• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

How to know if someone is lying to you in a text message

EyeToEye

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Liars take longer to text back : study

People who lie via text are often slow to respond to messages, according to a study out of Brigham Young University. They also send shorter texts.

AFP RELAXNEWS

PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2013, 12:27 PM
UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2013, 12:27 PM

afp-text.jpg


BYU researchers found people who lie in digital messages take longer to respond. The findings could lead to digital lie detectors built into social media and text message services.


Researchers have discovered that the longer it takes someone to respond to a message, the greater the chance that the sender is not being truthful.

The study, conducted by Brigham Young University in Utah, found that when participants texted a lie, it took on average 10 percent longer to compose the message. A group of over 100 students from two US universities were asked to have text-based conversations with a specially written computer program. The program asked each participant 30 questions and the subjects were instructed to lie in roughly 50 percent of their responses.

As well as taking longer to compose, the researchers found that those messages that were less than accurate were also more edited and shorter than their truthful counterparts.

"Digital conversations are a fertile ground for deception because people can easily conceal their identity and their messages often appear credible," said Tom Meservy, BYU professor of information systems, who co-authored the study. "Unfortunately, humans are terrible at detecting deception. We're creating methods to correct that."

It is hoped that the findings, published this week in the academic information systems journal ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, will provide a good starting point for developing systems to identify when people are being less than truthful.

According to Meservy the average person is only able to detect when someone is lying 54 percent of the time and that's when they can look that person in the eye or hear their tone of voice, but these new findings could help to develop automated systems that could, as Meservy describes it, "track deception in real-time."

However, before you reach for your smartphone and a stopwatch, remember that sometimes people really are just too busy to respond to a message immediately. As fellow BYU professor and co-author Jeffrey Jenkins says: "We are just at the beginning of this. We need to collect a lot more data."

 
Top