• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

LUI Fxxx YEW: BAD IDEA TO STOP TRANSPORT COMPANIES FROM MAKING PROFITS!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=1]LUI TUCK YEW: IT'S NOT A GOOD IDEA TO STOP TRANSPORT COMPANIES FROM MAKING PROFITS[/h]
Post date:
13 Feb 2015 - 3:49pm








Transport minister Lui Tuck Yew said that they government should not be putting in policies which affect the profits that transport companies can make. He suggested that they should be allowed to make big profits so that they will have incentives to improve productivity and efficiency.
He said that this could ultimately lead to better outcomes for Singaporeans.
He said this in parliament in response to questions about why SMRT and SBS are allowed to continue increasing fares when they both report millions of dollars in profit each year.
MP Lee Bee Wah had asked why transport companies are not being forced to absorb the costs of rising costs when they report such good profits.






Minister Lui said that the companies' bus operations are still losing money and they have not been making huge profits on their fare business. He explained that the reason why these companies are reporting large profits is because they are making these profits in their non-fare businesses.
“If we say that you stifle every possibility of a private operator (from) making some profit, improving efficiency, productivity...if you stifle all that, then ultimately if it results in an even larger increase in fares, is that of benefit to everybody? That to me must be the question we must always ask,” he said.
He also said that the current system is intended to ensure long-term financial sustainability of the public transport system.
He said that they are already trying to keep fares affordable and this is fine.
Mr Low Thia Khiang had said that if, as Mr Lui claims, the operators were efficient and productive, they would not need to raise fares at all.
Without elaborating, Mr Lui also revealed that the Ministry of Transport has plans for the remaining amount in the Public Transport Fund, after setting aside some S$7.5 million to fund Public Transport Vouchers for needy households. It will announce the details later.
 

Froggy

Alfrescian (InfP) + Mod
Moderator
Generous Asset
Civil servants and public transport are to serve the people or serve shareholders? Fuck you la motherjeeby Fuck Yew!
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
transport companies with George Cronies can make money but when the company works for WP, all is evil.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
What's more amazing is they have the power to authorize 1 billion of taxpayers money to fund operations and still call themselves private.diu lei Lou moh ham kah Chan.if u take 1 billion taxpayer money, raise fares every year and still cannot make profit,I think that's a massive sigh of incompetence.improve services ki lan go jump MRT track better.
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
What Lewd Fuck You seems to forget is that these transport companies making big profits operate on roads paid by taxpayers and MRT train lines and stations build by the govt. If they want to kindly repay all the billions $ spend on the construction of the original MRT lines and stations along with the accrued interest and other fees, they can than make big profits.
 

SgParent

Alfrescian
Loyal
Transport minister Lui Tuck Yew said that they government should not be putting in policies which affect the profits that transport companies can make. He suggested that they should be allowed to make big profits so that they will have incentives to improve productivity and efficiency.
lui *uck y** has a pt about not artificially restricting transport company making profit from its own improvements

but the truth is, the white scums are going to the extremes, removing real competitions, wasting taxpayers' money and forcing the fare hikes down the commuters' throats, to artificially triple guarantee transport company will definitely making increasing profit even when they are incompetent and complacent.
 

rusty

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Not forgetting public transport are collecting monies in advance via EZ-Link
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Same argument the PAP will use to justify why estate maintenance was devolved to the TC instead of keeping it under the HDB. To let PAP cronies make money ...more money to dish out. Never mind that it has cost taxpayers hundreds of milllions as a result.

PAP is not there for sinkees ...they suck sinkees dry to feed their cronies.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Who are the major shareholders in those public transport companies? Who have they appointed as CEOs and directors?

No need to ask, you should know.
 

xebay11

Alfrescian
Loyal
Strange, our ministers always harping that every government linked organisation and ministers and PAP must be paid well in order to get good performance, but never the citizens, why can't they say bad idea to pay citizen's less or else they cannot get the best performance from them too.
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Nothing strange, they just simply don't care and wish all sinkie just die just like what Richard hu said. They don't care, as long as you sign up automated payments to them the resistance not important. You die your biz.

They only interested to have yr money n more of it. Thats why they rather dump you into old folk's hm n make you sell your house so they can import more slaves to displace aging one.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Transport minister Lui Tuck Yew said that they government should not be putting in policies which affect the profits that transport companies can make. He suggested that they should be allowed to make big profits so that they will have incentives to improve productivity and efficiency.
He said that this could ultimately lead to better outcomes for Singaporeans.


This guy is moron and this is the problem when you have ministers who have no private sector experience.

No private company has incentives to improve productivity if they are making big profits.

The only time when productivity becomes an issue is when companies are making losses.
 

STORM88

Alfrescian
Loyal
LUI TUCK YEW: IT'S NOT A GOOD IDEA TO STOP TRANSPORT COMPANIES FROM MAKING PROFITS.

And it is a good idea to keep increasing the transport fare on the citizens every year ? !

Indeed a nitwit minister and DUMB !
It is more important for the minister to ensure and look after the welfare and wallets of the SG citizens !
 

Patriot

Alfrescian
Loyal
10922586_10153167500076383_1553973433673700513_o.jpg
 

Dark Knight

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If this chap keep saying Sillypore's transportation companies is not making profits, then why the CEO and shareholders keep getting huge bonus
especially the previous "see saw lady" who ran away with a big bonus every year?
 

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Civil servants and public transport are to serve the people or serve shareholders? Fuck you la motherjeeby Fuck Yew!

Exactly.. And the profit should be return to the got but it is given to shareholders.. This is called legalised corruption.. A public transport profit given to private individuals in the name of shareholders..

What does a public profit got to do with private individuals? Sinkies.. Pls ask this yourselves..
 
Top