• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

LOW THIA KIANG ACCUSED of using political influence to advance BUSINESS INTERESTS

M

Mdm Tang

Guest
You're not being serious right ? Is there anyone in Singapore who does not know who is LTK?

Lets Max the mileage LTK can
extract. it still pale when compare with with
MIW. SBF lets help LTK to
improve on the card.
 

Ramseth

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
JBJ did that after he won Anson too. The logic to more legal business is still simple. You're charged by government or police. You want a lawyer who's on their side or against them tooth and nail to defend you? His business boomed!
 

drifter

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
if LTK wanted to use political influence to advance " BUSINESS INTERESTS " he would have join the PAP ...thats common sense .
 

Kohliantye

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I don't see anything wrong with this.

Declaring who he is on his name card is better than not declaring. If it is the honorable truth, there is nothing you need to hide.

I totally agree with kryonlight.
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG, if he did it
Not only Singaporeans already know who is LTK.
The whole World and international Politicians are aware of LTKs existence in Singapore Parliament for the last deceades.
Even Ex President Nelson Mandela and current US President Obama knows about LTKs existence.
Those who believe in life in other galaxies, also has good reasons to state that LTK is known in other Universes too.
Maybe other politicians, who enter Parliament via back-door or on the coat-tails of others, have to resort that way as no one in the entire world knows them.
With so much of publicity in his (LTK) favour, why the need for him to do it the way Ron Ron suggested.
That claim by Ron Ron stinks to heaven.
Yet another attempt to crucify opposition MPs.
 
Last edited:

streetsmart73

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
I also find nothing wrong. Furthermore there is more important matters to deal with rather than this petty little thing


hi there


1. tsk tsk tsk!
2. again some daft sheep blah to the same tune of attacking.
3. the daft sheep in question should attend one of mr low's meet-the-people session & challenge mah.
4. does it know what's green environment & cost saving?
 

streetsmart73

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
There is still a long way to the next GE and they are already spinning it? That's impressive!



hi there


1. aiyoh!
2. what's so impressive, the same old tune leh.
3. more crying sheep, more apologies, more running dogs!
4. come on! those daft sheep give me something new.
 

denzuko1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Is Aljunied MP and Secretary-General of the Workers Party Low Thia Kiang making use of his political status to promote his own business interests?

According to a tip-off we received from someone who had business dealings with Mr Low, he seems to leverage on his political status to boost his own business.


“The things that politicians will do for fame, power or reputation are amusing and hilarious. MP for Hougang and Secretary-General of Workers’ Party, Mr Low Thia Kiang leverages on his political status to boost his own business. He uses this unscrupulous tactic so as to have an upper hand in the face of competitors. Just take a look at the name card and you will be slapped with right-in-your-face, hard sell marketing,” our informant who wishes to remain anonymous wrote.

He added that he is disappointed with Mr Low’s ‘marketing’ tactics:

“As a politician who claimed to be from a prestigious alternative party to the ruling party, Mr Low should have exercised more tact in political marketing and should not have monopolised on good samaritan acts to increase his business revenue. Call it unethical or not, this is definitely not the way to make money, and especially not a palatable way to attract customers or clients.”


From Temasek Times

The one who wroe this have certainly never received a name card before.

There is nothing wrong putting various identity into the name card because the very purpose of the name card is to present to others who you really are. You can put anything in as long as your company permits you to. LTK simply put every thing into the same name card so that he does not need to manage different name cards for different occasions, this is call efficiency.

There is no abuse of power for personal gain in such cases, even for PAP MPs. I am sure that they too would put their credentials on to the name cards when opportunities allow.
 

Jlokta

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
There is still a long way to the next GE and they are already spinning it? That's impressive!

this is in preparation for the hougang BE.

pappies know they'll loose out in a straight fight, thats the reason for the smear campaign agains WP.
 

Sadist

Alfrescian
Loyal
I won't say it's wrong.

But to have the namecard printed that way with the emphasis of him being so and so rather then projecting the company tell us something about LTK, doesn't it.

Is it sense of power?
 

Hwheels

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don't see anything wrong with his namecard if it serves to summarise who he is and where he's employed + affiliations.

UNLESS, unless, he tries to 'kelong' some contract for his own company. Btw what is the nature of his business?
 

Cruxx

Alfrescian
Loyal
then goh meng seng your namecard put what?

tiny computer shop owner in tampines :biggrin:

failed politician :eek:

certified macau cheongster :p

political observer :rolleyes:

pap paid troll :oIo:

If Goh Meng Seng ran a funeral parlour, nobody would die! :mad:
 
Top