• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Judge seizes tape recorder

Lu Bu

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Singapore
Home > Breaking News > Singapore > Story
Jan 20, 2010

Judge seizes tape recorder


<!-- by line --> By Elena Chong
<!-- end by line -->
A LAWYER caught recording the proceedings in court was asked by a judge on Wednesday to hand over the digital voice recorder. District Judge Francis Tseng was hearing a professional negligence suit taken out by a divorcee against some lawyers for mishandling the sale of his marital property when he was told about the breach in court rules. Private audio recordings of court proceedings are prohibited, and neither lawyers nor reporters are exempt. Proceedings of civil cases in the High Court are recorded by an external service provider and transcripts are available - only to parties involved in the dispute - upon request. The culprit was a young woman lawyer, understood to be helping out in her first trial and apparently unaware of the rule against recordings. She was on the defence team representing four of the five lawyers being sued by Mr Simon Suppiah Sunmugam, a 62-year-old private eye.

Read the full report in Thursday's edition of The Straits Times.

 
Top