• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Gopalan Nair: Ionescu should not come back

cheekenpie

Alfrescian
Loyal
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Singapore's state controlled media says "Ionescu Won't Return"
Ladies and Gentlemen,

Singapore state controlled the Straits Times newspaper's online edition of Jan 08, 2010 writes "Ionescu Won't Return (to Singapore)", something I correctly predicted in my earlier post.

Apart from diplomatic law which does not require him or his government to submit to the jurisdiction of Singapore, every other circumstance is in his favor too.

As I said, this is the unintended consequence a state (Singapore in this case) suffers as a result of their own bad conduct.

And you know what, not a single honest country in the world would fault Ionescu or his government for his refusal to return to a city state such as this.

First, Romania can argue that the Singaporean public are against his repatriation to Singapore. In fact it now shows that an overwhelming majority of Singaporeans are on his side and believe he should not return!

Why then, apart from a handful of anonymous writers in the Internet that demand his return, there has not been a single protest on the streets of Singapore demanding his repatriation, whereas had this happened in Sydney or Mumbai, there would have been mass protests!

In Singapore there has not even been a single peaceful protest, not even one before the Romanian Embassy in Singapore; which only means there is no popular support to demand his return.

It also means the people of Singapore do not believe the hogwash against him in their state controlled press. It actuially shows the vast majority of Signaproeans believe he is innocent since there are no protests at all!

Second, the International Bar Association in their 72 page report on Singapore recently clearly points out that Singapore does not have the rule of law, that their judges routinely misuse the law, and there is no guarantee that judges who unjustly destroy Lee Kuan Yew's political opponents in the courts can be expected not to be biased and not misuse the law in other cases. Ionescu cannot therefore expect a fair trial in Singapore.

Singapore an island city state with nearly 5 million people has only 3,000 lawyers! This by itself shows there is something patently wrong with the island despite it's claims to be an international city and so forth. It indicates more similarity with despotic regimes such as North Korea or Communist China where there are similarly very few lawyers as law is generally an occupation suitable for government sympathisers whose job it is to imprison and jail government critics. The same in Singapore.

In any case Ionescu has himself declared that he was never in the car at the time of the accident. On the principle that a man is innocent until proven guilty, no one can fault his right to assert his innocence.

The Romanian government has confirmed that they will conduct an investigation in their country while Ionescu is there.

And if Lee Kuan Yew's Singapore government is serious about this matter as they claim in their state controlled press, they should send their witnesses in Singapore to be cross examined by Romanian lawyers in Bucharest.

I don't believe they will dare to do this, as they themselves do not seem very confident about themselves especially since there has not been a single Singaporean protester on the streets of Singapore demanding Ionescu's return.

The international community would have looked upon this situation very differently if Ionescu had been involved in an accident in Australia, New Zealand, Canada or any European country that is taken seriously by the nations of the world.

Singapore is a pariah state that denies basic human dignity to it's own people. In such a case, the world has to be on the side of Mr. Ionescu.

And I can bet you one more thing. Mr. Ionescu will never ever step into Singapore in his entire life.

Mr. Ionescu will not get a fair trial in Singapore. He stands a much better chance at a fair trial in Bucharest Romania, which has been accepted into and now part of the European Union, as an equal member as Germany and the UK. This by itself is a seal of approval for its administration of justice.

Gopalan Nair
39737 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite A1
Fremont, CA 94538, USA
Tel: 510 657 6107
Fax: 510 657 6914
Email: [email protected]
Blog: http://singaporedissident.blogspot.com/

Your letters are welcome. We reserve the right to publish your letters. Please Email your letters to [email protected] And if you like what I write, please tell your friends. You will be helping democracy by distributing this widely. This blog not only gives information, it dispels government propaganda put out by this dictatorial regime.
Posted by Gopalan Nair at 5:54 PM
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Classic Gopalan Nair - still has no clue how to read the Political Ground. Besides the the Immunity issue, there is whole raft of issues that irk singaporeans about the conduct of this man and the conduct of the country he comes from. Note the silly comments by their ambassdor.
 

Internet Brigade

Alfrescian
Loyal
Classic Gopalan Nair - still has no clue how to read the Political Ground. Besides the the Immunity issue, there is whole raft of issues that irk singaporeans about the conduct of this man and the conduct of the country he comes from. Note the silly comments by their ambassdor.

Nair is a political coward. Begging like a dog while in Singapore and retracting his apology the moment he is safely back in the US.
 

SIFU

Alfrescian
Loyal
First, Romania can argue that the Singaporean public are against his repatriation to Singapore. In fact it now shows that an overwhelming majority of Singaporeans are on his side and believe he should not return! :confused:

CCB :oIo::oIo: bolumpar golapan...

fuck you dead... that romanian is a coward like u...:oIo:
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Classic Gopalan Nair - still has no clue how to read the Political Ground.

