-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
LOL LOL LOL! SIA Changi Airport Pic come and see!
- Thread starter Think_PAP
- Start date
I also can't tell. They all look alike to me.
I don't think you will celebrate when you, your family member or relative or even a close friend is on board one of these planes.
it's taking a bow in awe of 10/10 weekend.
Looks like this aircraft will be sold to unsuspecting buyer soon.
It also represent you who stupid conned and manipulated by a pussy
Weather report is on another channel
They should just scrape this airplane instead of putting it back on service.
Most probably they will retire this plane or sell it off second-hand.
Will avoid taking Airbus 330 for the Shanghai route or take other airlines for this route.
My life is more important than their profitability targets for their shareholders.
COE for place expired after 5 years of flying!!
Karma for the PAP after erection:
1. SGH Hospital screwed up patients !!
2. Now SIA front landing gear collapsed!!
3. What's next???
4.......?? akan datang??
Please use proper Engrish otherwise some anal-fucked jiu hoo kia will suan you jialat jialat :p
That should not be too much problem to put the plane back into service. It will still cost a couple of millions to repair, but a new plane is $100 million or so, and its within the capability of Airbus and ST to repair it. The questions to be answered are:
1) Is the engine damaged? One of them is resting on the tarmac, and is the pylon holding the engine to the wing damaged too.
2) How bad was the retracted gear damage. Did it go all the way into the avionics bay and damage the structure?
3) The front landing gear door appears to have taken the brunt of the weight, how bad was it damaged.
4) the front of the plane crushed some equipment on its way down to the tarmac, how bad was this part damaged
5) Did the entry door of the plane get ripped off the hinge when the plane sank belong the aerobridge?
Either way, some one is going to lose their job over this. If they intended to raise and lower the front landing gear to see whether it retracts properly or not, they have to tow it to the hanger and raise it on jacks to do this. If they were just hooking it up to a monitorng system to do a system check, they need to put the locking pin in place so the wheel does not retract like it did.
Not possible for the other gears to retract on the ground. The main landing gear retracts into the fuselage or wing. When the weight of the plane is on them on the ground, its not possible for the main wheels to swing into the landing gear bay. The nose wheel is different because it retracts into the fuselage without too much weight on it.
See the wing fucked off by collapsed main gear?
another:
http://avherald.com/h?article=444461f4
another:
http://www.bangaloreaviation.com/20...ar-collapses-at-khajuraho-airport-closed.html
Similar threads
