.

During this time, she also told the Committee of Inquiry (COI) that there were no maintenance issues with SMRT’s trains; that the train parts are “upgraded continuously” and “changed in accordance to the time of wear and tear” on a regular basis.

“If there is any need to upgrade, anything in the system, it would have been,” she added.

Saw also listed reasons for the spike in train faults.

First, she revealed that the newly-installed platform screen doors did not always work in sync with the signaling system and faults were caused due to delays or misalignments.

New trains were a source of bugs, she said.

In addition, the signaling system was under significant stress due to the high frequency of trains and wet rails caused by rainy weather.

The COI also referred to an incident during the 15 December breakdown, where passengers were stranded in a train without lighting and ventilation after the emergency battery expired before its 45-minute limit.

It also questioned Saw about the time SMRT took to evacuate passengers from the train, which added up to more than one hour.

In response, Saw said that the evacuation took so long as the decision to “de-train” passengers from the tunnel was a last-resort decision, after they failed to transport the faulty train to another station.

“The processes in place, protocols in place were necessary,” she said.

Meanwhile, SMRT was hit by another delay during the morning peak hours on Thursday. A train fault on the East-West Line between Joo Koon and Jurong East stations at about 8.30am caused passengers to be delayed by up to 30 minutes.
 
Top