• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat MAS fined DBS and UBS for $1million

biondi

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news...-operations-in-singapore-imposes/3196162.html

MAS orders Falcon Bank to shut operations in Singapore; imposes fines on DBS, UBS

SINGAPORE: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) announced on Tuesday (Oct 11) that it has ordered the Singapore branch of Falcon Private Bank to cease operations for serious failures in anti-money laundering (AML) controls and improper conduct by senior management.

In a press statement, MAS said it will be withdrawing the merchant bank status of Falcon Private Bank Ltd, Singapore Branch (Falcon Bank) for failures at the Head Office in Switzerland as well as the Singapore branch.

MAS will also impose fines on DBS and UBS banks for breaches of MAS’ AML requirements.

"The actions on the three banks follow supervisory examinations by MAS into 1MDB-related fund flows that took place through these banks from March 2013 to May 2015," MAS said.

MAS said they decided to withdraw Falcon Bank's status as a merchant bank in Singapore taking into account three factors.

Firstly, Falcon Bank’s Head Office failed to guard against conflicts of interest when managing the account of a customer who was associated with the bank’s former Board Chairman Mohamed Ahmed Badawy Al-Husseiny.

"The former Chairman misled and influenced the Singapore Branch into processing the customer’s unusually large transactions despite multiple red flags," MAS said.

Secondly, the improper conduct of the Singapore Branch Manager and certain senior managers at the Head Office had impaired the effectiveness of the Singapore Branch’s compliance function in discharging its responsibilities.

Their interference was wrongful and egregious in nature, and contributed to substantial breaches of AML regulations. MAS has been informed that the Singapore Branch Manager, Mr Jens Sturzenegger, was arrested by the Commercial Affairs Department on Oct 5.

"Falcon Bank has demonstrated a persistent and severe lack of understanding of MAS’ AML requirements and expectations.

"Taking into account the totality of Falcon Bank’s conduct, MAS’ assessment is that the merchant bank will be unable to comply with these requirements and expectations going forward," MAS said.

MAS added that it is working closely with FINMA, the home regulator of Falcon Private Bank, to oversee an orderly closure of the merchant bank branch in Singapore.

FINES FOR DBS AND UBS

MAS also said it has fined DBS S$1 million for 10 breaches of MAS Notice 626 - Prevention of Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism. UBS has been fined S$1.3 million for 13 breaches.

MAS imposed these fines after inspections of DBS and UBS banks in relation to their 1MDB-related fund flows revealed several breaches of AML requirements and control lapses.

"The control lapses observed in DBS and UBS relate to specific bank officers who failed to carry out their duties effectively," MAS said.

Although MAS did not find pervasive control weaknesses within these banks, it has admonished the two banks and instructed their management to investigate the lapses, promptly address the control deficiencies, and take appropriate disciplinary measures against the staff involved.

"There were deficiencies in the on-boarding of new accounts, weaknesses in corroborating the source of funds, inadequate scrutiny of customers’ transactions and activities, and failure to file timely suspicious transaction reports," MAS said.

MAS has also directed DBS and UBS to appoint an independent party to confirm that rectification measures have been effectively implemented and to report its findings to MAS.

MAS said it is finalising its assessment of the Singapore branch of Standard Chartered Bank and will make an announcement in due course.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wow. One million dollars sound like alot of money to me! I hope the bankers learn their lessons huh. :smile:
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
PAP allowed this to happen in the first place. It is wayang. Najib gave sinkapore everything it wanted. Sinkapore didn't reciprocate?
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Wow. One million dollars sound like alot of money to me! I hope the bankers learn their lessons huh. :smile:

One million is small change for UBS lah. If MAS meant business, it would have been at least $10 million. US went after Deutsche Bank for $14 billion!
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
One million is small change for UBS lah. If MAS meant business, it would have been at least $10 million. US went after Deutsche Bank for $14 billion!

Different. There is judge decide based on law. Here is money authority decide based on PAP. Here regulator impose fine, not judges, so cannot be too much and cannot say kangeroo court. :cool:
 

blissquek

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wow. One million dollars sound like alot of money to me! I hope the bankers learn their lessons huh. :smile:

Can we fine MAS..???