He's being sarcastic with a liberal dose of LHL logic. :wink: Surely a person of your intellect can read between the lines.:p

In Singapore there has not even been a single peaceful protest, not even one before the Romanian Embassy in Singapore; which only means there is no popular support to demand his return.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
For an lawyer, he does not know that most countries don't have jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute for an incident that is outside their own country except when special provisions in law are made. These provisions usually cover stuff like terrorism, child sex abuse, etc. Certainly not a traffic related matter. An imbecile.

One takes on the old man, the PAP for a raft of issues and there so many. And he picked the one that has no bearing.

Gopalan should form a club on how to seek out the elusive political acumen in everyday life. I know a gentleman who can fit the bill of patron aptly and coterie of fans who are just as clueless.
 
Last edited:

AhBeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think Gopalan and a representative of the Parliament should have a fist fight in the Cal-de-sac in Freemont. I am sure it will interseting and we might live telecast it on Sammyboy.
 

Internet Brigade

Alfrescian
Loyal
He's being sarcastic with a liberal dose of LHL logic. :wink: Surely a person of your intellect can read between the lines.:p

Beg to differ. There is no wit in this twit.

Second, the International Bar Association in their 72 page report on Singapore recently clearly points out that Singapore does not have the rule of law, that their judges routinely misuse the law, and there is no guarantee that judges who unjustly destroy Lee Kuan Yew's political opponents in the courts can be expected not to be biased and not misuse the law in other cases. Ionescu cannot therefore expect a fair trial in Singapore.

Is this meant to be sarcastic then? Does he really then believe that he can get a fair trial in Singapore?

And if Lee Kuan Yew's Singapore government is serious about this matter as they claim in their state controlled press, they should send their witnesses in Singapore to be cross examined by Romanian lawyers in Bucharest.

A crime is committed in Singapore but witnesses must be sent to a third country for trial.

See what a brilliant lawyer he is. (now thats sarcasm)
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
I know he is taking a shot at the "apathetic singaporean" but you got to have the skill to craft it and get away with it. He does not and therefore fair game to a misfired missle that is homing back.

ps. Don't bet on my intelligence on any given day, it seldom works.

He's being sarcastic with a liberal dose of LHL logic. :wink: Surely a person of your intellect can read between the lines.:p
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
I know he is taking a shot at the "apathetic singaporean" but you got to have the skill to craft it and get away with it. He does not and therefore fair game to a misfired missle that is homing back.

ps. Don't bet on my intelligence on any given day, it seldom works.


It's an excellent article. It captures the essence of what is wrong with sinkiepoor.
 

Char_Azn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
First, Romania can argue that the Singaporean public are against his repatriation to Singapore. In fact it now shows that an overwhelming majority of Singaporeans are on his side and believe he should not return! :confused:

CCB :oIo::oIo: bolumpar golapan...

fuck you dead... that romanian is a coward like u...:oIo:

I certainly disagree with the bolumpar insult U have of Gopalan. Wasn't he the same idiot who posted his address and challenge the police to go arrest him?

Brainless, yes balless? nah
 

SIFU

Alfrescian
Loyal
I certainly disagree with the bolumpar insult U have of Gopalan. Wasn't he the same idiot who posted his address and challenge the police to go arrest him?

Brainless, yes balless? nah

yes he is THAT guy...

he is also the same guy who apologise to LKY and the court etc.. and when he fuck off bk to US, immediately withdrew his apology...

coward or not, u say leh... keep idolising if u want..
 
Last edited:

ozeman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Classic Gopalan Nair - still has no clue how to read the Political Ground. Besides the the Immunity issue, there is whole raft of issues that irk singaporeans about the conduct of this man and the conduct of the country he comes from. Note the silly comments by their ambassdor.
you should read GN between the lines. then, perhaps you will have a better understanding of what he is trying to say!:wink:
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
This thread is ample illustration that Sinkies do deserve the govt they get.

Greedy, selfish, moneyfaced, uncouth citizens have elected a govt that behaves just like they do. A symbiotic relationship if I ever saw one!

I can't think of anything more democratic! :p
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
You should read my comments in subsequent post.

Writing and speaking well is one thing but crafting satire, placing innuendos, and deploying double entendres are a whole different ball game. Whatever is written must be factual, consistent and drives home a clear message. Words and phrases take on different meanings, insinuate many things and the tone can range from ascerbic, caustic, cutting or at the other end of spectrum, witty and fun.

Romania cannot investigate and prosecute this traffic case in Romania. Witnesses from Singapore cannot play a part except its an inquiry on his conduct as civil servant of his country. If he thinks that Romanians legal system is equal to UK and Germany, he is in another planet. These are all false. His point about singaporeans not protesting and therefore not concerned is where the bite is supposed to be.

Do read animal farm, the pigs don't fly, the cows don't bark and the only license granted is language of communication common to all. Many people cannot do it and he is one. Its like a ballet dancer with big tits hoping to be graceful. He made the error of going to for too many targets in one go.

He is correct to think that Singaporeans are apathetic but he also assumed that we are ignorant and unintelligent.




you should read GN between the lines. then, perhaps you will have a better understanding of what he is trying to say!:wink:
 
Top