• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

LOL USELESS SPF took 2 years to source charging cable for old phone?

LedZeppelin

Alfrescian
Loyal

.... while it took me only under a minute! No kidding! :biggrin:

Chow keng !! Chiak leow bee !!



He took 57 upskirt videos


JAILED: Benjamin Chow, a married man with two sons, took upskirt videos of women at various locations in Singapore. (Inset) A Sony Ericsson K700i.

20160226_videos.jpg


Photo: The Straits Times

Ronald Loh
Saturday, Feb 27, 2016

He was a married man with two sons, but it did not stop him from taking upskirt videos of 57 unsuspecting women over a year.

A passer-by saw what he was doing and helped nab him in April 2013.

But Benjamin Chow Tuck Keong, 52, a self-employed businessman, was charged in court only in September last year.

Chow had thrown away the charging cable of his Sony Ericsson K700i mobile phone, a model released in 2004, and the police had a hard time finding the right cable to access the videos.

Yesterday, three years after his arrest, Chow was jailed for six months for his upskirt offences.

Court papers said that Chow was at Newton MRT station on April 3, 2013, when he preyed on an unknown woman.

He stood behind her on the escalator, which was going up, and placed his mobile phone on his left thigh with the camera lens facing upwards.

He positioned his mobile phone below the woman’s skirt, filming her inner thighs and underwear.

Chow did not realise a passer-by was watching him.

The passer-by later approached the woman and told her what had happened.

He also called the police and they tailed Chow to Barker Road, where the man and some security officers of a nearby school arrested Chow.

The woman left the scene before the police arrived.

After Chow was arrested, he submitted his phone to the police, but not the charging cable, Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Andre Chong said.

DPP Chong added that when the authorities asked him for the charging cable, which was no longer available in the market, Chow claimed he had thrown it away.

The phone had run out of battery, so the police could not extract the videos.

Because it was an outdated phone, the forensics team had to source for the charging cable and this took time, DPP Chong told the court.

He said the forensics team eventually managed to extract the videos and produced the evidence after two years.

The authorities found a total of 57 videos, filmed between April 2012 and April 2013 at various locations in Singapore, on his phone.

None of the women’s identities could be established, court papers said.

Yesterday, Chow pleaded guilty to 10 counts of insulting a woman’s modesty, with 47 charges taken into consideration for sentencing.

The judge allowed Chow to defer his sentence to March 24 to settle some business contracts.

[email protected]



 
Last edited:

Brightkid

Alfrescian
Loyal
All the poodles need to do is ASK, and many people will gladly lend them.

I have this model of phone before. Smallest phone with great camera of its time.

Guess the poodles knew no one will lend them the cable, or case was swept under carpet until now cannot hide anymore?
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
No lar, they ask Singtel but Singtel always tell them out of stock so that's why so long.
 

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal

.... while it took me only under a minute! No kidding! :biggrin:

Chow keng !! Chiak leow bee !!



He took 57 upskirt videos


JAILED: Benjamin Chow, a married man with two sons, took upskirt videos of women at various locations in Singapore. (Inset) A Sony Ericsson K700i.

20160226_videos.jpg


Photo: The Straits Times

Ronald Loh
Saturday, Feb 27, 2016

He was a married man with two sons, but it did not stop him from taking upskirt videos of 57 unsuspecting women over a year.

A passer-by saw what he was doing and helped nab him in April 2013.

But Benjamin Chow Tuck Keong, 52, a self-employed businessman, was charged in court only in September last year.

Chow had thrown away the charging cable of his Sony Ericsson K700i mobile phone, a model released in 2004, and the police had a hard time finding the right cable to access the videos.

Yesterday, three years after his arrest, Chow was jailed for six months for his upskirt offences.

Court papers said that Chow was at Newton MRT station on April 3, 2013, when he preyed on an unknown woman.

He stood behind her on the escalator, which was going up, and placed his mobile phone on his left thigh with the camera lens facing upwards.

He positioned his mobile phone below the woman’s skirt, filming her inner thighs and underwear.

Chow did not realise a passer-by was watching him.

The passer-by later approached the woman and told her what had happened.

He also called the police and they tailed Chow to Barker Road, where the man and some security officers of a nearby school arrested Chow.

The woman left the scene before the police arrived.

After Chow was arrested, he submitted his phone to the police, but not the charging cable, Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Andre Chong said.

DPP Chong added that when the authorities asked him for the charging cable, which was no longer available in the market, Chow claimed he had thrown it away.

The phone had run out of battery, so the police could not extract the videos.

Because it was an outdated phone, the forensics team had to source for the charging cable and this took time, DPP Chong told the court.

He said the forensics team eventually managed to extract the videos and produced the evidence after two years.

The authorities found a total of 57 videos, filmed between April 2012 and April 2013 at various locations in Singapore, on his phone.

None of the women’s identities could be established, court papers said.

Yesterday, Chow pleaded guilty to 10 counts of insulting a woman’s modesty, with 47 charges taken into consideration for sentencing.

The judge allowed Chow to defer his sentence to March 24 to settle some business contracts.

[email protected]




"where the man and some security officers of a nearby school arrested Chow"--since when can security guards simply arrest anyone
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
what kind of camera phone could take photos but is so outdated they couldnt find the charging cable.this man is a upskirt panties camera phone pioneer.

PAP should give him award for paving way for future singapore generation.
 
Last edited:

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
this guy's face looks like a PAP ib and administrative worker,very similar to chan chun sing and some other PAP arsehole.
 
Last edited:

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
what kind of camera phone could take photos but is so outdated they couldnt find the charging cable.this man is a upskirt panties camera phone pioneer.

PAP should give him award for paving way for future singapore generation.

PAP should hire him for the MDA!
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Fuckpoodles were enjoying the video content lah

They are trying to locate the victims. They are trying to identify the shape of the cameltoe. That is why it took so long. Since they cannot find any victims at all, he can just say those were pics of his wife. He likes to take them for his fetish. This is the exact reason why people like Whore Jinx don't wear skirts. What if someone upskirt her?
 

harimau

Alfrescian
Loyal
Being able to use a google seach is nothing to be proud about. Humility is a virtue many Singaporeans lacked.
 

bigboss

Alfrescian
Loyal
... or case was swept under carpet until now cannot hide anymore?

OC slept skived, case officer also double skived and case file left to rot ... until accused wanted to know outcome of his case and the file sitter could not sit on file any more ...

Pol Comm should ask for an internal investigation to determine why it took years for a simple case to go to court unless skiving is common and widespread in SPF.
 
Last edited:

Vulture

Alfrescian
Loyal
Being able to use a google seach is nothing to be proud about. Humility is a virtue many Singaporeans lacked.

Alamak. I am sure many people knows how to google so it's no big deal but this proves that your SPF is USELESS. :biggrin: Either that or they must be withholding other information that caused the long delay. Not surprised with the standard of journalism of presstitutes.
 
Top