We have confirmed the 1st marriage of the messenger is not for SEX.
mahomet married towkay khadijah for her money??
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Jews spit on christians in israel. Dare not do the same on muslims.
- Thread starter syed putra
- Start date
mahomet married towkay khadijah for her money??
And science doesn't change?
So Jesus was verified by non-christian sources..and Mohd had never been verified by outside sources? Mohd only quoted by islamic sources? That is like ownself promote ownself
So the prophet is a toy boy to a rich ah soh?
After khadijah's death, the messenger acquired about 1 wife per year. Right?
What mean no outside sources except the religious text and medina constition.
The koran doesn't change and is perfect, Allah knows best. Close cousin marriage is a GOOD islamic culture, just look at the saudi royal family as example.
We have to thank Allah for revealing the message of close cousin marriage through his messenger to muslims. You can fuck your cousins but remember the rule is max 4.
There could be other sources but everything was expunged. Erased during Arab rule. That is why nothing survived art historical records when the area was already surrounded by well developed civilisation. That is the conclusion of some historians.
Pretty much means no outside sources about mahomet. Kinda like a Forrest Gump story where a fictional character met with actual influential people of that period.
At last you got it. That wasn't too difficult, was it?
Anyway what's wrong with the sauds?
And do you know that science is based on collection of data, repeatability of that data and if the data was wrong the science is wrong?
In fact, one set of data can present different conclusions repeatedly
That is the perfect and exceptional role model muslims are following. The islamists believe human morality comes from islam, that means islam is only perfect on paper. In practice, koran + hadiths are the source of evil.
Why did he pick on his step-son wife, no other choice?
Can eat don't waste
You said human morality comes from islam, as a non believer it really and really very difficult to figure that out. The saudi royal family is the perfect proof of how close cousin marriage works perfectly. Allah has revealed that secret only to muslims, that why the population growth of believers of other religions is on the decline, but muslim population is multiplying through close cousin marriage and incest. Allahu Akbar.
There are non Christian accounts of Jesus....wat about Mohd?
Some historians think he was fictional. Did not exist. But his name is printed in the medina constitution, a peace agreement between mohamad and the tribes in yathrib.
It's impossible for texts written by men to be error free, not even 50 years ago with type writer, less 1400 years ago. Ask those working in the publishing line.
What i mean is the spirit of the koran is unchanged for 1400 years. You believe that is good or bad?
Right. That means it's a divine revelation and clearly mentioned it will be protected from corruption and mischievous error.
Of course it's good as it comes from the creator, as many will change their laws to their whims and fancies.
As human nature doesn't change so does laws that govern human behaviour.
Did the past 2000 years of technological progress changed human behaviour?
Is there a reduction in greed? Wars? Selfishness? Poverty?
No!
Similar threads