Their audit has gaping holes...Someone wired some $153 million to an account belong to a ordinary peasants and this escape the watchful eye of the regulator for more than 2 years.

Don't they scrutinize all big big amount transactions.??
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Shows foreign talent at the top does not mean better performance-a Singaporean cannot be CEO of DBS and yet can be Chairman?
 

THE_CHANSTER

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Wow. One million dollars sound like alot of money to me! I hope the bankers learn their lessons huh. :smile:

Like others have said
S$1 million is chicken feed to banks like DBS and UBS.
If you really want to hurt banks, it needs to impact their balance sheet (like the recent example of the DoJ $14 billion fine levied on Deutsche Bank).

If Deutsche cannot reach an agreement to get this fine reduced and goes under, then we really are ALL in trouble.
 
Last edited:

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal
straitstimes.com
1MDB fund flows: DBS, UBS to take action against staff for control lapses
GRACE LEONG

DBS Bank and the Singapore branch of UBS said yesterday that they will take action against staff who were involved in lapses in relation to 1Malaysia Development Berhad-related fund flows.

The statements came after both banks were fined by the financial regulator for breaches in anti-money laundering laws.

DBS was hit with a $1 million penalty for 10 breaches of these laws while UBS must fork out $1.3 million for 13 violations.

The lapses involve weaknesses in corroborating the source of funds, inadequate scrutiny of customer transactions and failure to file timely suspicious transaction reports.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) had earlier said DBS and the Singapore branches of UBS and Standard Chartered Bank were used as "conduits" for a complex web of global transactions involving entities and individuals in Singapore, the United States and Hong Kong.

It added it did not detect pervasive control weaknesses at DBS and UBS, finding instead the lapses were due to specific bank officers failing to carry out their duties effectively.

It admonished the two banks and told management to address the control lapses and take disciplinary action against the staff involved.

DBS did not say how many staff members would be penalised.

Its spokesman noted: "Any staff we feel could have done a better job... will be held accountable. In general, there is a wide array of possible consequences, ranging from a warning, bonus impact to dismissal.

"We should have taken more rigorous action with respect to the questionable activity, even if it was intentionally designed to conceal another purpose.

"These actions are for lapses which occurred in 2013 and 2014. We have made many enhancements since then and are in a materially better position than before."

The spokesman said the bank will donate "profits attributable to our shortcomings to a worthy cause".

UBS said it was "disappointed" it had not done more to detect the breaches earlier. The bank said it is strengthening its controls and action will be taken against individuals responsible for the lapses.

"UBS is determined not to be used as a platform for financial crime," it said.

"We will donate all profits from this account to the establishment of an industry-wide anti-money laundering programme to be run by an independent educational body to help combat financial crime and reinforce Singapore's status as a financial centre which adheres to the highest standards."
 

kkbutterfly

Alfrescian
Loyal
Like others have said
S$1 million is chicken feed to banks like DBS and UBS.
If you really want to hurt banks, it needs to impact their balance sheet (like the recent example of the DoJ $14 billion fine levied on Deutsche Bank).

If Deutsche cannot reach an agreement to get this fine reduced and goes under, then we really are ALL in trouble.

can share why we will be in trouble?
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
Like others have said
S$1 million is chicken feed to banks like DBS and UBS.
If you really want to hurt banks, it needs to impact their balance sheet (like the recent example of the DoJ $14 billion fine levied on Deutsche Bank).

If Deutsche cannot reach an agreement to get this fine reduced and goes under, then we really are ALL in trouble.

Fine also must be reasonable lah. Whose interests does it harm for other people's money to do laundery here? How will fine help to make it better again? We are a pragmatic people sir. Let them do as they please. If not they go elsewhere, who will pay the taxes? :confused: Who will remind you they pay more taxes than sinkies so you better know your place? Worse come to worst sanctions will be imposed on sg but it ineffective as banks will simply move elsewhere. No fear! Nothing will happen. :cool:
 

apogee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wow. One million dollars sound like alot of money to me! I hope the bankers learn their lessons huh. :smile:

No use the fine is paid by the Bank and therefore, ultimately, the shareholders.

They should find the CEO, all key employees and the persons who are directly involved. This will make the fine meaningful.
 
Top